The invasion of Venezuela?

[paxamericana]

US Military build up off the coast of Venezuela. Theoretically, we can topple the regime in a week. But would require an Iraq style peace keeping mission to liberate their oil. 
 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/china-condemns-us-military-buildup-venezuela-coast-foreign-interference-regional-affairs

[Chrissy1979]

Fascists don't liberate. They just invade.

[paxamericana]

2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Fascists don't liberate. They just invade.

Maduro predecessor Hugo Chavez gave their population guns just so it would complicate US/European invasion . Remember, with the Russian and Iranian going offline, we need as much oil production as possible. So don’t think the European will have their hands clean if we do decide to invade. The Chinese couldn’t care less as long as they can buy the oil.

[Chrissy1979]

The U.S. is over. Sad to see a once great nation fall.

[User]

20 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The U.S. is over. Sad to see a once great nation fall.

Check your glasses. 

[herbie]

Oh let them invade FFS maybe they can thump their chests, tongue bather the flag and leave us the hell alone.
We can watch the movie and laugh at it when it comes out.

[User]

40 minutes ago, herbie said:

Oh let them invade FFS maybe they can thump their chests, tongue bather the flag and leave us the hell alone.
We can watch the movie and laugh at it when it comes out.

There is no invasion... 

[paxamericana]

22 hours ago, User said:

There is no invasion... 

It sure looks like an invasion fleet. Has all the usual gear too. Take note of USS Iwo Jima and the two LPD. You wouldn’t need a LHD and LPD unless you wanted to get troops to shore in mass. 

 

Edited August 25, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

It sure looks like an invasion fleet. Has all the usual gear too. Take note of USS Iwo Jima and the two LPD. You wouldn’t need a LHD and LPD unless you wanted to get troops to shore in mass. 

LOL. You literally have no idea. 

They are going down to do drug interdictions. 

[paxamericana]

1 hour ago, User said:

LOL. You literally have no idea. 

They are going down to do drug interdictions. 

Nah man, you don’t need an entire invasion fleet for drug interdictions. That’s called an excuse. They’re going for Maduro.

Edited August 25, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

49 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Nah man, you don’t need an entire invasion fleet for drug interdictions. That’s called an excuse. They’re going for Maduro.

This is called a circular argument. You say it is an invasion fleet to argue that it is an invasion fleet. 

You seriously have no clue what comprises an "invasion" fleet. 

[paxamericana]

1 hour ago, User said:

invasion" fleet

Comprises of Aircraft carriers and engineering ships that act as floating docks. Don’t tell me the drug police require a nuclear ballistic missile submarine for drug interdictions either.

Edited August 26, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

8 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Comprises of Aircraft carriers and engineering ships that act as floating docks. Don’t tell me the drug police require a nuclear ballistic missile submarine for drug interdictions either.

I don't have to tell you anything. The deployment of submarines is standard; nor does it specify anything about a ballistic missile submarine. They are not "aircraft carriers," they are amphibious assault ships with a handful of fighter aircraft... 

Again, you have no clue what you are talking about. This claim is absurd on its face, and you offer sensationalized language, as if we are somehow invading Venezuela with less than 1,000 combat troops...

 

 

 

 

[paxamericana]

2 hours ago, User said:

nor does it specify anything about a ballistic missile submarine

mmmhmmm

2 hours ago, User said:

handful of fighter aircraft... 

2 hours ago, User said:

invading Venezuela with less than 1,000 combat troops...

So what was Lybia then? America toppled an entire regime without even sending combat troop.

Look, I'm not really interested in poking holes at your fecal matter flinging fest, so what is your actual argument?

Why is America sailing to the coast of Venezuela?

Edited August 26, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

8 hours ago, paxamericana said:

mmmhmmm

Are you just being deliberately obtuse?

It says “submarine” and the graphic you provided said it was an attack submarine.

8 hours ago, paxamericana said:

So what was Lybia then? America toppled an entire regime without even sending combat troop

So, now your argument isn’t “invasion?”

Libya was a UN backed and NATO led mission to back rebels during a civil war with thousands and thousands of air strikes from a NATO coalition. 

8 hours ago, paxamericana said:

Look, I'm not really interested in poking holes at your fecal matter flinging fest, so what is your actual argument?

Why is America sailing to the coast of Venezuela?

You couldn’t poke a hole through a wet paper bag if you had a sharp stick.

i already told you why they were going.

 

 

 

 

[paxamericana]

45 minutes ago, User said:

i already told you why they were going.

Drug Interdiction? The Venezuelan themselves don't believe that.

"On Friday, Maduro described the U.S. moves as an "illegal" attempt at regime change."

Edited August 26, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

52 minutes ago, paxamericana said:

Drug Interdiction? The Venezuelan themselves don't believe that.

If only this were a discussion about what Maduro claimed vs your absurd “invasion” assertion. 

No doubt, this move is meant to put pressure on Maduro for any number of reasons.

That isn’t what your claim was or what the point of contention here was. 

[paxamericana]

5 minutes ago, User said:

absurd “invasion”

Toppling a regime , going after their oil doesn't constitute as an invasion? Okay.

Enjoy the cherry you picked?

[User]

On 8/26/2025 at 9:42 AM, paxamericana said:

Toppling a regime , going after their oil doesn't constitute as an invasion? Okay.

Enjoy the cherry you picked?

Boy, you just can't stop using sensationalized language. 

I am not cherry picking, you just spew garbage out and have no regard for its validity. 

[paxamericana]

55 minutes ago, User said:

using sensationalized language

It’s for my fans, like you.

[paxamericana]

@User, Your apology letter? As I’ve mentioned , regime change was and is on the table. Constituting WAR! https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-cia-venezuela-9.6940096

[User]

2 hours ago, paxamericana said:

Your apology letter?

For what?

You were on here crying about an “invasion” which didn’t happen and still isn’t happening. 

[paxamericana]

11 minutes ago, User said:

For what?

You were on here crying about an “invasion” which didn’t happen and still isn’t happening. 

 The SOUTHCOM commander just resigned over this issue, stating “Everything we’re seeing is setting off alarm bells,” said Brian Finucane, a national security lawyer with the International Crisis Group, an organization focused on conflict resolution. “The military buildup in the Caribbean, these lawless strikes on vessels there … the administration talking about potential action in Venezuela. None of this is being undertaken with congressional authorization.”

This is definitely a I told you so moment.

Edited October 20, 2025 by paxamericana

[User]

On 10/19/2025 at 6:55 PM, paxamericana said:

This is definitely a I told you so moment

You could never say how it was an invasion before now and still can’t. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

They have the most corrupt regime in power as a result of rigged election. They only have good relation with other murderous rigged regimes like Islamic republic of Iran and Russia. Yes it will be a quick invasion. Maybe Trump does what he chickened out to do in Iran. Invasion but very unlikely in my view. They just want to give the impression to accelerate or aid regime fall.