hot enough

Steven Jones and the other six scientists have never been refuted by any peer reviewed scientists. All the USGOCT supporting scientists are long gone.

Try discussing something, anything from your "links" that you think is pertinent. You are too scared to do so because you will illustrate quickly that you know nothing, which has been evident all along. Try discussing Rue's "science" on how the towers fell. It's hilarious.

You made the false claim. It's up to you, Rue. Dig deep in your skeptic's website.

Still no science, no sources, no nothing from Rue. How many PhDs are there at your "source", Rue?

No science, no sources, no nothing from Omni. MLW Guidelines: If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful.

Still no science from Rue, just a garbled rant. Rue lies with no sources to back his lies. That's hardly a surprise. Provide sources, Rue. People can see you are a joke.

Which illustrate why you know nothing about the events or the science of 911.

Logic is not any of you folks long suit. Still no evidence from Omni for the USGOCT. Another lie from the folks who do this regularly. I have addressed it. There are many many US false flags that were hidden for many many years, much longer than 911. It's hardly silent. People have known for years that the NIST reports were a farce, the science was overwhelming that there were three controlled demolitions. Odd isn't it, how Omni and the rest of the crew haven't leaped to address the seismic record, the one that shows the waves recorded at LDEO were from powerful subterranean explosions that coincide perfectly with the reports of those explosions from eyewitnesses. But the seismic data does not support the USGOCT. You folks are so desperate to avoid the nanothermite, the molten steel, the vaporized steel, the molten molybdenum and you lie each time you post by not addressing these realities, the ones that there are pictures for, myriad scientific papers on, yet almost none since the initial flush.

You believe? The 911 Commission didn't write or have anything to do with the NIST reports. NIST reports came out after and much after the 911C report. You really don't know much about this at all. That seems to be the norm here, none of the anti-truthers/science deniers/supporters of the USGOCT don't even know anything about it. That's why no one can provide any evidence for the USGOCT. Yet you are willing to believe the phantasmagorical USGOCT, the one that none of you can provide any evidence for, the one, that, when one looks at the evidence, it is totally impossible, a goofy as all get out conspiracy theory. The science says THREE, not 2 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, because the USGOCT can't account for the alleged hijackers doing all these impossible things that none of you know anything about.

I believe I asked 2) What NIST report did you post?

Stating something means squat. Even you know that! Discuss it, taking into consideration all the known facts.

These are hardly complicated for US military demolition experts. It was actually done rather well, tricking even scientists, ... . But too bad the unreacted particles of nanothermite were found, and the widespread molten metals which can only be accounted for with the nanothermite/thermate, which, you must note, was described by RJLee, FEMA, USGS, Steven Jones group.

Wow, the hypocrisy. It's not MY scheme, Michael. Stop beating around the bush and discuss YOUR point! These are the very definition of shermerisms.

Stop whining and discuss your point!

1) Go ahead, discuss your point! 2) What NIST report did you post?

Then why is it so impossible for any of you to ever show that. Just a bunch of shermerisms, that all you folks are.

Oooooooooo, "that one thing"! Ominous, Michael, really ominous. You are so blatantly dishonest. There have been myriad things that you and others would/will never discuss. You, a moderator, provided cover for so many of these folks who do all the drive-by snipings, never addressing the issues as described by MLW guidelines.

One of thee top US physicists peer reviewed the paper and he has come out as a reviewer. He also won the national debate on 911 science by default because no US scientist will debate for the USGOCT. You, of all people, should not be calling others crackpots. You are the guy who always flees after taking a few potshots. You can't even name any of these scientists, architects, engineers, physicists who you are calling crackpots. You are one of the guys who NEVER brings forth anything from any scientist for the USGOCT because no scientist will try to defend such arrant wackiness.

It's always " the only one I want to discuss", Michael, which illustrates perfectly why no one should ever trust anything you say, or offer. You are already planning your escape.

You have avoided, as you folks always do, an unbelievable amount of hard science that says you are attempting shermerisms, deliberate attempts to move the discussion away from what is important. The nanothermite, the molten/vaporized steel, the free fall of WTC7, the accelerating speeds of the twin towers, the impossible NIST WTC7 fable, ... . Billions of dollars in removing all the hazardous asbestos and retrofitting might be one reason.

Why would you suggest that anyone believe Michael Hardner and not Dr Steven Jones, a PhD? What are you, Michael? Micheal will now disappear, as he always does.

A typical illogical Michael Hardner argument. Illustrative of your lack of knowledge. You know nothing at all of what was planned.

So, here we are at July, 2017 and US government proprietary nanothermite, both unreacted particles and the residue of exploded nanothermite, iron microspheres, have been found in WTC dust. None of this material had any legal/legitimate reason for being there. That, along with all the other irrefutable evidence, makes it clear that WTCs 1, 2 & 7 were controlled demolitions, carried out not by Al Qaeda or any Muslim terrorists.

As of today within the scientific community as it relates to 911 science, the Harrit et al paper entitled, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", describing the nanothermite found within WTC dust is uncontested science. There has been nothing to challenge this paper in any peer reviewed journal. I'll let Dr Steven Jones describe how the process works, for Omni and others for whom this all to be a wee bit too much to digest.

No Trolling/FlamingDo not post inflammatory remarks just to annoy people. If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful.