Goddess

LOL I cannot educate you, you only believe CBC headlines and don't have the brain capacity to understand studies or datasets. It's also not my job to educate you. It's YOUR job. I've posted extensively on IFR in this thread. You can type "IFR" into the search bar and see all the posts. Of course, you won't do that. You're lazy and for some reason think I'm your mommy or are somehow obligated to obey you. You'll just continue whining about how I didn't spoonfeed you.

So a few thousand a year and we know that they were likely very sick children to begin with because the chances of a child dying are 0.03%. Remember the Alberta boy who "died of covid" even though he had brain cancer and died 2 days after they tested him for covid? Why would they test a child for covid on his deathbed and then announce he "died of covid"? Hmmmmm? Dishonest much? I know you are firmly against medical ethics, eyeball, but some of us still do. For that amount of kids/year, a medical intervention would need to be 100% safe for the risk/benefit ratio to justify force vaccinating children. PS - For perspective, now do how many children have died of other causes per year. Like trampolines, car accidents or bee stings.

Are you kidding me? You're here arguing about everything and you don't even know the IFR of either covid or the flu?????????? Holy fuque, no wonder you won't look at any of the papers on OAS - if you haven't even looked at the IFR, OAS is going to be waaaaaay over your head.

Neither of these 2 have the brain cells necessary to reason anything out for themselves. Neither has ever looked at a medical study or a dataset and they wouldn't know how to read it or figure out if it's a good study or not, anyways. If it's not on CBC, they give themselves license to ignore anything scientific. You'd think they would figure out they'd been conned by all the politicians & public health people who partied, travelled and had orgies during the lockdowns, but no....................... And all those photo ops where they wore masks for the picture, then took them off and laughed at the plebes.......but no............

Barely. The IFRs are almost the same. At the beginning, the WHO estimated the IFR at over 3, Trump listened to real epidemiologists and told everyone it was less than 1. Everybody went ballistic, but Trump was right. Covid IFR is between 0.03 and 0.07. The very elderly still only had a 0.5% chance of dying of covid, at most. Not worth all the damage done by the OMG EVERYBODY PANIC response. Unless you're eyeball who wants children to be maimed and die for him on the off-chance it might save his own sorry a$$. You're both a couple of m0r0ns.

Masks prevent covid but no the flu, don'cha know. It's the same "science" as went into "The covid virus will attack you if you're standing in a restaurant, but not if you're sitting and it can tell if you're buying nails at Home Depot or at the independent hardware store down the street, so we have to close the Mom & Pops and only let Home Depot stay open." These people are m0r0ns.

You made a comment on an obscure internet forum? How helpful. 🙄 Yes, I know. Still avoiding the points made about it, I see. 🙄

And what did you do when that was going on? Did you speak up? Name one disease/illness that more people died of AFTER a vaccine came out than BEFORE. I notice you didn't address any of the points I made about "cumulative."

No, it wasn't. The gain was only for the very elderly, the very obese and the already terminally ill. For everyone else (the majority) it was all risk and no gain. It didn't stop anyone from getting covid and it didn't stop transmission. It didn't stop hospitalizations and it didn't stop death. For someone like yourself, who believes children and working age adults should risk disability and death for yourself, then ya - it was a great deal. I can tell you this - my grandmother died just before covid, she was 97. She would have never agreed to have children die for her. She would have rather risked getting the virus, than be alone and die alone.

I addressed this above.

I'll help you out because you're obviously not a deep thinker. You saw "cumulative" and then your brain shut off. The pull forward effect (sometimes called "dry tinder effect", much like when a forest fire burns first the very dry scrub, but I don't prefer that term) means the most vulnerable who would have died anyways, have already died. What is left is very few vulnerable (especially as variants weakened) and lots of healthy people, who have an almost 100% chance of surviving the virus. So Yes, while death numbers will "accumulate", they should not skyrocket, as we've seen. Especially AFTER mass jabbing with an injection claimed to prevent infection AND with weaker variants. Why would this be? I believe the studies I've posted here on ADE and OAS, the studies on IgG4 antibodies and what we already know about non-sterilizing vaccines is the answer.

