WestCanMan

Yes, it's a criminal charge in Canada now. They just have a more ominous name for it: "MISCHIEF!" DA Da dahhhhhhhhhh. If you believe that it was a Nazi onslaught, spitting out jewish corpses as they hated their way across the country, then you can choose this option. If no one discovers any corpses then you can just blame Trudeau, CTV and CBC for giving you false info.

http://www.bcchildrens.ca/about/news-stories/stories/myocarditis-pericarditis-and-the-covid-19-vaccine It is acknowledged here, but downplayed massively. I don't know 100,000 people that have vaccinated, but I know far more than 1.5 people who have experienced side-effects. Whether or not the BC medical acknowledges that they're all from the pseudovaxes is a different story. Our daughter missed her period for over 4 months after getting the second dose. I didn't even know that was a pseudovax side-effect until goddess mentioned about a week ago. We hadn't blamed it on anything prior to that, she works out a lot and has a low BMI, we thought that she was just under 11% body-fat or something. She's a teacher and apparently she's supposed to have her 3rd dose but she just lies about the booster and no one has ever checked into it. A business associate, middle aged male, who went into convulsions for 2 hours right after vaxing. My wife's best friend has a son around 25 in the navy who got vaccinated right before he flew between Turkey and the US. He ended up paralyzed for 12 hours. Our best friends have a son who plays on our softball team, and his girlfriend got myocarditis from the first dose of the vaccine and so she didn't get the second one. His sister's best friend works for BC Health and she got it worse - she's been on medication ever since. My wife's clients have a son who flew to Japan shortly after vaxing and he ended up in the hospital there with brain haemorrhaging. I don't know how old he is, but he has young children so he's probably between 25-35. Those are my personal links to vaccine side-effects, and I don't know anyone who got more than just a flu from covid. The there's the fact that 2021 was the year of "professional athlete heart attacks". Aside from two teen-aged basketball players who collapsed from known heart conditions about ten years apart, I hadn't heard of professional athletes suddenly collapsing for heart issues with "no known reason". https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/Public Comments 324 to 328.pdf I randomly googled Megan Roth and Ferran Duran from the list of 69 and they actually did have cardiac episodes. No one is attributing these heart attacks to the vax, but they are all vaxed, and their heart issues are disconcerting to say the least. Surely you know at least 3-5 people who had moderate-to-serious side effects soon after vaxing. Whether or not you're willing to admit it is another thing.

"Enemy of the State"

Get your head out of your ass. A large, legitimate, peaceful protest came to Ottawa and our PM refused to talk with them. Instead he hid in his basement, engaged in hatemongering, invoked martial law, had people trampled by horses, beaten by dirty cops, froze their bank accounts and then jailed people without bail for things like "mischief". Our country's descent from a free democracy to fascist shithole with a dubious banking system has been noted by prominent leftists and politicians from around the world.

Gross.

OK, cut with the outright bullshit ef. You clearly have no idea of what you are talking about and doing rectal plucks to try and prove your point. You have absolutely zero credibility with your retarded BS. FYI it's an absolute, proven fact that kids are getting badly hurt by the vaccines, possibly even killed by the vaccine, and you should care about that, period. Forcing children to take a vaccine that has known, dangerous side effects should not be occurring, period. If the pseudovaxes worked that would be one thing, but there are 1,500 triple-vaxed deaths since Christmas. Forcing people to take them is 100% anti-science. Stop being a propaganda victim ffs. I personally know two people between 20-25 who got myocarditis from the vaccines. It's not a minor ailment. One of them is still on medication over half a year later. I don't need your idiotic opinion on any topic, let alone this one.

Wow, you're hurtin' dude. Michael Hardner: "IF CBC DIDN'T SAY IT, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!" ? OK Mikey, there are no side effects from the jab lol. Don't have an aneurism. Also, there was no "WE scandal", no "SNC scandal", etc.

They did nothing but organize the largest peaceful protest in the history of the world. Period. Of course the government is going to get snotty when someone stands up to their fascist decrees, but that doesn't make what the Freedom Convoy did wrong. So sayeth one of the stooges who believed that it was a Nazi insurrection lol. Almost every single leftist on this site cares about US politics more than Canadian politics. Say "Trump" and they start frothing at the mouth.

