Troop surge is working

[Jerry Galinda]

Guthrie - you are a lier !

“Brazilian, Chilean, Spanish, Polish, Serbian, Turk, Italian ... even French Nazi's –“ – prove your statement – lack of some nationalities.

Especially lack of memberships of this “big” parties.

Btw – don’t forget that muslims support Nazis (e.g. in Egypt)

Bosnians were a member of SS-mountain division "Handschar" ; SS Mountain division "Skenderbeg". Formed in 1944. Made up of Albanians and so on.

[Jerry Galinda]

your next „inteligent” request

“Bulgarian Nazi's” should be looking for – archeologist – because they disappeared without any visible achievements.

maybe you should scrub a little of the whitewash away

...

In early March 1941, Bulgaria joined the Axis alliance and, in April 1941, participated in the German-led attack on Yugoslavia and Greece. In return, Bulgaria received most of Thrace from Greece, and Macedonia as well as parts of eastern Serbia from Yugoslavia. Though Bulgaria participated in the Balkan Campaign, it refused to enter the war against the Soviet Union in June 1941.

PERSECUTION OF JEWS IN BULGARIA

Beginning in July 1940, Bulgaria instituted anti-Jewish legislation. Jews were excluded from public service, discriminated against in their choice of places of residence, and restricted economically. Marriage between Jews and non-Jews was prohibited.

...

Link

[Jerry Galinda]

next "inteligent' request - this facts were not connected with The Bulgarian National Socialist Party.

Lack of knowledge - childish boy.

[Jerry Galinda]

very "inteligent" requet 1

next "inteligent' request - this facts were not connected with The Bulgarian National Socialist Party.

Lack of knowledge - childish boy.

[Catchme]

Back on topic.

The troop surge is not working. At best it has now made an armed stand off possible for awhile.

What Will the Blowback from Iraq Look Like in the Decades to Come?

What will the blowback from Iraq look like in the future? A new report from the Congressional Research Service gives us some idea of the depths of despair that many in Iraq are experiencing.

From Secrecy News, a project of the Federation of American Scientists:

"The humanitarian crisis many feared would take place in March 2003 as a result of the war in Iraq appears to be unfolding," says a new report (pdf) from the Congressional Research Service.

"It is estimated that in total (including those displaced prior to the war) there may be two million Iraqi refugees who have fled to Jordan, Syria, and other neighboring states, and approximately two million Iraqis who have been displaced within Iraq itself." See "Iraqi Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons: A Deepening Humanitarian Crisis?," (pdf) March 23, 2007.

Another Congressional Research Service report provides a detailed examination of the pending defense supplemental appropriations bills, which include congressional direction on redeployment or withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. See "FY2007 Supplemental Appropriations for Defense, Foreign Affairs, and Other Purposes" (pdf), updated March 28, 2007.

We will be paying compounding costs for Iraq a long time.

It's too bad we can't figure out a way to make President Bush and his Rasputinesque Vice President Dick Cheney bear the burden and consequences of this for all time.

The fact is that others will have to clean up this terrible situation, and all of us will pay for it.

Bagdad is not safe enough for John McCain to get away with a market stroll photo op --

The surge only adds a frame to the horrendously ugly picture that is the occupation of Iraq

There was a documentary on Discovery about it this week end, it was bleak, the only thing that is going to happen is the military industrial complex gets even more wealthy off of the tax payers, more Iraqi and Amwerican lives will be lost for nothing, but Oil and the military industrial complex's drive for more wealth and control of the planet.

[Guthrie]

next "inteligent' request - this facts were not connected with The Bulgarian National Socialist Party.

Lack of knowledge - childish boy.

no, why would anyone think The Bulgarian National Socialist Party was in anyway associated with the alliance between Bulgaria and Hitler --- get real

[Jerry Galinda]

no, why would anyone think The Bulgarian National Socialist Party was in anyway associated with the alliance between Bulgaria and Hitler --- get real

Exactly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lack of knowledge - childish boy.

The Bulgarian National Socialist Party was a small group – political folklore.

You should to read something – books – not only wikipedia and internet.

I have about 900 books - but you don't know this language.

[Jerry Galinda]

You should to apologize some of this nationalities (Brazilian, Chilean, Spanish, Polish, Serbian, Turk, Italian) – because even small groups nazist’s didn’t exist in some of this countries or in some cases it was only a political folklore.

[Guthrie]

go peddle it in Bulgaria

[stignasty]

I'm going to give you guys one last chance to learn something. Here it is:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

...

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

[Guthrie]

I'm going to give you guys one last chance to learn something. Here it is:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

...

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

and did you bother reading the other definitions from other reference books?

[BubberMiley]

I guess the definitions in large bold font are the only ones that count.

[M.Dancer]

Nor will you hatefilled racists get any slack from me. Peddle your lies about Muslims elsewhere - they are no better than their counterpart lies about Jews your counterparts peddled in the 30's

Sorry Woody, the only one making you look like a twit is yourself. I would just about wager that everyone here, left right and centre is taking five steps back and away from you because of your pathetic attempts to skate around the fact you type without thinking and lie as a matter of course.

Now come on, you said there were more Canadian and American nazis than German, last chance to save your dignaty in front of all these people whop DO NOT know you like I do, prove it or repudiate it.

OH, btw, didn't you just emote a day or 3 ago that calling people racist was irrelevant because there'sonly one race?

.....poor poor woody........

