Text Book (MAGA) Cult Attachment Behavior Brought to you by Trump

[robosmith]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/730534696747110 Video

[User]

More lazy spam from the spam bot. 

[robosmith]

55 minutes ago, User said:

More lazy spam from the spam bot. 

^More IGNORANCE from LUser. You don't even know Erika Jordan's expert qualifications.

We KNOW you're not in graduate school and never will be.

 

[User]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^More IGNORANCE from LUser. You don't even know Erika Jordan's expert qualifications.

We KNOW you're not in graduate school and never will be.

 

You posted a link to Facebook with no comment. 

This is lazy spam. 

[gatomontes99]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/730534696747110 Video

If you are going tonpost a link, comment on it.

[Legato]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

^More IGNORANCE from LUser. You don't even know Erika Jordan's expert qualifications.

We KNOW you're not in graduate school and never will be.

 

Erika Jordan (Sexologist): Erika Jordan is identified as a sexologist, NLP practitioner, and love coach with experience in social media management and content creation. Her work is centered on providing dating and sex advice.

You lonely robo?

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Erika Jordan (Sexologist): Erika Jordan is identified as a sexologist, NLP practitioner, and love coach with experience in social media management and content creation. Her work is centered on providing dating and sex advice.

You lonely robo?

IF you see "sex advice" in the video I posted, then it seems you are the lonely one here.

But being a TROLL, you probably didn't examine the evidence before posting. LMAO

[User]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IF you see "sex advice" in the video I posted, then it seems you are the lonely one here.

But being a TROLL, you probably didn't examine the evidence before posting. LMAO

You are spamming the forum with links to videos and no comment... then all of those threads turn into crap, just as you wish, because that is all you offer, is crap. 

You are the most worthless poster on this forum right now with how you spam and troll. 

Edited November 28, 2025 by User

[Legato]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF you see "sex advice" in the video I posted, then it seems you are the lonely one here.

But being a TROLL, you probably didn't examine the evidence before posting. LMAO

Didn't you see any, the whole montage was sexy as hell.

Is the TDS blocking production of testosterone?

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Didn't you see any, the whole montage was sexy as hell.

So you did see "sex advice" and ARE the lonely one here. LMAO

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Is the TDS blocking production of testosterone?

Seems you Trump Deification Syndrome is triggering yours.

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you did see "sex advice" and ARE the lonely one here. LMAO

Seems you Trump Deification Syndrome is triggering yours.

Ok, because he said something, I watched it. It was hilarious. Like, how do you not see that that was a skit?

She hyper sexualized that whole thing. There was no substance there. Did you actually think there was substance? Did you even losten to the words? It was completely nonsensical. That skit, was just her saying big words in a sexy voice with whore like makeup. It was probably supposed to be some sort of commentary on sexism. But it is just to funny to be anything other than satire. 

[Nationalist]

On 11/27/2025 at 3:48 PM, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/730534696747110 Video

Is this your idea of hard hitting reporting? This broad is nothing but a cum dumpster. A slut.

Robo...if this is what you think is anything but fluff, you need your head examined. 

[gatomontes99]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/827839683243156/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v video lmao

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Is this your idea of hard hitting reporting? This broad is nothing but a cum dumpster. A slut.

Robo...if this is what you think is anything but fluff, you need your head examined. 

Just because you can't understand the big words she uses ONLY tells you, you should have finished college, dropout.

[Nationalist]

34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Just because you can't understand the big words she uses ONLY tells you, you should have finished college, dropout.

She's a tramp. Right up your alley. 

[robosmith]

39 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

She's a tramp. Right up your alley. 

Your ^gratuitous IGNORANT ad hominems mean NOTHING except that you're an lDIOT.

[gatomontes99]

Just because I am bored in a hotel room, let's debunk what is obviously not a serious video. 

The crux of her "argument" is that Trump is creating "Cult attachment behavior". The problem with her argument is that she misuses the phrase/concept. Cult attachment theory relies on the subjects needing a sense of belonging in a world that rejects them. They cling to a cult because the cult accepts them as part of their society. 

What does that sound like?

The typical conservative that is heterosexual, part of a nuclear family, attends church and has a job

Or 

Someone that feels isolated because they are part of a social group that claims to be marginalized (lgtbqia+bipoc as an example).

And this is why I say the video has to be a skit. She blatantly misuses the concept to say Trump floats concepts and then harps on the ones we like and pulls back on the ones we don't. That is how he creates chaos and then makes chaos feel normal so we all somehow become mind numb slaves or some b.s. 

The reality is, we all are more open about what others accept (vis a vis our opinions) and more reserved about what others don't accept. That is not cult behavior, that is human behavior. Cults don't create chaos. Chaos would push away those seeking belonging. 

