WestCanMan

I just googled her. Senator from Georgia. Big deal. Am I supposed to remember who every American Senator and recent ex-Senator is? FYI there are 100 sitting Senators and some more who were recently voted out. So now I know who she is, am I supposed to care if she had some pictures taken with some other people that I don't know? Did she have a photo taken with Sen. Byrd? OMG, burn her at the stake.

You said all that and called me a dumbass in the process? That's enough irony to rebuild the Titanicy. Why the F was Obama at an event that Farrakhan was at? That's not kosher either? Even if it happened, there's still NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER for him to pose with that guy. None. Would you pose with Osama Bin Laden? Would you pose with the Boston Bomber? Why or why not Beave? OBAMA WAS OVERTLY CUMMY WITH FARRAKHAN AND POSED FOR A PICTURE WITH HIM. PERIOD. That's extremely alarming to every decent person in North America.

Speaking of gibberish lol. Wanna try that again, in English?

The theory of relativity is gibberish to you too, that doesn't make it any less useful. Coles' Notes: I predicted something in advance which you can't understand with the benefit of hindsight. Shocker.

Cite?

Duhhhhh, which way'd he go Geaorge? Do I honestly have to spell this out for you Beave? When that picture was taken, Farrakhan was by far the most famous and outspoken racist/anti-Semite in the western world. Obama definitely knew that, because I already knew that for a decade and I live 4,000 miles away, so Obama chumming with him and posing for a picture with him was absolute support. It's like if Hitler was alive and you went and posed with him for a picture. How on earth could you do that and still pretend that you're not a supporter of his? How could you do that Beave? Who is Kelly Loeffler? Was she elected the leader of the GOP? Who were these white supremacist leaders? Were they the latino leaders of the Proud Boys? You must understand why I treat everything you type as meaningless bullshit, right?

You have no clue wtf my words meant. That's no shocker because you're a leftist and you can't believe anything until Rachel Maddow says it. I'm typing this slowly so that you can read it.... 1) Trump killed terrorist LEADERS. Dems thought that was stupid, they even tried to portray Suleimani as a beloved father figure to Iranians, but Trump's MO was effective because when no one wants to brag about leading a terrorist org, morale, recruitment and attacks go down. In all of human history it's common knowledge that leaderless groups aren't strong (kind of like the US is now). 2) Biden is putting young militia members in bodybags. FYI not everyone who joins militias in the ME are terrorists. Killing them, whether they're actually terrorists or not, dredges up hatred for America, which helps recruit terrorists. Biden is basically a recruiter for jihadis. Three months as potus, two attacks.

Sure Beave. White conservatives are Americas biggest terrorist threat, they just haven't attacked yet, and muslims keep on committing mass murders but their attacks are never considered terrorism.

FYI ludicrous conspiracies are things like Russian collusion, Ukrainian collusion, Dr Ford was almost raped, Nick Sandman taunted a guy by putting his face against the guy’s drum, GOP hate speech caused a muslim terrorist to kill gay people, etc. The Dems honestly backed all of those idiotic theories. The GOP don’t push a lizard people theory godzilla. You’re just being an idiot. Grow up.

https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/capitol-hill-ramming-attacker-member-of-antisemitic-nation-of-islam-org-663975 Another Terrorist attack by a muslim, this time a Nation of Islam member. That's 2 attacks now in only 3 months: TBH, it's not certain whether he was a terrorist or just someone indoctrinated to hate the police by the Dems, BLM and the MSM, but his biggest crackpot theories revolve around Obama's buddy, so that's where we'll lay the blame for now. It's probably a combination of the two. Whatever. Here's a picture of Farrakhan, right front, beside Obama:

When the cat's away: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56616778 I don't think that Russia's just going to make a play while there's nothing else going on in the world, but they're poised to strike as soon as the world (and the aged, stammering fool in DC) is distracted by something else.

This is seriously childish and without merit godzilla. Have you no shame whatsoever?

When you have to play stupid to try and refute someone else's point it means that you've lost Beave. What you don't understand is that she is fully-grown, and she had that job because she was deemed capable of it. She was not. It wasn't a "one bad moment" fail, like tripping over your shoelaces, where anyone could do it and then you could expect them to go 30 years before it happens again. It was a "lacks the physical capability to perform basic procedures" fail. You linked an article to a women's Howitzer unit, I showed you a video of a woman failing at the most basic and essential level in that capacity. OMG. You don't understand the difference between someone falling off a camel and someone who lacks the physical ability to ever be relied upon to execute their most basic duty? That woman was like an accountant who can't add or a blind sniper. Her failure wasn't a one-off. It was her complete inability to perform her basic duty. Yes, it is exactly like sports, only losing involves death or dismemberment. And we're not talking about most military occupations. We're talking about key military occupations where a lack of strength and endurance can case deaths within your own unit. I've already spoken quite clearly to the contrary, stop lying. Of course my numbers were 'wrong', you could engineer the requirements any number of ways to generate whatever type of results you wanted. But a basic kit loadout and a minimum marching, elevation gain requirement is going to give the same result over and over - women aren't suited to front-line, boots-on-the-ground combat roles. It's not a 'toxic culture', it's a stress-relief culture. It's a culture where a lot of people are psychologically damaged and sometimes they're a bit volatile. Bad shit's gonna happen no matter what because Canadians grow up in a bubble and 18 year olds from Kenosha aren't mentally equipped to pick up bunches of children's heads after a Yugoslavian or Rwandan genocide. If it's not that it will be something else in the future. Blowing off steam at the level that a military unit needs to blow off steam isn't PG-13, by a long shot. The reason why people who served in Yugo or WWII don't like to tell war stories is because they don't want to remember war stories. Some of them don't hang out with other vets any more for that exact reason. When you see a veteran totally obliterated in a bar they'll talk about wearing blue latex gloves and the cheap covid masks you wear to Superstore, to sift through the snow, looking for fingers and bits of scalps after a genocide. Obviously the bigger parts, heads and the like, are easier to find, even when they're children. Sure, women can deal with things like that just the same as men can, but getting drunk or sleeping in the same barracks with guys who went through that is not normal.

