Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Elon Musk discovers 'magic money computers,' or how the U.S. financial system actually works

Apparently Muskrat believes anything he doesn't understand is "magic." LMAO

Quote

Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX and the brainchild behind the Department of Government Efficiency, went onto Sen. Ted Cruz's podcast to discuss what he's learned in Washington.

"It's insane," said Musk, as Cruz asked him about "magic money computers."

"So you may think that the government computers, like, all talk to each other, they synchronize, they add up what funds are going somewhere, and it's, you know, it's coherent," said Musk.

"I call it a magic money computer. Any computer which can just make money out of thin air," said Musk.

He says there are 14 computers in all that send out payments - mostly, though not entirely, at the U.S. Treasury.

What Musk described is indeed how the global financial system works. The U.S. government can create money out of thin air.

One could even call it magical.

Ben Bernanke has been talking about this for years. "The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost," Bernanke said in a famous 2002 speech, when he was a governor at the Fed.

Adherents to what's called modern monetary theory go further - they say there are no limits at all to spending for governments with their own currencies. Taxes are not needed, though they can be used to keep inflation from running too hot, or to redistribute wealth.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"I call it a magic money computer. Any computer which can just make money out of thin air," said Musk.

So like Bitcoin?

  • Haha 4

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Elon Musk discovers 'magic money computers,' or how the U.S. financial system actually works

Apparently Muskrat believes anything he doesn't understand is "magic." LMAO

 

It's great that Elon is beginning to learn how money is created. Some of us have known for a while. I personally think that the best documentary to explain how money is made these days is one from a former banker. It can be seen here:

 

Posted

Y'all have a comprehension problem. He was pointing out the scale at which our fiat currency was being abused. It's a sad state when y'all just accept that as fine or normal.

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)

You don't need to know how things work to break shit, and that is the mission, after all. 

Trump was like, "Pull a Twitter on the mutha, Elon!"

Edited by Hodad
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You don't need to know how things work to break shit, and that is the mission, after all. 

Trump was like, "Pull a Twitter on the mutha, Elon!"

Gawd, you people just don't get it:

X in 2024 Doubled Highest Yearly Twitter Profits

If he breaks the government like that, I'm in.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Gawd, you people just don't get it:

X in 2024 Doubled Highest Yearly Twitter Profits

If he breaks the government like that, I'm in.

Awww, you gushing fanboys are so smitten. Meanwhile X is privately held with private books. 

What we do know is that he took it over, broke it, turned it even more toxic, spurred a mass exodus of users and advertisers, and drove down revenues to the point that it was worth less than a third of what he paid for it as of just a few months ago. 

That's what you want for the US? 

Although I think just last week he did get his billionaire buddies to issue a rosier rebound valuation for it. See how long that lasts as users flee X as fast as they are fleeing Tesla to get away from this toxic sociopath.

Edited by Hodad
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Awww, you gushing fanboys are so smitten. Meanwhile X is privately held with private books. 

What we do know is that he took it over, broke it, turned it even more toxic, spurred a mass exodus of users and advertised, and drove down revenues to the point that it was worth less than a third of what he paid for it as of just a few months ago. 

That's what you want for the US? 

Although I think just last week he did get his billionaire buddies to issue a rosier rebound valuation for it. See how long that lasts as users flee X as fast as they are fleeing Tesla to get away from this toxic sociopath.

I keep hearing that all the users who hate StormTrooperX are fleeing to BlueSky where there is real intelligent conversation.

Probably people like gato really love StormTrooperX 🤮

Edited by robosmith
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

You don't need to know how things work to break shit, and that is the mission, after all. 

Trump was like, "Pull a Twitter on the mutha, Elon!"

And yet X is running fine. 

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I keep hearing that all the users who hate StormTrooperX are fleeing to BlueSky where there is real intelligent conversation.

Probably people like gato really love StormTrooperX 🤮

No... it is a bunch of radical leftists like you who can't stand having anyone disagree with them. 

Only, instead of running away from this whole forum, you just put people on ignore and run away from threads where your BS gets called out. 

