WestCanMan

Yep. It's called the emergency act now, and he did enact it. https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/the-emergencies-act-has-been-enacted-here-s-what-that-means-1.5781457 From CTV: So it has been used once during each world war, and then in the FLQ crisis when people were being murdered and a politician was kidnapped and murdered. Do you see the similarities between then and now? No? Just pretend that some of the things that Trudeau was saying about the convoy were true, and then it would kind of make sense.

? Classic eyeball. Hey good news! The war measures act has been enacted! Grab some popcorn, crank up the propaganda on CBC, CTV or Goebbels, and just imagine that the people getting slammed to the ground by the jack-booted vax-Nazis are me ? YAYYYYY! Peaceful protesters getting f-ed up! How perfect! Maybe their lives will be ruined for standing up for their bodily autonomy and for protecting their children ?

You edited your post and it still looks like that? ?

Some, sure. All? That's obviously not true. Taking the jab was worth the risk for wealthy people who in covid's target demographic. They had lots to live for and they felt like taking the jab really increased their chances of survival. Over 20,000 Canadians 80 and over have died from covid, and only about 4% of Canadians are over 80. Anyone over 80 who owns a TV station and isn't vaxed is an idiot. It's even beneficial for them to do whatever they can to encourage younger people to take the vax because in some cases it will slightly reduce the spread of covid. Less than 30 people under 20 have died of covid, and that is about 25% of our population. Should they jump the line to get jabbed? We've never really heard the gov't say anything about side effects, but we know that they're there. That's the scary part for people who don't need the vaccine. Here's an article that's very pro Astrazeneca from Feb 7 of this year: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/feb/07/doubts-cast-over-astrazeneca-jab-probably-killed-thousands-covid-vaccine Oooh, that sounds really bad. "Damaging the reputation" of a "vaccine". If it was true, that would be bad. Is it? Blood clots aren't always a big deal. How bad were the blood clots? No mention. One in 65,000.... will what? Get a little blood clot? Die? Still no mention. People buy lottery tickets with much longer odds than 1/65,000. Do you get why people who have almost 100% chance of surviving covid don't want to take the jab? How is this woman still pimping the AZ? Why is she bemoaning it's fate? A couple of months ago Aristedes posted a link here about how safe the vax was for children. About 8.9M kids got the Pfizer jab in the US and only 12 died within the first week. That's not necessarily alarming, it happens. 6 of them died from causes which were mentioned in the article (2 from blood clots in the lungs, a heart attack, and 2 intracranial haemorrhage deaths among the 6), and in all cases the CDC decided that they likely weren't caused by the vax, and there were 6 deaths that were still under investigation. This doesn't even include all the known cases of myocarditis, a very severe heart condition which is only completely cured about 81% of the time. The fact that there are severe side effects is known, but the gov't is treating us like mushrooms: keeping us in the dark and feeding us bullshit. They'll go on for hours and hours about putting up plastic screens for cashiers, different kinds of masks, how to wear masks, how racist some flight restrictions are compared to others, Bonnie Henry can do her sleeper monologues, they'll lecture us about a "'healthy' (fat) 59 yr old in Britain who died of covid", covid numbers in different parts of the country, Cuomo's heroism, Cuomosexuality, Trump's dastardly covid nonsense, rising counts over here, lowering counts over there, etc, but they never do anything to address the elephant in the room. At best they'll say "We believe that the benefits outweigh the risks". Oh geez, THANK YOU! At best I'll say "When we know more about the risks, we'll consider giving it to our son, who, from all the stats to this point, absolutely doesn't need it."

Trade was down 25% for a week. The vax mandates are forcing people to lose 100% of their wages for months. Trudeau is a piece of shit.

That's a very infantile take on it. Your comps are basically just words with no meaning. What's Dudley George's story? Why was he shot? How does it compare? What happened with the Oka crisis? Why were there fatalities there? You're talking about 3 fatalities which don't seem to be comps at all. This is a lawful, peaceful protest. Trudeau is sad that int'l trade was down 25% for a wekk, protesters are angry because they got turfed for not taking the placebo and they lose 100% of their wages for months. Trudeau is a worthless hate monger and a vax-Nazi. This is an atrocity.

