cannuck

"Trudeau" and "thinkging" is an oxymoron (with the emphasis on "MORON")

You are absolutely correct. Allowing, even encouraging immigrtation from Islamic states is the cause, and once here, our endless generosity funds them.

Uh,,,NO. It is a fact. Pierre Elliot Trudeau carried a Communist Party card when he studied at the Sorbonne - taking "walking trips in Eastern Europe" on several occassions. I assume that is public record.

Michael, I hoped you would know better. It is not the Antioch Baptist Church that is radicalizing NA borne Muslims. That is a 100% imported problem. By saying that by being borne here (such as Khadr) that makes them "Canadians" and "Home Grown" is nonsense. Their families and the commun ity imported from outside has not assimilated, in fact done exactly the opposite. Have ALL Muslim immigrtants become radicals? Of course not. BUT: were those who did influenced by assimilating long established Canadian (or American) values? Of course not. Most of all, the community that SEEMS to be "moderate" is in most cases abundantly aware of the radicals within, and does nothing to expose them. Nor is it a competitiion between WASP terrorists and those from Islam. It is a problem that can easily be dealt with by terminating immigration and expelling all who have associated with radical elements or aided, assisted or covered up for them in any way.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/31/us/new-york-shots-fired/index.html and the left-leaning media criticize Trump for identifying the problem as a Muslim problem.

We elected a card carrying communist as Prime Minister, they don't need to infiltrate, they ran the place.

there is an abandoned army base (CFB Picton) and a former BCATP airport there, or at least there was at one time (yes still there). I would imagine that there is some kind of existing land claim from some treaty that would give the whole thing to an Indian band of some flavour. Worth looking at - would set the whole mess on its ear if you could find that and work that angle.

you should look at Prince Edward County.

I had contempt for the new Federal government, but now that Khadr and 60 of his besties are so welcome by Trudeau, I am now disgusted with cabinet and amazed at just how ignorant and complacent Canadians have become. Of course, the Communist Broadcasting Corporation will give them all a pass, as that is what their job is - to yank this country far enough to the left to be a thorne in the side of the Yanks. I never could have imagined that would extend to becoming a home base for terrorists who could then attack our neighbour.

gee, at the going rate, that is going to cost the taxpayer $600,000,000.00 when they get their Khadr reward for killing on behalf of the Liberal's favourite charity - ISIS. I could get behind bringing them into Canada - as long as they are confined to Ottawa.

It is the same biting cold that the rest of us live with. Where exactly are you and where do you see your commune being created?

there IS a way to do what the OP wants: find a "first nation" that is on the smaller side, buy out the leadership or just get elected chief and move in. You can be a sovereign state within a state, make all of your own rules, and get paid handsomely by the Feds just for asking.

Have you ever been in Nigeria or tried to do any business there? The crime rate is literally 100x what it is here. There is so much criminal activity (particularly fraud) that it is simply tolerated, not prosecuted. We spent one Christmas getting our agent released from kidnapping. It was reported to the police (obviously) and absolutely nobody was charged with any crime - thus one more statistic that never happened. It is literally impossible to find a government official who is not on the take - or skimming in BIG TIME. Almost every Nigerian I have met in Canada and US simply continue to maintain their criminal associations at home and look constantly for opportunity to scam over here.

I would have hoped that was obvious. It is something we in the real world call "humour".

At the rate we are going, Canada soon.

GMO babies is really nothing different from "natural" selection. For millenia before, mates were chosen by the obvious traits that made a better gene donor, provider, nuturer, etc. These days, even the most undesirable seem to be able to mate up and procreate in spite of their shortcomings. Even birth defects, injuries or abnormalities that would otherwise eliminate pro-creation, medicine can intervene and make it possible. Similarly, science and our intellectual abilities are simply adding one more counterpoint as a tool to return to selecting most desirable traits. Far more than just a hedonistic thing, the end result would be to raise the bar in the overall gene pool (although, in Africa, tall, blonde and blue eyed might not be considered so). I already HAVE two tall, blonde, blue-eyed and extremely gifted children, so I guess I don't need to spend the bux to participate.

You will note that nowhere in the charter does it define how MANY men and women make up a family.

