gatomontes99 Posted June 19 Author Report Posted June 19 36 minutes ago, robosmith said: Is ^this the same guy who defends all of Trump's crimes including FELONY CONVICTIONS? Why yes it IS. Your denial of the EVIDENCE that the Trump campaign (manager Manafort) colluded with Russia does NOT make that EVIDENCE go away. Duh No, it doesn't. YOU have ZERO EVIDENCE of fake DL being used to vote. Zero evidence? There is an eye witness testimony and an interception of some of the IDs. That's evidence. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Zero evidence? There is an eye witness testimony and an interception of some of the IDs. That's evidence. ALL of the ID's were intercepted. AKA none USED for anything. You have ZERO EVIDENCE there were more, nor that they were USED to cast fraudulent votes. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted June 19 Author Report Posted June 19 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: ALL of the ID's were intercepted. AKA none USED for anything. You have ZERO EVIDENCE there were more, nor that they were USED to cast fraudulent votes. The witness says there were more IDs. You just wish what you are saying was true. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: The witness says there were more IDs. You just wish what you are saying was true. Quote that HERE. Until you do, you have ZERO EVIDENCE. Who is the "witness" and how does he KNOW? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted June 19 Author Report Posted June 19 30 minutes ago, robosmith said: Quote that HERE. Until you do, you have ZERO EVIDENCE. Who is the "witness" and how does he KNOW? ...and instead was just dismissed even though there was evidence of the fake licenses. Officials who have seen the documents told Just the News the FBI had a relatively new confidential source who provided information in summer 2020 that the Chinese government was manufacturing and exporting fake U.S. driver's licenses as part of a plot to create voter identities for Chinese residents living in the United States so they could vote with fake mail-in ballots. The intelligence source claimed the plot was specifically designed to benefit Biden, officials said. But, in fact, another agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, had intercepted nearly 20,000 fake licenses around the time the intelligence came in a possible corroboration of the report, officials said. ------------------------ First, nothing in the article claims that the IDs were imitation to the 20,000 that had been caught. Second, it is strongly suggested that the plot was.ongoing and not a one time thing. Thus the use of words like "manufacturing" and "exporting." Those are active verbs that are written in the present. If it was a one time shipment it would have been "manufactured" made "exported". This isn't the first time China did thie either. Do a web search and educate yourself. Grassley has abolished China for sending fake IDs as far back as 2012. Weird how that was an election year as well. 🤔 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: ...and instead was just dismissed even though there was evidence of the fake licenses. Officials who have seen the documents told Just the News the FBI had a relatively new confidential source who provided information in summer 2020 that the Chinese government was manufacturing and exporting fake U.S. driver's licenses as part of a plot to create voter identities for Chinese residents living in the United States so they could vote with fake mail-in ballots. The intelligence source claimed the plot was specifically designed to benefit Biden, officials said. But, in fact, another agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, had intercepted nearly 20,000 fake licenses around the time the intelligence came in a possible corroboration of the report, officials said. ------------------------ First, nothing in the article claims that the IDs were imitation to the 20,000 that had been caught. Second, it is strongly suggested that the plot was.ongoing and not a one time thing. Thus the use of words like "manufacturing" and "exporting." Those are active verbs that are written in the present. If it was a one time shipment it would have been "manufactured" made "exported". This isn't the first time China did thie either. Do a web search and educate yourself. Grassley has abolished China for sending fake IDs as far back as 2012. Weird how that was an election year as well. 🤔 Do you know how many "confidential sources" that the House RepubliCONS CLAIMED to have damning Joe Biden during the last term, which completely fell apart because they were crooks looking to be absolved for their crimes? And now Patel is a bigger clown than Comer.... LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Is ^this the same guy who defends all of Trump's crimes including FELONY CONVICTIONS? Why yes it IS. Your denial of the EVIDENCE that the Trump campaign (manager Manafort) colluded with Russia does NOT make that EVIDENCE go away. Duh No, it doesn't. YOU have ZERO EVIDENCE of fake DL being used to vote. Convictions that are chickenshit and will be overturned. @gatomontes99, this is why these snot-nosed little Libbies deserve everything they get. Crooked judges, cheating, lying and anything else they can do. Their hatred knows no bounds. They have become traitors to their own country...for hate's sake. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: Convictions that are chickenshit and will be overturned. Thank you Mr. FAKE LEGAL AUTHORITY. LMAO 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: @gatomontes99, this is why these snot-nosed little Libbies deserve everything they get. Crooked judges, cheating, lying and anything else they can do. Their hatred knows no bounds. They have become traitors to their own country...for hate's sake. You don't have the vaguest idea what you're talking about; AKA just FANTASIES. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted June 19 Author Report Posted June 19 41 minutes ago, robosmith said: Do you know how many "confidential sources" that the House RepubliCONS CLAIMED to have damning Joe Biden during the last term, which completely fell apart because they were crooks looking to be absolved for their crimes? And now Patel is a bigger clown than Comer.... LMAO So now you agree that the evidence exists but you want to disparage the witness with no legitimate reason. I don't know why you think the case against Joe fell apart. The case was solid. The politics were not. They couldn't get your kind to see reality for reality so they didn't act. In part, because they didn't want to make Joe a martyr. That doesn't mean the facts aren't there. They are. But your side is so delusional that you'd have an easier time teaching a chicken to play "Camptown Races" on the banjo than getting the left to come back to reality. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 37 minutes ago, robosmith said: Thank you Mr. FAKE LEGAL AUTHORITY. LMAO You don't have the vaguest idea what you're talking about; AKA just FANTASIES. Just wait...time is not your friend. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted June 19 Report Posted June 19 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Just wait...time is not your friend. I'll wait for you to get your law degree and practice law in NY State. LMAO Quote
