The Western World is mobilizing

[User]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'm only going back 80 years or so. You've never played the Bible card in these discussions? Good for you. One less thing.

You go back only as far as is convenient for you and gloss over any historical context that is not. 

If they showed us where people were posting from on here, I bet you are from a hole in the ground in Gaza somewhere. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

You might as well be a hoola hoop.

Well that's what you'd expect a bot to say  If it was coded by a 14-year-old using chat GPT

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

And yet it was less than a century ago...within living memory even.

So was the bombing of pearl harbor, but if the US used that as a reason to attack japan today almost everybody in the world would agree that it was unreasonable.

It's stupid to imagine that something that happened almost a century ago has any relevance to anything that's happening today with regards to excusing violence.

And 75 years is barely living memory, means that anyone who is actually participating in it it is dead and only people who were children at the time would still remember that it even occurred, and most of those would probably have been unaware of it at the time.

You see petty dictators and lunatics using this kind of logic. Putin says his war on Ukraine was completely justified based significantly on part due to history that's a hundred years old. 

 

Sorry kid. It is universally accepted that you cannot conduct an attack today and retaliation for something that's nearly a century old

[User]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Sorry kid. It is universally accepted that you cannot conduct an attack today and retaliation for something that's nearly a century old

And the retaliation already took place, immediately following this massacre Arabs engaged in their own massacre killing a bunch of Jews. 

This was part of an ongoing back-and-forth civil war and fighting going on BEFORE Israel even existed as a nation. 

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I'm only going back 80 years or so. You've never played the Bible card in these discussions? Good for you. One less thing.

What do you mean only?

Name one other conflict that is based exclusively on things that happened 80 years ago but the wrld considers completely justified today.

Can we attack Vietnam today because of the conflict that happened in the 70s?

Yemen allowed attacks on American shipping only a couple of years ago, can we start bombing them today For that?

 

It's the kind of excuse that liars use to justify actions they know are terrible.

1 minute ago, User said:

And the retaliation already took place, immediately following this massacre Arabs engaged in their own massacre killing a bunch of Jews. 

This was part of an ongoing back-and-forth civil war and fighting going on BEFORE Israel even existed as a nation. 

 

Of course it was. And I think everyone can agree that it would have been better if that wasn't what was going on and if the two sides had learned to live in peace.

Just like it would have been better if germany and France/ Britain Had learned to live in peace and we hadn't had two world wars over it.

But to bomb germany today using world war II as an excuse would be universally recognized as being insane. Yeah here's this loser trying to suggest that exactly that logic is perfectly acceptable

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, User said:

You go back only as far as is convenient for you and gloss over any historical context that is not

I just go back to when this started - where you people do anything and everything you can to avoid.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

I just go back to when this started -

This started on October 7 2023

When a group of murderous terrorists slaughtered innocent civilians and raped women and burned children. You have categorized this as being their human right to do.

[User]

4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I just go back to when this started - where you people do anything and everything you can to avoid.

This is not where things started. Try to actually respond to what I have said and stop being a sad pathetic liar hiding in whatever terror tunnel they have you operating out of. 

[eyeball]

37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sorry kid. It is universally accepted that you cannot conduct an attack today and retaliation for something that's nearly a century old

Really? You people still routinely say things like Deir Yassin are justified because of the story's people read in the Bible.

You guys hop hither and yon thru history like it was all just yesterday.

[eyeball]

43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's stupid to imagine that something that happened almost a century ago has any relevance to anything that's happening today with regards to excusing violence.

You figure Genesis was last week or something? LMAO!

[eyeball]

18 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

This started on October 7 2023

Some say it started 4000 years ago.

I don't ever recall you correcting that when that's thrown out. How come?

[eyeball]

22 minutes ago, User said:

This is not where things started. Try to actually respond to what I have said and stop being a sad pathetic liar hiding in whatever terror tunnel they have you operating out of. 

It's definitely where things really started going sideways.

Deir Yassin was as shocking and disturbing to Palestinians as Oct 7 was to Israelis. For the very same reasons.

[User]

9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's definitely where things really started going sideways.

Deir Yassin was as shocking and disturbing to Palestinians as Oct 7 was to Israelis. For the very same reasons.

No, it was no where near the start of anything. Once again, you ignore history and context so you can support your terrorist pals killing people today. 

There were massacres going on long before that one and immediately following it. Yet you are ignorantly using it to justify shit today. 

 

[CdnFox]

31 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Really?

