election fraud 2020, The Most Secure Election In History, NOT

[gatomontes99]

The highly esteemed NYPost

FBI Director Kash Patel forked over a trove of documents to Congress detailing an alleged Chinese campaign to meddle in the 2020 election that involved thousands of bogus US driver’s licenses.

...

Authorities had caught wind of the alleged plot around August 2020, but intelligence reports on it were recalled for reasons that aren’t fully clear, the spokesperson added.

US Customs and Border Protection seized almost 20,000 fake licenses around that time.

Biden won the swing states of Arizona and Georgia by more than 10,000 and 12,000 votes, respectively, and President Donald Trump’s margin of defeat in Wisconsin was more than 20,000 votes.

_______________________________________________________________

Always remember that whatever the swamp tells you is a lie. 

Repudiating Trump, officials say election ‘most secure’

Trump’s own officials say 2020 was America’s most secure election in history

2020 election "most secure in history," security officials say

And now it is proven that they were lying and we knew it the whole time. It took Kash Patel declassifying the information to find out the China (who was paying Hunter Biden piles of cash) helped Joe Biden. 

 

[Nationalist]

It's about time!

Well Libbies? How are y'all gonna try to lie your way outta this one?

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

It's about time!

Well Libbies? How are y'all gonna try to lie your way outta this one?

They can't blame Trump or Patel, these files were hidden by Wray and CBP. The CBP seized enough IDs to sway the election. Who knows how many got through. It's not like piles of plastic cards are high on their watch list. They are looking for guns and drugs. 

So I am certain the left will blame Trump and Patel despite the fact that there is no way they could have been involved.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The highly esteemed NYPost

^This just DESTROYS the credibility of YOUR POST. 

Next you'll be quoting the National Enquirer with a straight face. LMAO

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

It's about time!

Well Libbies? How are y'all gonna try to lie your way outta this one?

No one with a brain is stupid enough to believe the NYP or Kash Patel.

[gatomontes99]

19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^This just DESTROYS the credibility of YOUR POST. 

Next you'll be quoting the National Enquirer with a straight face. LMAO

No one with a brain is stupid enough to believe the NYP or Kash Patel.

Ok...

Newsweek

ABC

It's not the source that's the problem. It is the people it implicated that is what you have a problem with. 

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok...

Newsweek

ABC

It's not the source that's the problem. It is the people it implicated that is what you have a problem with. 

No, I have a problem with you calling NYP "esteemed," when it is famously tabloid trash. AKA you LIED.

Here is a quote from your Newsweek cite:

Quote

"detail alarming allegations" about potential Chinese interference in the 2020 election

Not even allegations about ACTUAL Chinese interference. Duh

They confiscated 20,000 fake DL, with NO assertions of ADDITIONAL DL that were ACTUALLY USED TO VOTE.

Edited 17 hours ago by robosmith

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, I have a problem with you calling NYP "esteemed," when it is famously tabloid trash. AKA you LIED.

Nice try at deflection Tweenkie-Poo but many of us knew all along...and once again...time proves us right and you...

Dead wrong yet again.

[robosmith]

Just now, Nationalist said:

Nice try at deflection Tweenkie-Poo but many of us knew all along...and once again...time proves us right and you...

Dead wrong yet again.

What you believe you "knew" is NOT AT ALL nefarious NOR verified by the stories cited here. Duh

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

What you believe you "knew" is NOT AT ALL nefarious NOR verified by the stories cited here. Duh

Lol...so consistent.

[robosmith]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...so consistent.

Consistently CORRECT.

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...so consistent.

You can't even cite ANYTHING more than "allegations" of "potential" interference. Duh

[gatomontes99]

41 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, I have a problem with you calling NYP "esteemed," when it is famously tabloid trash. AKA you LIED.

Didn't the NYP break the Hunter Biden Laptop Scandal? And didnt you call that a bunch of lies? Seems like you are the liar, not the NYP.

[Nationalist]

55 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You can't even cite ANYTHING more than "allegations" of "potential" interference. Duh

It's in the OP.

Wakey wakey...

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

It's in the OP.

Wakey wakey...

