hot enough

You try this cheap trick, when it is science denying, anti-truthers like you who make a mockery of all the people murdered on 911 and since because of huge lies, huge lies that you are supporting with your ZERO evidence. Still none of this voluminous evidence you say is available, Michael. Answer the questions I have posed to you and bcsapper. What are you so afraid of? Why do you continue with your lame song and dance?

Does Omni have two accounts? Still no evidence from you, Michael, but your song and dance routine is beginning. Soon, following your usual patter, you will disappear.

You won't watch it. Will you read it? EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY! / MacQueen NYFD 9/11 witnesses

Typical no evidence, Michael. Address what he says. Remember the MLW rules about not playing the body, playing the facts.

3) 4) Has been discounted. Your say so means absolutely nothing. 5) Not psychology but personal experience with tunnel-visioned individuals. I have stated already that I'm open to evidence. You abhor evidence. That is so abundantly apparent because you never offer any. Please state what would cause you to disbelieve the theories you have posted here. What a ludicrous notion! You provide zero evidence for anything and then you pull this crazy Omni.

You often spout the lines, with a self assurance that has no basis in fact, Michael. You weave and dodge, mostly you are absent, then you come back with a bunch of unsupported nonsense, all the while ignoring the innumerable facts that demolish your nonsense. ============== http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/09/07/the-tide-is-turning-the-official-story-is-now-the-conspiracy-theory-paul-craig-roberts/ The Tide is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory — Paul Craig Roberts The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.” See: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/31/are-you-a-mind-controlled-cia-stooge-paul-craig-roberts/ The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK. The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything. By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/11/20/poll-62-percent-believe-broader-plot-killed-kennedy/

A typical Michael Harder nebulous response to give you an out later.

Provide evidence for your beliefs/propaganda. You totally discount the evidence from the hundreds of firefighters who describe explosions and bombs. Why is that? George Bush describes twin tower bombs and explosions. Why don't you address that? What of the human being being exploded out a twin tower window? What of the hundreds of witnesses who describe molten steel? What of the molten steel flowing out of WTC2 just before collapse? What kept the fires/molten steel going until February 2002 when there was millions of gallons of water poured on the fires and Pyrocool, which put out a burning oil tanker in hours? Why do you not engage in productive discussion? You only engage in discussions of psychology that you have zero expertise in.

Why are you discounting the FACT that the engine was found, there, on Murray Street, the trajectory and the distance fitting the flight path and speed of the object seen flying from out of the explosion of the north side of WTC2? Just this one issue, the wrong engine, therefore the wrong plane, NOT the plane described by the official US story illustrates a big big lie that is fatal to the USGOCT.

The aviation experts, when asked about the speeds the purported planes supposedly reached at sea level, laugh and say that those speeds are not possible, not attainable for the planes the US official story says were involved. 1) How does the nose make it out in perfect shape, thru two walls of 14" steel box columns? You saw what a bird does to wings and noses. 2) How did the molten metals with much higher melting points than that of jet fuel/office furnishings come to be there? 3) How did Arab hijackers get a hold of US government proprietary nanothermite? 4) How does the wall of WTC2 self heal when the jet is supposedly half in and half out? Your genuine disbelief seems to be skewed to only be at disbelief level for certain things.

You can't be this thick, really, bc/absapper. The wrong engine, illustrating that it was not a 767-200.

It is impossible for wing tips to cut thru three 14" steel box columns. Your admission, and your inability to discuss any of the issues/science/events in any adult like, intelligent fashion illustrates that you are not competent. All you are, all you have ever been, is someone bent on deception, a way less voluble Omni, a Michael Hardner, a OftenWrong, a Wilber, a, my deepest apologies, b_c2004.

How is it possible for a wing tip, which can't even hold fuel, to cut thru THREE 14" steel box columnS?

That would require that you did some research. There is no research required to know that a building cannot self heal.

One engine. You can see it flying from the north side of WTC 2. Its speed and trajectory have been calculated. The only problem is it is not an engine that was put in the 767-200.

Yes, a CNN video. No, it is not new. How is it possible for that to happen? When you actually check you find that there are a lot of people who said they never saw a plane.

Another nebulous guy.

Omni says "bye bye" and here he is again. You are doing the usual Omni lying routine again.

How do you think it is possible for a 767 to fly into WTC2 and be half in and half out and the building in perfect shape?

You are doing the usual Omni lying routine again.

You are so casual about US war crimes, crimes against humanity, terrorism. That sure doesn't speak well about you as a human being, capricorn.

You can't be this thick. Wait a second, you have always been thick when it comes to the events of 911.

Are you again doing the usual Omni lying routine?

It was almost never discovered. It was only by happenstance. If Richard Gage hadn't heard David Ray Griffin speaking on the radio he wouldn't have started AE911Truth. If he hadn't done that Steven Jones may never have heard anything either which led him to start investigating a few things, which led to him finding the red gray chips, the unreacted nanothermite in the dust samples, which led to Neils Harrit watching a video of WTC7 come down and he, like any rational human being, knew it was a controlled demolition, which led him to contact Dr Jones and ... .