“Cide” literally means kill and has that meaning in homocide, fratricide, infanticide, you get the idea. Using that word so loosely, a word used to describe the intentional mass murder of races and peoples in the past, such as Jews or Armenians, is irresponsible. The problem with the report of the inquiry is that it takes a very serious socio-economic, racial, gender issue with a very specific history that requires thoughtful attention and uses it as a wedge to make a set of tenuously or totally unrelated measures. What the hell does guaranteed basic income have to do with missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls? It also lays the personal responsibility of the people who actually committed these crimes at the foot of colonialism. What a copout. No government in Canada has ever condoned such crimes, and the people who put together the Indian Act, residential schools, and reserve system are long gone, not that such policies should be held responsible for these murders. They are contributing factors to poverty, cultural marginalization, and social problems that are significant and should be addressed with concrete measures. So what is stopping this from happening? If it’s about policy and reasonable funding it should be fixable.
I think it’s also about other uncomfortable truths that people don’t want to talk about, such as a culture of reliance on outside support. A condition of self governance is a certain amount of self-reliance. If it’s a matter of asking for more money without accountability to the providers of that money, that only reinforces the dependence. Nevertheless, racism is still a problem, conditions on reserves must change, and there must be better protections for these vulnerable women. Some of the inquiry’s recommendations are very sensible and important.
Just don’t turn this into some kind of social safety net omnibus bill that will only be supported by a narrow segment of the left.
Politicizing serious issues and invoking inflammatory language is off putting, yet the focus of the inquiry is an important one. I mention taxation to you because I’ve learned that commitment to causes is more accurately measured by how much people are willing to sacrifice. Yet I also believe that not all solutions involve increased spending. It’s called cutting our cloth to fit and living within our means. Reallocate existing resources with sensible policies. Start there.
I assure you that there are vested interests in maintaining the current dysfunctional system. Interestingly, I don’t think non-Indigenous people are standing in the way, unless the initiatives involve demanding more of their income. Now you’re talking about people’s priorities and money. When I look at the costs in increased taxation of implementing all of these resolutions, I just see the public disengaging. If taxes climbed to such a height to pay for what is essentially unconditional wraparound financial support (for housing, food, transportation infrastructure, community programs, health, and education), I would certainly take advantage of my dual citizenship and leave the country. I’m sure many others would agree. How much buy-in can you expect? It’s hard enough to take care of your own family.