What she is doing is planting terms the viewer does not understand in a story the viewer wants to believe. In so doing, she elevates her opinions to facts in the minds of the viewers. In reality, she said nothing. When you applybthe actual concepts of the phrases she uses to the examples she gives, the entire argument becomes nonsensical. 

Like this:

 

 

[Venandi]

On 11/27/2025 at 4:48 PM, robosmith said:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/730534696747110 Video

Once muted and expanded to full screen, she may be your best forum contribution to date.

 

On 11/27/2025 at 8:18 PM, robosmith said:

You don't even know Erika Jordan's expert qualifications.

You left out her efforts on behalf of "The Mighty Orb"

Let me get that for ya:

 

Edited November 29, 2025 by Venandi

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Venandi said:

Once muted and expanded to full screen, she may be your best forum contribution to date.

And this you've surpassed all previous posts with *this VACUOUS TROLLING. LMAO

2 hours ago, Venandi said:

 

You left out her efforts on behalf of "The Mighty Orb"

Let me get that for ya:

 

Only an lDIOT believes ^this has anything to do with what I posted.

[Venandi]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Only an lDIOT believes ^this has anything to do with what I posted.

I don't usually bother looking at sources and evaluating their credibility, in her case though the looking part was less tedious than your usual fare. 

Being as I would asses her credibility as poor, I think you should continue offering her commentary as it tends to elevate your own to a similar level. 

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, Venandi said:

Once muted and expanded to full screen, she may be your best forum contribution to date.

 

You left out her efforts on behalf of "The Mighty Orb"

Let me get that for ya:

 

OMG!

A slutty little daliance and an embarrassingly bad actress?

That cuts it.

We're a cult...

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Venandi said:

I don't usually bother looking at sources and evaluating their credibility, in her case though the looking part was less tedious than your usual fare. 

Being as I would asses her credibility as poor, I think you should continue offering her commentary as it tends to elevate your own to a similar level. 

If you understand the LOGIC, the credibility does not depend on ANY FACTS.

Unfortunately that distinction is beyond your understanding.

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

OMG!

A slutty little daliance and an embarrassingly bad actress?

That cuts it.

We're a cult...

And you fail to understand the LOGIC, too, AS USUAL.

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

If you understand the LOGIC, the credibility does not depend on ANY FACTS.

Unfortunately that distinction is beyond your understanding.

And you fail to understand the LOGIC, too, AS USUAL.

There is no logic. There is a mish-mash of terms that are used improperly to bolster her opinion. 

 

Edited November 29, 2025 by gatomontes99

[gatomontes99]

On 11/28/2025 at 5:16 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Ok, because he said something, I watched it. It was hilarious. Like, how do you not see that that was a skit?

She hyper sexualized that whole thing. There was no substance there. Did you actually think there was substance? Did you even losten to the words? It was completely nonsensical. That skit, was just her saying big words in a sexy voice with whore like makeup. It was probably supposed to be some sort of commentary on sexism. But it is just to funny to be anything other than satire. 

 

21 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just because I am bored in a hotel room, let's debunk what is obviously not a serious video. 

The crux of her "argument" is that Trump is creating "Cult attachment behavior". The problem with her argument is that she misuses the phrase/concept. Cult attachment theory relies on the subjects needing a sense of belonging in a world that rejects them. They cling to a cult because the cult accepts them as part of their society. 

What does that sound like?

The typical conservative that is heterosexual, part of a nuclear family, attends church and has a job

Or 

Someone that feels isolated because they are part of a social group that claims to be marginalized (lgtbqia+bipoc as an example).

And this is why I say the video has to be a skit. She blatantly misuses the concept to say Trump floats concepts and then harps on the ones we like and pulls back on the ones we don't. That is how he creates chaos and then makes chaos feel normal so we all somehow become mind numb slaves or some b.s. 

The reality is, we all are more open about what others accept (vis a vis our opinions) and more reserved about what others don't accept. That is not cult behavior, that is human behavior. Cults don't create chaos. Chaos would push away those seeking belonging. 

What she is doing is planting terms the viewer does not understand in a story the viewer wants to believe. In so doing, she elevates her opinions to facts in the minds of the viewers. In reality, she said nothing. When you applybthe actual concepts of the phrases she uses to the examples she gives, the entire argument becomes nonsensical. 

Like this:

 

 

[Venandi]

On 11/29/2025 at 12:58 PM, robosmith said:

If you understand the LOGIC, the credibility does not depend on ANY FACTS.

Capitalizing the word "logic" isn't enough to convey ownership of it and asserting that credibility can thrive in the absence of "any facts" won't hasten its possession. 

 

Edited December 1, 2025 by Venandi