I said that you needed some evidence. Look above. I also mentioned that you need very real evidence to substantiate such a serious claim about so many people. I probably said that you provided zero evidence, which was the absolute truth. Here's a comparable eyeball, and you can't pretend to not understand this: When a single fully vaxed person died of covid, that wasn't proof that the vax was junk. Do you understand so far? One covid death among millions of vaxed doesn't mean that "THEY'RE ALL GONNA DIE!" By the same token, when a tiny swastika on the corner of a large flag just magically shows up behind a CTV camera, and only lasts ten seconds before it's taken down, that's not proof that "THE CONVOY IS EVIL!" CTV and CBC made an extremely substantial accusation which is being backed by their useful idiots all across the country. If what you provided me was proof that the convoy is evil then by the same token you also have to admit that the vax is complete garbage and we shouldn't have passports or force-vaxing anyways. I'm not digging a hole, I'm just running circles around and you're confused, as usual.

Is, but that was a fair comment. I don't think that they are/were a real thing in Canada. I never even heard of them before all the hubbub about disbanding them. Their leader in the US was a hispanic iirc, and if that's the case they obviously weren't very good at being white supremacists. The Dems' militia, the KKK, didn't have any competition from that quarter.

I think it's bizarre that an actual terrorist supporter like Jagmeet Singh, whose own terrorist org has blown up an airplane killing hundreds of people, can accuse others of being terrorist when they haven't done, proposed or endorsed terrorist activities. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/as-jagmeet-singh-condemns-terrorism-second-video-shows-him-speaking-alongside-sikh-separatist In this video, which is no longer available, Jagmeet just sits there chilling while the guy on his right talks about the need to use violence to achieve their goal of having a country of their own (no one ever gets killed when that happens, right? The partition of India was mostly peaceful by Dems' standards). Now Jagmeet calls peaceful protesters terrorists. Jagmeet Singh is a hypocritical piece of shit. (I just wanna make it clear that the vast majority of Sikhs are extremely decent people who only use violence as a means to protect themselves and others, their religion does not permit wars of aggression, but that didn't stop a small minority of them from becoming violent extremists/terrorists.)

? It's ok to force people from their jobs and ruin them financially for not taking the jab, and if they protest, we'll just destroy their lives a bit more. Does that sound about right to you blackbird? How the fuck do you sleep at night? FYI your jab is worthless dude. 1,500 fully-vaxed Canadians died of covid since Dec 15th. Why should we take your jab or lose our rights blackbird? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1257040/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-vaccination-status/ 50x more fully vaxed people died since Dec 15th than people under 20 died since January of the year before. Why should they vax blckbird? You have no answer. Pathetic.

Nope. "I got covid. Can't leave my house."

I'm not sure what proof you want me to have. That one symbol just mystically appeared when a CBC camera was right there and it was already down by the time Cooper was done speaking. I coulda got a better picture of that on my iPhone from that far away. Looks highly suspicious, right? Is that really enough for CTV and CBC to characterize the whole movement? Hundreds of thousands of people in several cities across the country? Obviously not. You need way more than that. There are several videos of BLM supporters in different cities doing chants calling for people to kill police officers. CNN says that "Those mostly peaceful protesters don't represent BLM." Really? Literally everyone in that march feels that way or they'd quickly gtfo. Not even 1% of the people at the march are represented by a flag that only lasted ten seconds. Here are a bunch of white supremacists standing in front of Youngkin's bus in Virginia. Did they represent him? No, they were planted by the Lincoln Project. Just like the confederate flag at the rally was seen beside Trudeau's personal photographer. If a leftist is digging it, it's a rathole by definition.

Did you really just use Trudeau's lies to try to prove a point? Do you realize that CTV News doesn't have any proof of what Trudeau is saying or they'd have shown us by now? Can you show me pictures or video showing what the PM's is talking about, which CTV let him spew without correcting him? I'd like to see some photos of those symbols flying right in the Freedom Convoy, otherwise you just became a useful idiot of Trudeau and CTV by using that link as evidence of something. This is the part where leftists always fall 100% flat.

According to our leader, those people are a threat to others. They're not like the good folks of BLM, who have his support.

