Carney appoints liberal friendly "interim budget officer" for 6 months to cover his next two budgets, refuses to appoint a permanent officer.

[CdnFox]

Carney appoints interim budget watchdog as current officer's term ends | CBC News

So the outgoing budget officer has been complaining and publicly: Out the fact that despite his term coming to an end the liberals have done nothing to arrange a replacement as they are supposed to. He's been saying this for almost a year, becoming more and more urgent about it over time.

The libs have refused to consider anyone, and will now be appointing Jason Jacques as 'interim' watchdog.  He's known to have liberal political leanings 

And he'll be nicely disposable, once the two unpopular budgets are gone and he's done his job he can go  back to his current job with a nice bonus. And the liberals can appoint someone who is more in line with their thinking longer term. 

If the guy was good for the job they'd just appoint him permanently but they'll be looking for someone even more partisan to put in his place. 

This guy will keep his head down and not blow the whistle on the libs when he should, he'll be focused on going along to get along. Is it

There is no reason in the universe not to have a full time replacement now, they've known about it for ages, other than they want to stack the office with someone 'loyal'. 

[eyeball]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

This guy will keep his head down and not blow the whistle on the libs when he should, he'll be focused on going along to get along.

I could have sworn you said Harper fixed all this nonsense years ago.

[Legato]

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I could have sworn you said Harper fixed all this nonsense years ago.

Alternate universe again.

[eyeball]

12 minutes ago, Legato said:

Alternate universe again.

You've never heard about all the things Harper did to make our governance Transparent and Accountable?

Where have you been?

[CdnFox]

27 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I could have sworn you said Harper fixed all this nonsense years ago.

He did. The libs fixed it back the way they like it 

That's what libs do   Conservatives make things more accountable, the libs make it possible to cook the books  

And once again you're trying to sell the idea that the liberals corruption is harper's fault 😆😆😆

[Shady]

42 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I could have sworn you said Harper fixed all this nonsense years ago.

You always like to deflect from the actual issue.

17 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You've never heard about all the things Harper did to make our governance Transparent and Accountable?

Where have you been?

More whataboutism.  FYI, Harper was PM 11 years ago.  

[Legato]

22 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You've never heard about all the things Harper did to make our governance Transparent and Accountable?

Where have you been?

In the real universe

 

[eyeball]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

He did. The libs fixed it back the way they like it 

Which always comes back to the point that Conservatives are as useless at legislating Transparency and Accountability as Liberals. They're the Tweedle brothers.

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's what libs do   Conservatives make things more accountable, the libs make it possible to cook the books

Conservatives have to make things that can't be cooked.

$10 says every other party would back them if they did 

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And once again you're trying to sell the idea that the liberals corruption is harper's fault

No, I'm just mocking your typically superficial angst over accountability especially when you say...and I paraphrase...There is no reason in the universe not to have a Liberal proof Transparency and Accountability Act now, we've known about it for ages, they always stack the office with someone 'loyal'. 

Yeah I just made that up to argue against. Deal with it.

[eyeball]

9 minutes ago, Shady said:

You always like to deflect from the actual issue.

No, CdnFix clearly made whistle blowing, especially the lack thereof, the issue.

[eyeball]

17 minutes ago, Shady said:

More whataboutism.  FYI, Harper was PM 11 years ago.  

PP was there, he knows, or should by now know what the issue is here.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Which always comes back to the point that Conservatives are as useless at legislating Transparency and Accountability as Liberals. 

No, they're great at it. The liberals are equally great at undoing the law. 

Do you need me to explain again that it is not possible to pass a law that a future gov't can't undo? 

Once again you blame the CPC for the liberal's corruption. "It's not the liberals fault for changing the law back it's that the conservatives can't magically pass a law the liberals can't change "

I know. Justin was your hero and you don't want to hear anything against him. BUt the liberal's crimes are theirs not the cpc's. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Conservatives have to make things that can't be cooked.

$10 says every other party would back them if they did 

Not possible.  And you know that 

Tell me how they would do that. 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No, I'm just mocking your typically superficial angst over accountability especially when you say...and I paraphrase...There is no reason in the universe not to have a Liberal proof Transparency and Accountability Act

I've never said anything remotely like that. I've been clear that there's no act the libs can't undo 

You've painted yourself in a corner again and want to blame the CPC for the liberals corruption,  But it just doesn't work like that 

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No, CdnFix clearly made whistle blowing, especially the lack thereof, the issue.

No, the kid is right. You know you're wrong, you've been caught lying yet again and you're deflecting 

It's all the left has.  

No wonder you support the terrorists, being accountable for your own actions is like poison to you. 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, they're great at it. The liberals are equally great at undoing the law.

Then make Transparency and Accountability a constitutional issue. You said it, there's no excuse.

 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Not possible.  And you know that

Well, maybe you should let it go and stop losing sleep over something that's impossible to change.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I've never said anything remotely like that.

I know doofus, I said it.

 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Well, maybe you should let it go and stop losing sleep over something that's impossible to change.

 

 

You're the one who brought it up and keeps freaking out about it   LOLOL!!!!

Quote

I know doofus, I said it.

I know you said it. The problem is you said I said it.    Which was a lie.  Shocking, i know. 

[eyeball]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

know you said it. The problem is you said I said it.   

Its not lying, especially when you make it clear you're paraphrasing.

You should try it sometime.

 

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

Its not lying, especially when you make it clear you're paraphrasing.

Of course it's a lie. And saying your paraphrasing changes nothing.  Let me paraphrase, you said "i admit i like the idea of having sex with small children and i make my living by stealing my aged grandma's social security cheque while leaving her starving".   

Now, i was just paraphrasing so it must be true right?     must be true because i paraphrased  

So how long have you been into small children?