CBC is Toxic Filth, Only Fit For Cultist M0-rons

[WestCanMan]

Jimmy Kimmel did a skit where he pretended to be at the WH Correspondents' Dinner, and made this comment:

• "Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow"

CBC's only comment about Kimmel's atrocious filth was:

• CBC: "Trump has repeatedly urged broadcasters to remove comedy or news programs he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed regulators to take action to revoke the licences of broadcasters he says treat him unfairly."

Firstly, the CBC couldn't find the decency to comment on how distasteful Kimmel's comment was.

Then they glossed over the story about the shooter in the WH with this one simple sentence: "Trump and the first lady were rushed out of the dinner on Saturday after a shooting in the ⁠lobby of the ⁠Washington Hilton where the event was taking place." They made no mention at all of the shooter's hatful ideology, or where it obviously came from. If a shooter went into the WH while Obama was president and then his GOP-playbook manifesto was revealed, the CBC would be talking about it at length for the next 6 months.

Thirdly, Trump wasn't whining for no reason, and he wasn't just talking about himself. His strongest criticism of Kimmel prior to this was back when Jimmy Weasel was making jokes about Charlie Kirk being murdered.

Last, but not least, Trump has successfully network news for blatantly lying. He won approximately $35M from ABC back when they edited out Kamala's botched interview question and swapped in a coherent response from her which was made from a mashup of her other comments during the interview.

 

The CBC absolutely does not have a "news" channel, and it's another stab in the heart of democracy every time they get to call themselves that.  

 

In fairness to CBC, here's what other cult-leaders posted, and what Google Search pulls up in a search for Kimmel's comment:

 

FWIW, here is Melania's eloquent reply:

• "Kimmel’s hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country. His monologue about my family isn’t comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America. People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate."

[WestCanMan]

Word on the street is that Jimmy Kimmel's wife can't have an orgasm without thinking about Jimmy getting shot like Charlie Kirk. 

[herbie]

Speaking of toxic filth look in your mirror.

[Barquentine]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

"Look at Melania, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow"

He's 80. She's a 55 year old trophy wife. That was f*ckin funny!

[John Johnston]

22 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

He's 80. She's a 55 year old trophy wife. That was f*ckin funny!

Priceless.

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, herbie said:

Speaking of toxic filth look in your mirror.

Dude you're just too dumb to be toxic. 

I think you wanna be, you're just not good at anything. 

[LinkSoul60]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Firstly, the CBC couldn't find the decency to comment on how distasteful Kimmel's comment was.

That's not the role of media 'news'.  "News' is reported as it is. 'Comments' on newsworthy items are a persons editorial/opinion pieces.  You can find those on X and Facebook.

Besides the jokes about your favourite couple.... why so upset?  I thought it was funny as hell.   

 

[WestCanMan]

19 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

That's not the role of media 'news'.  "News' is reported as it is.

That's a perfect snapshot of just how much of a dumb f'ing cultist piece of shit you are.

You don't think that CBC passes judgment on a constant basis? 

• Caught on tape making shockingly crude comments about a married woman he tried to seduce, Donald Trump reeled under widespread condemnation on Friday. 

That's the first line from a CBC article about Trump. Take as much time as you want to read that you GD loser, and tell me if you can spot a part that's a bit judgy 😂

30 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Besides the jokes about your favourite couple.... why so upset?  I thought it was funny as hell.   

But if it was a joke about Trudeau or Biden you would have wanted Kimmel fired. There's the rub. 

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's a perfect snapshot of just how much of a dumb f'ing cultist piece of shit you are.

You don't think that CBC passes judgment on a constant basis? 

• Caught on tape making shockingly crude comments about a married woman he tried to seduce, Donald Trump reeled under widespread condemnation on Friday. 

That's the first line from a CBC article about Trump. Take as much time as you want to read that you GD loser, and tell me if you can spot a part that's a bit judgy 😂

But if it was a joke about Trudeau or Biden you would have wanted Kimmel fired. There's the rub. 

But whatabout Biden 😂

Poor little guy is upset that Jimmy was picking on his two of his favourite people....  Get a sense of humour 🤡

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

But whatabout Biden 😂

Poor little guy is upset that Jimmy was picking on his two of his favourite people....  Get a sense of humour 🤡

Did you spot the part about CBC being judgy there, Link?

Ten minutes ago you rushed to CBC's defence, pretending that "they didn't get judgy in that article because they're so objective that they're above that", and then I showed you their own quote from a different article about Trump which was 100% judgment and no news, which showed how much of a Mo-ronic cultist you are. You basically just pointed the thread title at yourself.