Let's look at cumulative. Yes, it means deaths will go up as more are added. How fast do the numbers rise is the point here. Let's say, before the vax, 10 people die each month of the year. That's 120 people in a year. With no vax. Then 90% of people get a vax that prevents the virus. The next year, 20 people per month die. That's 240 in a year, cumulatively it's 360 people. After mass vaxxing. Can you explain, Little Boy Facepalm, how more people dying AFTER vaxxing than BEFORE vaxxing, indicates the vax is working? You know if you just THINK a bit before rushing to denounce, you wouldn't look so foolish. To help you out though, I'll remind you to also think about how the pull forward effect and healthy vaccinee bias would also apply here. Let me know if you figure it out.

Ah yes. 90% of the population gets vaxxed and deaths not only DON'T come down, they continue to skyrocket. That is definitely the sign of a successful vaccine. Remember when the smallpox vax came out and smallpox deaths skyrocketed? Ya, me neither.

Ex-NYC COVID czar Jay Varma fired from job after sex-party scandal (nypost.com) “Varma boasted about harassing people into submission over the vaccine mandate and admitted to participating in illegal sex parties, all while he, former Health Commissioner Dr. David Chokshi, and then-Mayor Bill de Blasio imposed draconian measures that shut down the entire city,” the Queens Democrat said. “The hypocrisy is outrageous.” Varma’s seamy chats — which included him boasting, “I did all this deviant, like sexual stuff,” and, “I had to be kind of sneaky about it … because I was running the entire COVID response in the city” — were made public last week by conservative podcaster Steven Crowder. His firing came as enraged city business owners and parents joined lawmakers on the steps of City Hall on Monday to rally against the randy doctor, saying that while they were masking up, keeping their kids home from school and taking other precautionary measures against deadly COVID — under his instruction — he was getting up close and personal with throngs of people. “While grandmothers took their last breaths alone on cold hospital beds, Dr. Varma was fulfilling his sick fantasies with hundreds of sweaty strangers,” city Councilwoman Inna Vernikov (R-Brooklyn) raged. "They never, ever, ever told us it was 100% effective." Uh-huh 🙄

Oh wow. 😮 You're a special kind of stupid. Maybe........search Ivermectin? The medical abbreviation IVM? Do you also need help getting dressed today, little boy? Is your mommy around? Do you see an adult around you that you can ask for help? Holy fuque.

Just curious......then, what makes you believe so strongly that I have to obey you, do your bidding and spoon feed you information that's already been posted here?

This is how I know you're not serious. It's not about one study. That's not science. That's cherry-picking. It's a preponderance of the evidence - studies, datasets, real world use - and it's all here. Just waiting for you to learn how to use the search bar.

@WestCanMan has posted some really good information on IVM, too. When you figure how to use a search bar, you read his posts, as well.

Look. Here's the thing. I believe what I believe about Ivermectin because I've read almost all of those 87 studies (and the ones paid for by Pfizer that say otherwise) and I've looked at the datasets from countries that used it like El Salvador, Peru, Mexico and Uttar Pradesh. I've looked at the success front-line covid docs had with it in the US. I had a prescription for IVM when I was traveling the world because that's what my doctor gave me to help with almost any illness I might have encountered. It won a Nobel prize for human medicine in 2015 and is on the WHO's list of must-have medicines. You believe Ivermectin is "horsepaste" because the CBC told you so. We're not on the same intellectual level. If you want to get yourself up to speed on the topics I mentioned to you before, I'm happy to engage with you. Everyone here knows you're full of shit when you claim I haven't posted plenty of info on IVM. At this point, you're like an over-tired toddler demanding mommy help you with your socks. And I ain't your mommy. Either you're a big boy now. Or you're a toddler. Use the search bar. Or don't. Good night.

I got rid of my airplane spoons when my kids grew up. Sorry.

Yes. You're lazy. Or stupid. Or both. I think there's a thread somewhere here for forum help where you can ask how to use a search bar. I'm sure someone will help you out. Good luck!

You're embarrassing yourself. Everyone here knows I've posted extensively on these subjects. You following me around, demanding I re-post information because you're too lazy (or stupid) to use a search bar, is childish. If you think you can bully me and push me around because I'm a woman, you can't. Use the search bar. Or don't.

Again, and for the last time, they're here. This forum has a search bar. Look for them or don't. It's entirely up to you and has nothing to do with me. I've already done my part. I get that you expect to be spoon-fed by mommy, but.....I ain't your mommy.

