Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thats one hell of a statement because Justin has spent more than any other PM in history, including our war years....Not sure where the money is coming from, maybe the budget will balance itself but this guy is a banker he should have a plan right, only three ways to spend new money, cut some place, or raise taxes, or just add it to our national debt like justin did...It seems like the liberals will just keep printing money until the bank is broke....so much for inflation control, sound monetary policies, for which bankers are known for....its spend like a drunken sailor... I'm starting to think this is the guy we need in charge, to finish off where Justin left us...Broke...

 

Matthew Lau: Carney's spending plan would put even Trudeau to shame

 

Edited by Army Guy
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted

The term 'carbon competitive' is an absurd creation. It means, i guess, if we are to get our carbon footprint down around where others have theirs. But that doesn't account for our much larger land space requiring more travel, or our climate or our oil and gas industries.

Besides, which this is a competition we don't want to win. It involves greatly increasing spending on wasteful energy projects and increasing the cost of energy to discourage people from using it. And that inevitably leads to lower growth and more poverty.

Bjorn Lomborg demonstrates what this means in just two minutes.

 

 

Posted (edited)

I would be fine with separating operating from capital spending on one condition. That there was a schedule to pay each capital project off. Something that no government from either party has done for many decades.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
50 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Lots of opinion, no facts.  This reads like a very scared rightwing party puff piece.  

How Net Zero is economic suicide for the West.

In which Paul Marshall points out that those countries furthest ahead in net zero have the most expensive power, and are losing their industries to China and other countries. The cost of power in the UK is now 7 times what it is in China. We are driving our industries to the enemy, where they set up and use cheap coal power to build what they used to build here, then ship it back to us. China then uses the money to build weapons and to spread its influence into every Western government.

 

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...