Deluge Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 "Bill would eliminate judicial immunity for federal and state judges whose leniency leads to new violent crimes". I'm OK with it, as long as the penalties are harsh. Looks like it would force judges to follow the law, or not be judges anymore. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/senator-tim-sheehy-soft-crime-judges-need-consequences-jail-act-delivers 1 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 31 minutes ago, Deluge said: "Bill would eliminate judicial immunity for federal and state judges whose leniency leads to new violent crimes". I'm OK with it, as long as the penalties are harsh. Looks like it would force judges to follow the law, or not be judges anymore. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/senator-tim-sheehy-soft-crime-judges-need-consequences-jail-act-delivers I like it. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted June 11 Author Report Posted June 11 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: I like it. I do too, and I wasn't even something I thought about before. Why not slam dunk judges? Most of them deserve it anyways. Quote
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 25 minutes ago, Deluge said: "Bill would eliminate judicial immunity for federal and state judges whose leniency leads to new violent crimes". I'm OK with it, as long as the penalties are harsh. Looks like it would force judges to follow the law, or not be judges anymore. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/senator-tim-sheehy-soft-crime-judges-need-consequences-jail-act-delivers You've been duped by FOS LIES AGAIN. LMAO can state court judges be removed by Federal law? Quote No. State court judges are governed by state constitutions and state laws, meaning the federal government and federal laws lack the authority to remove them from office. [1, 2, 3] The independence of the state judiciary is protected by the concept of federalism. State judges can only be removed, investigated, or disciplined through processes defined by their specific state: [1, 2, 3] State Impeachment: Most state legislatures have the power to impeach and remove judges for misconduct. Judicial Conduct Commissions: Every state has a specific agency or commission—such as the California Commission on Judicial Performance in California—that investigates ethical violations and recommends disciplinary actions or removal to the state's highest court. Elections & Recall: Depending on the state, judges face regular elections and can occasionally be removed by voters via a recall. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Federal law strictly dictates the removal of federal judges (which requires impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives and conviction by the U.S. Senate), but it does not apply to state court judges. Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments Quote Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments. They hold office "during good behaviour," meaning they can keep their positions for the remainder of their lives unless they resign, retire, or are removed through impeachment by Congress. [1] The Basics of Lifetime Tenure Who it applies to: Article III judges, which include U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Court of Appeals judges, and District Court judges. [1] How they are selected: These judges are nominated by the President and must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. [1] How they leave: Judges with life tenure only vacate their seats if they choose to retire, resign, pass away, or are impeached and convicted by Congress. Because of this, judicial appointments are often viewed as a president's most enduring political legacy. [1, 2] LMAO 6 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I like it. You are IGNORANT of the LAW HERE. LMAO Quote
Legato Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: You've been duped by FOS LIES AGAIN. LMAO can state court judges be removed by Federal law? Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments LMAO You are IGNORANT of the LAW HERE. LMAO They hold office "during good behaviour," meaning they can keep their positions for the remainder of their lives unless they resign, retire, or are removed through impeachment by Congress. [1] 1 Quote
Deluge Posted June 11 Author Report Posted June 11 (edited) 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: You've been duped by FOS LIES AGAIN. LMAO can state court judges be removed by Federal law? Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments LMAO You are IGNORANT of the LAW HERE. LMAO I'm sorry, robowoke, but everyone knows states like California are addicted to crime, so it's time for emergency legislation. Thanks to the democrats, lifetime appointments can't work anymore. At least they can't work for you degenerates because you're hardened leftists - no longer compatible with the US. Edited June 11 by Deluge Quote
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, Legato said: They hold office "during good behaviour," meaning they can keep their positions for the remainder of their lives unless they resign, retire, or are removed through impeachment by Congress. [1] Well, DUH. That is case NOW. A Federal Law does NOT change the Constitution. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 (edited) 32 minutes ago, robosmith said: You've been duped by FOS LIES AGAIN. LMAO can state court judges be removed by Federal law? Federal judges appointed under Article III of the U.S. Constitution (including Supreme Court Justices, appellate judges, and district court judges) serve lifetime appointments LMAO You are IGNORANT of the LAW HERE. LMAO My gawd you just gravitate to wrong. Actual bill: Congress It is a bill that removes judicial immunity from litigation. In other words, you can suit their asses. None of that shit you posted is a valid criticism. Edited June 11 by gatomontes99 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Legato Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Well, DUH. That is case NOW. A Federal Law does NOT change the Constitution. LMAO It does not need to be changed Duh and Lol and double Lol. Reply for a triple Lol. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 2 minutes ago, Legato said: It does not need to be changed Duh and Lol and double Lol. Reply for a triple Lol. This thread is about a new law which purports to change judicial tenure, CLOWN. I posted evidence that it CANNOT. Duh You got BUPKIS. Quote
Legato Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 Just now, robosmith said: This thread is about a new law which purports to change judicial tenure, CLOWN. I posted evidence that it CANNOT. Duh You got BUPKIS. Okay triple Lol and..... Quote
Deluge Posted June 11 Author Report Posted June 11 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: Well, DUH. That is case NOW. A Federal Law does NOT change the Constitution. LMAO well, thanks to you perverts, Congress now needs to clarify and adjust. Quote