[M.Dancer]

...

Your flaccid insults aside....You gave a (I can see you wish you hadn't) ridiculous statement. I did half the work. I gave you a NUMBER...In 1933 The NAZIs had over two milion members....know stoip being such am idiotic pussy. Either stand by your whack job assertions and find a number that supports your hyperbolic bullshit or admit that you often speak without thinking.....

You have not a clue what I've said nor have you taken the opportunity to actually learn something --- this, I judge by your little fit here -- YOU not just often but almost exclusively post without thinking. I am sorry of nothing I have posted on this matter as I have posted the truth.

Nor will you hatefilled racists get any slack from me. Peddle your lies about Muslims elsewhere - they are no better than their counterpart lies about Jews your counterparts peddled in the 30's

BTW, this strike out of posts you quote is disrespectful and insulting to the posters. You should consider stopping before Figleaf reports you.

[Guthrie]

...

Your flaccid insults aside....You gave a (I can see you wish you hadn't) ridiculous statement. I did half the work. I gave you a NUMBER...In 1933 The NAZIs had over two milion members....know stoip being such am idiotic pussy. Either stand by your whack job assertions and find a number that supports your hyperbolic bullshit or admit that you often speak without thinking.....

You have not a clue what I've said nor have you taken the opportunity to actually learn something --- this, I judge by your little fit here -- YOU not just often but almost exclusively post without thinking. I am sorry of nothing I have posted on this matter as I have posted the truth.

Nor will you hatefilled racists get any slack from me. Peddle your lies about Muslims elsewhere - they are no better than their counterpart lies about Jews your counterparts peddled in the 30's

BTW, this strike out of posts you quote is disrespectful and insulting to the posters. You should consider stopping before Figleaf reports you.

go ahead and cry your silly little heart out

[M.Dancer]

go ahead and cry your silly little heart out

So sad Woody...at least your are conssistant in your impotant rage.......

[Jerry Galinda]

Shouldn’t he be "punished" for ............. and lying ??

[Guthrie]

Shouldn’t he be "punished" for ............. and lying ??

lying? who was lying? if there is punishment, then you guys can line up and take it or you can weasel around in your pathetic denials

me? I have only told the truth. Sorry, if you guys can't deal with it.

[stignasty]

I'm going to give you guys one last chance to learn something. Here it is:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

...

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

and did you bother reading the other definitions from other reference books?

I found it curious that you would exclude the first definition (you know why it's listed first, right?) but then bold the definition that suited your purpose. Just thought I'd point it out.

[M.Dancer]

lying? who was lying? if there is punishment, then you guys can line up and take it or you can weasel around in your pathetic denials

me? I have only told the truth. Sorry, if you guys can't deal with it.

Poor poor woody.....

[stignasty]

Civilian life in Iraq 'ever-worsening': Red Cross

Last Updated: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 | 11:17 AM ET

CBC News

Iraqi civilians are forced to endure "unbearable and unacceptable" suffering in daily life in an "ever-worsening" humanitarian crisis, a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross said Wednesday.

The ICRC said it released the report because the international community has grown accustomed to hearing about the number of dead in Iraq and is becoming desensitized to the human face of the crisis.

It is difficult to determine the numbers of people killed in shootings, bombings and military operations, but the overall picture of what is happening in the country has been steadily deteriorating, with the ranks of refugees swelling, medical staff fleeing and other problems growing, said the ICRC's director of operations, Pierre Krahenbuhl.

"The suffering that Iraqi men, women and children are enduring today is unbearable and unacceptable. Their lives and dignity are continuously under threat," he said.

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/04/11/r...raq-070411.html

[Guthrie]

I'm going to give you guys one last chance to learn something. Here it is:

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

...

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Nazi

Na·zi (nät'sē, nāt'-) Pronunciation Key

n. pl. Na·zis

1. A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, founded in Germany in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler.

2. often nazi An adherent or advocate of policies characteristic of Nazism; a fascist.

and did you bother reading the other definitions from other reference books?

I found it curious that you would exclude the first definition (you know why it's listed first, right?) but then bold the definition that suited your purpose. Just thought I'd point it out.

I emphasized that definition because it is the one I was using. Is there something wrong with showing a definition that supports my position?

get real

[M.Dancer]

I found it curious that you would exclude the first definition (you know why it's listed first, right?) but then bold the definition that suited your purpose. Just thought I'd point it out.

I emphasized that definition because it is the one I was using. Is there something wrong with showing a definition that supports my position?

get real

Now if you can only find the numbers that support your position you would be in business. So take another bong hit and relax...just find two million north american Nazis.......

[stignasty]

I emphasized that definition because it is the one I was using. Is there something wrong with showing a definition that supports my position?

If you had only emphasized the one you were using, I wouldn't have objected. However, you omitted the one that contradicted you altogether. Selective citing is as dishonest as making up facts.

[Guthrie]

I emphasized that definition because it is the one I was using. Is there something wrong with showing a definition that supports my position?

If you had only emphasized the one you were using, I wouldn't have objected. However, you omitted the one that contradicted you altogether. Selective citing is as dishonest as making up facts.

Bullroar -- that omission meant nothing - I offered the definition I was referring to, so what --- the only question is whether I used a legitimate definition or not --- and my definition is legitimate

you poor whiney bast**ds need to get over yourselves - argue legitimate points or shut up - this kind of semantic drivel is not a discussion