It says "alleged" in the OP. Duh

IF you have definitive evidence QUOTE IT HERE. I won't hold my breath.

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

It says "alleged" in the OP. Duh

IF you have definitive evidence QUOTE IT HERE. I won't hold my breath.

No no...don't let me stop ya.

[gatomontes99]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It says "alleged" in the OP. Duh

IF you have definitive evidence QUOTE IT HERE. I won't hold my breath.

Alleged is always used until  cconvicted. your dishonest implication that the proper use of the term alleged means unsupported is grotesquely partisan. 

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Alleged is always used until  cconvicted. your dishonest implication that the proper use of the term alleged means unsupported is grotesquely partisan. 

^ONLY applies to prosecutors.

There are not even charges and won't be.

20,000 fake IDs confiscated and NO EVIDENCE ANY were USED FOR VOTING. Duh

[Nationalist]

44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^ONLY applies to prosecutors.

There are not even charges and won't be.

20,000 fake IDs confiscated and NO EVIDENCE ANY were USED FOR VOTING. Duh

Lol... @gatomontes99, the guy is beyond reason.

Give 'im a zucchini and call it a day...

[gatomontes99]

41 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^ONLY applies to prosecutors.

Uh...no.. you'll never see a news agency report on the violation of a crime without saying allegedly unless the individual/group is actually convicted. They are too worried they'll be sued. 

43 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There are not even charges and won't be.

You don't know that. All you know is that Kash declassified documents. I haven't seen the documents yet either. Until we do, the press release that says they have evidence the documents were intended to be used to vote illegally. 

 

48 minutes ago, robosmith said:

20,000 fake IDs confiscated and NO EVIDENCE ANY were USED FOR VOTING. Duh

What makes you sure there is no evidence? You sound (to me) like a little kid that just can't believe his dad is cheating on his mom. 

[CdnFox]

You really just have to look at the numbers overall for that election to realize something went wrong somewhere. Millions and millions and millions of voters just magically appeared that have never been there before and then vanished by the next election

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see that someone had to thumb on the scale for that one. I don't know if it was this or something else but I can tell just at a glance that something was up that nobody's been able to account for.

So the revelation that there is indications that there were significant fraud as of no surprise to me.

And if there wasn't there will be because the US system is an absolute cluster fcuk I've screwed up laws and different rules for different places and the potential for fraud is massive and you cannot have an open door to fraud that somebody doesn't eventually walk through.

Covid was probably about the worst because of how they handled melons, but nobody could look at the US system and believe it was secure.

Until they take action how can anyone look at the election results and their democracy and have any faith in it at all? And I mean that for both sides, no matter who wins the losers will have reasonable grounds to believe they may have been defrauded and that it's gone undetected

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol... @gatomontes99, the guy is beyond reason.

Give 'im a zucchini and call it a day...

Neither of you have ANY REASON to offer. Duh

Where is the EVIDENCE ANY fake ID's were used to vote? NADA.

[robosmith]

Fact check: 20,000 fake driving licenses seized at O’Hare Airport not linked to voter fraud

Quote

Facebook posts shared thousands of times claim that 19,888 fake driver’s licenses were seized at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport after being ordered by people “all registered to vote, all Democrats.” Suggesting that the licenses were part of a voter fraud conspiracy, this claim is partly false. While it is true that U.S. Customs and Border Protection seized 19,888 counterfeit licenses at O’Hare in late July, they had no apparent connection to Democratic Party registration or the upcoming election.

 

Posts making this claim can be found here;, and here;.

On July 27, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency announced ( here O’Hare’s International Mail Facility (IMF) had seized 19,888 counterfeit  licenses between January and June. The press release stated that most had come from China and Hong Kong, as well as Great Britain and South Korea, and that they were largely for students.

“These fraudulent identity documents can lead to identity theft, worksite enforcement, critical infrastructure protection, fraud linked to immigration-related crimes such as human smuggling and human trafficking, and these documents can be used by those individuals associated with terrorism to minimize scrutiny from travel screening measures,” the CBP release said.

 

Fox 5 New York also reported on the seizure ( here;).

