Jump to content

hot enough

Member
  • Posts

    4,100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Status Updates posted by hot enough

  1. Has Omni been banned from discussion in all 911 threads, relegated to lurking and making emoticon faces? 

    I doubt that this is a MLW instituted policy and I certainly wouldn't want that to occur, so why is Omni doing this? It is so silly. 

    I would love to see Omni actually discuss these issues, like an adult. 

    'Cause you know, actually everyone knows this; that is what adults are supposed to do. Not hide behind distractions and diversions. 

    1. Hal 9000

      Hal 9000

      It sounds like a conspiracy to me, you'd better check it out.

    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      Hal, please. You are the one conservative who came forward and stated that the USGOCT was bogus, unless I have you confused with someone else. 

      You folks talk about various and sundry conspiracies all the time. 

    3. OftenWrong
  2. [Unnamed] a self styled defender of the right had been posting about a 93 year old who has been accused of groping at least one women from his wheelchair.

    Unnamed failed to mention that this man is George HW Bush. Unnamed has deleted numerous post to his SSU feed

    Why? because he want to control the narrative? This from a "free speech conservative". 

    Unnamed wrote:

    Does the following sound like a 93 year old George HW Bush who has a "very much an excuse for poor behavior"?

    Jordana Grolnick said in August 2016 while she was working on a production of The Hunchback of Notre Dame in Maine, Bush came backstage during intermission and grabbed her as they posed for a picture.

    She claims, “He reached his right hand around to my behind, and as we smiled for the photo he asked the group, ‘Do you want to know who my favorite magician is?’ As I felt his hand dig into my flesh, he said, ‘David Cop-a-Feel!’”

    1. Show previous comments  16 more
    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      Oh great, another conservative supporter of Bush the war criminal, the terrorist, the purveyor of genocide, the baby killer, the torturer, the sexual predator, ... shows up.

       

       

    3. drummindiver

      drummindiver

      Oh Great, another person who can't substantiate the cheap he spews even after having been requested multiple times.

      Either your accusations are legit or not. Stfu if you can't provide even a single cite.

    4. hot enough

      hot enough

      Oh great, another of the zero evidence USGOCT conspiracy theorists hypocritically wags his digit. 

  3. The level of intellectual cowardliness behavior on this website is stunning in its volume and level of delusion. 

    A Scottish engineer writes; Yet here we are, more than seven years later, and not one single person has shown one single piece of physical or visual evidence that supports this latter claim.

    The "latter claim" to which he refers is the USGOCT, which amazingly, has no evidence at all to support it and volumes of evidence proving it is one huge lie. 

    Goebbels was sure right when he said, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it".

  4. This is a university sponsored and funded website [maybe changed now] that is supposed to provide a platform for intelligent and reasonable Canucks to speak their minds. 

    Why are there so many reality challenged people attracted to MLW?

  5. Has anyone noticed how popular the anti-dark people/anti-Muslim threads are among a certain "class" of individuals?

    1. Show previous comments  9 more
    2. betsy

      betsy

      Does a very, very yuuuuuuge chip makes you do all that? :D

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself with your evidence free posts, Betsy?

  6. HE: Seismic wave measurements show that ONLY powerful basal explosions could have created the waves recorded at LDEO, 34 km away from WTC.

    ========

    CONCLUSION

    "Near the times of the planes' impacts into the Twin Towers and during their collapses, as well as during the collapse of WTC7, seismic waves were generated. To the degree that (1) seismic waves are created only by brief impulses and (2) low frequencies are associated with energy of a magnitude that is comparable to a seismic event, the waves recorded at Palisades and analyzed by LDEO undeniably have an explosive origin.

    Even if the planes' impacts and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude would have been insufficient to be recorded 34 km away and should have been very similar in the two cases to one another. As we have shown, they were not."

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Omni

      Omni

      "powerful subterranean bombs", that's a good one. And now apparently there were millions killed on 9-11. Good gawd! We're witnessing delusional.

