LinkSoul60 Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago Are you able to function in the real world? Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Legato said: Did you fall off? Might fall but always get back up. Try it... Quote
Legato Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago 14 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you able to function in the real world? Absolutely, come and join us, it's fun. 12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Might fall but always get back up. Try it... Well you do have an odd concept of "up". 1 Quote
robosmith Posted 21 hours ago Author Report Posted 21 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Lol...nag nag nag... ^FRAUD like I said. 🤮 Quote
Nationalist Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Might fall but always get back up. Try it... Experience speaks... 27 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you able to function in the real world? He does...and he does it without a safetynet made o' lies. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
LinkSoul60 Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Legato said: 10 minutes ago, Legato said: Absolutely, come and join us, it's fun. Well you do have an odd concept of "up". When you find the real world let me know. Until then, keep those brilliant insights coming. 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Experience speaks... He does...and he does it without a safetynet made o' lies. Nothing but truisms from the red hat crowd.... Quote
Nationalist Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Nothing but truisms from the red hat crowd.... Indeed. Nothing but truisms...and a dash o' common sense. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: I’m not a democrat…. Nobody said you were. Go back and reread it, nobody called you a democrat. Wow, sounds like a bit of a Freudian slip on your part kiddo Quote And what exactly does Biden and Harris have to do with the subject title Trump is Objectively Bad for the Nation: 'Crook, Liar, Racist': I’m Not Afraid to Call Trump What He Is Well that should be obvious even to someone in elementary school such as yourself. It can very easily be argued that if trump is the better of the two choices and is the least problematic then he's actually the best choice and is there for objectively good for the nation in that context. Thing is the democrats are worse than trump for everything you specifically mentioned then that would seem to be the case. Trump would be objectively good considering the alternatives. 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you able to function in the real world? Who are you even talking to? Was this a question for yourself or something? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CdnFox Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago 43 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Nothing but truisms from the red hat crowd.... You're Canadians. We would be the blue hat crowd Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Posted 13 hours ago 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: Experience speaks... He does...and he does it without a safetynet made o' lies. TROLLEGATO needs no "safety net" to play the clown. Quote
CdnFox Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: TROLLEGATO needs no "safety net" to play the clown. It's true, he manages to play you without a net 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 7 hours ago, robosmith said: TROLLEGATO needs no "safety net" to play the clown. Lol...like I said...no safetynet of lies. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
LinkSoul60 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 16 hours ago, CdnFox said: Nobody said you were. Go back and reread it, nobody called you a democrat. Wow, sounds like a bit of a Freudian slip on your part kiddo Well that should be obvious even to someone in elementary school such as yourself. It can very easily be argued that if trump is the better of the two choices and is the least problematic then he's actually the best choice and is there for objectively good for the nation in that context. Thing is the democrats are worse than trump for everything you specifically mentioned then that would seem to be the case. Trump would be objectively good considering the alternatives. Who are you even talking to? Was this a question for yourself or something? No freudian slip. You obviously just type to "hear yourself talk".... I'd suggest pulling out your Dr Suess books for a re-read... I don't think the democrats are in any position to be making claims like that after Biden who was significantly worse on all those fronts. And unfortunately Kamala was just a joke. I get that she was the best they could do with the 5 minutes they had to make a decision but even that is their own fault. They knew Joe was horrifically senile and not capable of being president before that debate ever happened and they still let him run. 16 hours ago, CdnFox said: You're Canadians. We would be the blue hat crowd Whichever colour.... yours is too tight. Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 17 hours ago, Nationalist said: Indeed. Nothing but truisms...and a dash o' common sense. Common sense is subjective. You need more than a dash.... Quote
Nationalist Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Sure. And if you're stupid, common sense is unattainable. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted 4 hours ago Author Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Lol...like I said...no safetynet of lies. None needed to post his gibberish. Quote
robosmith Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: It's true, he manages to play you without a net Only in YOUR FANTASIES, CdnLIAR. Quote
robosmith Posted 3 hours ago Author Report Posted 3 hours ago 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: Nobody said you were. Go back and reread it, nobody called you a democrat. Wow, sounds like a bit of a Freudian slip on your part kiddo Well that should be obvious even to someone in elementary school such as yourself. It can very easily be argued that if trump is the better of the two choices and is the least problematic then he's actually the best choice and is there for objectively good for the nation in that context. There were MORE than two choices lDIOT, thus making your dichotomy FALSE. 17 hours ago, CdnFox said: Thing is the democrats are worse than trump for everything you specifically mentioned then that would seem to be the case. Trump would be objectively good considering the alternatives. Nope, they COULD all be objectively BAD, even if your FALSE PREMISE were true, which IT IS NOT. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) Trump is so bad that: Inflation is under control One hundred plus countries agreed to new, more US friendly trade deals Zero aliens have been released into the US Violent criminals and job stealers are being deported Nuclear holocaust was averted Edited 3 hours ago by gatomontes99 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, robosmith said: There were MORE than two choices lDIOT, thus making your dichotomy FALSE. No, there were only two choices. You could choose to vote for someone else but given the circumstances there was No practical expectation that they had any chance of victory. So the president was either going to be Kamala or trump. That was the binary choice I understand that politics is confusing for you but try and stay with us if you can 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Nope, they COULD all be objectively BAD, even if your FALSE PREMISE were true, which IT IS NOT. Unless you can demonstrate that they are exactly equally bad then one must be better than the other. Making that person the better choice. And making the better choice is always good for America. You know, I know this stuff is complex but take an aspirin and you work through it and you'll be fine Edited 2 hours ago by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago @robosmith, young...whatever you identify as...please never change. You and those like you are a perfect Republican election campaign advert. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.