drummindiver

So, you are a bigot. I'm not sure why you are allowed to state opinions in this inflammatory manner, but the very plain fact, is that you are a bigot. I don't know how to block your insipid, revolting posts, but I would if I could.

I hope it speaks volumes. You continually defend terrorists, which speaks volumes about you. Please, what do you consider a reliable source? Canada is at 75% The US is at 80% This from your `source`. `designed to strangle` You are so out in left field. So, maybe we should be kinder, and stop sending money. I wouldn`t mind a break on my taxes so we could stop sending billions of dollars to needy people who only think receiving this gift is a `designed to strangle`affair. Maybe foreign aid should be outlawed. I wouldn`t want to be seen as aiding in `strangling`a needy person with our donations. Or, how about we set up orphanages in Afghanistan, and employ convicted murdering terrorists as employees? You know, kind of like what your hero Kadhr did. That wouldn`t be `designed to strangle`anyone, would it. btw, the USA was number 1 in amount of dollars given on every list I could find. Every single gd list.... Peace, Omar

Je suis Omar, I don't know what to say. Yes, I used CBC, and Time, on purpose, as many ppl trust in their reporting veracity and honesty. Unlike, of course, the leftist guerrilla blogs you get most of your information from. Mr.Kadhr was a terrorist who helped sponsor terror. He died in a firefight while doing just that. He indoctrinated his whole family, and yes, I blame Omar for throwing the grenade, but Mr Kadhr, as you refer to him, is even more responsible. I guess $42 billion is peanuts to Carter. Keep defending terrorists Omar.

Now you're turning a murderous al Qaeda operative into a hero? http://www.cbc.ca/news2/interactives/khadr/slides.html We know from historical records that in fact the US gives a boat load of money not just to help Afghanistan, but many other less fortunate countries. Of course, this doesn't fit your narrative, or whatever "historical records" you are reading. http://time.com/43836/afghanistan-is-the-big-winner-in-u-s-foreign-aid/

A hostile foreign army? To whom? Kadhr? As has been documented on this site ad nauseam (and by that, I mean it is sickening because it's true) Kadhr is a CANADIAN. The forces to whom he attacked were, to him, NOT a HOSTILE FOREIGN ARMY (ok, to terrorist Islam extremists they were..but he isn't one of those, right?) This fact is what actually makes him a TERRORIST. Please, stop saying he was "defending his home" from "hostile foreign army".

After you kill a medic. That wasn't armed.

So you admit he is a terrorist.

So, I know I've ranted about rubbish... but a whole thread advocating murder and mayhem (please don't explain sarcasm...I get it.) Are you bashing bikers, or the whole state of Texas? Cause, you know, the only good Texan.....

For someone who opposes racism, you sure say some bigoted things against Americans. Talk about painting with a broad brush.

Blacks had slaves long before they even knew about whitey. Aboriginals had slaves long before they even knew about whitey. Quit making excuses for ppl behaving badly.

Obviously. I thought you succeeded, even if at my expense.

lol wow, get pissy and post one little rant, and I've now got hexes on me by a goat blood drinkin mod. Fair enough, I deserve it.

I have talked to Charles. I have apologized to the forum. Cheers

Just to be clear, you think a convicted terrorist has more class than democratically elected public officials? So, I hate the Liberals, with their scheming, thieving ways (never mind the multiple billion dollar boondoggles) and yet I still hold them in higher esteem than a person who cowardly killed and maimed people I'm hoping you're just spewing abhorrent, contemptible rhetoric.

Sorry, why not? Is him throwing the grenade not the issue at hand? If you think no, why not? Are we debating whether he went to Afghanistan of his own volition, or whether he threw the grenade of his own volition? I personally don't care how or why he went to Afghanistan. I think everyone agrees he went there due to being indoctrinated by his father, Osama Bin Laden's personal bud. Fair enough. However, Omar threw the grenade, killing and maiming. He was not a member of a defending army, he was a terrorist. Plain and simple. What happened to him after should not have happened in a fair, democratic society, one we all aspire to (I would hope). At the end of the day, indoctrination does not absolve guilt. Most violent murderers are indoctrinated into violence through violent parents or violent environments, and we don't absolve them of guilt....so why Omar? You spend so much more time detailing what happened to him AFTER he murdered and maimed and so little time on his crime.

So, please follow along. Yes, I understand that you used it after Rue had used it. I hadn't realized Rue had used it (honestly, I can't read through his diatribes). You said, and I quote "I did respond in kind to one of his posts where he referred to some as dummies for not seeing things his way". This was in response to a post from WCR, referencing me. Not Rue. So, you implied that I had used the term first, and that you used it only after I had. If you read posts 11 through 13, I'm sure you will not find Rue's name anywhere. Should I have gotten upset about this? Nope, I'm not 12. Sometimes things get to ppl when they shouldn't, and ppl react in inappropriate ways. My bad. I apologize to the forum.

Check # 11, 12, 13 in this thread if you like.

Nope. You are probably right, Charles is not bias. It must be very hard to moderate a forum with so many view points and personalities.

Yes. You used the term `dummies`. And then lied that I used it. You`re welcome

Being indoctrinated does not absolve you of guilt. He was not coerced. He threw the grenade of his own volition.

I deleted my response. Nothing further to add.

To Big Guy Who made you boss. I can have an opinion, like something, or dislike something. And please, don`t be so condescending. Thanks

You are an outright liar. You called people dummies (your spelling) yesterday when ppl did not agree with your argument. The only time I ever said dummy was in reference to you calling ppl that, and that I found it odd Charles would allow you to do that. The whole point of this thread is the fact Charles allowed you to do that, yet censors others for far less...because he has the same political sensitivities as you do.

Really? If you have over 24 thousand posts and haven't observed a slight tilt to one side, me getting out my crayons to draw it for you ain't gonna help.