hot enough

If we had a democracy, you might be right. The US is a totalitarian theocracy controlled by the right wing and far right wing parties. If that had any truth to it you would be willing to debate these "truths" they advance. But you are as big or bigger a coward that they are. Again, if that had any truth to it you would be willing to debate this. But you are as big or bigger a coward that they are.

The science haters of long centuries try to advance a new pretense that they now embrace science but still they massage it with their religious fantasies.

You drone on and on and on after bcsapper showed everyone that you are often wrong, OftenWrong.

None of those countries has illegal invaded sovereign nations over 70 times since WWII like the USA has and none of them have killed people of other nations to the tune of tens of millions like the US has since WWII. And remember, the US is supposed to be the good guys.

No one calls anyone a racist. That is expressly forbidden by Michael Hardner.

Canada has pretty much always supported the US in its war crimes and terrorism.

That means Omar was compensated for something you would have been screaming to high heaven about if it had been anyone but a Muslim. You must be lying about being a lawyer, Rue, for no lawyer could be this clueless. Are you a lawyer, Rue?

You must be lying about being a lawyer, Rue, for no lawyer could be this clueless. Jacee is ten times the lawyer you pretend to be. Are you a lawyer, Rue?

That is what happens sometimes when you join up with an illegal terrorist/war criminal invasionary force. Learn to spell, Rue. He didn't profit, he was paid compensation for having his rights abused by the war criminal/terrorist USA, with their torture chambers. That sure isn't a sign of a freedom loving people.

In your normal dishonest manner.

Then petition the government to pony up with the $20 million.

That's very juvenile, Angus. Stop whining and show your proof that the invasions of Iraq and A were not war crimes.

This is a study in total confusion, but I will allow that it is a routine Angus study in total confusion.

You guys know zilch about the things you try to discuss. There is no, that is ZERO evidence in your little scramble, Angus. Pathetic!

Since you are such an adept liar about the molten steel, it's clear that you are also trying to advance a lie Re: the planes. You tell us what happened, with proof. Remember, you support the "rock solid" USGOCT.

Chretien is also a war criminal, just like Harper. There was no UN approval for either Iraq or Afghanistan. You defend the equivalent of the war crimes of the Nazis.

What a god awful "explanation"! You know you are lying because there is scientific proof in the article I provided, in the form of scientific experiments that refute the false NIST contention that it was molten aluminum. A scientist who worked for NIST actually did the experiment that proved organics would not mix with molten aluminum, but NIST knew that was false even before they advanced it. Just as you know it is false now! Why do you continue to outright, baldface lie?

Wild abandon lying or fairly well focused lying is still lying. It's evident that you're not worth the trouble of typing a sentence to. We can all agree on one thing. The supporters of the US government official conspiracy theory frequently lie, by omission and by outright denying reality.

Explain to us how it has been "debunked".

That's not the important point. Why do you lie with such wild abandon?

Harper was a full supporter of the US/UK war crimes and terrorism. He is a war criminal himself, having taken part in the illegal invasion of Afghanistan and providing support for the Iraq illegal invasion. Though he later said the Iraq invasion was a mistake. Clear, unequivocal proof of their being war criminals. Why don't these war criminals go to jail?

You sure don't have much respect for MLW Guidelines, or yourself, Omni. If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful.

No, you like to lie, as you have already admitted. If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful.

You know that is an outright lie, Omni, and still you lie. Why? You know NIST lied and still you support those lies. Why? NIST never did any tests/experiments to verify their unscientific contention. You know it is molten steel, which is, in and of itself, fatal to the USGOCT, the one you can't provide any evidence for

You've already proven and admitted beyond any doubt that you are a purposefully dishonest distorter, falsifier, talebearer, charlatan, cheat, dissembler, liar ... . Without any sense of shame whatsoever.