WestCanMan

"Multiple locations where things are burning.... Mostly peaceful." FYI the idiot putting the words on the chyron works for CNN. This isn't just the words of one idiot. Producers at CNN are approving, if not setting the narrative for, these segments. They are officers of the company. This is CNN. You lose again eyeball. Now it's time for you to provide evidence of all the nazi and racist symbols present at the FREEDOM CONVOY. Your dodgy weaselling has run its course. Put up or shut up.

What do your videos have to do with Joe Biden questioning the integrity of the 2022 mid-terms in advance, when the polls have him down in the low 30s? Dems question every election they lose, and yet somehow their lapdogs at CNN were declaring the 2020 election fraud free on election night. What's up with that?

I expect that the politician with the lowest ethical standards in the history of our country, who was directly accused by the former AG herself of subverting the judicial process, would recuse himself from the process.

? The flags come from LPOC propagandists. That's why there's only 1/2 a second worth of vdeo of them and it's not from the protests. Only complete idiots have been sucked in by the "confederate and Nazi flags at the protests" story. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/money-began-to-rain-on-trudeau-foundation-once-justin-took-over-liberals-analysis-shows Looky looky. Foreign money pouring into the Trudeau Foundation! All of it since he became leader of the LPOC How much from foreign lobbyists? I put the quotes beside "high". The article was from 2016. We know a lot more about Trudeau's ultra-low ethical standards now.

Hmmmm. That was hard. A guy who hasn't even spent a minute in law school, and who was just busted for bullying and then turfing an AG on behalf of a criminal entity, is choosing our federal judges. What more could we ask for?

It's not an insurrection, it's a protest. No one said that violence will ensue if demands aren't met. It's just a protest. Mayor Karen seems to be forgetting that people all across the country have been suffering through ridiculous covid restrictions for 2 years now, along with some reasonable ones, and she's only been inconvenienced for a couple of weeks.

It's more of a comedy

Good call

Lol. Nice try. I posted facts, you're snivelling. Go fish.

IIRC it was the mayor of Ottawa.

Trudeau said that "an excellent example of a protest that he supported was BLM". The leaders of the BLM riots. The ones whose large groups of protestors were calling for pigs to be murdered on several occasions. Believe it or not there was some bitch on CTV yesterday calling it an insurrection lol. I'll find the video if you need it.

So you just lavished praise on his pure & unbigoted precious heart, and now you're unable to mount even the slightest defence against an accusation of hostile bigotry by him, complete with his own actual quote proving the allegation to be true. Is that where we're at? Does your hasty retreat tell us that your new opinion has changed to "Yes, he's a vile bigot, but he's still our PM ?"? Yeah, I'm keeping score.

There are lots of reasons to hate PET, but I've never heard that take on him declaring the war measures. Why do you say that it almost broke the country? I was 2 when it happened, so I have no actual memories of the time, and I've never heard a Quebecois POV on the matter first hand before. I do not have a full understanding of the issue, but this is what came up when I googled October Crisis 1970 timeline: Is that accurate? I'm sure that even if what's written there actually happened, there's also a lot missing. I'm not dumb enough to believe that anything I read, which is of a political nature, is accurate and not missing any pertinent information. I personally don't think that using the war measures act seems unwarranted considering all of the things that were going on, but like I said, my personal knowledge of this issue is not worth mentioning. What's the deal?

You know that what you just said is 100% total bullshit which can easily be disproven, right? Trudeau's "anti-vaxer" speech meets every single criterion of the dictionary definition of bigotry. He even said that people who don't get the pseudovaxes are just taking up space, and asked if they should be tolerated. FYI there's no basis for him to brand people as racists and misogynists just for choosing not to get the Pfizer/Moderna shot. None at all, and he never even tried to offer any proof. He just made serious accusations without a shred of substantiating evidence. He's a god-damned hate monger, plain and simple. Anyone who doesn't acknowledge that themselves is just a total moron or a hatemonger themselves. Do you understand this stuff citizen, or do you have some proof of all the things that Trudeau said?

I think you skipped the part where you illuminate us all on the apolitical nature of the judicial appointment process.

LOL. Please don't try to make sense of that post. It's perfect the way it is.

Wow, that's straight outta "Propaganda for Dumbasses 101". Leftists are like a deer in the headlights for that stuff. I love how their little video with the Nazi flag is 1/2 a second long, with no landmarks visible behind it so that people can figure out where it is, and there are only a handful of people visible [from too far away to see their faces] even though there are hundreds of thousands of people at the rallies. Who was the coward that saw a Nazi flag flying in Canada and didn't approach them to get their faces on camera? That person is just as bad as the people with the flag. I honestly would love it if the people holding that flag were caught and were charged with some kind of crime, just so that their names would become part of the public record. I can make a video with a flag and some random dudes who are too far away for their faces to be visible, with nothing but the sky in the background, and they can also have a picture of Justin Trudeau with them. I just need to find a liberal to get a Nazi flag from.

