Jump to content

Goddess

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

Everything posted by Goddess

  1. I just quoted you directly from the Health Canada website. You are wrong. Check it out in the Canada Communicable Disease Report, click "Continue to Publication and the PDF will load. It's on page 3 of the document.
  2. There are only 2 provinces that have legislation for vaccinations for children - Ontario and NB. "Legislation" is not a LAW. Health Canada states that Immunization is NOT mandatory in Canada: "Unlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; It cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution. ......legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization."
  3. Yes, thank you. My post wasn't clear on that. The test picks up anything you've had in the flu family.
  4. I know. Kids, especially young boys/men, have a 4X greater chance of getting myocarditis than they do of dying of covid. It's bizarre to me that any parents would do this to their normal, healthy children. An experimental vax with zero long-term studies. I don't either. But it's being framed as a "selfish" issue to parents and then some parents are using the "selfish" angle to get their kids to agree. They are branded "selfish" if they don't risk their children's lives for octogenarians. From the comments on a lot of news articles about kid vaxxes, there are quite a lot of parents who feel the same. Most say they feel they were forced to vax, but they will no t allow their children to be. Things always change when they go after people's kids.
  5. You might want to check that out further. The reason so many died in NYC when this all started was because of the use of ventilators. They surmised very quickly that most covid cases were not needing them and the ventilators were actually killing people. There was no need for the 40,000 ventilators NYC was calling for and they were never acquired or used. It seems you are way behind.
  6. You're welcome. I feel that the government would lose on the 3 subtests, especially 2a The government must first establish that the provision of the law which limits a Charter right is rationally connected to the law’s purpose. If it is arbitrary or serves no logical purpose, then it will not meet this standard. When Public Health Officers like Patricia Daly (and others) are admitting publicly that they do not see much transmission of covid in restaurants, movies and gyms but the vax passports only serve the purpose of forcing people to get vaccinated, that is very arbitrary and illogical. Hinshaw also admitted there is not much transmission in schools. There are lots of other public leaders who have made similar remarks about various aspects of the restrictions and the passports, so it will be hard for them to go back in time and say there was a pressing need for them, when it is clear, there is not.
  7. There are over 1000. And the letter contained in that link has almost 50,000 signatures so far. Yesterday it had less than 5,000. It's only been circulating for less than 5 days.
  8. The business would have to prove that it was necessary to discriminate against unvaccinated people. And I really think when the dust settles on all this, even the government is going to have a tough time proving that. One of the legal basis for restricting freedoms in a democratic society in Canada is the Oakes Test. They have to prove that the benefits of a law outweigh the violating of rights. In R vs. Oakes, police caught a man with a small amount of hash and charged him with possession for the purpose of trafficking. The Oakes precedent rules out a "reverse onus" where the police cannot presume trafficking from such a small amount of drugs. There MUST be very extreme circumstances for the government to remove people's Charter rights. This is one of the things that is being debated about draconian covid restrictions and mandatory mass vaccination - is it so extreme that the government should be allowed to remove individual Charter rights? It's a tough one to call. Yes, it's worse than the seasonal flu, but it also has a 99.5% survival rate and mostly affects elderly and terminally ill people, much like the seasonal flu, which has never necessitated taking away Charter rights of Canadians.
  9. That's what my friends told them, too - that they aren't available yet but the business said they were so, they were turned away.
  10. I'm only showing what the government website says about it. And they say lawsuits are possible. I know some people are keeping track of businesses that are overreaching so they can sue later.
  11. I know, it's supposed to be Nov. 30, I think. I only heard about this because I have friends in BC and they said, just like some businesses that are not mandated to require vax passports are requiring them anyways, some businesses are asking for both passes already. They've already been asked at 2 places and when they didn't have the federal one, they were turned away. I'm just saying it's quite possible some businesses are requiring more than what they are even mandated to require. As aside point In regard to this issue, this is hard to find on the AB government site and of course, is not being announced publicly, but businesses who require more than the government is mandating open themselves up to lawsuits. I think there's going to be a lot of them when this fiasco is finally over.
  12. 2 provinces are requiring 2 passes - one federal, one provincial. I think it's BC and SK. Then your driver's license to confirm identity. That's 3.
  13. The Flawed COVID-19 Model That Locked Down Canada – IEDM/MEI
