Disgusting Erica Kirk Attack

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Even me. I pick on Trump about the Iran debacle. 

As for Canastan...Tim Horton's has to do an about face on its hiring policies, because of their former hiring policies...which were opportunistic and racist. 

TIM friggin' HORTON'S!

Well there you go.... If Tim Horton's does a change of face then it totally justifies you being Kid Canastan.

When are you leaving again?  

 

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Well there you go.... If Tim Horton's does a change of face then it totally justifies you being Kid Canastan.

When are you leaving again?  

 

What a goof.

I'm still waiting to hear how Trump is so divisive.

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You didn't threads about them and I noticed you don't even deny it here

 

You are the one that brought up to trump and divisiveness and got all excited about it

I've never said once that I found him or divisiveness cool

Once again you have to manufacture fake arguments because you are so desperate to defend what this guy did. 

Typical liberal

No, I said Trump perpetuates political divisiveness (not debatable) and you minions lose your shît.  Good god man.... that was 2 weeks ago and you still can't let it go 😂

 

[Nationalist]

29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, I said Trump perpetuates political divisiveness (not debatable) and you minions lose your shît.  Good god man.... that was 2 weeks ago and you still can't let it go 😂

 

@CdnFox

He likes to make grandiose declarations, but can't back them up. You would think, for such a divisive president, that he could make a great argument. 

But he can't...

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

What a goof.

I'm still waiting to hear how Trump is so divisive.

You've become so integrated into his schtick that it's over your head now....  How about starting with using the DOJ to attack his long list of political enemies, or sending ICE thugs into democrat lead cities, or ending long time military and government careers because they were 'woke', or rarely answering a question without 'what about Biden doing this, or Obama doing that, or Hilary doing whatever', or only being able to refer to the left as 'the radical left'. 

It's the norm now, but there hasn't been this much political division that I can remember, or maybe better said cared about way back when....?  It's obviously gone beyond the talk of politics and into hatred and violence which also appears to be the norm.  Maybe it's not Trump and he's just a symptom of the larger social pivot that we're going through but he is what he he is, a guy with the worlds biggest microphone that creates division in most his actions.  

I guess we'll never know the answer to my comment/question, so we can move on now....  

 

34 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

@CdnFox

He likes to make grandiose declarations, but can't back them up. You would think, for such a divisive president, that he could make a great argument. 

But he can't...

You have TDS...

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. I'm on the 'side' that wants to see people get along.

2. That unity you say doesn't exist is that ~50% of independents that are tired of your politics.  

3. I don't see BLM and Antifa running around talking it up...are they?

1. No, you're on the side that wants to make Trump disappear. Stop lying. 

2. Which means independents want open borders, pride flags everywhere, and IRS goons climbing up their ass?  

3. Not lately, no. Are you saying BLM and Antifa have put rioting behind them for good? 

[Nationalist]

4 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You've become so integrated into his schtick that it's over your head now....  How about starting with using the DOJ to attack his long list of political enemies, or sending ICE thugs into democrat lead cities, or ending long time military and government careers because they were 'woke', or rarely answering a question without 'what about Biden doing this, or Obama doing that, or Hilary doing whatever', or only being able to refer to the left as 'the radical left'. 

It's the norm now, but there hasn't been this much political division that I can remember, or maybe better said cared about way back when....?  It's obviously gone beyond the talk of politics and into hatred and violence which also appears to be the norm.  Maybe it's not Trump and he's just a symptom of the larger social pivot that we're going through but he is what he he is, a guy with the worlds biggest microphone that creates division in most his actions.  

I guess we'll never know the answer to my comment/question, so we can move on now....  

 

You have TDS...

What's you question?

His schtick. I don't listen to his schtick. In fact, I think I've told you, I can't listen to Trump for more than a few minutes. I find him droll. Tiring to listen to.

You dont like the DOJ going after Libbie darlings? Where was your disgust at that incredibly warped sexual assault case? Or that frivolous fraud case? Or rooting through Melania's underware? What the Hell did you expect?

ICE is doing its job. Stop obstructing justice and they won't hurt you.

I remember when "the far right" was fabled America's most dangerous people. Again...don't start shit if you don't want shit.