Really really  

 

Quote

You people still routinely say things like Deir Yassin are justified because of the story's people read in the Bible.

I have never even talked about that event and it certainly isn't in the bible, nor have i ever suggested it was. 

So once again having been confronted with the truth all you can do is cower and lie like a beaten rat. 

32 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You guys hop hither and yon thru history like it was all just yesterday

????

Drinking a little early?  new years isn't till tomorrow. 

[eyeball]

3 minutes ago, User said:

No, it was no where near the start of anything. Once again, you ignore history and context so you can support your terrorist pals killing people today. 

It was just three weeks before the first Arab-Israeli war and a significant reason why the Arabs attacked Israel in the first place.

[User]

Just now, eyeball said:

It was just three weeks before the first Arab-Israeli war and a significant reason why the Arabs attacked Israel in the first place.

Once again, there had been killings and massacres going on BEFORE this one, where Jews were massacred and killed BEFORE this one. Yet you choose to focus on this as the starting point for your own dishonest story to support your terrorist pals today. 

The single defining factor as to why the Arab states launched a war was because of their opposition to a Jewish state being formed. 

 

[eyeball]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I have never even talked about that event and it certainly isn't in the bible, nor have i ever suggested it was. 

I didn't say you did. And yes I realize you stay as far away from addressing what happened at Deir Yassin.

Thankfully Einstein saw what happened and was able to report and comment on it.

[User]

Just now, eyeball said:

I didn't say you did. And yes I realize you stay as far away from addressing what happened at Deir Yassin.

Thankfully Einstein saw what happened and was able to report and comment on it.

Here you go again, the bot is circling back around to its dishonest talking point. 

[eyeball]

7 minutes ago, User said:

Once again, there had been killings and massacres going on BEFORE this one, where Jews were massacred and killed BEFORE this one

There were tit for tat skirmishes all right. Zionists killed the British and even other Jews who got in their way.

[User]

Just now, eyeball said:

There were tit for tat skirmishes all right. Zionists killed the British and even other Jews who got in their way.

Arabs were also massacring Jews BEFORE as well. 

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, User said:

Arabs were also massacring Jews BEFORE as well. 

Sure, so were Christians. Arabs were being massacred too... everyone's been subject to getting massacred.

 

[User]

Just now, eyeball said:

Sure, so were Christians. Arabs were being massacred too... everyone's been subject to getting massacred.

 

OK great, so why are you stuck on your dishonest version of events where you ignore all this?

[eyeball]

10 minutes ago, User said:

OK great, so why are you stuck on your dishonest version of events where you ignore all this?

Because it followed so closely after the Holocaust.

As I mentioned above Jewish European refugees, of all people in the world, should have known better than anyone to act like Nazis.  It's why I agreed with you that there's no moral equivalency between Irgun, Haganah, Lehi and Hamas.

Jews clearly should have known better than to behave the way they did.

Einstein was certainly shocked enough to speak out against it. You people on the other hand maintain two wrongs make a right.

 

Edited December 30, 2025 by eyeball

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

You figure Genesis was last week or something? LMAO!

Are you drunk or something?  You're never terribly smart but now you're just blathering like a twat.  I'm not even religious. 

Da fuk is wrong with you? You support killing babies and women as a legitimate target in war because 'repressed' and make up absolute nonsense to support it. You'd have to be 10 times smarter than you are just to be considered stupid.  

1 hour ago, User said:

OK great, so why are you stuck on your dishonest version of events where you ignore all this?

Because he's a lying sack of shit it was desperate to defend his hatred of the Jews and support of anyone who would kill all of them.

Do not kid yourself man, if he had a button to make all Jews vanish and all people Like you and me who don't hate them vanish with them he be pressing it like a madman. Christians would be next on his list

[User]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Because it followed so closely after the Holocaust.

This isn't anything more than random words, there is no reasoning here. 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

As I mentioned above Jewish European refugees, of all people in the world, should have known better than anyone to act like Nazis.  It's why I agreed with you that there's no moral equivalency between Irgun, Haganah, Lehi and Hamas.

Who are you talking about specifically? You are generalizing all Jews now. I guess your real anti-semitism is rearing its ugly head now.

 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Jews clearly should have known better than to behave the way they did.

As I alluded to above, you are an anti-semite ignorantly generalizing Jews like this.  

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Einstein was certainly shocked enough to speak out against it. You people on the other hand maintain two wrongs make a right.

You are a dishonest person. You hide like a coward behind these vague generalizations knowing you are full of shit.