Absolutely everything is pathetic about your post. Who the fuck would make a joke about the topic of hundreds of children who got myocarditis from a fake vaccine that they wouldn't even have needed if it was real? If it was affecting your grandchild you'd care, but the thought of someone else's grandchild in hospital or on medication indefinitely means nothing to you. Then you went on to pretend that police brutality that was captured on video is a joke too? You need help dude. You're conflating seriously injured children with partisan politics.

It's even more of a shame that the people who support taking political prisoners in our country also applaud Kamala Haris's effort to bail violent rioters out of jail in the US.

If you read the whole article it doesn't back up the moronic claim in the title at all. TBH we all know exactly why the Playboy Bunny entered into an NDA with Trump but for whatever reason no one is allowed to say it. The fact that people act like it was the only NDA in the history of politics just draws more attention to the fact that the article is gibberish. For example, here's an NDA story for you: https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/10/10/trudeau-accusor-lands-a-seven-figure-nda-to-keep-quiet-about-his-west-grey-departure/ You can choose to believe it or not, but why hasn't Trudeau sued the B C and others for libel if it's not?

I'll admit that I care less about my carbon footprint than your leaders, like Trudeau, H Clinton, David Suzuki, Bernie Sanders, Al Gore, Leo Dicaprio, Prince Harry, and all of the other people who pontificate to us about global warming from private jets while they're en route between their various monster homes. That's why I don't buy carbon offsets [aka pixie dust] to make up for the gas that I burn in my 35 mpg car. I still care though ?

If Al even cared about it he would have flown there on a private jet for a photo op.

You wanna hear about a crazy weather phenomenon? When Lei DiCaprio was in Calgary the temp went from -1 to +15 in an afternoon. The world almost melted. It really chinook him up.

It's not an exaggeration to say that she was trampled by a horse. That was the intent, and that was what happened. It was a clearly unwarranted & excessive use of force. By your own admission people were being reasonable in assuming that she was a senior citizen, therefor you're acknowledging that people weren't lying when they called her a senior - they were just wrong about her age, therefor you are a liar for pretending that people were lying when they called her old. 1) So it took 48 hours to confirm that she wasn't a senior, and in that span of time literally everyone thought that she was, for several reasons. Again you knew that you were just slandering people by calling them liars. 2) Only an idiot reads/watches CBC. It would be a compliment to call it disinformation, it's actually just drivel. By your simple understanding of the matter, the choice to leave and just force their children to take a pseudovax which could harm them very badly would be reasonable. By your simple POV the choice to just take the dangerous pseudovax that they didn't need in order to keep their jobs would be reasonable. FYI those things are not reasonable, and just giving up would not be reasonable. Your understanding of the topic at hand is sadly lacking. The fact is that many of the people that stood up to our fascist gov't are the very best of us. That's why our MSM ran such a determined campaign of slander and lies against them. Lying is your thing, don't put words in my mouth. I never said that Zelenski alone "started the war" but he created the reason for the war and when he had the opportunity to take reasonable steps to avoid war he chose not to. Zelenski forced Russia to take a stand against NATO encroachment and he is absolutely as responsible as Putin is for this war - he was a willing combatant. That's just your window connoisseur 'logic' again. Sometimes people don't provoke attacks against them, sometimes they do. Eg, if you told someone who could bench 70 lbs "I'm getting 4 of my friends to scratch you and pull your hair" and they said "Don't you dare, or I'll kick your ass", and you said "Oh yes I will", and then they slapped you around a bit, it wouldn't be their fault alone, you'd be 'consenting to violence' by refusing to back down from your threats. If, on the other hand, a 12 yr old girl took a liking to your Hello Kitty backpack and demanded that you give it to her, and then she bitch-slapped you for non-compliance, she would be guilty of assault. Get it? Sometimes you can be considered a willing combatant for refusing to obey an ultimatum, sometimes you're not. She's awesome. You could only hope to be a moon-cast shadow of her on your best day.