Then you dodged that bit of info, which is the main thrust of the thread, and made an awkward attempt at a strawman argument about Biden.

Dummy, your "news" channel is nothing but a propaganda portal that TELLS you how to feel about everything that happens, and you don't even notice. 

Edited April 28 by WestCanMan

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Did you spot the part about CBC being judgy there, Link?

Ten minutes ago you rushed to their defence, pretending that "they didn't get judgy in that article because they're so objective that they're above that", and then I showed you their own quote from a different article about Trump which was 100% judgment and no news, which made you a liar.

Then you dodged that bit of info, which is the main thrust of the thread, and made an awkward attempt at a strawman argument about Biden.

Dummy, your "news" channel is nothing but a propaganda portal that TELLS you how to feel about everything that happens, and you don't even notice. 

You're showing me something from 2016???  LMAO...what a 🤡

 

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You're showing me something from 2016???  LMAO...what a 🤡

OMG you're stupid.

I showed you a perfect example of "CBC being entirely judgmental" after you pretended that they only present objective, pertinent facts. Try as you might, the fact remains that you got hoisted on your own petard.

Now you think that somehow the date matters: "Being objective was invented in 2017, clown!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!! HA HA!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!"

Seek help, cultist dipshit.

Edited April 28 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

I'll grant you this much, @LinkSoul60: If leftists can find humour in being exposed as cultist m0rons, then maybe Kimmel's comments really were funny to you, just like you're "environmentalists and champions of freedom and women's rights" who can make an exception for sinking tankers with 2M barrels of oil if it helps the ayatollah.

You leftists are a strange breed. 

[herbie]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Dude you're just too dumb to be toxic. 

Too civll you mean/ Daddy got medals to shoot fascists, I ain't putting up with them.
Got better things to do then gripe about the CBC. Push the button and change the channel already. Way easier than telling 40 million others what they have to do.

[CDN1]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

Too civll you mean/ Daddy got medals to shoot fascists, I ain't putting up with them.
Got better things to do then gripe about the CBC. Push the button and change the channel already. Way easier than telling 40 million others what they have to do.

I can assure you, his brothers in arms did not sacrifice their lives to see the country handed away to third worlders and Islamists.

You're a treasonous shit who routinely pisses all over their graves.

Edited April 28 by CDN1

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, herbie said:

Daddy got medals to shoot fascists

And oh how you resent him for that. 

Quote

 telling 40 million others what they have to do.

That's literally the CBC you dolt. 

[herbie]

1 hour ago, CDN1 said:

I can assure you, his brothers in arms did not sacrifice their lives to see the country handed away to third worlders and Islamists

Align yourself with the bigots and claim they fought something else. Why not, half you scum rewrote the Bible to further such attitudes.

[CDN1]

15 minutes ago, herbie said:

Align yourself with the bigots and claim they fought something else. Why not, half you scum rewrote the Bible to further such attitudes.

I've never been religious, bud. However, over 95% of those who served in WW2 were White Christians. You can't even hide your contempt for them & their faith, you ancient pos.

 

 

[herbie]

I don't even try to hide my contempt for bigots.
Especially chickenshit ones who hide behind meaningless statistics to claim they aren't.
Wear it on your hat, admit it act like you're proud to be one.

[John Johnston]

32 minutes ago, CDN1 said:

I've never been religious, bud. However, over 95% of those who served in WW2 were White Christians. You can't even hide your contempt for them & their faith, you ancient pos.

 

 

What a dumbass comment. 

[CDN1]

1 hour ago, herbie said:

I don't even try to hide my contempt for bigots.
Especially chickenshit ones who hide behind meaningless statistics to claim they aren't.
Wear it on your hat, admit it act like you're proud to be one.

Yeah, I'm proud not be an anti-White guilted cuck like you who pretends other races are nowhere near as bigoted and falls for their manipulation constantly.

This has been studied. White people have the lowest in-group preference among all races.

I do not discriminate on a micro-interactional level. Outside of playing hockey, the majority of my friends growing up were not White.

This isn't about individuals. Macro group dynamics absolutely f'n matter when it comes to societal stability. There's a reason Singapore's multi-ethnic model works. They strictly manage their demographics and maintain a Chinese ethnic supermajority while managing housing to prevent ethnic enclaves from forming and destroying integration efforts.

Every single Muslim nation on earth discriminates against non-Muslims. We have no obligation to unilaterally disarm.