You must have been livid when Trudeau went out into a huge throng of non-socially distanced people during covid to support BLM, when their riots were destroying cities in the United States. Honestly, you're certifiably insane if you think that it's worse for Trump to support a peaceful protest than it is for Trudeau to support a group that was openly calling for the murders of police officers and was rioting, looting, burning down neighbourhoods, assaulting people, killing people, assaulting and killing officers, overrunning police stations and that attacked the whitehouse.

What am I missing? https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/ccs-ajc/05.html What does this mean to you? At the end of the day, it all boils down to one thing. Is this process free from political influence? Not sure where you think the clear line is between the government and the political, er, judicial appointments.

Is his post any worse than this: I think not. Trudeau's frothy-mouthed hate speech is a collection of wildly slanderous and off-base accusations, followed by a sinister comment that's tantamount to a call to action. Honestly, saying "should we tolerate these people" is asking whether or not they should be protected from violence. And now the convoy was rammed by some loser with a truck, and a car ran over 4 protesters in Winnipeg. Those are two clear examples of what happens to people "when we no longer tolerate them." You're holding a random internet poster to a higher standard than our own PM is held to.

So, becoming a judge is an apolitical affair here in Canada? https://globalnews.ca/news/4049900/trudeau-omar-khadr-lawyer-john-norris-justice/ Did Global News lie to us here? Was this judge not really appointed by the Liberals?

@eyeball - Most of the world remembers things like this, which you claim to be unaware of? "Multiple locations where things are burning. Mostly peaceful."

Then maybe show it for once? Just once, cite a page with some facts on it instead of just doing.... whatever you want to call this. Do you honestly need to see plinks proving that CNN supported the riots? Are you really going there? If you post the words "I don't believe that CNN was supporting the riots" then I'll post some links just for you, ok? I'll even post links to show you that the current VP was wildly supportive of the riots. But you need to say those words, because I'm not just fetching links for you, I'll be doing it to prove a point about your intelligence. When you think you're making a point, just maybe think twice? When things are well understood by the whole rest of the planet you don't need to post links. People don't post links to prove that the moon isn't made of cheese to anyone but you. I can say "Michael Jackson was a very popular pp singer in the '80s" without posting a link because only 1 person on earth would require a link - that's you. I can say "many people believe that Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player of all time" without posting links because only 1 person on earth would require a link - that's you. I can say "Michael Jackson was a very popular pp singer in the '80s" without posting a link because only 1 person on earth would require a link - that's you. I can say "many people believe that Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player of all time" without posting links because only 1 person on earth would require a link - that's you. That's not actually what it did. It proved that you still don't understand the rules of polite discourse. People don't post links to prove that the moon isn't made of cheese to anyone but you. By not accepting "my word" you're actually doubting that CNN supported the riots. That's fine buddy, but most people will think that you're extremely stupid for holding that opinion. Still, I need you to say that "you do not believe that CNN was supporting the riots" because it provides an extra level of proof. Wow, you clearly took some time thinking about that, and all it did was look childish. Wrong. You're asking me to provide links to prove something that everyone else already knows, while at the same time refusing to just show the evidence to back up a very substantial accusation that you've made, which most people here know to be false. I always supply cites when they're needed, but in this case they're not needed. You're just dodging. I'll only provide the links after you admit that you are actually completely unaware that CNN supported the riots. There's a big difference between "getting the links just because you asked for them" and "getting the links to prove how completely oblivious of current events you are". "Learn the language. Learn the etiquette. Stop making snotty insults. Grow up." - That part still stands

Last I heard you get all your stuff from blueanon, but you can call it what you want. I guess I can't really argue with one of the sheeple about how they pronounce baaa, or in your case beee, so I'll give you that one. Bleat to your heart's content, eyeball.

Of course you understand that in this instance, the burden of proof is on you, right? At the heart of this little tete a tete is my claim that you need to show some kind of proof of all the "nazi flags and racist symbolism" that you keep popping off about. Eyeball was actually coming to your defence by saying that I needed to show proof that "CNN supported the riots", because according to him, some people still don't know. Anyhow, you're admitting that the burden of proof is on the positive claim, or in this case, proof of your comments about the symbols, so it's put up or shut up time. For the tenth time, @eyeball & Michael Hardner, show the proof that you claim to have.