WestCanMan

This thread is actually older. He actually started that thread because this thread offended him. It even says so in his opening post. He doesn't understand the meaning of the word 'murder' apparently. People can argue about whether or not it was racist to ban travel from China and Europe, or if shutting down the economy when there were less than 100 deaths was too slow, but no one can call those things 'murder'. Cuomo sent infected people into the most vulnerable places in America and many people died as a direct result of his illogical and blatantly deadly command. That's like biological warfare, which is even a war crime. The whole "sexual harassment" issue is a smoke screen imo. It accomplishes a couple of very big things for the Dems: 1) It gives them an opportunity to drop the label of 'sexual harassment hypocrites' but sticking it to one of their own high-profile members instead of denying/covering up, as is their norm. 2) It spares them from having to admit that they were just being completely duped the whole time they were fawning about Cuomo's covid-fighting leadership & prowess. He got an Emmy, the term 'cuomosexual' was coined, and the MSM and Dems were touting him as America's covid crusader but he was actually a mass-murderer. The Dems get to choose between throwing Cuomo under the bus and making themselves look good, or looking like fucking idiots for praising him while he was euthanizing Americans, and the choice couldn't be any easier for scum like them. They'd put Cuomo and everyone that looks like him on Vlad's spikes before they'd admit to any wrongdoing on their own part. If they thought about it, they'd say that it was a 'white privilege' crime.

Sapper, try to follow: 1) If you were a member of the Canadian Armed Forces raiding a Taliban compound would you rather have 5 Rhona Rouseys with you or 5 Chuck Liddels? In a voluntary force, when you have your choice of who to train, you should train men. 2) If you were a member of the Israeli Defence Force, and training every man in the country wasn't enough, would you want to train the Rhonda Rouseys? Of course. It makes sense in some instances to train women for combat. In Canada it doesn't. It's just for the sake of virtue signalling, and combat is no place for virtue signalling.

Are you fuckin kidding me right now Bubber? Did you not see Pelosi, Schumer, Hillary, Clapper, Brennan et al lying about Russian collusion for 4 years? Did you fail to notice the bogus smear campaign disguised as an investigation? Are you oblivious to the fact that the FBI committed serious crimes to keep that smear campaign going, and withheld all kinds of exculpatory evidence? You backed all of that BS, and now you're saying Trump stooped! That's the most ridiculous level of hypocrisy and stupidity that I've ever seen in my life. Dude, if anyone put a half-assed attempt at trickery into anything then every single leftist on earth would have bought it, and you're as far left as they come.

It's based on a lifetime of experience, and I provided an anecdote which contains more than just the commentary about 1 girl: you'd be shocked if you ever saw an NHLer cry from breaking an arm. If you saw your neighbour's wife cry after she broke her arm it would just be normal. I know that you won't admit to that, so I guess we're at an impasse.

Everyone who believes the 'anonymous source' stories is stupid enough to believe anything. The whole tone of Trump's call was mischaracterized. It's what WashPo does. No intelligent, rational person ever thought that Trump should go to jail. Only the BlueAnon dolt brigade ever felt that way.

Yeah, I still don't see it.

https://wabcradio.com/2021/03/16/the-story-was-a-hoax-trump-responds-to-washington-post-retraction-on-georgia-elections-phone-call/ Trump's second impeachment hearing included information from the oft-discredited Washington Post: theoretically a single anonymous source informed the Post that Trump told an investigator to "find the fraud" or some crap like that (I dunno much about it, I don't follow WashPo disinformation or the Dems' idiotic impeachment hearings). The audio of Trump's conversation was released and he never said any such thing. WashPo did a retraction. YAY, THEY GOT THEIR CREDIBILITY BACK!!!!! So what's with the leftist dolts and their idiotic thirst for information from a single anonyous source? How does a lie from an anonymous source make it all the way to an impeachment hearing, while at the same time the NYPost got their twitter account blocked for 3 weeks just for reporting actual facts about Hunter Biden? The US is already a shithole country, transition complete.

Now Biden is saying that if the sexual harassment allegations against Cuomo are verified he should resign and that he should be prosecuted. Now this sexual harassment issue looks like a smoke screen to get him out of office before there's an impeachment re: the covid scandal. Dems and their MSM really don't want egg on their faces regarding all of the fawning they did over Cuomo's fight against folks in raisin ranches surviving covid.

Although Tucker is more commentary than hard news, he's still far more accurate than CTV News and not nearly as deceptive. No one watches Tucker Carlson and comes away with any impressions that are nearly as twisted as Rayshard got shot for 'falling asleep at a drive-thru'. CTV is unwatchable. My skin literally crawls when their twisted words hit my ears.

You're such a worthless liar Bubber. We played that game and I rubbed your nose in it. CTV said exactly what I accused them of, word for word. The fact that you're ok with their deception or that you lack the reading comprehension to fully understand how twisted their narrative was is no fault of mine. Go read a book, kid. CNN's false narratives are legendary. I challenged all of you leftits to name a major news story that CNN didn't skew beyond belief and the entire lot of you came up with nothing. Zip, zero, zilch.

A majority of women cry fairly easily when they feel pain. Almost all men do not. That's just basic knowledge. In what percentage of your posts do you think you've ever made a point sapper? Of course you didn't make a point. You observed that women give birth and men don't but you didn't make a comparison or quantify that in any way. That's not a point. It's a random comment.