Maybe this...maybe that. Your complaints are all reaction to your side starting...shit.

Don't start shit.

[LinkSoul60]

54 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. No, you're on the side that wants to make Trump disappear. Stop lying. 

2. Which means independents want open borders, pride flags everywhere, and IRS goons climbing up their ass?  

3. Not lately, no. Are you saying BLM and Antifa have put rioting behind them for good? 

1. I don't want to do that.  Wouldn't;t be upset if he did though.

2. No, it means independents are probably tired of the hyper-partisanship and idealogical divide between the two parties and voting for issues, not party. 

3. Not that I keep up with either, but haven't heard of either group rioting in the last 5 - 6 years. have they?  

[LinkSoul60]

52 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

What's you question?

His schtick. I don't listen to his schtick. In fact, I think I've told you, I can't listen to Trump for more than a few minutes. I find him droll. Tiring to listen to.

You dont like the DOJ going after Libbie darlings? Where was your disgust at that incredibly warped sexual assault case? Or that frivolous fraud case? Or rooting through Melania's underware? What the Hell did you expect?

ICE is doing its job. Stop obstructing justice and they won't hurt you.

I remember when "the far right" was fabled America's most dangerous people. Again...don't start shit if you don't want shit.

Maybe this...maybe that. Your complaints are all reaction to your side starting...shit.

Don't start shit.

C'mon, that's funny now...  You don't listen to his schtick but then go off and start justifying it with his guilt findings, and Melania's underwear.  Really...  

 

 

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, the facts say that the right-wing is more prone to political violence than the left.  There has been a rise if violence from the left but that could have to do with the political divisiveness being sown in the US by the president, or maybe just a coincidence 🤔

I haven't excused anyones behaviour.  You're just sensitive.... or like listening to yourself talk.

No they don't. In fact I just posted the most recent study which showed that the left wing is by far more prone to violence. And we certainly seen that in the last year or two

Are Democrats growing more accepting of political violence?

liberals are becoming more open to political violence.

In the Marquette poll, taken days after Kirk was killed, 15% of Democrats agreed with the statement that it is "justified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." That was higher than for independents (12%) and Republicans (6%).

The Reuters/Ipsos poll found a similar disparity when asking whether it is acceptable "for someone in my political party to commit violence to achieve a political goal." Among Democrats, 7% said yes, more than twice the rate of Republicans. (A differently phrased question found similar results between the parties.)

Ooopsie doodle.   

In fact three recent polls from credible sources show this same trend

And as noted in the last 2 years most of the violence has been done by those leaning left. Certainly political violence at least.

So that would be a big fat nope

6 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I haven't excused anyones behaviour.

. You have said that this person is not responsible, it's trump's fault

But if that's not what you meant to say you can correct it right now. You can say trump had nothing to do with this this person is entirely responsible for their own actions.

Which would be true. But you won't say it because it doesn't fit your echo chamber narrative

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, I said Trump perpetuates political divisiveness

And it's red that had nothing to do with trump or political divisiveness but did have something to do with the behavior of an individual.

There is no reason to bring it up unless you are point is that trump is responsible for their behavior of the individual. I realize you think you're talking to grade two students because that's your usual audience but unfortunately the people here for the most part are adults  

There's absolutely no reason to bring up trump except to excuse this Behavior. And I notice that you still haven't condemned this Behavior or admitted that it has nothing to do with trump.

Game set and match kiddo

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

C'mon, that's funny now...  You don't listen to his schtick but then go off and start justifying it with his guilt findings, and Melania's underwear.  Really...  

 

 

No really. I am much more concerned with results than schtick.

Actions speak louder than words.

[Deluge]

12 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. I don't want to do that.  Wouldn't;t be upset if he did though.

2. No, it means independents are probably tired of the hyper-partisanship and idealogical divide between the two parties and voting for issues, not party. 

3. Not that I keep up with either, but haven't heard of either group rioting in the last 5 - 6 years. have they?  

1. So now what? What are the next steps? 

2. So what's next for Independents? 

3. That's because you've been busy cultivating your TDS. 

Looks like May 31 was the last event. Here, check out the link below; that'll get ya started.  

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/tag/nationwide-protests