 

Edited April 28 by CDN1

[Michael Hardner]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

 

• Caught on tape making shockingly crude comments about a married woman he tried to seduce, Donald Trump reeled under widespread condemnation on Friday. 

That's the first line from a CBC article about Trump.  

Ok, how would you have reported that?

 

Was that the "grab them in the p----" line?  Asking honestly.

[herbie]

2 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Yeah, I'm proud not be an anti-White guilted cuck

Course not. Delude yourself that anyone who's not a bigot is anti-white. Lie to yourself if it makes you feel better.You need to.

It's why you hate CBC, they won't give you a sgow to 'balance' normal Canadians with your disgusting opinions

 

[CDN1]

8 minutes ago, herbie said:

Course not. Delude yourself that anyone who's not a bigot is anti-white. Lie to yourself if it makes you feel better.You need to.

It's why you hate CBC, they won't give you a sgow to 'balance' normal Canadians with your disgusting opinions

 

I know you have a thing for strawmanning, maybe that makes your decrepit worldview slightly easier to understand, but dude, you're swinging at air. You're out of touch with current events & living in a state of denial.

I haven't watched CBC since they lost the NHL rights and I can't say I miss it at all. 

 

[WestCanMan]

15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Was that the "grab them in the p----" line?  Asking honestly.

No, it wasn't, and just basic reading comprehension tells you as much. 

The "I just grab 'em..." comment was about "women" in general, plural. The comment that I quoted from CBC referred to "a married woman", singular. 

The comments referenced about the married woman were printed later in the article:

• "Trump is heard saying he "did try and f—k her. She was married." He's referring to an unknown woman. He also used graphic terms to describe the woman's body and said he frequently tried to kiss beautiful women."

Quote

Ok, how would you have reported that?

Well, if I was to report on it with a conservative bias that's similar to CBC's leftist bias I guess I'd start the article by saying:

• U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday that Donald Trump should be immediately removed from the Republican ticket. He joined his wife Michelle in calling out the GOP candidate for a comment that he made to Billy Bush in private a decade ago, which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood.

That would be the opening paragraph, running in perfect parallel to CBC's article about the Kimmel/Trump topic, shown here:

• U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that Jimmy Kimmel should be immediately fired by ABC and its parent company ‌Walt Disney. He joined his wife Melania Trump in calling out the late-night talk show host for a monologue he delivered prior to a shooting that took place over the weekend near a gathering of journalists and politicians.

Do you see how my opening paragraph didn't touch on Trump's comment at all, like the CBC article avoided Kimmel's comment? And how I framed the article to condemn other people's reactions to Trump's comment, while not commenting on Trump's comment? That's how CBC rolls, so I guess that I should do the same thing if I wanted to be "objective", right MH?

 

 

Then I would parallel CBC's article again, with a comment like this:

• Obama has repeatedly urged the GOP to remove candidates that he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed the IRS, FBI and other government agencies to investigate and discriminate against conservatives and conservative-oriented groups.

That's an important addition to the article about Trump's comment, right? Because it mirrors this:

• Trump has repeatedly urged broadcasters to remove comedy or news programs he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed regulators to take action to revoke the licences of broadcasters he says treat him unfairly.

What I said about Obama was true, just like what was said about Trump was technically true. 

Do you see how my comments, which are a direct parallel of the opening paragraph and another one from CBC's article, takes the heat off of Trump's comments, and instead turns the whole article into an attack on Obama? 

 

If you read this "article", would you find it a fair commentary on the Trump comments, from the Access Hollywood tape:

ACCESS HOLLYWOOD COMMENTS CAUGHT ON TAPE

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday that Donald Trump should be immediately removed from the Republican ticket. He joined his wife Michelle in calling out the GOP candidate for a comment that he made to Billy Bush in private a decade ago, which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood.

Ten years ago, in a comment that Trump made in private which was caught on tape by Access Hollywood, Trump was heard saying "I grab 'em by the pu**y", and he wasn't just talking about Justin Trudeau.

Obama has repeatedly urged the GOP to remove candidates that he dislikes or that have been critical of ⁠him, and has pressed the IRS, FBI and other government agencies to investigate and discriminate against conservatives and conservative-oriented groups.

 

If you read that article, would that cover the Access Hollywood comments story adequately and fairly? Is that what you needed to know about it, MH? Did you learn enough about Trump, Obama, and the comment? 

Surely you must think I nailed it, because I echoed CBC's methods perfectly.