CITIZEN_2015

How is the law written currently? That if plainclothes officers got into fight with people without any reason (like to uphold the law) then it is always the innocent people who will be judged against?

I wasn't responding to your post in the thread, just a post of my own that Europe has gone far right because of unacceptable actions by some Muslim immigrants. Yes for now we are okay in Canada because first Canadians are more tolerant than Europeans, second, Canadians are a nation of immigrants, third, minorities are much larger and more deeply rooted in Canada, fourth, immigrants in Canada are not yet as bad as those in Europe, more educated and less violent. All said, however, if the current policies of high number of immigration and lack of good selection criterion continues, I anticipate that Canadians may soon go to extreme right too. I am an immigrant myself (though from decades ago) and wish to cut down immigration to a third and be much more selective on third world immigrants.

No same level of rights for everyone. Those persons should appeal the judgements unless they broke the law and cops (plainclothes or otherwise) tried to stop them.

Muslim immigrants and their unacceptable actions in Europe has swayed the population to far right. 25% of votes for far rights in Europe is unprecedented since 1945.

All people should be equal before the law (even though I don't believe all people are equal as I believe in evolution, some more some less evolved), but it make me upset when a tiny minority tries to take advantage of the laws meant to protect them by victimizing themselves or governments having special treatments when it comes to employment or hate laws. Yes I do believe in gay pride and right but not in super-rights. Everybody should be proud of what she or he is.

Israel freed 4 hostages by military action yesterday and killed 15 terrorists. All other Israeli hostages must be freed immediately and unharmed. Two days ago Israeli attack in east Syria sent an Islamic Republic traitor to hell as well. Keep up thr good work Israel. Victory to Israel. Death to Islamic Republic and its proxies.

Hear hear. In cases when someone is targeted because of his/her race or orientation there should be harsher punishment as deterrent however, it should go both ways. It should not be specific to specific groups likes gays, Muslims or blacks or colored people but anyone regardless of race, orientation or religion if targeted.

The majority of gay people are fair and just but the few bad apples among them victimizing themselves taking advantage of hate laws to take advantage of the law in their favor for even more rights. This is not acceptable. We need laws to protect white heterosexual men who have becomes the new group with less rights and no laws to protect them from bigotry.

Listen Arabs are my enemy, Israel is my friend. But I have no tolerance when it comes to killing women and children. Israeli army knew well that many defenseless people including women and children will die if they attack the school but they went ahead with the criminal act anyway.

It is equally bad. The law says that the guys should have been arrested for assault and if it was proven that your friends were attacked because of their orientation then they should have charged with committing a crime out of hate which carries more severe punishment. The law enforcement did not do their job and your friends should have reported them.

If a straight man fights back in self defense it is likely a hate crime by the straight man. If a gay man attacks a straight man it is also likely a hate crime by the straight man.

I responded in a PM.

Never mind all previous 8 months but just today they bombed a school run by UN and killed 45 people. Again a most recent example is just today. They bombed a school tun by United Nations.

The right to defend themselves against those with a different preference without being accused of hate crime. They are recent laws to protect people with different preferences however, a tiny minority abuse them by victimizing themselves to demand even more rights.

I think we need an amended Charter to protect the majority as well. I think white heterosexual men have become new category with less rights these days.

II am no lawyer but I think if a government is elected based on that platform this means the majority of citizens have voted for that white-only immigration law so the majority government elected can also change the constitution and override the Charter. That said I don't think in practice this will ever happen.

By international law prohibiting Canada I meant if Canada is going to adopt white only immigration not banning refugees. If Canada wants to stop immigration altogether that is not against international laws but if Canada adopts white only immigration it will be. What Canada needs to do and is legal too is to be selective both financially and culturally as who gets in and deport the bad apples even after citizenship (no time limit on foreign born citizens).

I am not sure it would be so complicated. In UK there are white supremist political parties like the National Front or British National parties. They freely participated in elections. I think even in Canada in spite of the fact that Canadians are much more tolerant than Europeans, I think we had or still have a Heritage Front party which wants a white-only Canada (if I am not mistaken because I haven't wasted my time to read their platform).

In a democracy an elected government decides on policies based on their platforms during the election. I think that Liberals did make it clear that they are pro-immigration especially those from middle east. They were elected with about one-third of the votes and they are carrying out their platform. I did vote for them even though I didn't agree with them on immigration and a few other policies but this is democracy. Form a party and state your platform as ending immigration for 7 years and accepting white immigrants only and if you win then of course you can form the government and carry out those policies and you have the right to do so again because this is democracy based on majority will not an individual's wish. Hell, I may even vote for you.

TOTAL ECONOMIC BLOCKADE OF IRAN IN AIR AND SEA AND LAND. I have said it many times over already, twice in responding to your posts. BLOCK iRAN'S PORTS. Sent US and British nuclear submarines to torpedo and sink any ship carrying Iranian oil or Iranian goods or goods for Iran. Suffocate the regime and strangle its economy. Shoot down its fighter jets and sink their navy. The regime will have no money to pay off its murderous mercenaries and the nation of Iran will rise up within and overthrow this F*cking murderous Islamic Republic within months. So not bomb civilian targets as the nation is a friend to the West just taken hostage.

What is wrong with rest of the world is that they are cowards. Biden, Europe have adopted policy of appeasement with the devil. Bunch of idi*ts to trust the devil. That is what I am saying. The West must get united to deal with the real enemy of the world by all available means. Islamic Republic doesn't care that Iran and surrounding will become nuclear wasteland. They are not Iranians to care about Iran. They are bunch of subhuman Arabs or Arab loving bunch of terrorists who believe they will go to heaven if they are killed. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE. REMOVE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC BY ALL AVAILABLE MEANS. Maybe Trump will wake up to this reality.

The enemies of Israel are getting stronger because Israel crushed the 3 armies in 6 days in 1967 but now they have much more powerful more evil enemies like Islamic Republic (about to have nuclear weapons thanks to idi*t peanut bran Carter and Hamas and Hezbolah and they are stuck in mud in the 8 month war against Hamas in 2024.

Absolutely not. I want Hamas and Hezbollah and other proxies of Islamic Republic including Islamic Republic itself to be obliterated but the head of the Satan or octopus is in Tehran not Rafah.

There is indeed a housing crisis in Canada but there was also a labor shortage during pandemic and a future pension crisis looming too as someone must support the aging population. Though I agree that immigration levels should be cut to a third due to housing crisis and my preference is European and South American immigrants due to adoptability issues , however, I don't think legally they can do this. This will be against international laws. I think they take immigrants as percent of the country to world population and we know India and China almost have a third of world population and middle east a quarter and Europe less than a quarter unfortunately. Like yourself I too worry about Canadian values be swallowed by large number of non-European immigrants without consideration for adoptability and potential for integration.

Very true. The UN does nothing and is a corrupt organization. They even declared one minute silence for the death of the butcher of Tehran last week which shocked human rights organizations. F*ck UN.