It's actually just imbecilic that you don't understand what I said about Nancy, and the difference in the way she reacts to something that happens to her and something that happens to someone else. She didn't do jack about the vast majority of the violent rioting. It was all great. She didn't speak out against people letting rioters out of jail or bailing rioters out of jail. People overran police stations, overran parts of Seattle and declared sovereignty, attacked federal buildings for 100 days straight, they attacked the WH and injured over 60 secret service members - it's all good baby. Let 'er rip! ESPN dude - the riots are awesome. BURN IT ALL DOWN BABY! Those are all examples of being pro-riot, and CNN was right there. You were too, because you dodged using the word riot as well. Your idiocy is on the previous page: ?

Heya goddess, try not to get too offended by what the vax-Nazis say. They're just playing follow the leader, and their leader is a divisive, ethically-challenged hate monger. Just be happy that you're on the right side of history and try not to stoop down to their level. They're happy in the muck, lying and slandering. They'll chill out at that level with you all day if you let them.

This might shock you, but not everyone can afford to take time off work and drive all the way to Ottawa, and then sit there for two weeks. I can't even believe that I have to explain that to an adult. Truckers have mortgages. They have dependents. They have legitimate reasons why they can't leave their work. This might blow your mind, but there are unvaccinated truckers still working, they just can't cross the border. There are also vaccinated truckers taking part in the protests. They're doing it because they care about other people. It's wild, right? Many of the people are hooligans? Really? Why isn't CTV able to find evidence of that? They'd like nothing more than to support Trudeau's hate mongering but they just can't get the footage that they need. The truckers never said that only truckers could protest. They're not like the vax-Nazis, just trying to keep the others away.

QFT. That was quite a mature, accurate and decent post by your standards.

Wrong. You want to prevent unjabbed people from participating in society. They can't attend social gatherings and they can't even work in a lot of places. That's a lot of restrictions to put on people for not taking a jab that still allows covid to spread, allows people to die in large numbers, and has side effects. Get this through your head: 1,500 fully vaxed Canadians died since mid December. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1257040/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-vaccination-status/ There were 981 fully-vaxed covid deaths in mid-Dec, 2,490 now. If you don't believe me search up your own stats. Pfizer and Moderna said that the vaxes won't provide herd immunity. Obviously, people who are sick enough to die from covid can still spread it. Less than 30 people under 20 have died from covid since the start. It's not serious to warrant force-vaxing them all. The jabs also have serious side effects on the very healthiest of them. Not wanting those kids force-vaxed is not "being an anti-vax zealot". Your comment actually makes you a vax-zealot (aka a vax-Nazi)

OMG, it's a string that's at least, 1/4 of an inch long. How can anybody follow that? It's like solving a Rubik's cube!!! eyeball, you're still a liar and a slanderer until you find some proof that there were racist flags at the freedom convoy. Just because CTV, CBC and Global have 4 useful idiots here doesn't mean that they're off the hook.

DUDE! Your post was just as stupid as CNN's narrative! HAHAHA!! ? An honest report would say that there was extremely destructive rioting going on in Kenosha. Listen to yourself: "the protests were mostly peaceful until later on in the evening, when things got worse." ? That's some stupid bullshit right there. wo people would say it like you just did: 1) a propagandist defending the rioting by using cuter words to describe them 2) a complete idiot who doesn't understand the difference between a "riot" and a "protest Anyone would characterize it as violent protests unless they're downplaying it. You're just like Nancy Pelosi, who thought that riots were cute when they were destroying other people's communities. Nobody needed the National Guard to protect them even after weeks of "mostly peaceful protests". Then when they were at her place of business for 2 hours she called in 20,000 NG and had them there for months. If those "mostly peaceful protests" happened in your neighbourhood you'd be this guy:

Based on what? CBC's propaganda? Trudeau's unsubstantiated accusations? What's wrong with their demands? Do you have a reasonable defence for the vaccine mandates? Do you have a reasonable defence for the vaccine passports? That would be unique.

Another *whoosh* moment for you. Don't care.

That's a lie. You obviously don't know what you're talking about because I used 1 link to show that CNN was supporting the riots. FYI, this was rioting. CNN downplayed rioting for 3 years and called it 'mostly peaceful protests', don't play stupid. I'm not going to search up any more video than I need to to back my claim. Are you asking eyeball and MH to back up their serious claims of racist symbols? Of course not. You're just here as a propagandist and a useful idiot, you're not here as someone worried about forum etiquette.

Wrong on both counts: 1) I did substantiate it 2) Everyone does know that CNN supported the riots. It's idiotic to claim that they didn't.