ExFlyer Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 On 3/17/2026 at 1:25 PM, WestCanMan said: I don't want to be rude, but everything that you said there displays an acute lack of knowledge of covid and Trudeau. It's at a level that's alarming. VAX MANDATES: Go look at covid death stats by age and you'll see that covid was not dangerous AT ALL for people under 50 who were healthy. Their need was ZERO. Couple that with the fact that, by the time the at-risk populations were finally vaxed, and we could get around to vaxing people that didn't need it, we already knew 100% that the jabs did not prevent transmission, because people were already getting sick enough to die after being jabbed. (People who get sick enough to die are contagious, right?) So, with their own need being zero, and the "prevention of transmission" aspect gone, what reason was there for vaccinating young Canadians? Why give them an experimental vaccine that they didn't need, which provided no known benefit to society? The MAIN benefit of jabbing them was that "their cohort was always going to have outstanding covid stats, regardless of their vax status". If you vaxed 20M healthy young Canadians then you were guaranteed to end up with 20M m-vaxed people who never die of covid, thereby pumping up the stats, bigtime. Conversely, if the 20M aren't vaxed, then their success at surviving covid goes into the unvaxed camp. Right? One side or the other was going to get a cohort of 20M people who were going to have a 100% survival rate. Not only did their arrival in the vaxed camp make that camp look good, big pharma alos got the money for 20M doses X 2. Hijab Hoax: 12-yr-old muslim girl said that a Cinese guy attacked her and cut her hijab with scissors. Media tizzy... Trudeau quickly goes on TV to condem Canadians for being racist, as if anyone is more bigoted than muslims. Couple days later the police reveal that there was never an attack, and that she was just a liar out stirring up religious hatred, so Trudeau went and doubled down on his prior comments, saying that he still felt like Canadians are too racist. That was that. Ultra-pathetic. Vile. Sub-human. But not a big deal to the CBC, because you don't even know about it. Trudeau's Hitler Speech: During the pandemic he went on French TV and made a speech saying that: the unvaxed were anti-science very often racists and misogynists and he said "As leaders, and as Canadians, what we have to ask ourselves is 'should we tolerate these people?'" Note that at the time Trudeau was saying that, he was secretly building "voluntary covid self-isolation camps" in the Yukon. And I say secretly because it was secret. So secret, in fact, that when Ont MPP Randy Hillier first brought attention to the existence of these concentration camps that were built, Trudeau flatly denied the existence of anything being built there, and the media didn't even look into it - they just-mocked Hillier and anti-vaxers like a bunch of middle school bullies. It couldn't stay secret forever though, because people outside of the MSM didn't stp digging, so eventually they had to come up with the "voluntary self-isolation story. But let's be honest, no one was gonna go to the Yukon to fight off the flu, and sick elderly people weren't gonna be flown there... So think about those camps for a sec... Trudeau was freezing bank accounts, taking people's livelihoods away, forcing people to show a gesundheitspass everywhere they went, protesters were being beaten on the street, police were stealing gas from protesters, Trudeau was calling the unvaxed racists and misogynists and asking Canadians if they should even be tolerated, he was building concentration camps, and the MSM was lying to us about who even needed vaccines... Adolf Trudeau's Camps: Now remember, the legend went that there was a rabid death-bug that you could somehow carry asymptomatically, and the only way you'd know you were carrying it was from a nasal swab. So you could feel healthy, but a swab could say different, and then what... You'd be whisked away to a camp where all the CBC cultists expected you to die anyways, because "you had covid"? That's Hitler's wet dream right there: a secret medical test that revealed that you were carrying a deadly pathogen, necessitating your unwilling relocation to a camp where everyone expected you to die, and no one was allowed to viit you (remember we couldn't visit people in care homes - they died alone). Would Hitler have used such a thing? How close did Trudeau come to using it? He had vax-fascists like eyeball and EF riled up enough to cheer for the forced confinement of the unvaxed, for sure. No doubt his hate-laced screed on Quebec TV was just him testing the waters to see if he could get away with such a move. HA HA HA. Triggered again HA HA HA Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 22 minutes ago, Goddess said: Check the conflicts of interest. I have the actual data in the Trickle Thread. I also have a post on there about how to evaluate medical studies. But your ability to quickly google an opposite view without understanding the content is really outstanding! It's been beaten to death (no pun intended) for years now and always with the same conclusion.... vaccines saves lives...period. Next... Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Stop comparing apples to oranges, dummy. I'm comparing Canada before the vax, to Canada after the vax Canada before the vax: 14,500 deaths/yr, on avg. 15k and then 14k. Canada after 86% vaxed: 19k deaths/yr, with the VAST majority being vaxed. Almost 90%. When deaths were up by 31% over the 2-yr average, and nearly 90% of those deaths were among the vaxed, how can you call that a success in this country? Those stats come from our own government. Was the goal of vaxing 86% of our country to make more people die? Was it? Because of it as, then the vax worked. Why don't you just answer the data I provided from your original comments and how that compares to same society US data? Quote
