Shady

It’s really simple. Doctors aren’t slaves. That’s why a right to an abortion makes no sense, along with the science based reasons. Regardless this is thread drift and doesn’t belong in this topic discussion. Btw, at various points in history, courts ruled that involuntary sterilization was legal. Your crutch is relying on decisions from the 1960s and 70s based on outstayed science and outdated reason. But that’s for a different discussion.

See my update edited post. Hopefully you’ll understand the difference between a right and privilege. Regardless, with up to date science, it would be interesting to see how the courts considered an unborn baby with a beating heart.

Yes, that’s based on 40 year old science. Regardless, rights require nothing from anybody else, as you have no right to other people’s money or labour. If all of a sudden doctors refused to preform abortions the government couldn’t force them to because it’s a “right”.

Legal doesn’t mean it’s a right or that it’s right. Slavery used to be legal as well. You still don’t understand the difference between a privilege and a right.

There’s no right to somebody else killing your unborn child. There’s also no right to having other people pay for it. You have no right to other people’s labour and/or money. A right is something that can be exercised without requiring anything from anybody else. Otherwise, that’s called a privilege.

It’s not the woman’s body that’s the issue.

There is no right to kill another human being.

When rights are infringed, everyone ultimately loses.

Complete and utter nonsense. Asking people to give up fundamental rights to make you feel safe is actually the selfish thing to do. Stop being selfish. Stop asking people to give up their rights. Get fully vaccinated and you don’t have to worry about whether somebody else is or isn’t. The science indicates that you have a one in 5000 chance of getting COVID. If you do it will be mild. You have a bette chance of being killed in a car accident. If you haven’t stopped driving yet then stop asking other people to give up their rights. It’s disgusting. Civil society falls apart all over a virus that if you’re not older and sick have almost a zero chance of dying. We’ve become so bloody soft it’s ridiculous.

Stop defending tyranny. It’s disgusting.

So can you provide a legal opinion on 18 months being unexpected? Or is that your non-legal opinion. Stop defending tyranny.

Not at all. It’s expensive and it would probably be a long drawn out proceeding. How anyone can argue that covid is a surprise now is beyond me. There’s absolutely no reason that laws can’t be written and passed properly. None.

That’s a fallacious argument. The absence of court proceedings doesn’t make the abuse of the emergency authorization moot. For one, it’s very expensive to take the government to court. Regardless, by definition, 18 months later doesn’t qualify as unexpected.

No, it’s no longer unexpected. There no reason why laws can’t be passed properly.

Not at all. It’s up to me as to whether I want to divulge private information. Not the government.

Because it’s not an emergency anymore. An emergency by definition, is something unexpected. It’s been a year and a half. Covid is and has no longer been unexpected. It’s actually the opposite now. Pass laws properly!

Exactly. Medical information is private, and should always be.

I can understand emergency measures at the beginning of covid, but it’s been a year and a half. Make law the constitutional way now. Edicts need to end. Covid isn’t a surprise anymore.

Thanks to AstraZeneca, the covid virus isn’t new to my immune system now. I think it’s actually better protection.

Most public health orders aren’t really law. They haven’t been debated on and voted on as per actual legislation. Most of them are decrees circumventing the proper process of making laws.

Libtards prefer foreign oil profited by dictators and terrorists over Canadian oil profited by Canadians.

Exactly. They won’t protest Saudi Arabia and they won’t protest China. They choose the easy and less relevant targets.