Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, robosmith said:

FASCISM is what Trump IS DOING when he DEMANDS the DoJ prosecute his POLITICAL OPPOSITION.

Of course BIGGER FASCISTS like Putin just kill the political opposition and reporters.

Do you understand now, PRO FASCIST?

No. What i understand is that you Tweenkies are getting a taste of your own chickenshit and now...miraculously...it's not fun anymore.

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you have no idea what EMTALA means. Didn't even bother to google it. LMAO

Here a clue for YOU: US citizens benefit greatly when ANYONE HERE gets treatment for communicate deadly diseases.

But that's NOT what EMTALA mandates.

Ur a goof.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
20 hours ago, robosmith said:

Challenging despicable piece of shit Trump does not make anyone a "despicable piece of shit".

Of course YOU MAGA CULT are blind to the FACT that Trump is a "despicable piece of shit" who violates agreements he makes at the drop of a hat. 🤮

That's why Dems don't trust him enough to vote to open the government. Trump and Johnson are LYING ALL THE TIME about what Democrats are demanding.

Democrats want open borders and pronoun sluts indoctrinating our kids.

No room for dishonesty there, fascist - it's pretty straightforward. ;) 

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No. What i understand is that you Tweenkies are getting a taste of your own chickenshit and now...miraculously...it's not fun anymore.

YOU have NO EVIDENCE that Biden EVER demanded his DoJ to prosecute ANYONE. 

You're getting so desperate you have to LIE ALL THE TIME.

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ur a goof.

^LIAR AGAIN. LMAO

Posted
57 minutes ago, robosmith said:

YOU have NO EVIDENCE that Biden EVER demanded his DoJ to prosecute ANYONE. 

You're getting so desperate you have to LIE ALL THE TIME.

^LIAR AGAIN. LMAO

There is plenty of evidence. You've been shown the evidence. But the evidence aligns with reality rather than your fantasy. So you refuse to acknowledge it. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Your naked link proves NOTHING. Quote the part which proves your point lazy ass. Duh

Cite an OBJECTIVE SOURCE which JLF is NOT. LMAO

Quote
The John Locke Foundation (JLF) is a conservative, right-leaning think tank, a stance confirmed by its own self-description and assessments from independent monitoring groups. The organization's bias is evident in its advocacy for policies and its funding sources. 
 
Political ideology
  • Self-described conservatism: While the JLF does not identify as a Republican group, it acknowledges that its core principles—free markets, limited constitutional government, and personal responsibility—are labeled conservative in the current American political context.
  • InfluenceWatch classification: The independent watchdog group InfluenceWatch classifies the JLF as a "right-of-center think tank".
  • Policy advocacy: The JLF promotes a conservative agenda, including lower taxes, school choice, and less government regulation. It has often advocated for and influenced policies enacted by Republican majorities in the North Carolina legislature. 
 
Funding and affiliations
  • Key funding sources: Much of the JLF's funding comes from conservative and free-market sources. It has received significant support from the family foundation of Art Pope, a wealthy North Carolina businessman and prominent Republican donor who co-founded the organization.
  • DonorsTrust: SourceWatch has noted that some of the JLF's funding comes through DonorsTrust, a group that allows wealthy individuals and corporations to make anonymous contributions to conservative and libertarian causes.
  • State Policy Network (SPN): The JLF is an affiliate of the State Policy Network, a national group of conservative and libertarian think tanks. SPN has been criticized for promoting policies that block renewable energy, which aligns with JLF's past climate change skepticism. 
 
Specific controversies and criticism
  • Climate change denial: The JLF has a long history of questioning mainstream climate science. In 2007, it released a report promoting climate change skepticism and has distributed misleading information to lawmakers and the public, according to reporting from Facing South and SourceWatch. The Energy and Policy Institute has also highlighted JLF's role in advancing climate denial and receiving funding from sources like Duke Energy.
  • Conservative media arm: The foundation publishes the Carolina Journal, a news outlet that critics argue has a clear conservative bias despite claims of non-partisanship. SourceWatch notes its connection to the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, which funds state-level reporting with a conservative slant.
  • Methodological criticism: Critics have accused the JLF and similar think tanks of producing reports that serve an ideological agenda rather than rigorous, evidence-based social science. They argue that these "studies" lack the systematic, peer-reviewed methodology of real research and are designed to shift public opinion to the right.

 

Edited by robosmith
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your naked link proves NOTHING. Quote the part which proves your point lazy ass. Duh

Can't read?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
12 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...oh how naive you are. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60669763

 

Ho. Ly. Crap. 

Did you not read that naked link you posted? Or do you actually think that private citizens operating as paid mercenaries in foreign conflicts means that "we" the United States, are "in" wars?

Seems preposterous that a person would think that. The generous interpretation is that you didn't read it. The more likely explanation is that you didn't care that it was a lie. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Ho. Ly. Crap. 

Did you not read that naked link you posted? Or do you actually think that private citizens operating as paid mercenaries in foreign conflicts means that "we" the United States, are "in" wars?

Seems preposterous that a person would think that. The generous interpretation is that you didn't read it. The more likely explanation is that you didn't care that it was a lie. 

Naive.

Do you actually think these mercenaries wouldn't be in Ukraine without US funding? Talk to any American serviceman and they will tell you that the State Department is funding the American mercenaries in Ukraine. They just don't do it directly. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Naive.

Do you actually think these mercenaries wouldn't be in Ukraine without US funding? Talk to any American serviceman and they will tell you that the State Department is funding the American mercenaries in Ukraine. They just don't do it directly. 

US money is in Ukraine. The US is not in a war in Ukraine. 

US money is in Gaza. The US is not in a war in Gaza. 

That's an asinine assertion. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

US money is in Ukraine. The US is not in a war in Ukraine. 

US money is in Gaza. The US is not in a war in Gaza. 

That's an asinine assertion. 

These Americans died fighting in Ukraine, now their parents have a message for President Trump: ‘Freedom isn’t just for America’

We have war fighters there and we are paying them for Ukraine. Sure, the money isnt direct, so we deny everything. But talk to any serviceman and they will tell you exactly how it works. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

These Americans died fighting in Ukraine, now their parents have a message for President Trump: ‘Freedom isn’t just for America’

We have war fighters there and we are paying them for Ukraine. Sure, the money isnt direct, so we deny everything. But talk to any serviceman and they will tell you exactly how it works. 

Lol. No, "we" do not have "warfighters" there. Again, random people working for companies abroad does not mean the United States is working for those companies. They aren't there on behalf of the US government. 

Again, completely asinine. 

US dollars fund humanitarian aid in Gaza. Does that mean we're in a war against Israel? US dollars fund military aid in Israel. Are we in a war against the Palestinians? Wait...  Are we in a war with ourselves? Has the civil war begun?

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...