hot enough

Interestingly, a survey found that USians/people who could locate North Korea on a map thought that peaceful negotiations were the way to solve the problem. Can you find NK on a map, Rue? If you can, why are you still such a rabid war monger, a person who would have innocents slaughtered by the chief slaughterer, the USA?

Rue, the dishonest one, somehow strangely feels that people should take him at his word. "Lol, Lol" Are we dealing with an adult here, Rue, at least one that is able to legally drink?

Again with the dishonesty. You and capricorn played that tune. And however 911 fits into these issues, and it obviously does a lot, seeing as how all the illegal invasions were based on that one BIG LIE>

Rue professes to be a lawyer. He's got the distractions down pat, so he really ought to give law school a whirl.

You people are absolutely without any measure of honesty. You use the 911 meme just like all your other memes, which is all you have, as we witness here in this thread, Omni, where you have taken to memeing because you got shot down.

What an absurd and meaningless remark!

Never a source, never a nothing from Rue. Oy vey!

Yup, he smites/strikes down any scientists who get ahead of him revealing his creation process. These revelations only come thru Haggard, Jim Jones, ... or the war criminal Billy Graham and are passed on to worthy young men and women in trysts had in public washrooms around the USA. Go and spread my seed, unnnnuunnnn, message child to the people of the world!

Is Omni teaching you how to provide sources, capricorn?

It, [previous one] and this one sure do look like typical Omni sources.

You have never shown any. The crap you have brought forward was out of date, which you, in your ignorance, didn't even realize. And the odd time that any of the science deniers/anti-truthers brought any source, they/you were totally incapable of discussing it.

Is this one of the famous Omni sources?

That's hilarious, coming from a "christian", Betsy. Christians believe in fantasies, they always have, their whole world is a fantasy. They stroke each others fantasies like horses doing mutual grooming, only what horses do has a meaning, a purpose, a benefit. It isn't intended to brainwash as your mutual grooming is.

That's not what the guidelines for Maple Leaf Web say, Rue. Please do try to gather your wits about you and actually discuss the issues. You might even one day try a source.

Oy vey! I have noticed that you have great difficulty with the English language, Rue.

None of the resistance groups fighting in WWII were ever charged.

Those in government like payouts because it provides the rational for further payouts, with no one ever being held responsible for their crimes. That, and many other things have to change for government should be a reflection of how society works, not a safe haven for criminals.

You know as little about this as you know about every other topic you offer your uninformed opinion on, especially your out to lunch 911 conspiracy theory.

Why are you, supposedly a christian, Betsy, always writing screeds supporting torture chambers and the torturers? Supporting war criminals/terrorists the equal of Hitler, PolPot, both of whom your favorite war criminals supported, and other equally unsavory butchers. Do you teach this to your children, to bible class, when you speak to the congregation?

You sure did fight for the wrong side, homeless vet. You fought, and lost an arm, for callous, insensitive people who support the most vicious war criminals and terrorists, people who will use you in propaganda like this silly cartoon, people who support those who lied their asses off to illegally invade Afghanistan to steal its wealth. It's not like this was the first time. There has been every Latin American country, more than once, the Philippines, Angola, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Korea, Laos, ... .

You know as little of this as you know of 911 and its science, Omni. Afghanistan: The Other Illegal War The U.S. invasion of Afghanistan was every bit as illegal as the invasion of Iraq. Why, then, do so many Americans see it as justifiable? By Marjorie Cohn / AlterNet July 31, 2008, 9:00 PM GMT So far, President Bush's plan to maintain a permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq has been stymied by resistance from the Iraqi government. Barack Obama's timetable for withdrawal of American troops evidently has the backing of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, Bush has mentioned a "time horizon," and John McCain has waffled. Yet Obama favors leaving between 35,000 and 80,000 U.S. occupation troops there indefinitely to train Iraqi security forces and carry out "counterinsurgency operations." That would not end the occupation. We must call for bringing home -- not redeploying -- all U.S. troops and mercenaries, closing all U.S. military bases and relinquishing all efforts to control Iraqi oil. In light of stepped-up violence in Afghanistan, and for political reasons -- following Obama's lead -- Bush will be moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan. Although the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan was as illegal as the invasion of Iraq, many Americans see it as a justifiable response to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and the casualties in that war have been lower than those in Iraq -- so far. Practically no one in the United States is currently questioning the legality or propriety of U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan. The cover of Time magazine calls it "The Right War." The U.N. Charter provides that all member states must settle their international disputes by peaceful means, and no nation can use military force except in self-defense or when authorized by the Security Council. After the 9/11 attacks, the council passed two resolutions, neither of which authorized the use of military force in Afghanistan. Resolutions 1368 and 1373 condemned the Sept. 11 attacks and ordered the freezing of assets; the criminalizing of terrorist activity; the prevention of the commission of and support for terrorist attacks; and the taking of necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist activity, including the sharing of information. In addition, it urged ratification and enforcement of the international conventions against terrorism. The invasion of Afghanistan was not legitimate self-defense under article 51 of the charter because the attacks on Sept. 11 were criminal attacks, not "armed attacks" by another country. Afghanistan did not attack the United States. In fact, 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, there was not an imminent threat of an armed attack on the United States after Sept. 11, or Bush would not have waited three weeks before initiating his October 2001 bombing campaign. The necessity for self-defense must be "instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation." This classic principle of self-defense in international law has been affirmed by the Nuremberg Tribunal and the U.N. General Assembly. Bush's justification for attacking Afghanistan was that it was harboring Osama bin Laden and training terrorists. Iranians could have made the same argument to attack the United States after they overthrew the vicious Shah Reza Pahlavi in 1979 and he was given safe haven in the United States. The people in Latin American countries whose dictators were trained in torture techniques at the School of the Americas could likewise have attacked the torture training facility in Fort Benning, Ga., under that specious rationale. Those who conspired to hijack airplanes and kill thousands of people on 9/11 are guilty of crimes against humanity. They must be identified and brought to justice in accordance with the law. But retaliation by invading Afghanistan is not the answer and will only lead to the deaths of more of our troops and Afghans. http://www.alternet.org/story/93473/afghanistan%3A_the_other_illegal_war ================= http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1060&context=jil

I'm going to have to really try to not be condescending. Perhaps you might want to check your facts instead of spewing propaganda. Had Castro stolen hundreds of millions [jesus h murphy!] his lifestyle would have reflected that. Really, how gullible can you be? Castro stipulated, no streets, buildings, anything named after him. You keep concentrating on people who did what they felt they had to do to keep the US from murdering their people. The kind and benevolent one has slaughtered tens of millions since WWII, in countries where they "were saving the oppressed"!

Those CDN forces were participating in the supreme war crime, the illegal invasion of a sovereign nation. An illegal invasion by the USA/UK/... based on lies which you were gullible enough to fall for, Goddess, ["Him and his whole family were..."] the university educated lady.

His family was trying to stop the USA from its known war crimes/terrorism. tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk, you say that you are a university educated lady, Goddess.

Not only should Omar K be compensated, all CDN government officials who aided and abetted this crime against humanity should be charged and brought to trial.