I seem to remember a very long period of time where a significant number of Canadian soldiers were deployed to Afghanistan - seems to match up with that citation my son-in-law received for leading the deepest incursion into Taliban territory of ANY of the combatants. BTW: their greatest fear was "friendly fire" from US troops. We had a different government that wisely backed out of Vietnam #2, and a VERY different government that honoured our commitment to come to the aid of our ally to reply to the legitimate source of the attack on your country. While I may strongly disagree with our current government's foreign and military policy, I will defend that as it is what we do in freely elected, democratic countries. I don't need to remind you that the only two major wars in which the US has ever been on the winning side Canada was on the front line for YEARS before the US showed up late to the party.

They are a cartel of contractors with little accountability for performance and no competitive marketplace to control costs. Nothing at all like a business. In fairness to the government: I believe is was PSCs (Personal Service Companies) that was their target, but they instead drew the circle around actual business out of total ignorance.

Nobody in Trump's business status is without conflicts of interest with government. Only way to avoid that would be to limit the Presidency to people who have never accomplished anything significant and signed the FRONT side of a paycheque in their lives - Obama and the Klintons come rapidly to mind. That last flirtation with little conflict of interest cost the American taxpayers more than all of the wars and previous Presidents COMBINED. The Uniparty insiders have used their sphere of influence to turn the taxpayer into a piggybank for their privlieged buddies. They have trampled MANY good businesses and people along the way. I am intimately familiar with one very significant business that Obama swore to correct the wrongs for - and did diddly squat except protect those who cashed in on the screw job. WITHOUT EVEN BEING APPROACHED, Trump's people sought the victims and are trying to fix the damage - and this long after the election was history. (on edit) sorry, forgot to mention: the damage was done under Reagan, and there were a lot of people who should have ended up in jail that instead climbed to the top of political and government entities.

I don't really care much about Trump's conflicts, real or imagined. There are a thousand things that legislators and bureaucrats have set up as cozy deals to skim billions a week from the American taxpayer, and many people and businesses were hurt badly when these arrangements were set up and perpetuated. Those are the lizards I would like to see high and dry. I have direct evidence of Trump's people doing just that for a minority owned business screwed over decades ago by both sides of the Uniparty - to the benefit of the political insiders.

yes (I am posting on the fly while trying to re-arrange 3 projects in 3 different places), I neglected to mention Pakistan - who are behind a LOT more than just the Noko stuff. Not convinced that the IAEA inspections under the current agreement are really seeing the whole picture at all.

The other war is the result of mindless idiots giving Noko communist government billions of dollars and a pair of reactors that were not supposed to be used to create weapons - also probably aided by Iran getting a pass on genuine audit of their nuke programme that I strongly suspect contributed a lot of technical support to Rocket Man.

I can not imagine any reason they WOULD!!! Business people are usually 100% invested in themselves. To hand over their money to some asshole financial institution for a paultry couple percent return - just to avoid some kind of tax - would be suicide and illogical. Also TFSAs are only tax free from the INTEREST earned. RRSP contributions are nothing but tax deferrement, not tax reduction. Income splitting is extremely important to small business as it REDUCES the amount of money earned from their work being given to an unaccountable government to squander away on idiotic things such as immigrtation vote buying. and YES, income splitting from a business earning $100k makes a significant difference in what is in the bank account.

Those who live on salaries paid by someone else and those who have inherited or married enough money not to know what a paycheque is have no idea of the level of risk and work involved in "small" business. That also excludes the MDs who are nothing but contract employees of the state for the most part. A small biz guy is LUCKY to net a hundred Gs after sticking his neck out for years and busting his arse daily. With something like 95% failure rate, it is hardly the free ride that the feds are claiming are taking a ride on the back of taxpayers. Now, GOVERNMENT employees, who have no risk, no function, no contribution but enjoy massive paycheques well up into the quarter million range (yes, MANY management and professional government jobs are right up there) and enjoy benefits the private sector could never afford are clearly NOT in the line of fire for the Libs. Suggesting the highest risk working people in the land - the ones who create most of the wealth - are getting some undue benefit is disgusting in the extreme.