  14. I know. I worked for a doctor during H1N1. It's the nature of flu shots. He only recommended flu shots for high risk people - elderly, asthmatics, people with comorbidities. Which is what should be done with covid shots. Not mass forced vaccinations on healthy people who have very little risk.
  15. The reason I linked to that article was because they had compiled all the research and provided the links to all the scientific papers and studies. I see none of those references interested you though. Odd.
  16. Nothing to say about all that information, eh? Colour me surprised. Not.
  17. I read all the studies back when this all started. It's getting increasingly disturbing to me, actually, that their findings have been ignored and discounted when their predictions have all come true.
  18. Partly true. But the scientists and immunologists who have been sounding the alarm on this vaccine since before the rollout have been correct in their predictions based on their experience with viruses and study of cornonavirus shots. They said from the beginning that it wasn't going to prevent transmission, but other scientists and governments said they were crackpots. Turns out they were correct. They predicted lots of myocarditis, neurological disorders, fertility/menstrual issues. And that's exactly what we're seeing. They predicted that the tide would reverse and more vaxxed people would be contracting and spreading and dying of covid and again, that's exactly what's happening. Because this vax actually weakens your immune system with each successive shot. It's why reinfections and deaths are so high in vaxxed people. Immune system weakening will open many people up to further infections and health issues. They have raised the alarm on the long-term effects, too. So far they've been 100% correct. Maybe it's time we started listening to them, or at least allowing debate about their findings. Because they are predicting large numbers of immune disorders, neurological disorders, infertility, cancers, heart issues in the near future. Don't kid yourself - the shots will continue. Trudeau purchased options for 30 million doses in 2022, 30 million in 2023 and a whopping 60 million in 2024. Your vax pass will be useless every time the government decides you need another booster.
  19. Do you know who Neil Ferguson is? You should. This whole fiasco started with a modelling prediction from him. His report is what all countries (except Sweden) based the lockdowns on. He predicted that unless the entire planet locked down for 18 months in complete isolation, there would be massive deaths. His report stated that just isolating the vulnerable elderly population would only reduce deaths by half. Unfortunately, no one checked his background. He had already demonstrated on numerous occasions that he was unable to predict anything. In 2002 he predicted that 150,000 people would die of Mad Cow Disease, but only 2704 died. His estimation was 55 times higher than the real number. A few years later, he predicted that 65,000 would die of Swine Flu and only 457 people died, his estimate was 142 times higher than the real number. His prediction that 200 million would die of the bird flu was 439,560 times higher than the real number of 455. He has a long history of overreacting and overpredicting. He predicted that by June 2020, there would be tens of millions dead of covid. But by that time, the real number was 494,179, not tens of millions and even this number is questionable. This time he was off by millions. The average age of death for covid is 80, with almost all who died having comorbidities. The virus has had little effect on young, healthy people. Mr. Ferguson resigned in disgrace when he was caught having his mistress over for sexy time when he was supposed to be locked down and isolating, like the rest of the population was doing on his recommendation. We are trapped in a lie. And the powers that be are desperately trying to make it seem like this was all worth it.
  20. Please read the appendixes of this document. Specifically Appendix G deals with natural vs. vaccine induced immunity. https://mounties4freedom.ca/?fbclid=IwAR2tSVGj4MA0rDNyi-zTSHSulziOkj_K85H7tCOSTNXTWHhSCapF0fAHhp8 The entire document is very good. But I'm sure you have no interest in reading it in its entirety as it goes against everything you want to believe in regarding Covid.
  21. Big Pharma is so incredibly lucky that Covid19 came along. A virus for which there is no natural immunity and now the entire world has to take boosters every 3 months for the rest of their lives to remain protected. Cha-Ching!$$!
  22. https://nomoresilence.world/pfizer-biontech/sean-daniel-hartman-pfizer-death-at-17-years-of-age/ Kind of a relief to know that this 17 year old didn't die from the vaccine, just a normal every day heart attack. Teens have them all the time. It's so common, I don't even know why his parents are upset.
  23. Not true. This is part of why the PCR tests are crap - They pick up coronavirus antibodies from previous coronavirus infections, including H1N1 and the common cold.
  24. Yes, thank you. It really is a relief to me to know that no children are having heart attacks and strokes from this vaccine. I can't imagine why so many are lying about it? I guess you're right - kids dying from heart attacks is perfectly normal and nothing to get worried about. Whew!
  25. You should let this politician in ON know that the deaths of children are all a hoax. He's calling for an OPP investigation. Boy, is he ever going to feel like an idiot when you tell him there's no such thing.
×
×
  • Create New...