hot enough
Member-
Posts
4,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by hot enough
-
Actually, many times. Even in my last post. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapse of WTC7 fell at free fall speed. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapses of WTCs 1 & 2 fell at accelerating speeds. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapse of WTC7 fell at free fall speed. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapses of WTCs 1 & 2 fell at accelerating speeds. Please, Hal, by all means, I encourage you to jump right in and do so. Omni is totally blind, as are most people, including Michael Hardner. None of them will face up to any reality, because they know to do so to myriad realities will sink their little boat, the one they so desperately cling to.
-
You and Omni just finished a set of intended insults and you have the unmitigated gall to pull this arrant nonsense. You are and have always been, very dishonest. Because you are making silly responses that you try to characterize as "observations" when you have shown all along that you know very little about the events. You know that all you are trying to do is create confusion and smoke and mirrors. Your "observations" mean absolutely zilch when measured against the thousands of scientists, architects, engineers, physicists, ... who have studied all this in great detail.
-
1. All you have ever done is hateful lies, and in this latest posting, that's all you are doing. Zero evidence, again! 2. Stop talking about it and produce some evidence. Provide evidence for the molten steel flowing out of WTC2 is something else. Provide evidence to explain the presence of nanothermite in WTC dust. Provide evidence that can explain the molten/vaporized metals. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapse of WTC7 fell at free fall speed. Provide evidence that can explain how the supposed gravity collapses of WTCs 1 & 2 fell at accelerating speeds.
-
So the science and the scientists say. You don't have the foggiest notion what the new nanothermite explosives can do. Hell, you seriously deluded folks are still denying its existence. It exists and it was present in WTC dust. Anyone who is sentient knows what that means. There were no Arab hijackers, which, of course, no a one of the seriously delusional USOGCT supporters have ever been able to offer any evidence for. I already told you, OftenWrong. NIST refused to test for explosives. Why? Because NIST's work was farcical science, it was Bush rigged science.
-
Some can, but you are not among those people. You deny reality, you deny evidence, you provide no evidence ever and you don't even understand the meaning of 'bye bye'. You hold to the ludicrous idea that a falling building can produce nanothermite. And you aren't even bright enough to realize that if that were the case then there was no discovery by the US Lawrence Livermore scientists. They are blowing their horns for nothing. Have you never asked yourself, Why aren't all the scientists saying to the US Lawrence Livermore scientists, "You guys didn't discover anything, I can make nanothermite in my kitchen? Have you never asked yourself why did they give a patent for these new super explosives when any old "scientist Omni" can make nanothermite at home? And not a one of your equally totally dumb USGOCT supporters have called you on your lunacy, which illustrates 1) that they are as scientifically stupid, or, 2) they are complicit in your massive lying campaign. The notion that you folks have been scientifically aware and/or scientifically honest is the biggest lie of all.
-
Wrong again, OftenWrong. Surely you don't doubt GW Bush! NIST didn't and wouldn't look for that. How unscientific is that? Nanothermite was found in the dust, unreacted particle and the chemical signature of these thermitic reactions. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2: 7-31Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen3(NH) Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark. Electronic publication date 3/4/2009[DOI: 10.2174/1874412500902010007] Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7
-
Would JT call "Breast Ironing" Barbaric?
hot enough replied to Boges's topic in Moral & Ethical Issues
Don't you think that the murder of tens of millions just to steal their wealth constitutes barbaric cultural practices? Why do you think there is all this crazy talk about Muslim terrorism when not one single event comes anywhere close to myriad US terrorist events that have seen thousands to millions murdered? -
Omni said, in another thread: It certainly is if it can be proven that that conversation actually took place as described because it provides the magic ingredient "intent". ============ And this provides intent, Bush and his guilty conscience. Bush knows there were bombs in the twin towers, as do all the science denying USGOCT supporters here - Michael Hardner, bcsapper, Omni, Boges, Hal, ..., the latter two have been honest enough to admit it. [bolding/size increase is mine] http://people.com/politics/george-w-bush-opens-up-about-his-sleepless-nights-after-911/
-
What best? Is that when she/he is celebrating the slaughter of half a million Iraqi children?
-
It caused the US to illegally invade two sovereign nations. And odd, people are still supporting the US terrorist program.
-
All bush_cheney2004 nonsense. Notice how he/she never provides sources for his/her fabrications. How can one trust anything he/she says when she/he takes the name of the world's grandest liars, when he/she continually and relentlessly with no shame whatsoever defends and glorifies US war crimes, terrorism, baby killing, rape, torture, ..., when he/she is not even truthful about his/her gender?
-
b_c2004 is too wrapped up in spreading how much he/she loves US war crimes, crimes against humanity, US terrorism, US genocides.
-
Because he wasn't a terrorist. What part don't you understand that the US illegally invaded Afghanistan, not to mention many other countries. The US has been terrorizing the Afghan people for over 40 years. The question really is, why do you support such deeply evil people, the ones who have murdered tens of millions all the while pretending they are something good.
-
America under President Trump
hot enough replied to betsy's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Read: We have a totally fucked system of "government". -
Your quoted portion has nothing to do with the issue at hand. You always fail to address that which embarrasses you and you jump to a new tangent. In fact, you STILL haven't dealt with any of the issues, scientific evidence, absolute impossibilities that make the USGOCT a zero possibility. If you need someone to help you determine what is evidence we are both wasting our time here. You should simply volunteer to stop posting. Try again. It wasn't the Guardian. So much for your evidence. You quote the liars who gave you the yellowcake stories, the Iraq WMDs, the liars who planned the genocide of the Iraqis in the 1990s which killed a million people, as evidence for the same liars' conspiracy theory. None of that changes all the hard physical evidence that you dismiss out of hand, the hard physical evidence that is still totally lacking from any of you.
-
Can you do a comparison of the US genocide against Native Americans and the Canadian genocide against First Nations?
-
All Rue blather with no sourcing, no evidence.
-
It wasn't the Guardian. So much for your evidence. You quote the liars as evidence for the same liars' conspiracy theory. None of that changes all the hard physical evidence that you dismiss out of hand, the hard physical evidence that is still totally lacking from any of you. [You don't need hyphens for out of hand. That is illustrative of an old fuddy duddy who clings to old useless information]
-
He is a qualified research professor. Talking to professional firefighters. You anti-truthers make these silly blanket statements as if your words have some quantifiable value when it is just the opinions of people who know nothing about the issues or the science. You have illustrated in all your offerings from the get go that you have no science knowledge at all. You still haven't addressed any of the gigantic impossibilities. When are you going to announce your departure? That shows that you make no sense. You are defending murderers for what silly reason, I can't imagine. You do this not by offering any evidence to support the incredibly wacky conspiracy theory you support, you just deny reality after reality with no evidence whatsoever. "... or whatever else.. You make no sense at all for there was nanothermite there and there was much molten/vaporized metals. You and the rest of your science denying crowd have seen it pouring out of WTC2.
