Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Legato said:

There is no alternate universe where the damp cortex exhibits a modicum of eloquence.

Give me three letters that eloquently describe dumb..........

Well, she got elected to Congress. WTH do YOU do besides TROLLING on the interwebz?

Posted
47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Well, she got elected to Congress. WTH do YOU do besides TROLLING on the interwebz?

I didn't run.

But I once did stay at the Holiday Inn.

Now, where are the three letters?

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you can't back up your claims about Kirk backing up his "statistics and logic." Not surprised. LMAO

Just look at the rates of Black children growing up in single parent homes pre & post civil rights. Programs incentivized single mother homes as being eligible for more government money. Liberals don't seem to have any concern over downstream effects of their policies.

These statistics are well known. Children, especially boys raised in homes without fathers are significantly more likely to drop out of school and end up in prison. It's next to impossible for most families to build any real wealth without dual incomes today.

Democrats continue to enable and prescribe learned helplessness.

Edited by CDN1
Posted
4 hours ago, CDN1 said:

Just look at the rates of Black children growing up in single parent homes pre & post civil rights. Programs incentivized single mother homes as being eligible for more government money. Liberals don't seem to have any concern over downstream effects of their policies.

These statistics are well known. Children, especially boys raised in homes without fathers are significantly more likely to drop out of school and end up in prison. It's next to impossible for most families to build any real wealth without dual incomes today.

Democrats continue to enable and prescribe learned helplessness.

Democrats continue to enable survival and prescribe food and shelter.

You favor death for those down on their luck like Kilmeade on FOS LIES who prescribed lethal injection for mentally ill  homeless.

4 days ago — Last week, while discussing an August incident in which an unhoused and mentally ill man stabbed and killed a Ukrainian refugee on a train ...
Posted
On 9/19/2025 at 12:35 PM, West said:

Her real issue with Kirk is that she's a raging sexist and racist. Kirk was a white male. She has harbored so much hatred toward white people and been radicalized by the women and gender studies professors that she's okay that he was assassinated. 

Very sick person 

At least she's not shamelessly exploiting Kirk's death to get rid of free speech, which Kirk was a strong advocate for. You guys have contempt for Kirk but hide it with your crocodile tears.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

At least she's not shamelessly exploiting Kirk's death to get rid of free speech, which Kirk was a strong advocate for. You guys have contempt for Kirk but hide it with your crocodile tears.

Nobody is getting rid of free speech. Lil Jimmy can be ignorant in private just not on public airwaves 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Weird then that you guys got so upset when they told you Biden was doing it.

It's weird that you're covering for him and his administration's actions while pretending to be a staunch advocate yourself. 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, User said:

It's weird that you're covering for him and his administration's actions while pretending to be a staunch advocate yourself. 

Are you referring to twitter’s actions when Trump was still president?

Posted
1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Are you referring to twitter’s actions when Trump was still president?

I already addressed this before and you are proving my point again. I am referring to all major social media's actions when Biden was President. 

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, User said:

I already addressed this before and you are proving my point again. I am referring to all major social media's actions when Biden was President. 

Can you point out where you addressed it before so I can know what you’re talking about?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Can you point out where you addressed it before so I can know what you’re talking about?

Are you for real? You already responded to this point earlier and you are still here pretending you don't know any better. Does your dishonesty ever stop?

 

 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

Are you for real? You already responded to this point earlier and you are still here pretending you don't know any better. Does your dishonesty ever stop?

 

 

You can’t provide more details? Maybe an article…or a meme?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You can’t provide more details? Maybe an article…or a meme?

Back to the point:

It's weird that you're covering for him and his administration's actions while pretending to be a staunch advocate yourself. 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, User said:

Back to the point:

It's weird that you're covering for him and his administration's actions while pretending to be a staunch advocate yourself. 

If you can’t tell me the specifics, can you at least tell me how the Supreme Court ruled on it? I can’t cover for something I know nothing about and your link didn’t give me any more details.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If you can’t tell me the specifics, can you at least tell me how the Supreme Court ruled on it? I can’t cover for something I know nothing about and your link didn’t give me any more details.

The fact that you pretend to not know while repeatedly blaming Trump and/or are too lazy to just google it is enough to prove my point. 

Nevermind I already pointed this out to you earlier and you are STILL here pretending to not know. 

You are a lousy, pathetic liar. 

 

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, User said:

The fact that you pretend to not know while repeatedly blaming Trump and/or are too lazy to just google it is enough to prove my point. 

Nevermind I already pointed this out to you earlier and you are STILL here pretending to not know. 

You are a lousy, pathetic liar. 

 

I’m not pretending anything. I have absolutely no idea what you are specifically talking about. I’m getting the feeling you don’t want to say because you’re scared you would be exposed (again) as a liar.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I’m not pretending anything. I have absolutely no idea what you are specifically talking about. I’m getting the feeling you don’t want to say because you’re scared you would be exposed (again) as a liar.

You never exposed me a first time. You on the other hand... 

 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Why are you scared to say what you’re talking about?

I already did. 

Hell, I gave you just as much as that accuser of Trump gave and you are on here worshipping her assertions from 10 years ago as if they were Gospel. 

The difference is that my assertion is easily proven. 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, User said:

I already did. 

Hell, I gave you just as much as that accuser of Trump gave and you are on here worshipping her assertions from 10 years ago as if they were Gospel. 

The difference is that my assertion is easily proven. 

No, you didn’t. You just linked to your initial post, which gave no details.

i think you’re lying and you know it and that’s why you don’t want to say anything further.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

No, you didn’t. You just linked to your initial post, which gave no details.

i think you’re lying and you know it and that’s why you don’t want to say anything further.

It gave more details than you can provide on the Trump accuser you praise. 

The fact that you would just as soon call me a liar on this only proves how pathetic you are. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

It gave more details than you can provide on the Trump accuser you praise. 

The fact that you would just as soon call me a liar on this only proves how pathetic you are. 

I didn’t call you a liar. I said I think you’re one. You could still redeem yourself by saying what you’re talking about specifically, as I did when I gave you the name of Trump’s accuser.

Posted
Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

I didn’t call you a liar. I said I think you’re one. You could still redeem yourself by saying what you’re talking about specifically, as I did when I gave you the name of Trump’s accuser.

I did not say you did call me a liar. I said you would just as soon call me a liar.... 

Which proves how pathetic you are. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...