hot enough

Still can't imagine what you would do if someone entered your home and slaughtered all your relatives, eh, Hal?

It shows nothing of the sort. I asked you to entertain a hypothetical and you don't possess the honesty needed to do that. You don't care who started it, and you think I am showing compassion for the killers. What weird logic is that?

"Do not use diminutives or character substitutions in proper names that are not recognized by the original person to whom the reference is being made. For example, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not identify himself as Stevie therefore, it is unacceptable to identify him as Stevie. Likewise, Paul Martin did not identify himself as Mr. Dithers, therefore, it is unacceptable to identify him as Mr. Dithers. In the discussion forums, such infractions will be considered as third-party insults."

OftenWrong can't even get his name right.

Flip the situation, powerful Muslim countries, or any powerful countries invade Canada or the US, kills millions of people, rapes women, kills children with wild abandon, steals the wealth that should be feeding your kids, your nieces and nephews. What would you do?

And Noam Chomsky illustrated, if you had read it, that you don't know what you are talking about, OftenWrong!

And still you don't get it. Of what use is it posting things that illustrate that you are woefully ignorant of the things you address?

Cryptic is simply pretending you are saying something when you aren't, still, ever, saying anything of any importance, of any veracity, of anything remotely resembling facts or truth.

Nothing there about the facts. You rant and rave about one little attack in the UK - this is always the shtick used, when all one has to do is look at what the west has done, is doing to countries all over the world.

Typical of your kind, Rue. Not "saturated bombings", Rue, saturation bombing. That's what the US did to the people of Iraq starting in the early 1990s. And here we are in 2016 and US terrorism still has a devastating effect upon the people of Iraq.

The gall, the unmitigated gall.

"The reality of the times was that several countries were working on the atomic bomb at the same time. Germans were ahead of everyone. " You were surreptitiously trying to advance your "be very afraid" "reality of the times", which you still have not done. War crimes are war crimes. That's all you and your gang have done from the get go. Go back and find for me where any of them discussed the issues, you included.

Or you could address the fact that the US has been guilty of vicious war crimes during WWII, and for the following years right up to today.

There sure are a lot of experts ranting and raving about how well they understand it, you included.

Those ages of Christian and Judaic violence haven't ended. For the former they have been going on for centuries, for the latter, since WWII. What of the "shake and bake", much worse than running someone over? Saturation bombing, millions dead, much worse.

I mean bring forward one iota of proof or rational discussion. That should not have to be spelled out to you.

The reality of the times was that Germany was defeated. You folks are hopelessly ignorant of the most basic issues and history.

You are one of a number of conspiracy theorists. You believe in the US official conspiracy fable. You continue to believe in this when there is nothing to support the things that you know nothing about. You don't even argue, again, because you know nothing about the science, the circumstances. You are woefully ignorant of the entire affair. I suggest that you bring some tiny measure of thought and knowledge to the discussions.

That is arrant nonsense. German war criminals were not spared the noose because of the "reality of the times".

They are people who got duped, just like you and all the others who run from one silly excuse to another, mouthing the same tired, worn bits of propaganda. They are people who got used, similar to young people getting talked into gangs.

You have never posted anything approaching reality. It's always insignificant remarks that are completely divorced from reality.

Would that help you salve your conscience?

The Islamaphobes constantly use no sources and if and when they do, they are simply more Islamaphobes.

The US has tried and continues to try to this day. The only "insane mad with power imperialists" are the US and their little evil cohorts.

Yes, Canada has been aiding and abetting the USA's war crimes. That doesn't make US war crimes any less egregious or evil or incredible lies, bragging as they constantly do that they are warm, benevolent, while they are cold and malevolent.