 

 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Awww, you gushing fanboys are so smitten. Meanwhile X is privately held with private books. 

What we do know is that he took it over, broke it, turned it even more toxic, spurred a mass exodus of users and advertisers, and drove down revenues to the point that it was worth less than a third of what he paid for it as of just a few months ago. 

That's what you want for the US? 

Although I think just last week he did get his billionaire buddies to issue a rosier rebound valuation for it. See how long that lasts as users flee X as fast as they are fleeing Tesla to get away from this toxic sociopath.

I think I'll take my link with facts over your opinion and speculation.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I think I'll take my link with facts over your opinion and speculation.

I love that you think that some rando's unsourced blog is "facts."

Sort of explains why you keep posting random tweets as "news."

I have no idea if he has inside information or not, but neither do you. The difference is you'll but into whatever is convenient in the moment.

Edited by Hodad
  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I love that you think that some rando's unsourced blog is "facts."

Sort of explains why you keep posting random tweets as "news."

I have no idea if he has inside information or not, but neither do you. The difference is you'll but into whatever is convenient in the moment.

Ok

 

Quote

Social media platform X has regained its $44 billion valuation, marking a significant turnaround for the company since Elon Musk took over. TX’s Financial Recovery and Cost-Cutting Moves

Despite revenue drops following Musk’s takeover, X posted around $1.2 billion in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in 2024

https://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/elon-musks-x-hits-44-billion-valuation-againwhats-driving-the-comeback/3782441/

Or

https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/

Screenshot_20250322_113231_Firefox.thumb.jpg.8c5f27e6102d43af747ab02b28266237.jpg

Twitter was losing money. It is now profitable. Revenue is down. But so are costs. That's why it is making money.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok

 

Or

https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/

Screenshot_20250322_113231_Firefox.thumb.jpg.8c5f27e6102d43af747ab02b28266237.jpg

Twitter was losing money. It is now profitable. Revenue is down. But so are costs. That's why it is making money.

Holy shit. He IS a business genius after all. Anybody who can repair his own damage in just 3 years must be the bestest! -- maybe he can un-f*ck Tesla by 2028?

Nah, just kidding. The consumer businesses will continue to suffer by association with the world's richest troll. SpaceX and StarLink are going to continue to suckle at the government teat and will be okay. 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. He IS a business genius after all. Anybody who can repair his own damage in just 3 years must be the bestest! -- maybe he can un-f*ck Tesla by 2028?

Nah, just kidding. The consumer businesses will continue to suffer by association with the world's richest troll. SpaceX and StarLink are going to continue to suckle at the government teat and will be okay. 

 

Dude took a social media company that never showed a profit and made a profit. For that, you think he failed?

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

 

AKA, anonymous sources. Better make that investment before anonymous sources disappear.

Couldn't refute it so you attacked the source. If only someone had a way to predict you would do that.

🔽👇⬇️

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
27 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Holy shit. He IS a business genius after all. Anybody who can repair his own damage in just 3 years must be the bestest! -- maybe he can un-f*ck Tesla by 2028?

Nah, just kidding. The consumer businesses will continue to suffer by association with the world's richest troll. SpaceX and StarLink are going to continue to suckle at the government teat and will be okay. 

 

Twitter was over valued at the price he paid for it... so no, he did not repair his own damage. Twitter was losing money when he took it over... so no, he did not repair his own damage. 

SpaceX has revolutionized the way we put payloads into orbit at far cheaper prices and doing so at far greater pace. The notion that SpaceX is sucking at the teat of government vs they have provided not only the government but other commercial enterprises a far more cost effective way to put stuff into orbit is just you being you, not interested in any factual debate. 

Same goes for StarLink. You would rather waste countless billions on running fiber out to rural areas through a wasteful government bureaucracy when people have access to StarLink instead. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Dude took a social media company that never showed a profit and made a profit. For that, you think he failed?

Couldn't refute it so you attacked the source. If only someone had a way to predict you would do that.

🔽👇⬇️

Dude, you yourself posted a chart that showed Twitter was profitable in 2018 and 2019 -- and without a value setback of $30 billion.

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,891
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...