Hal 9000

Well, you clearly believe Juanita Broadrick and the others when they claim that Hillary threatened them - right?

Why is Trump's audio tape so important, yet Hillary's audio tape keeps getting hidden by the media?

Well, now i'm telling you! I don't condone the groping of women. He hasn't even been accused of groping - by anyone. Until that happens, shouldn't people stop setting their hair on fire.

If he groped someone, fair enough, all bets are off. I don't condone that, and please don't imply that I do.

Usually, but not always. Sometimes words are just words - crap being spewed. In this case, it seems to be a "past his prime" playboy spouting nonsense quest and conquer stories to a younger more hip man for laughs. Both acting juvenile for sure, but certainly not predatory or violent - and most likely hyperbolic. If he said it since running for president, I would be bothered - I'll give you that much.

I just can't find the outrage. I can't pull off the Claude Reins "I'm shocked, shocked I tells ya" routine. Yeah, it's bad, its inappropriate, rude, but predatory - c'mon! I've got sisters that I've heard speak worse than that.

I'm simply splitting hairs, no worse that what you people are doing for Hillary's indiscretions. He said "you can do anything, grab them by the pussy" , which is a lot different than "I've grabbed them by...". He's clearly joking, clearly looking for the response from the other guys. Is that OK, no...but it is what it is and really nothing more. Frankly, the embarrassment should be that he stood by the door and tapped the glass expecting someone to open the door for him - that's the part that amused me.

Really, what exactly did he admit? Kissing women?

He hasn't actually done anything (that we know of) though, he has said a bunch of things that amount to inappropriate language or humour - though, and nothing that comes even close to sociopathic. He's egotistical, and obviously shows strong signs of entitlement, but that's about the extent of it. Hillary shows more signs of being sociopathic behaviour than Trump, based on her actions.

No ones done that though. That's simply the deflection that Hillary supporters always throw out. Hillary is only accountable for her own actions, and those actions aren't that her husband was a slime ball or even that she stayed with said slime ball, it's that she not only covered for it at the expense of many women, she also led the charge to slander, accuse and levy (and carry through) threats against those women. Trump has said bad things about women, but Hillary has actually done bad things against women.

I didn't say I condone it, in fact I don't condone jokingly threatening someone's life - as Hillary did. It's inappropriate, but nothing more than bad humour and I give it the same weight as Hillary wanting to drone strike Assange - none. This issue is that we have one person making poor taste jokes toward a man and the other against a woman. The second period starts tonight and Trump is down a couple goals, that's all we're seeing.

First off, anyone who has never witness talk or behaviour like the Trump bus conversation is flat out lying. I've seen it countless times from both sexes - and i've worked in office environments as well as out in the field environments, golf course, locker rooms, bars etc. Now, what we're seeing here is nothing more than than show business - the ugly side perhaps, but show business. People know that there are a couple different routes to fame, publicity and therefore money in show business. In most cases, and in Trumps case, he has to have the media like him to give him good publicity. In some cases, it's a matter of someone reporting untruths. What we saw in the bus was banter between 2 guys, Trump was serving up the rhetoric to a receptive and laughing Billy Bush. Billy Bush seemed to be having fun with Donald, and Trump just kept taking it up a notch. The same with the Howard Stern interviews. The only reason people go on HS is to be and say outrageous things, you can't go on stern and give the same interview as you'd give Charlie Rose - that's just not the forum. If we believed everything I heard a celebrity say on HS, then we'd be looking a really sick world. Ever wonder why Obama goes on "The View" and is gushed over, while McCain shows up and they grill him on foreign policy - it's all about getting the media to like you and give you favourable publicity. Ever wonder why every celebrity seems to get along so well in front of the camera or at social events? Ever wonder how last year so many celebs liked Trump, and now they're calling him out. It's all a show, and 10 years ago, Trump made his brand using a certain persona. Ironically, the media that used to like it back then is using the same persona to crush him now. I can only imagine what what would happen if Louis CK or Russel Peters went into politics

I hope Anderson Cooper does a better job than Holt, there's nothing worse than a moderator turned troll.

I haven't seen any reports from cnn or msnbc about any new emails or wall Street speeches

Are you people fkng kidding! You really need sources or links to know about Hillary's Scandals? Next time we have a rape case, I don't want to hear this "We have to believe the woman" routine, because you people clearly believe all those Clinton women to be liars.

I'm on my phone so I can't link. However, I'm sure we've talked about her treatment of bills women (or victims). In listening to you, it's clear that Hillary has successfully convinced you people that calling Rosie odonnell or some beauty queen (who threatened a judges life) overweight is worse than her misdeeds - which include regime change against her own military advisors, which has left thousands dead or her threats and intimidation of Bills rape victims. Anyway, back to the emails, you do know they're still out there somewhere right? The dens seem to blame the Russians. What kind of leverage do you think that gives Putin?

Try Google. I'd give a link, but you'd clearly argue the validity of source. Anyway, someone who is fighting so hard to believe that there are only 2 Hilary scandals, and not very significant ones at that, has to be in clear denial or just not too bright.

Seriously kimmy, if that's all you know about Hillary, and I honestly believe that to be the case, there's really no point even discussing anything with you. However, if it was just the emails and the Benghazi, and you don't see any significance in why those are extremely important issues, then I'd really question you

Tell me this; who leaked those emails on the DNC?

The media has done a pretty good job on you if those are the only items of baggage you know about Hillary.

Many people do support her simply because she's a woman - not all, but many. You can't tell me that given the same baggage, a man would still be in the running for president of the US. It's completely naive to believe different.

This kind of ignorance is stunning. There is no dirty loopholes, there is nothing illegal or even immoral about what Trump claimed. That is a tax code used by everyone from the hippie coffee shop to Warren buffett. No worse that writing off auto depreciation, your car lease or your cell phone bill. Fair enough to slag a guy for doing something that not everybody does, but to go after him for this is plain stupidity.

Hillary slandered a 12 year old rape victim, she didn't give a sheet about the boko harem girls, she takes money from countries who actually do mistreat women as a state rule, and she has threatened,slandered and intimidated rape and and all sorts of sexual assault and harassment victims of Bill. She did it to protect her political future. Sorry, that's sleaze way above Trump calling out someone's weight or some acted out comments on Howard Stern. No matter how sleazy she is, she at least has a reason - her career. You people support her sleaze for a much shallower reason - to see a woman become president. The "feminists" on this site should be ashamed of themselves.