CrakHoBarbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 2 hours ago, User said: Of course. I witnessed firsthand the leftists in the media and others trying to fearmonger about Monkey Pox to the general public. Threatened by the scientific community much? I understand. Halfwits are tired of educated, highly intelligent people trying to save you from yourselves. Go ahead. Ignore doctors. Don't inoculate your kids. Ignore warnings from the cdc. Darwin called it "natural selection ". That's how the stupid kill themselves off. By being stupid. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 54 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: At first, homophobia was associated with increased odds of straight identification in all groups." If you read further, they then concluded: "homophobia is significantly associated with straight identification among men with same-sex sexuality" You are so uneducated, you dont even realize your reading comprehension is whacked. Sorry, but your gay (or at the very least you have underlying homosexual tendencies). And the way you deal with that is by lashing out at gays. Deal with it you halfwitted closet queen. LOL the report doesn't say what you claim Crack ho It's hilarious you'd bring a flawed study to the discussion tho, considering what a flawed person you are how does it feel to be owned by all these 'uneducated' people? And why are you STILL pretending being gay was an insult? Lets face it, if you really believed the study and you actually cared about gays or trans and thought he was struggling with latent feelings you sure as hell wouldn't be trying to use it as an insult. So right off the bat you've admitted you don't believe it either. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted January 4 Author Report Posted January 4 9 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: At first, homophobia was associated with increased odds of straight identification in all groups." If you read further, they then concluded: "homophobia is significantly associated with straight identification among men with same-sex sexuality" You are so uneducated, you dont even realize your reading comprehension is whacked. Sorry, but your gay (or at the very least you have underlying homosexual tendencies). And the way you deal with that is by lashing out at gays. Deal with it you halfwitted closet queen. Your quote is earlier in the article and discusses how other papers came to that conclusion. You pulled your quote from the Abstract. I pulled mine from the Conclusion. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 10 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Threatened by the scientific community much? I understand. Halfwits are tired of educated, highly intelligent people trying to save you from yourselves. Go ahead. Ignore doctors. Don't inoculate your kids. Ignore warnings from the cdc. Darwin called it "natural selection ". That's how the stupid kill themselves off. By being stupid. Gee whiz Barbie. For "educated highly intelligent people", they sure are wrong a lot. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Your quote is earlier in the article and discusses how other papers came to that conclusion. You pulled your quote from the Abstract. I pulled mine from the Conclusion. I quoted empirical studies. You posted a blog. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 4 Author Report Posted January 4 (edited) 27 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: I quoted empirical studies. You posted a blog. The studies you posted aren't empirical. In fact, the first study admitted it was flawed. It actually said that they likely misappropriated the cause of erections. The second link was a paper, not a study and that paper stated most of those that they categorized as homophobic, identified as straight. Considering your thesis is that all homophobes are actually gay, you've done a shit job of supporting that thesis. Along the way, the point you tried to counter (that you are a hypocrite) has been reinforced by your own writings. Edited January 4 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: The studies you posted aren't empirical. She got confused and thought 'empirical' mean it was written by darth vader 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Considering your thesis is that all homophobes are actually gay, you've done a shit job of supporting that thesis. Along the way, the point you tried to counter (that you are a hypocrite) has been reinforced by your own writings. I never stated "all" homophobes are closeted gays. The Oxford academic empirical study stated: "Latent class analyses also found distinct groups of straight-identified men and women with substantial same-sex activity and/or attraction, indicating that it is a heterogeneous population in terms of attitudes, including homophobia." So there is a correlation between homophobia and closeted homosexuality, regardless of how badly you wish to deny it. 1 Quote
User Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 18 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Threatened by the scientific community much? No, I was not threatened by Monkey Pox at all. No matter how ignorantly folks like you pushed it. Do you know why? Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 42 minutes ago, User said: No, I was not threatened by Monkey Pox at all. No matter how ignorantly folks like you pushed it. Do you know why? Having trouble distinguishing "scientific community " from " monkey pox" i see. Your demigod donald just appointed RFK Jr. as the head of health and human services. Before donalds even sworn in, RFK, a prolific spreader of anti-vax misinformation, decided he'd get his attorney to attempt to revoke approval for the polio vaccine. The polio vaccine!! You maga fools are anti-science and your demigod and his billionaires boys club are gunna get people killed. 1 Quote
User Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 15 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Having trouble distinguishing "scientific community " from " monkey pox" i see. No, you had that problem. I have been entirely consistent. 17 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: decided he'd get his attorney to attempt to revoke approval for the polio vaccine. So, tell us. Are you ignorant or a liar? Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 4 Report Posted January 4 10 minutes ago, User said: No, you had that problem. I have been entirely consistent. True. You've constantly shown your halfwittedness. 11 minutes ago, User said: So, tell us. Are you ignorant or a liar? RFK jrs. An incompetent buffoon, so you relate to him. Doesn't negate the fact that he told his attorney to ask the FDA to revoked approval of the polio vaccine. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiq7Y3-n92KAxVxEUQIHQ2FF2A4ChAWegQIEBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.axios.com%2F2024%2F12%2F13%2Frfk-ally-revoke-polio-vaccine&usg=AOvVaw37AVBKt8W-UjMZHaSGUpxI&opi=89978449 Of course, RFK backpeddled after public push back. Just like donald when he said he could lower food prices. Then, all of a sudden, after he was elected, said how hard it would be to lower food prices. It's the old bait and switch and the MAGA faithful fell for it hook, line and sinker. Yall are suckers. Quote
User Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: True. You've constantly shown your halfwittedness. Funny that you think so lowly of me and yet I continually best you. 9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Doesn't negate the fact that he told his attorney to ask the FDA to revoked approval of the polio vaccine. So... I will go with liar then. Since you keep repeating this same falsehood even after being called out. 11 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: It's the old bait and switch and the MAGA faithful fell for it hook, line and sinker. Yall are suckers. How am I a sucker? I am not the one here pushing the ignorance, lies or fear-mongering... you are. 1 Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 1 hour ago, User said: Funny that you think so lowly of me and yet I continually best you. Only in your tiny mind. 1 hour ago, User said: So... I will go with liar then. Since you keep repeating this same falsehood even after being called out. If you were correct, you'd of posted a citation proving it. 1 hour ago, User said: am I a sucker? Obviously Quote
User Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 17 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Only in your tiny mind. Yet again... if I have a tiny mind, that doesn't say much about yours. 18 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: If you were correct, you'd of posted a citation proving it. The source you provided proved it. Besides, it is your baseless assertion. It did not happen. There is no evidence it happened. 19 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Obviously Ah yes... once again, you have to resort to these dishonest tactics of selectively quoting a sentence to distort what is said... against someone you think has a tiny mind. LOL Doesn't say much about you. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 It's amusing for a while, but @CrakHoBarbie's "you are secretly gay" response to being proven wrong, is getting old. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It's amusing for a while, but @CrakHoBarbie's "you are secretly gay" response to being proven wrong, is getting old. Folks like crackhobarbie are just out of their league. They are mindless leftists who repeat the talking points they hear from whatever leftist hacks they listen to and as soon as they are challenged they break down like children throwing a tantrum. Quote
Legato Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 5 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: I never stated "all" homophobes are closeted gays. The Oxford academic empirical study stated: "Latent class analyses also found distinct groups of straight-identified men and women with substantial same-sex activity and/or attraction, indicating that it is a heterogeneous population in terms of attitudes, including homophobia." So there is a correlation between homophobia and closeted homosexuality, regardless of how badly you wish to deny it. Correlation is not causation. 1 Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 20 minutes ago, Legato said: Correlation is not causation. I didn't create the empirical studies. I just posted them. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It's amusing for a while, but @CrakHoBarbie's "you are secretly gay" response to being proven wrong, is getting old. Nobody's forcing you to continue responding to my posts. But you're all frenzied about the insinuation that you might be a closeted gay. I know i shouldn't enjoy this, but It's kind of fun watching you twist in the wind. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 1 hour ago, User said: Yet again... if I have a tiny mind, that doesn't say much about yours. The source you provided proved it. Besides, it is your baseless assertion. It did not happen. There is no evidence it happened. Ah yes... once again, you have to resort to these dishonest tactics of selectively quoting a sentence to distort what is said... against someone you think has a tiny mind. LOL Doesn't say much about you. Delude yourself all you want. Funny how you never post citations to support your nonsense. Why do you suppose that is? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 36 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Nobody's forcing you to continue responding to my posts. But you're all frenzied about the insinuation that you might be a closeted gay. I know i shouldn't enjoy this, but It's kind of fun watching you twist in the wind. Frenzied? You think frenzied is refuting your claims using your sources? Or are you just trying to come up neither words that you think will make my statements disreputable? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 28 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Frenzied? You think frenzied is refuting your claims using your sources? Or are you just trying to come up neither words that you think will make my statements disreputable? My contention is a known fact, and I've supported my statements with empirical evidence. Now, you are welcome to continue denying the facts I've presented. I'll still be here, trying to help you deal with reality..... For as long as it takes Queen Bee. Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 (edited) 5 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Having trouble distinguishing "scientific community " from " monkey pox" i see. Your demigod donald just appointed RFK Jr. as the head of health and human services. Before donalds even sworn in, RFK, a prolific spreader of anti-vax misinformation, decided he'd get his attorney to attempt to revoke approval for the polio vaccine. The polio vaccine!! You maga fools are anti-science and your demigod and his billionaires boys club are gunna get people killed. When all is said and done, RFK Jr will be responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths. Americans will live to regret voting in Trump for a second time. Edited January 5 by DUI_Offender Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 3 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: My contention is a known fact, and I've supported my statements with empirical evidence. Now, you are welcome to continue denying the facts I've presented. I'll still be here, trying to help you deal with reality..... For as long as it takes Queen Bee. Lmao...I identify as straight. Should the guy that demands people call him a woman honor that? Hypocrite. Oh...BTW...the difference is I identify as what I am. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.