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 40 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: It's been beaten to death (no pun intended) for years now and always with the same conclusion.... vaccines saves lives...period. Next... I tagged you in a post on the thread. I hope I have simplified the information enough for you to understand it. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 On 3/17/2026 at 11:53 AM, LinkSoul60 said: Sorry WesCanCBC, but I have little interest in debating vaccines any longer, except to say they save lives....period., and Canada/Trudeau did a good in mitigating the deadly affects that saved lives...end of story. Oh, my. What happened to "following the science"? You just admitted you're only mildly informed up to a certain date and quite happy to be so. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 minute ago, Goddess said: Oh, my. What happened to "following the science"? You just admitted you're only mildly informed up to a certain date and quite happy to be so. What does my comment have anything to do 'with following science'? It's simple.... this subject has been talked about and dissected ad nauseam for the past 6 years. I got all the facts and info I need to know about... The Federal and Provincial governments did a good job of mitigating covid's impact, and vaccines save lives. Next subject... Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 13 minutes ago, Goddess said: I tagged you in a post on the thread. I hope I have simplified the information enough for you to understand it. Much appreciated. You appear to be very proficient in 'dummying things down'. Quote
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 5 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: What does my comment have anything to do 'with following science'? It was an experimental vaccine. You're not interested in the results? The long-term data and studies? Admittedly, not many people are. I'm one of the few who continued following the science. 3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Much appreciated. You appear to be very proficient in 'dummying things down'. Most complicated subjects can be put in layman's terms. In fact, I believe, if you can't put a concept into layman's terms, you're likely trying to "baffle with bullshit" which will fool laypeople but not experts in the subject. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 minute ago, Goddess said: It was an experimental vaccine. You're not interested in the results? The long-term data and studies? Admittedly, not many people are. I'm one of the few who continued following the science. Not really. I'll defer to what I've said a few times; It's simple.... this subject has been talked about and dissected ad nauseam for the past 6 years. I got all the facts and info I need to know about... The Federal and Provincial governments did a good job of mitigating covid's impact, and vaccines save lives. A lot more important things going on in the world to pay attention to rather than going back 6 years and talking about covid vaccines. WestCanMan will be happy to indulge you in that conversation again, and again, and again though. Quote
Goddess Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said: I got all the facts and info I need to know about... Only up to about early 2021. Lots has happened since then. 2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: A lot more important things going on in the world to pay attention to rather than going back 6 years and talking about covid vaccines. Unless more people are dying and being injured by the jabs than you know. Unless they are going to affect future fertility in upcoming generations (which it looks like they do.) I mean, it's ok that you wish to be uninformed. At least you admit it. But since that is your choice, probably best to keep out of conversations on current findings. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 7 minutes ago, Goddess said: Only up to about early 2021. Lots has happened since then. Unless more people are dying and being injured by the jabs than you know. Unless they are going to affect future fertility in upcoming generations (which it looks like they do.) I mean, it's ok that you wish to be uninformed. At least you admit it. But since that is your choice, probably best to keep out of conversations on current findings. You proved again yesterday that you'll believe anything you see whether it's fact or not if it fits your anti-liberal narrative, yet you say I'm uniformed. If not following or believing what is said on X, Facebook and right-wing sites is being uninformed, then I'll stay that way thanks. I will continue to be better informed and learn more of subjects that interest me, and covid jabs are not one of those subjects. When the next pandemic comes around I'm sure I'll become interested again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.