Nationalist Posted June 20 Report Posted June 20 2 hours ago, robosmith said: I'll wait for you to get your law degree and practice law in NY State. LMAO Ok wait right there. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
gatomontes99 Posted June 25 Author Report Posted June 25 Part two: Just The News FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino alleged Tuesday that the bureau's prior leadership "chose to play politics" and hide evidence from the American people of a Chinese plot to hijack the 2020 U.S. election with fake mail-in ballots for Joe Biden. The two FBI leaders' statement came a week after Just the News reported Patel turned over to Congress earlier this month a long-hidden intelligence report raising concerns that China had mass-produced fake U.S. driver's licenses to carry out a scheme to swing the 2020 election to Biden with fake mail-in ballots. Patel located the evidence based on information that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, got from whistleblowers and forwarded to the FBI, officials said. Patel and Bongino said Tuesday they are committed to getting Grassley and the American public more evidence about the plot and the failure to fully investigate it. “Based on our continued review and production of FBI documents related to the CCP’s plot to interfere in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, previous FBI leadership chose to play politics and withhold key information from the American people – exposing the weaponization of law enforcement for political purposes during the height of the 2020 election season," Patel and Bongibo said in statement given to Just the News. "Thanks to the great Oversight work of Chairman Grassley, the information the old FBI regime covered up will now be released to the public," they added. "This FBI leadership team will continue keeping our promise of aggressive transparency and working around the clock to fix the underlying problems to restore the FBI to the trusted institution the American people deserve." The newly declassified intelligence reports from August 2020 weren’t corroborated or fully investigated and instead were recalled from intelligence agencies at about the time that then-FBI Director Chris Wray testified there were no known plots of foreign interference ahead of the 2020 election in which Biden defeated Donald Trump, officials told Just the News. When they were recalled, FBI officials asked fellow spy agencies to destroy their copies of the intelligence report, which included detailed information from a cooperating confidential human source. “This report was recalled in order to re-interview the source. Recipients should destroy all copies of the original report and remove the original report from all computer holdings,” the recall notice obtained by Just the News stated. The subject line of the FBI intelligence bulletin succinctly stated the potential nature of the alleged plot: “Chinese Government Production and Export of Fraudulent US Driver's Licenses to Chinese Sympathizers in the United States, in Order to Create Tens of Thousands of Fraudulent Mail-in Votes for US Presidential Candidate Joe Biden, in late August 2020 That said, the FBI bulletin provided significantly detailed information for agencies to investigate as leads to make sure the U.S. election wasn’t being hijacked by a foreign power seeking to exploit a sudden explosion in mail-in voting during the COVID-19 pandemic that struck earlier in 2020. “In late August 2020, the Chinese government had produced a large amount of fraudulent United States driver’s licenses that were secretly exported to the United States,” the report reads “The fraudulent driver's licenses would allow tens of thousands of Chinese students and immigrants sympathetic to the Chinese Communist Party to vote for U.S. presidential candidate USPER Joe Biden despite not being eligible to vote in the United States." "China had collected private US user data from millions of TikTok accounts, to include name, ID and address, which would allow the Chinese government to use real US persons' information to create the fraudulent driver's license,” the report continues. “The fraudulent driver’s licenses were to include true ID number and true address of US citizens, making them difficult to detect. China planned to use the fraudulent driver’s licenses to account for tens of thousands of mail-in votes.” ‐--------------‐-------------- This is why TikTok needs to be banned in the US. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted June 29 Author Report Posted June 29 I hope everyone saw this and saw the extent to which China is attacking the US electorate. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I hope everyone saw this and saw the extent to which China is attacking the US electorate. Wall of text with no context to inspire me to read it to try and figure out what your point is. If you're just going to post entire articles then you need to either post the summation that explains what your point is at the top or at the bottom. I don't need you to provide me a reading list I can find all kinds of interesting things to read. If you have an important point that you feel really needs to be made then state clearly what the point is and post the article as a backup documentation to make your point If it's an interesting point I'll read the article and I'm sure others will too, but if I just start throwing articles at you expecting you to read them and try and figure out where I was going with them I imagine you're probably going to have words for me. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted June 30 Author Report Posted June 30 12 hours ago, CdnFox said: Wall of text with no context to inspire me to read it to try and figure out what your point is. If you're just going to post entire articles then you need to either post the summation that explains what your point is at the top or at the bottom. I don't need you to provide me a reading list I can find all kinds of interesting things to read. If you have an important point that you feel really needs to be made then state clearly what the point is and post the article as a backup documentation to make your point If it's an interesting point I'll read the article and I'm sure others will too, but if I just start throwing articles at you expecting you to read them and try and figure out where I was going with them I imagine you're probably going to have words for me. Lmao...irony Ok, TikTok is the biggest identity theft ring in the history of the world and it is being used to swing US elections. That's what is in the one bold paragraph. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao...irony Ok, TikTok is the biggest identity theft ring in the history of the world and it is being used to swing US elections. That's what is in the one bold paragraph. LOL well for god's sake then next time just post the paragraph Anyway that has the ring of truth to it even without any supporting docs. I believe i just read this morning that trump has lined up some buyers for tick tock? But it's not like the chinese won't just try something else. Hell, they directly have their agents and money interfere in our elections, and control a bunch of Chinese community newspapers, Nothing even remotely subtle about their attempts here Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.