
hot enough
Member-
Posts
4,100 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by hot enough
-
Regarding "it". "it" wasn't an "it". It was the complete volume of Popular Mechanics. If there was an "it" that related to my offering, you should present your "it". I wouldn't just give you a link to a complete digest of material. The last one wasn't a "ones". Do you even read your stuff? It made some excellent points and I will read it again and digest what is contained therein.
-
Canada's Afghanistan Mission, and all of it's myths.
hot enough replied to Army Guy's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Sure I am, but this silly notion that certain topics are off the table when it is all so intricately connected is really loony. -
A typical illogical conclusion.
-
Isn't FEMA and its hired scientists enough for you? Aren't the pictures I have offered from way back at the beginning enough to at least start discussing it? Isn't the fact that a two year scientific study that tells us, unequivocally, that NIST's WTC7 report is bogus, enough? Do you think that RJ Lee Group is lying? You simply have never addressed any of these things. That's the deception I have talked about. And you have the temerity to say "far flung theories". You have the temerity to suggest that I have been attacking when you have never once said anything to those you saw as your "supporters", those strange bedfellows. Please state one moon size problem.
-
Your previous posts dealing with these non-issues have been deleted and here you are back with the same. Where did the fuels required to melt metals requiring temps far above the melting point of steel come from? How would you like it if your brother was framed, if your country and people were framed?
-
No sources. You've illustrated that you employ deceptive practices. The link I just gave you describes a much more compressed schedule. You, and "There was an explosives expert", none of us, have any idea of the capabilities of the new superthermites/nanothermites. You, in your deceptive ways, have not even acknowledged its existence, though there is voluminous proof. Nor have you, in your deceptive ways, ever addressed the proof of the molten metals, described, for dog's sake, by FEMA, by scientists who support the official conspiracy theory. Please offer one reason, good or bad, why anyone should trust what you say.
-
Then why do you so studiously avoid getting to this "science"? I didn't blow up the towers. That is apparent, even to back yard scientists. So right after pleading for calm so we can discuss the science, you go into speculative nonsense. Regarding WTC7, Danny Jowenko, a top Dutch demolitions expert, after watching WTC7 said, "This is controlled demolition". He was asked, "Are you certain?" He replied, "Absolutely".
-
I wonder, did any of these Iraqis see their female and/or male relatives or friends raped by the illegal invading bands of westerners? Do you wonder, Betsy?