Deluge Posted June 11 Author Report Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: This thread is about a new law which purports to change judicial tenure, CLOWN. I posted evidence that it CANNOT. Duh You got BUPKIS. According to AI, this is how we make the Jail Act work. To make the JAIL Act functional, Congress must navigate complex constitutional hurdles, specifically judicial immunity and federal-state separation of powers. Congress can make the legislation work by taking the following specific legislative actions: [1, 2, 3, 4] Waiving Immunity for Federal Judges: Congress can legislatively narrow or waive judicial immunity for federal judges in civil actions, stripping this defense so that victims can sue for damages if a habitual violent offender is released and re-offends. [1, 2] Leveraging Federal Funding (Conditional Grants): Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress generally lacks direct police powers over state systems. To influence state and local courts, Congress can attach strict funding conditions to Department of Justice grants (such as the Byrne JAG program), requiring states to waive judicial immunity for pretrial releases or face financial penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Passing the Bill Through Committee: For either the Senate or House versions of the JAIL Act to become law, they must clear the respective Judiciary Committees, overcome potential constitutional challenges regarding separation of powers, and survive a full floor vote to be sent to the President. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] Quote
Deluge Posted June 11 Author Report Posted June 11 We need to extend this to ALL crimes federal judges perpetuate, including illegal immigration. Quote
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 1 hour ago, Legato said: Okay triple Lol and..... ^STUPID meme is the best you got. LMAO AKA NOTHING. 1 hour ago, Deluge said: well, thanks to you perverts, Congress now needs to clarify and adjust. Congress cannot change the Constitution, lDIOT. Quote
robosmith Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 1 hour ago, Deluge said: According to AI, this is how we make the Jail Act work. To make the JAIL Act functional, Congress must navigate complex constitutional hurdles, specifically judicial immunity and federal-state separation of powers. Congress can make the legislation work by taking the following specific legislative actions: [1, 2, 3, 4] Waiving Immunity for Federal Judges: Congress can legislatively narrow or waive judicial immunity for federal judges in civil actions, stripping this defense so that victims can sue for damages if a habitual violent offender is released and re-offends. [1, 2] Leveraging Federal Funding (Conditional Grants): Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress generally lacks direct police powers over state systems. To influence state and local courts, Congress can attach strict funding conditions to Department of Justice grants (such as the Byrne JAG program), requiring states to waive judicial immunity for pretrial releases or face financial penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Passing the Bill Through Committee: For either the Senate or House versions of the JAIL Act to become law, they must clear the respective Judiciary Committees, overcome potential constitutional challenges regarding separation of powers, and survive a full floor vote to be sent to the President. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] IOW it's a Hail Mary WITHOUT a CITE, which will never pass let alone work. LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted June 11 Report Posted June 11 (edited) I think its a grand idea. "You did what?" "I let this poor victim of White Supremacy go back in public." "He stabbed a person a week later. You have grossly abused your responsibilities to the law and public safety." "I let this poor victim of White Supremacy go back in public." Ok...if that's the game you wanna play...here's a nice fat law suit along with the end of your career. Have a warm and fuzzy day." Edited June 11 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Johnston Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 4 hours ago, Deluge said: "Bill would eliminate judicial immunity for federal and state judges whose leniency leads to new violent crimes". I'm OK with it, as long as the penalties are harsh. Looks like it would force judges to follow the law, or not be judges anymore. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/senator-tim-sheehy-soft-crime-judges-need-consequences-jail-act-delivers Perfect. Trump and hid family would be in jail instantly. Nice. 👍😄 Quote
Nationalist Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 14 minutes ago, John Johnston said: Perfect. Trump and hid family would be in jail instantly. Nice. 👍😄 For what? Which of them are judges? 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 (edited) Im going to put this clip here because I think both canastan and the USA...especially the USA...are headed to this. Edited June 12 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted June 12 Author Report Posted June 12 15 hours ago, robosmith said: Congress cannot change the Constitution, lDIOT. Congress can do whatever it takes to keep your activist judges from f*cking up the country, PERVERT. Quote
Deluge Posted June 12 Author Report Posted June 12 (edited) 16 hours ago, robosmith said: IOW it's a Hail Mary WITHOUT a CITE, which will never pass let alone work. LMAO I asked AI to show how Congress can punish your left-wing activist "judges", and it gave me the steps. Now, find a better source that refutes this one or stfu and go wrap yourself in your new pride flag. Edited June 12 by Deluge Quote
Deluge Posted June 12 Author Report Posted June 12 14 hours ago, John Johnston said: Perfect. Trump and hid family would be in jail instantly. Nice. 👍😄 Trump isn't a left-wing activist judge. You perverts had your chances with Trump but you f*cked them up. Quote
Nationalist Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 5 minutes ago, Deluge said: Trump isn't a left-wing activist judge. You perverts had your chances with Trump but you f*cked them up. This is very true. Ya gits wut ya pays fer. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 22 hours ago, Nationalist said: I think its a grand idea. "You did what?" "I let this poor victim of White Supremacy go back in public." "He stabbed a person a week later. You have grossly abused your responsibilities to the law and public safety." "I let this poor victim of White Supremacy go back in public." Ok...if that's the game you wanna play...here's a nice fat law suit along with the end of your career. Have a warm and fuzzy day." Your ^fantasies mean NOTHING HERE, dropout. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.