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      Some authors have been puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the events at the World Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant. They are particularly intrigued by the presence of seismic "peaks" before the collapses. (See MacQueen, 2009). This text focuses on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades. The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC, as presented by the government in the NIST and other reports, null and void. On the contrary, all the documented evidence points to explosions as the source of the recorded seismic signals.

      1 Dr. Rousseau is a former researcher in geophysics and geology at the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) of France and a specialist in acoustic waves. He is also a member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.

    4. hot enough
  7. Why didn't the Grenfell Towers collapse? The NIST boys must be shittin' their pants!

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      Nope, Omni, the guy who won't even provide any evidence for his lie.

    3. Hydraboss

      Hydraboss

      No concrete-eating nanobots.

       

      Obviously.

    4. hot enough

      hot enough

      Who dresses you, HB?

  8. Why do you folks think folks are such cowards? We are talking about adults, right? 

    1. Nanothermite was found in WTC dust. 

    a. unreacted particles, which when ignited gave the chemical signature of a thermite reaction, one of the more notable of these is the production of iron microspheres.
    b. Some 6 percent of WTC dust was iron microspheres. This was determined by a top US forensic engineering firm, RJLee Group, who was hired by Deutsche Bank. RJLee said that the dust signature was unique; it was caused by the events of 911, including these iron microspheres

    2. USA military labs, Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore, developed nanothermite in the 1990s. It is not commercially available. No one save for the US government possesses it or knows how to make it. 

    3. Arab hijackers could not have made nanothermite, nor could they obtain it. Nor could they have brought it in their luggage. 

    The only logical conclusion one can draw is that there were NO ARAB HIJACKERS. 

    Do you agree or disagree?

    1. Show previous comments  31 more
    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      Another "adult" like response.

    3. overthere

      overthere

      4 seconds that time.

    4. hot enough

      hot enough

      The following illustrates why you are not acting in an adult fashion.

      1. Nanothermite was found in WTC dust. 

      a. unreacted particles, which when ignited gave the chemical signature of a thermite reaction, one of the more notable of these is the production of iron microspheres.
      b. Some 6 percent of WTC dust was iron microspheres. This was determined by a top US forensic engineering firm, RJLee Group, who was hired by Deutsche Bank. RJLee said that the dust signature was unique; it was caused by the events of 911, including these iron microspheres

  9. In the 1990s US military labs, Lawrence Livermore, developed a new generation of super explosives. This was done by creating thermite in a new and unusual way, with nano technology. Normal thermite is ground down to small particle size - the smaller the particles, the more reactive the material.

    Nanothermite is built up, NOT ground down, so the particle sizes are on the, of course, nano scale. This creates SUPER explosives. 

    Energetic nanocomposites have a fuel component and an oxidizer component mixed together. One example is a gel made of an oxidizer with a fuel embedded in the pores of the gel. In one such material (termed a thermite pyrotechnic), iron oxide gel reacts with metallic aluminum particles to release an enormous amount of heat. "These reactions typically produce temperatures in excess of 3,500 degrees Celsius," says Simpson.

    https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html

    Nanothermite was found in WTC dust, as were the by products of thermitic reactions. 

    1. hot enough

      hot enough

      1. Nanothermite - a US government developed, solely US government owned, no one else in the world has this explosive.

      2. It was found in WTC dust, unreacted particles of Nanothermite. The by products of nanothermite reactions were also found in WTC dust in large quantities.

      Who, among you, cannot connect the dots?

    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      It seems that there are many who are too frightened, too child like to want to connect the dots. That is hardly surprising.

  10. Where have all the science deniers gone? Why is there no one that can offer any support/evidence/proof for the US government official conspiracy theory?

    1. Show previous comments  13 more
    2. bush_cheney2004

      bush_cheney2004

      It was Gorgo, dammit !

