hot enough

Nanothermite was used because it was found there, in WTC dust. Forget the possible perpetrators and focus on the science. I agree, there are myriad things that don't make sense. But there are so many more things that don't make sense if it was orchestrated by Arab hijackers.

You run off on wild assed notions before even addressing the US scientists' description of naonthermite. What would you expect?

See what I mean. You make the wildest, goofiest assumptions. Have you read the nanothermite article written by the Lawrence Livermore military lab scientists?

No ad hominem, just a realization that your ignorance level on this is huge, even humongous.

Who says they were hijacked? No one has provided evidence for that. What there was was nutty as hell. Those calls have never been proven either. In fact most have been disproven by the FBI. I see your facts come from propaganda movies.

Thank you. I now know the intellectual level I am dealing with.

Have you read the article from the US government scientists describing how nanothermite is made? Why haven't you addressed any remarks to Omni for his ludicrous suggestion that nanothermite can be made by the accidental collisions of rust particles and aluminum? I thought you were pro fact. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that it was done, Boges? Nanothermite was found in WTC dust.

You do realize that you are lying with your blatant evasions, don't you? And it bothers you not at all! 1) What world renowned scientists made your "little" video? Names, please. 2) Is it peer reviewed? By who? 3) Has it been published in a peer reviewed journal? What journal/journals? You just continue on and on with your attempts to not engage in "intelligent, honest and responsible discussion". You continue on with your "not bringing anything new to the argument, ... messages [that] are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value."

The science long ago showed that the accused hijackers did not cause the collapse of the three towers, Boges. This will almost certainly be your last post because you know how ignorant you are on this subject and you won't want to embarrass yourself. Why do you folks so hate science? Yet you make pretense in other threads that science is important to you. Actually that is exactly how it works. The US government made the claims as to who done it so the US government has to prove it. I wonder how this escapes a mental giant like you. The US government failed to provide any evidence for their wacky conspiracy theory, the one that still has you duped. When the US governments' evidence is reviewed it is ludicrous, but I note that it still has you duped.

You are as bad at comedy as you are at science, law, spelling, cogent thought, knowledge of 911 events, ... .

When did you get religion? You should have stayed in school.

You obviously don't understand the word 'facts', but that has been apparent in most of your posts.

You do realize that you are lying with your blatant evasions, don't you? And it bothers you not at all! 1) What world renowned scientists made your "little" video? Names, please. 2) Is it peer reviewed? By who? 3) Has it been published in a peer reviewed journal? What journal/journals? You just continue on and on with your attempts to not engage in "intelligent, honest and responsible discussion". You continue on with your "not bringing anything new to the argument, ... messages [that] are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value."

This is the type of stunning dishonesty that has marked every thread about 911 and the USGOCT. All the supporters of that goofy conspiracy theory are deceptive, unresponsive, diversionary, underhanded, sneaky, dishonest, unscientific, anti-truthers who know nothing about the topic they always fail to discuss.

You do realized that you are lying, don't you? And it bothers you not at all! 1) What world renowned scientists made your "little" video? Names, please. 2) Is it peer reviewed? By who? 3) Has it been published in a peer reviewed journal? What journal/journals? You just continue on and on with your attempts to not engage in "intelligent, honest and responsible discussion". You continue on with your "not bringing anything new to the argument, ... messages [that] are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value."

I prefer people who are honest, warm, loving, kind, generous to others and so far that has been a wide ranging number of ethnicities.

What world renowned scientists made your "little" video? Is it peer reviewed? Has it been published in a peer reviewed journal? You just continue on and on with your attempts to not engage in "intelligent, honest and responsible discussion". You continue on with your "not bringing anything new to the argument, ... messages [that] are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value."

This has engendered massive war crimes and you are silent on these and the US government conspiracy. You are being patently dishonest and you are breaking forum guidelines. It is not my "anything". That is a personal jab that you know is intended as such in contravention of the guidelines. You also contradict yourself in the course of two sentences. You say that you "will leave it to the experts", then you make a statement based in ignorance. The science is uncontested and peer reviewed. It stands as the accepted science of the day. That's how western science works. Nanothermite was found in WTC dust. That is US government discovered, US government proprietary nanothermite. Lest you feign ignorance of this material, I'll again post US scientists describing how this nanothermite is made. After you read this, you can help explain to Omni that his planned and oft-repeated, and known to him to be a complete falsehood, "You mean the rust and aluminum...and it was already in the building", can make nanothermite. You both have seen these US government scientists describe how nanothermite is made. You are the only registered follower of this thread, Michael, except for me. How can you both be so patently dishonest? Omni is doing this not to "promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion" as MLW guidelines state. He is doing it for "simply nuisance value", which you too know and fully realize yet you address me.

It wasn't thermite, it was nanothermite. Maybe they will help you explain how "You mean the rust and aluminum...and it was already in the building", can make nanothermite.

Maybe they will help you explain how "You mean the rust and aluminum...and it was already in the building", can make nanothermite.

Omni states the following ludicrous nonsense: "You mean the rust and aluminum...and it was already in the building", as a way to explain the formation of nanothermite and you, and all the other science denying supporters of the USGOCT say nothing at all to this most ridiculous of ideas. Why? This is a dandy example of Michael Hardner's silence.

You'd be happy with slavery being brought back, and active programs of genocide, right, Hal?

That is completely illogical but then I've read your posts on many things. Here's an example of you being silent, Michael. Michael H: " .... ..... ..... ...... " I'm done with you.

That's a good idea. You usually use that excuse much sooner.

Your silence proves your silence. Your silence allows the slaughters to continue. I have never once seen you address anyone on any of these myriad slaughters. They have come up time and again, in fact the defenders of the US war criminals love to throw up the fact that their good guy is getting gored. Again, your silence of these topics is proof in and of itself. What's holding you back now that you are an old guy? This is the same silly type of meme everyone used when face with irrefutable proof that the USGOCT was garbage - "go back and research all the "evidence". Odd that none was ever brought forward. Is this the same for your "proof"?