Though neither the CBP nor Fox 5 New York mentioned voter fraud, an opinion piece was published on Aug. 9 on  the website of conservative author and podcaster David Harris, Jr., with the headline, “Potential Voter Fraud Anyone? Shipments Of Nearly 20,000 Fake Driver’s Licenses Seized At Chicago Airport In 2020!” ( here;).

On Aug. 11, CBS affiliate WUSA9 debunked the blog post’s link between the false licenses and voter fraud ( here that "While tens of thousands of fake IDs were seized at Chicago O’Hare International Airport since the start of the year, the only place linking them to a voter fraud operation is the article in question.”

 

On Sept. 6, a website called “Channel411News.com” posted an article with the headline “Feds Seize 19,888 Fake State Driver Licenses (Made in China) in Chicago O’Hare Airport – ALL Registered to Vote — ALL Democrat” ( here version of the claim has since been shared widely by Facebook users, some of whom have included the link ( here;).

The notion that fraudulent licenses could be used to impersonate other voters or vote more than once at Illinois polling stations is weakened by the fact the state does not have voter identification requirements under normal circumstances ( here Dietrich, a spokesman for the Illinois State Board of Elections ( here to Reuters via email that it is the voter’s signature, rather than photo ID, that is checked to verify identification at the polls.

 

Though Illinois voters do not declare a party affiliation when they register to vote, Dietrich said that a voter’s party affiliation, if they participate in primaries,  “can be inferred based on the party ballot the voter chose at the most recent primary election, but there is nothing in the registration system that attaches a party affiliation to a voter’s name or voter ID.” In order to determine whether the intended recipients of the fraudulent licenses were “all Democrats,” as the posts claim, Dietrich said that “you’d have to look up every individual’s voting record and determine whether they took a Democratic or Republican ballot at the last primary they voted in.” That would also assume they all voted in primaries.

 

As for voter registration, fraudsters would need a valid Illinois driver’s license in order to use the state board of elections’ online voter registration portal ( here explained that the driver’s license is necessary because the registrant’s signature is captured from the license record. But you would also need other personally identifiable information.

For in-person registration, a valid driver’s license can be one of the two required forms of ID. An applicant would need an additional form of identification, such as a utility bill or other mail sent to the voter’s address.

“But local election authorities also check Social Security numbers on applications, so a fake driver’s license number that doesn’t match up with a record at the Secretary of State’s Office would raise a red flag,” Dietrich said.

Essentially, the holders of these fraudulent licenses would have to know the voters’ address, or valid license number on record to potentially get through. Even in this unlikely scenario, there's no evidence, per authorities’ reports, that licenses seized at O’Hare were intended for election fraud or for "Democrats" as the posts claim. 

John Mirkovic, deputy clerk for Cook County, Illinois ( here Reuters via email that “the CBP has confirmed that these IDs are counterfeit, and that they have no evidence of voter fraud in relation to these shipments, and we have not received any information suggesting otherwise.”  

Explaining the signature verification system used for voter registration in Illinois, Mirkovic explained that “a false identity would not help someone falsely register, even if their actual photo were on it.” 

“Fortunately for voters, our systems are more sophisticated than something that might fool a bouncer at a bar," he said. 

The Reuters Fact Check team previously reported on social media posts oversimplifying voter fraud ( here scenario of voter fraud faces many obstacles, including being a criminal offense.  

VERDICT 

Partly false. While it is true that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized nearly 20,000 fake drivers’ licenses at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in July, there is no connection between the licenses and alleged voter fraud efforts. 

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work  here;

IOW gato's been scammed with a FAKE FB post. LMAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Nationalist]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Fact check: 20,000 fake driving licenses seized at O’Hare Airport not linked to voter fraud

IOW gato's been scammed with a FAKE FB post. LMAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is this the same Reuters that pushed the great Russia/Trump hoax?

Why yes it is.

[gatomontes99]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

Fact check: 20,000 fake driving licenses seized at O’Hare Airport not linked to voter fraud

IOW gato's been scammed with a FAKE FB post. LMAO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well, actually, this NEW information proves the Reuters article was wrong.