What do you mean by 'a visit of a cadet'? What you just witnessed is a failure of the highest order on a basic element of one's duty by a grown woman. What was simple and easy for a man was seemingly impossible for that woman. You can accept that at a Starbucks or at Staples, it's unacceptable in the military. 51% isn't a pass. You need to get 100% on the easy ones. The sports comparison is inescapable proof of the obvious. When you train men and women to do the same physical jobs, men are on a completely different level. Not just the elite, the 2nd tier, 3rd tier, 4th tier, etc. When men play against women they have to 'play nice'. Where you work you may be able to drag some people along who are chronic underachievers, there may even be women at your work who outpace you, but in combat your team is only as strong as it's weakest link. You can't drag people along just because they were never good enough in the first place. There are lots of men who didn't even get through basic training. Probably about 5% imo. It's not super-easy. In my platoon of about 120 there were ~ 5 iirc, but they were basically psych cases. They seem to have just cracked for whatever reason. I get that there are some women who could make it through basic training. Probably at least 50%. Some could even make it through battle school. 5%? Of that 5%, how many will really be able to hack it in combat? Almost none. Say they pass all that, there's still the male/female dynamic to contend with. People have to be able to get along. Adding one woman to a platoon changes the whole dynamic drastically. It's a case of 'one bad apple spoiled the bunch' on steroids. I don't even want to imagine a woman who blends in with GIs or Marines or Combat Divers. Just imagine the most 'colourful' hockey locker room that you've ever been in and make it 24/7.

This isn't 4th-hand account, I used to know a lot of people in the navy back then. You were the idiot who compared getting out of a war zone to getting a day off from Starbucks Beave, and FYI there are women in more services than just the navy. Second, you're wrong again. Lots of people sign up and then have second thoughts when they see part of someone's head come off beside them. Dude, you just keep saying stupid things and hoping that no one will notice. They aren't hypothetical situations. All of those things happen, a lot. There are almost no women that are stronger than a below-average 20 year old man. Of the ones that are comparable, almost all of them are morbidly obese. This isn't news, or me making things up. It's just basic knowledge. When you only have 20 people with you go outside the wire you need every singe one of them to be able to handle whatever happens. Having 7 or 8 people who can't do a lot of things is a huge mistake.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-investigation-impeachment-breakdown

The video above is a woman trying to fire a Howitzer for 45 seconds. The man spends less than one second and easily discharges the weapon. What did you learn from watching that? Do I need to explain to you how important it is for that weapon to work correctly when there's an actual combat situation instead of a ceremony? You know that there is more than just a few lives on the line, right? The difference between winning and losing a battle can be monumental. Re-taking lost ground can be far more difficult than holding it. And the cost of failure is measured in deaths, not just dollars or the pride of some stupid feminists. Even if the cost just is in dollars, how many women do you see in the NBA? The NFL (or even the CFL)? NHL? MLB? In MLS, Bundesliga, the Premier Division (or any of the lower divisions), etc? Why aren't there women there? https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=4537 Manon Rheaume, minor league goalie. Where do you get the impression that women are as good as men at fighting, carrying injured men around, covering large distances with kit (remember the women in the earlier article from this thread complaining that requirements were set too high for women to pass?), etc? If you or your son were going to combat, would you want other men there or would you be ok with the same number of women? If your favourite sports team was switched to 50/50 men and women would you still bet on them? If not, then why would you choose to allow your survival to rely on them? You do realize that when you swap women into a platoon for men, you're weakening it, right? Thereby reducing the likelihood of them surviving? How is that fair to the men in that platoon, that their lives are put at risk just for the sake of feminism? Could you replace the men with 1.5x as many women? Maybe, but would they be ok with 2/3 of the pay of the men in their platoon? Probably not. Your arguments are trivial and stupid. This is purely an issue of virtue-signalling and has nothing to do with reality.