Here's another one: Scott Gottlieb, described in Wikipedia as " an American physician, investor, and author who served as the 23rd commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from May 2017 until April 2019." INVESTOR. Gottleib really went next level on this one, leaving as head of FDA in mid 2019 (in the middle of his term) ,RIGHT BEFORE JOING THE PFIZER BOARD, right before Pfizer launched its most profitable drug in history on the back of dodgy studies, dodgier efficacy, and corner-cutting on safety and monitoring unlike anything ever seen as “emergency use” that was ever rushed to marked by suppressing alternatives and burying all signs that mRNA vaccines are a disaster. It got so bad that the heads of the FDA vaccine division quit over it. The CDC was so compromised they did not even try to monitor the safety signal instead choosing to suppress it. And don't tell me that isn't true because every time I try to point to VAERS data, you all rush in to tell me it's a crap system that doesn't prove anything. So don't try defending it now. In a sane, well intentioned world, you’d think this would lead to some soul searching and institutional cleanup. Nope. Instead it was a dinner bell for more misbehavior. This entire space is one big captured grift. It’s fully amoral. They do not care what they are pimping, only that they can scare you and pimp it. I'm just going to call it: public health is dead. This is the swamp RF Kennedy Jr. wants to clean up. These folks are not public servants, they’re public menaces. They are not in public health to be of service, they are there to serve themselves to the goodies on display at the corruption buffet. They are racking up royalties, book deals, sinecures, speaking fees, and ultimately, big fat private sector jobs and money streams. They are not about protecting you, they are about fleecing you. Lifestyle is the best long term wellness treatment. If they cared about your health, they'd ask about it. If they cared about your health, they’d speak about nutrition and exercise and sleep. They’d seek to make you healthy, not to push cures for aliments you could address without pharma. The fact that US public health ignores this near totally and pushes “we got a drug for that!” as a panacea, means they are not the solution, they are the problem and past a point a bad map is far worse than no map at all. American's health has been declining for decades. It’s high time these agencies were disbanded.

Which brings me to Ashish Jha, Dean of Brown School of Public Health and advisor to Biden. Ashish Jha repeatedly pushed Paxlovid on the American public. Oct 7, 2022: The Power of Paxlovid - The New York Times (nytimes.com) Jan 2023: May 2022, he told the LA Times: July 2023: (after Biden had already had COVID, multiple boosters, already gotten Paxlovid and was getting it a second time.) Jha’s policies allowed many young people without risk factors to get Paxlovid. His prediction on deaths averted was based on false assumptions. Ashish did this while knowing there was no good evidence to support his claims. The positive randomized trial was EPIC-HR. Variants no longer in circulation were circulating then. All participants were unvaccinated. None had a booster. You could not enter if you had previously had COVID. And you had to be at high risk of hospitalization. EPIC HR does not apply to Biden nor to nearly all people whom Jha was pushing Paxlovid upon. Meanwhile, Jha was aware that a study in vaccinated people EPIC-SR was negative. He knew this years ago. As time goes on, variants change, natural immunity grows, the data are negative. Jha surely knew this. Ashish Jha used a media campaign to push paxlovid, just as SigaTech wanted Varma to do with monkeypox vaccines. Ashish exploited the press, and was part of an administration that spent over 10 billion dollars on the drug— without randomized data that it in any way helped people who had already had covid, had vaccines or against prevailing strains, i.e. most of us. Ashish Jha is just like Jay Varma— a public health figure pushing a corporate product based on propaganda and not science. Jay Varma admits that SigaTech wanted him to create a media narrative around tecovirimat to approve and sell it, even while randomized trials were ongoing and evidence unclear. Ashish Jha actually DID create a media narrative around a costly pill with horrific drug-drug interactions to millions of Americans when the best data showed it would not help them. He did so because his boss spent billions on the drug, and had political advantage to push it, even if it were nothing better than placebo, in order to reassure his supporters who were still afraid of covid because they created exaggerated fear in young people. Both Varma and Jha are emblematic of how public health officials sell out. One to advance his salary, the other his professional standing. Jay Varma is not a one-off. He is emblematic of the root problems in public health. Reform is desperately needed. Again - fuque your fake "experts". You better start following the ones who are not beholden to Big Pharma and big corporations or they will just continue doing to us what they did for the last 4 years. It's galling to me how stupid most of you are.