    3. Omni

      Omni

      I can't find the damn picture now, but I recall seeing it at a time which I guess was deemed long enough after 9-11 so as not to be disrespectful, which was titled something along the lines of Newfies take revenge on Toronto. It featured an image shot from behind of what was apparently a Newfoundlander flying a hang glider straight into the CN Tower. 

    4. Omni

      Omni

      Of course it could have all been a fake shot created in Ottawa as part of a conspiracy to take control of east coast oil.  

  11. George W Bush admits in a PEOPLE Magazine article there were bombs and explosions at WTC AFTER the planes hit the twin towers. 

    ==============

    The 43rd president recognizes, however, that his plight was “incomparable” to the firefighters, police officers and other responders who witnessed the tragedy firsthand.

    “I had a job to do,” he says. “They [firefighters,first responders, ...] had a job to do, but I didn’t see the horrific scenes they saw nor did I get concussed by the loud explosions and the bombs that went off around them.”

    http://people.com/politics/george-w-bush-opens-up-about-his-sleepless-nights-after-911/

     

    1. Show previous comments  5 more
    2. Omni

      Omni

       Nelson should have had a chat with his C-130 crew who witnessed the crash. Of course there are many others.

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      When a thing is impossible, rational folk are at least willing to look at the facts. You USG official conspiracy theorists are not at all rational. 

       

  12. Iraqi newborns after the USA brings democracy and freedom, US style.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Iraq+children+deformed+from+depleted+uranium&atb=v34-3a_&iax=1&ia=images

    1. hot enough

      hot enough

      Not on anyone's mind? I wonder how come.

    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      The land of the brave, poisoning the unborn.

  13. Not a one of the four 911 "planes" has been actually connected to the alleged events by one of the millions of parts found in 4 jumbo jets. 

    And still "we" believe in this most fatuous of fables. 

  14. Why, why why are there so many intellectual cowards among the very people who constantly proclaim how they are from the open, honest, ready to discuss anything western countries?

    1. Show previous comments  12 more
    2. Ash74

      Ash74

      Thanks to the States

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      Huh, no, Ash. Stalin simply died. Shall we discuss the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals also to see how hypocritical and downright evil the USA has been since WWII?

      The US was happy doing business with the Nazis right up thru the middle of the war. 

    4. Ash74

      Ash74

      But Stalin was held in check because of the states. MacArthur kept the USSR out of Japan and those handy bombs made him behave.

      yes yes and the planes were flown by remote control

  15. George Bush describes the explosions and bombs at WTC on 911. 

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      Maybe he saw it on TV. . . like everyone else. 

    3. hot enough

      hot enough

      Saw what on TV, Boges?

  16. How long will it take before Trump commits his first war crime, his first terrorist act?

    Oops, too late, he has already done that - keeping the terrorism against Cuba going. He hasn't brought home all the CIA terrorists operating in myriad countries around the world. He has kept the Iraq and Afghanistan war crimes in gear. 

    I withdraw my question.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. hot enough

      hot enough

      That is a whole thread in itself, bb. International law, the principles of the Nuremberg War Crimes tribunals established what war crimes were.

      The US tolerated it, in fact the US created it, nurtured it, supported it, paid for it, love it ever since the 1980s.

      Not the "west", the US. And remember, Osama bin Laden wasn't involved in 9-11. Actually no Arabs were. Science says you were all badly scammed, played once again by your governments. When will you ever learn?

    3. bush_cheney2004

      bush_cheney2004

      Radical Islamists never commit "war crimes"...it is not halal.

    4. betsy

      betsy

      yes hot enough.  war crimes being committed by the Talibans. 

        giggle.gif

  17. Bill O'Reilly, the voice of conservative morality, has had new charges of sexual harassment leveled at him. O'reilly's show is losing advertisers who aren't interested in Mr Falafel/Loofah.

  18. I done it!! I have just acquired the ultimate in freedom of speech, the ability to post a MLW SU! 

    Glory be and hallalujah!

×
×
  • Create New...