I was told that it happened on the HMCS Protecteur when it went to the Persian Gulf. There were 42 women in a mess and 17 got pregnant in the 3 months between when they got notice they were going, and when the ship sailed. Yeah, because getting time off from Starbucks and getting out of fighting in Passchendaele are so similar. Only leftists can see the resemblance though. They have a special ability called 'abject stupidity'. You're using the kindergarten equality standard on military units and that's called 'virtue signalling'. Women and men aren't the same and in life and death situations virtue signalling should be out of the equation. People like you just have no other means of pumping up your self esteem, aside from blathering, so you're completely unable to reason (as usual).

If you look at the USA message boards, you'll see a whole bunch of godzilla threads dotting the forum like little turds. Every one of them has a catchy, inflammatory and ignorant title on it and they're all full of bullshit. Posting in his threads is troll-feeding, which is against forum rules (I'm pretty sure, but I never really read them).

Honestly, there's no correlation whatsoever between Trump's actions & murder. He closed travel from China, never issued the 'no mask' directive that Trudeau, The WHO and Fauci gave, he shut down the economy when there were less than 100 deaths, etc. It's just petulant and snotty to say that Trump murdered anyone, there's no supporting evidence. Cuomo gave a direct order to force infected patients back into care homes, turning them into euthanasia domes, at a time when that was completely illogical and unnecessary. It's absolutely certain that Cuomo's unfathomable order directly resulted in several hundreds of deaths, maybe thousands. He also passed a directive that those people weren't allowed to be tested for covid - just remember he used his position of power to ensure that his own family was tested for covid. Then Cuomo covered up the death rates in care homes. It's no stretch at all to say that Cuomo actually killed people with his unreasonable directives. It's a fact.

That thread was actually started after this one. It wasn't a real thread per se, just a retaliation for this one being out. GZ even admitted it in his opening post. Honestly, there's no direct correlation between Trump's actions & murder either. He closed travel from China, never issued the 'no mask' directive that Trudeau, The WHO and Fauci gave, he shut down the economy when there were less than 100 deaths, etc. It's just petulant and snotty to say that Trump murdered anyone, there's no supporting evidence. Cuomo gave a direct order to force infected patients back into care homes, turning them into euthanasia domes, at a time when that was completely illogical and unnecessary. It's absolutely certain that his unfathomable action resulted in several hundreds of deaths, maybe thousands. He also passed a directive that those people weren't allowed to be tested for covid - just remember he used his position of power to ensure that his own family was tested for covid. Then Cuomo covered up the death rates in care homes. It's no stretch at all to say that Cuomo actually killed people with his unreasonable directives. It's a fact.

You're only admitting that it's a crime now because you want to call the 95 minutes of unarmed yelling at Capitol Hill an insurrection.

That's not necessarily a crime, depending on what country he did it in.

More fuel for the impeachment fire: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-impeachment-inquiry-family-covid-tests If you recall, Chris Cuomo was diagnosed as covid positive back before he became infamous for violating his C19 quarantine: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/519781-cnns-cuomo-mocked-for-trump-mask-criticism-after-breaking-own-quarantine-put Even the leftist rag has drawn attention to the fact that Cuomo prioritized covid testing for his friends and family: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cuomo-priority-covid-testing/2021/03/29/79d40aa0-8e6d-11eb-9423-04079921c915_story.html From a "Caleb Hull" tweet (I don't know who that is): Long story short, not only was Cuomo inflicting C19 on seniors in care homes, he was also breaking NY State laws to protect his own family from C19. There's a rumour that Dem voters, gasping to draw their last breaths while dying from C19 in the care homes, would still genuflect before Cuomo (on their TV sets) and say "Ave, Cuomo, nos morituri te salutant!"

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-slammed-questionable-tweet-murder-accident CNN's tweet: A bit of backstory first - DC's violent crime rate is soaring as a result of 'we love crime' polices such as treating illegal firearm possession lightly and allowing rioting, looting arson & assaults to go unpunished. Now even little kids are in on it. The city is a University of Crime. So these girls wanted to steal a car and in the commission of their crime, which included an assault with a deadly weapon (taser), they took direct actions which killed the car's owner. It's just a fact of western judicial systems that when you plan a crime which involves the use of force and you end up killing someone, it's called murder. Whether or not it's always pre-meditated murder or not can vary by jurisdiction, but it's always murder. For example, in some places arsons which result in death are automatically 1st degree murder, ditto for bank robberies, but that's not the case everywhere. In Canada: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/what-s-the-difference-between-1st-degree-murder-2nd-degree-murder-and-manslaughter-1.5068520 So whether or not you plan to kill someone, when you plan a crime and kill someone during the commission of the crime, it's 1st degree murder. Whether or not the guy died because of the crash at the end or because the car side-swiped that bus shelter right after they drove off will be a big factor in choosing between murder one and criminal negligence causing death (manslaughter), but it was certainly murder either way. One of the murderers was 13, I doubt that much will happen to her, but the point of this thread is that CNN is disgusting. They also brushed off the fact that after they killed him, one of the girls was really upset because her cel phone was still in the car. "Ooooooh, I hope she got her phone!!! How does this story end????!!!!??!!"