I already debunked the stupidity of your post. 1) beating people once they're already restrained by 4 cops who are surrounded by 80 other cops is brutality and only a really stupid person would think otherwise. 2) The distance and quality of the video doesn't make it even the slightest bit difficult to see what's going on 3) Csaba Vizi will lose his truck for certain if he takes on our fascist gov't, and our PM/AG. Go price a semi and see if you're willing to just give one away.

https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/features/what-is-pandemic I was pretty certain that I was correct, until I read about this: https:www.the-great-sniffles-pandemic-of-1846.com/fakewebsite/lol

Some people think it's horrific to have their own cat put to sleep, some people think it's horrific to see someone else's child get a serious case of myocarditis, but I think they're both horrific. You can't say the same. Seriously, what is the matter with you?

1) China's lockdowns help with the fear porn that our western media is desperate for, and China will no doubt pimp a "ZERO DEATHS" success as a result of their draconian actions, which will be a Lib/Dem selling point for harsher lockdowns here. The Dems desperately need lockdowns to justify another round of mail-in ballots, otherwise they'll get massacred in the mid-terms. 2) That was actually a very sensible post. People like you & Dialamah, who are in favour of forcing children to be injected with a harmful substance that doesn't benefit them, would definitely support the euthanizing of pets, although you'd probably leave it to someone else.

Hence, Trudeau was slammed by members of foreign media and governments. We have no moral authority left to speak about the Chinese gov't's treatment of their citizens or that of any other government.

Personal experiences, but nothing about the military at all.

Either you're the world champ of playing stupid or you're a window connoisseur. Everyone who saw her talking in the video thought that she was elderly, the fact that she used a walker made her seem elderly, everyone who saw her on the cart in the hospital thought that she was elderly, it wasn't until her age was released that anyone knew she was under 60. You don't get to call people liars for making a minor, logical assumption when the facts aren't available. Everyone that saw her trampled by a horse saw her trampled by a horse and your lies are meaningless. The fact that you are resorting to sandbox insults about the protesters yet again is telling.

That's completely stupid and you know it. Even if the guy was resisting, he couldn't keep it up for much more than 30 seconds against 4 physically fit, trained officers who already had him on the ground, and they were surrounded by dozens of cops and some peaceful protesters much further away. The only thing that was making the situation dicey at all was the fact that officers were brutalizing a protester. There was no need whatsoever for such brutality. The precedent there was horrible, and an embarrassment to Canada.

Your post is imploding from it's own abject stupidity. It says right there in the bolded part that applying pressure is a means of controlling a person, and with 4 cops on top of that guy they obviously didn't need to use strikes. For your edification: The police can use whatever level of force is necessary to achieve their lawful and necessary objectives, but their use of force is strictly regulated. For example, police also have guns that they can use, but they're not allowed to just shoot people for not listening intently. An example of their use of force guideline is here, from the Newf Constabulary: https://www.ciddd.ca/documents/exhibits/P-0624.pdf So you can see here that the police don't just get to beat up people who pissed them off, but then surrendered peacefully. Once compliance is established, the use of force is not necessary, and therefor it is not reasonable. Since "reasonable" is a requirement (the words 'must be' = requirement), not reasonable = not allowed. IE, the police are not allowed to beat up people who surrendered peacefully on their knees. End of story. I know that you're far from being a "reading comprehension" guy, so I have a shiny picture for you. Note that in the shiny picture below, where it says "active resistance" at the 6 o'clock position, the officer's physical response is "physical control". When multiple officers have a lone man on the ground and his limbs are restrained, the officers have achieved physical control. That restrained person was completely unable to escalate the situation to "assaultive" with 4 dudes restraining him, so there was no reasonable need to escalate the police use of force beyond "physical control", which they had already achieved. If there were other violent or aggressive persons in the vicinity, escalating the danger to the arresting officers, that may constitute a need for a quicker resolution to the active resistance scenario which the officers were still facing, but the officers were actually surrounded by dozens of other armed officers, and the crowd was far away and peaceful. Bottom line - the officers were not in any danger of being "assaulted" at that point and there was no need for haste or an escalation of force. Therefor, they had no need or right to beat the person that they were holding on the ground into submission. An now, without further ado, as promised - a shiny picture. TADAAAAA!:

Or just wrong, like we all were, because she looks elderly and she uses a walker. Just remember that when she was first trampled no one knew her name or her age. We all thought that she was elderly. I didn't even know that she was only 49 util today, and I've seen her in speaking in a video and seen close-up photos before, like the one where she's holding the Tim Horton's cup on the stretcher.