hot enough

Betsy, you are off topic, and much sadder than that, you are continuing with a false narrative blaming this wide group of people who had nothing to do with 911. All these silly notions began from the gigantic lie perpetrated on 9-11. WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Did you not read the short quotes/paraphrases I supplied? Did you not go to the indicated portions of Professor Hulsey's talk that I kindly set out for you? It is not possible, that means it is impossible that WTC7 came down as it did by any means other than controlled demolition. Listen to Dr Hulsey, just the short portions I have noted, then we can discuss the portions you don't understand.

I don't want to burst your little bubble, Wilber.

No, there most assuredly are not. The fact that explosives were found at WTC, when they had no legitimate/legal reason to be there is the telling thing. And NIST flat out denied that explosions or explosives existed at WTC despite the 100 plus firemen testifying to explosions. So many baldfaced NIST lies! Barry Jennings testifying to the many explosions that were taking place in WTC7 long before it was imploded.

That isn't an apt saying, nor is it correct. The test isn't that there are evil Democrats, there are. The test is that Trump maintains a moral standard and the frequent times he hasn't he has and will be called on it.

This is one of the most confused posts I have ever read. And I dare say, racist. I'm more than willing to accept white gangs but all the other non-white gangs, well they are just scumbags.

I never expected such honesty. Of course they did, with whites in there exploiting the wealth and the people. You don't understand how foreign aid works, and your fantasy will never happen so there's no reason to discuss it further.

You are comfortable with a "theory" supported by lies? Perhaps you can understand why I said what I did. ... ?

It is really very simple; because, and there is no need to mince words, Africa has a long history of being viciously exploited by the so called civilized western nations.

Professor Hulsey went on to say, "Even a symmetrical structure, for god's sake, isn't built perfectly, so nothing is ever gonna come straight down unless you force it to do that". That again means that WTC7 was brought down by a controlled demolition. There is no other reasonable explanation, none. Watch from 1:40 to 3:06 at the following link for NIST's Shyam Sunder stumbling thru an explanation that is obviously causing him a great deal of discomfort.

Thank you very much for your contributions. I will discuss this further with those knowledgeable on the subject.

I would hope that Subway had completely independent tests done. And I can't imagine that CBC doesn't also have lawyers who vet these things before they go on air. The battle, it seems, will be between the two testing companies, or about the Subway manager who delivered the samples or the CBC aide who was told to take them to ABC Science Lab Inc.

Who is "him"? Why are you being so reticent?

Tell me about it. I have discussed this with untold numbers in this thread that illustrate that even with scientific proof this convincing, as if this was even needed, they still only do song and dances, using any and all distractions to turn talk away from the facts. Professor Hulsey has been completely forthcoming. NIST's leading and 2nd scientists outright lied, on the record. How many other scientists are there backing them up in their lies.

Have you also seen all the reports from, likely as far back as 2004, that NIST would never share their data on how they arrived at their conclusions? Is that scientific to your mind? Why haven't you commented about that scientific aberration? You can't have done much research on L Hulsey and his study because he took great pains to say that he was seeking peer review from as many quarters as was possible. He gave talks to his fellow peers at UofAF. Do you think he has gagged them?

If the US governments' story is so bullet proof, if it is rock solid, a done deal, why is there so much vitriol expressed towards those who state and show with voluminous proof that it is a false narrative. Why is there nothing brought forward by any of the people who defend the indefensible? And you were proven to be in err. That nuance is the third choice. Dictionaries usually place words in an order that matches how they are used in society, among native speakers.

Am I to assume that you think it is good to repeat rumors about such serious issues? Had they used "speaks" it would not have conveyed the nuance that was illustrated perfectly by the dictionary quote I gave.

Why would you say something like that that is completely false? Is the University of Alaska a conspiracy website?

If you don't mind, where was this pointed out?

Has anyone listened to Professor Hulsey? "We can't find any justification that it could come down by fire". Which is 100% in agreement with reality for none have ever come down. "... it's gonna have to be forced to come straight down". What does "forced" entail?

It is important for people to understand what a word means to people who use a language. Do you have something personal against the truth? 1

These realities never enter into any discussions in the free, open "democracies".

Can you imagine a world limited by your personal limits?

Here is the exchange between the lawyer and Prof Hulsey Daniel Sheehan [lawyer]: "On a scale of 1 to a 100, ... how probable do you think it is, or how possible do you think it is that this building [WTC7] could have collapsed simply because of the fires?" Professor Hulsey: "Zero." To see it for yourself go to, 13:09 of the following. Dr. Leroy Hulsey Testifies before Panel of Attorneys Dr. Leroy Hulsey Testifies before Panel of Attorneys JUSTICE IN FOCUS HIGHLIGHTS: Dr. Leroy Hulsey Testifies before Panel of Attorneys on September 11, 2016 Today, w... ========================= Professor Hulsey also said and I paraphrase, WTC7 was built asymmetrically, stronger on one side than the other, for gods sake, even a symmetrically built building cannot come down in this fashion without being forced down. Watch from 18:00 on of following to the end for a good, quick summary of how the NIST report is false. Truth Is Where Our Healing Lies | Part 4: Dr. Leroy Hulsey on the WTC 7 Modeling Study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IegkDCBJxjY&list=PLUshF3H0xxH0-LxNZYGPIJqIp8-roEJY4&index=4 Reply Reply to All F

Jared has reported from prison that the 50% soy was what enabled him to lose so much weight.

That is such terribly ignorant pro forma garbage. "Listen, do exactly as we see in this free and open society or you're outta here". Never once filling immigrants in on the genocide, the war crimes, the terrorism, the support for a country that murders their kin and steals their kin's wealth. "Welcome to democracy, immigrants, now shut your mouths and toe the party line."