Good heavens son, do you not understand the difference between crying and not crying, in a discussion about torture and pain tolerance? How old are you? I get it. Women give birth. Annnnnd... let's just jump to the wrong conclusion about pain tolerance just because women give birth....? My wife's mom had two kids and passed a kidney stone. She said the kidney stone was much worse. Lots of men have passed kidney stones. Does that prove something about pain tolerance by your weird standards? Little kids get cavities and earaches. Does that mean that they are somehow the champions of pain tolerance? Also, some women opt to get C-sections or epidurals to avoid the pain. One has serious side-effects 100% of the time, the other can cause paralysis or death in rare instances.

Name someone on CTV or CNN that you will vouch for? Someone whose program you can watch tonight knowing that they won't lie, twist, omit or fabricate? You can't. Whatever idiot you pick, I can watch their show and eviscerate their commentary. You'll clam up now.

If Tucker said it, I'll vouch for it. How's that?

I don't even have t watch it to know that it's stupidity, lies and bullshit.

It was tied for first, actually. The other biggest lie was that "Trump lied about having the bigger inauguration crowd". FYI, Trump said his inauguration crowd was bigger, but that was an estimate which they based on transit ridership that day. So Trump was wrong. Do you know the difference between being wrong and lying, Boges? An example of actual lying about this topic was when MSM members showed a picture of Trump's crowd several hours before his speech and said it was a comparison it to Obama's crowd photo, which was taken during Obama's inauguration speech. If Trump was dropping a nuke there'd be no room for being wrong, but being wrong about something as inconsequential as inauguration size wasn't that big of a deal. So the three biggest lies about inauguration day were: 1) "Trump lied about his inauguration size", 2) "Here are comparable photos from inauguration day" and 3) "Trump lied about whether or not it was raining during his inauguration speech". The net result of inauguration day stories was that they just exposed the MSM for their blatant lying and exposed their useful idiots' appetites for spreading known lies. Sadly, it was just a sign of things to come. Now ya know. Don't get this wrong again Boges.

.

LOL, you watch John Oliver. He's got an accent, so no doubt he sounds smart to some, but he's a lying dolt. He's the one who went on and on trying to call Trump a liar for saying that it didn't rain during his speech: https://time.com/4668566/john-oliver-trump-president-lies/ He even found a picture of Melania holding an umbrella to try to provee his point. Turns out Trump was right as usual, and Oliver was just editorializing and lying his face off. Here's a hi def video of Trump's inauguration speech from ABC news: Watch for yourself and you'll soon see for yourself that John Oliver is nothing but a worthless liar. Oliver attacking Carlson for being a loser is like Hitler calling Ghandi a warmonger.

LMAO. This reminds me of when I was younger and had roommates. I was watching Team Canada's women play the US and my roommates came home and laughed 'cause it was women's hockey. I said that they still make good plays, things just happen a bit slower. Then an American girl went to wrist the puck out of their defensive zone and one of the Canadian girls went to catch the puck, and started actually crying when it hit her hand. I've watched thousands of hours of men's hockey and seen many grievous injuries including broken bones, lost teeth, dislocated shoulders, etc, I still haven't seen a single one of the men cry. Don't bullshit me sapper. Women are absolutely not as good as men at absorbing pain and it's not even close.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/15/full-text-trump-comments-white-supremacists-alt-left-transcript-241662 I got my transcript from Politico, I think I might have said I got it from Politifact (aka Politifaked), the thoroughly discredit fact'checker'.

It's time for you to admit that you get your information from blatant disinformation sources then, because that's some serious BlueAnon going on there. It's really disturbing that you can find 3 sources with the exact same lies.

Tucker isn't a news anchor by definition. Did you not understand what I just told you? Are you completely retarded? FYI Chris Cuomo, Rachel Maddow, Don Lemon, Lawrence O'Donnell etc aren't 'news anchors' either. Nor do any of them claim to be 'news anchors'. They have a completely different job description. (I'm being nice here when I say: don't guess 'news anchor'.) Is everyone in the US military a general infantryman? Does everyone at GMC work on the production line? Is everyone who works in a hospital a doctor? Is every single leftist the dumbest person on earth? If you just have to know, Brett Baier is an example of a news anchor on Fox. If you want to make fun of their news anchor, try taking a run at Brett. Dude, you can't even grasp the most basic concepts. It's utterly pathetic. I feel like I'm talking to a small child.

"EVERYONE MUST OBEY DEAR LEADERS NANCY PELOSI, AOC AND CHRIS CUOMO!!!!!! BLASPHEMY AND HERESY WILL NOT NOT BE TOLERATED!!!!!!" Nothing makes leftists happier than the suppression of dissenting voices, and yet Tucker dares to make a mockery of CNN's false & blatantly stupid narratives right on national TV. It's too much to be tolerated. Emotional support blankies and tinfoil hats can't make the cognitive dissonance go away. That's why the useful idiots are rioting again in Seattle, Portland and LA.

When you said bollocks, I had just made salient points which you either didn't understand or had no decent reply to, so you just fired off a sandbox insult as usual.

A comparison of Hannity & Tucker from 2017 with Maddow/O'Donnell & Lemon/Cuomo from the same year would show a stark contrast now with the benefit of hindsight. Hannity and Carlson's commentary was accurate and proved to be true, the disinformation, slander and vitriol of the other 4 is repugnant from outer space.