Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 16 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: And they drank water and spoke english just like you. So you are a white supremacist! Your side is so pathetic. Are you genuinely stupid or is this all just an act? It would be helpful to know going forward. Edited January 15 by Black Dog Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 54 minutes ago, Black Dog said: 3. Again, I don't understand why you guys bother with the performance instead of admitting the fact he's a piece of shit is the appeal for you (same as Trump). Why would we admit to that? 3 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Are you genuinely stupid or is this all just an act? It would be helpful to know going forward. You are the guy who thinks a fake vagina is real.... you have no room to ever call anyone stupid ever. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 3 hours ago, Black Dog said: I'd have a tiny bit more respect for MAGAtards if Yeah, and winning YOUR respect is top of their priority list When you start making respectable arguments and contributions then other people might care but you're the guy who cheers when people he doesn't like gets shot and thinks islamists don't vote. It's like saying "if you do this, you might really win favour with this dung beetle. " Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 (edited) 4 hours ago, Black Dog said: Are you genuinely stupid or is this all just an act? It would be helpful to know going forward. I'm not so bigoted as to believe that someone that professes his faith makes him white supremacist. That is you. I'm the words mean God willing or God's will be done. Either way, if some a-hole used it as code doesn't mean Hegeseth is some neonazi or white supremacist. Only the truly ignorant and bigoted would draw such a comparison. Edited January 15 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Just now, gatomontes99 said: I'm not so bigoted as to believe that someone that processes his faith makes him white supremacist. That is you A super right wing guy gets a bunch of ink with symbols that so happens to be used by far right chucklef*cks and I'm supposed to give him the benefit of the doubt? lmao you're a rube. Quote I'm the words mean God willing or God's will be done. Either way, if some a-hole used it as code doesn't mean Hegeseth is some neonazi or white supremacist. Only the truly ignorant and bigoted would draw such a comparison. Like I said, context matters and when you consider this stuff in context of his whole deal and worldview, then I don't think you can rule it out either. Now IDK if he's a full on 1488 type but he's at least sympathetic. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 1 minute ago, Black Dog said: A super right wing guy gets a bunch of ink with symbols that so happens to be used by far right chucklef*cks and I'm supposed to give him the benefit of the doubt? lmao you're a rube. Like I said, context matters and when you consider this stuff in context of his whole deal and worldview, then I don't think you can rule it out either. Now IDK if he's a full on 1488 type but he's at least sympathetic. Oh please. You say the word context when you mean imagination. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Just now, gatomontes99 said: Oh please. You say the word context when you mean imagination. If he was just a regular dude who loved Jesus, you could try and push that bullshit about it being about his devoutness, but when you factor in his whole personality and other beliefs it paints a different picture. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 15 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yeah, and winning YOUR respect is top of their priority list When you start making respectable arguments and contributions then other people might care but you're the guy who cheers when people he doesn't like gets shot and thinks islamists don't vote. It's like saying "if you do this, you might really win favour with this dung beetle. " Hey what's up loser haven't seen you reply since you embarrassed yourself about Canada not restricting foreign immigration for a good chunk of its history and the whole deal with the cybertruck guy's mainfestos, and now you are gonna talk about respectable arguments? lol gtfo. Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Black Dog said: If he was just a regular dude who loved Jesus, you could try and push that bullshit about it being about his devoutness, but when you factor in his whole personality and other beliefs it paints a different picture. Sure... if you just make shit up, you can believe whatever you want. Like... a fake vagina is real! Just now, Black Dog said: Hey what's up loser haven't seen you reply since you embarrassed yourself about Canada not restricting foreign immigration for a good chunk of its history and the whole deal with the cybertruck guy's mainfestos, and now you are gonna talk about respectable arguments? lol gtfo. Says the fake vagina guy. Who is cowardly hiding from me. Again. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 7 minutes ago, Black Dog said: If he was just a regular dude who loved Jesus, you could try and push that bullshit about it being about his devoutness, but when you factor in his whole personality and other beliefs it paints a different picture. In your imagination. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 As an ex-drinker, I think it would be in the best interest of the US Government to conduct field sobriety tests, each time Hegsworth enters the Senate. Hegsworth has very poor coping mechanisms, when it comes to stress. He has never been grilled like this. I would bet that he will begin to show up drunk. The United States cannot have a drunkard, as Secretary of Defence. Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: As an ex-drinker, I think it would be in the best interest of the US Government to conduct field sobriety tests, each time Hegsworth enters the Senate. Hegsworth has very poor coping mechanisms, when it comes to stress. He has never been grilled like this. I would bet that he will begin to show up drunk. The United States cannot have a drunkard, as Secretary of Defence. Yeah, and you should have to use a breathalyzer that we can all monitor before you post here... What evidence do you have that Hegseth is a drunkard? 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: I'm not so bigoted as to believe that someone that processes his faith makes him white supremacist. That is you. I'm the words mean God willing or God's will be done. Either way, if some a-hole used it as code doesn't mean Hegeseth is some neonazi or white supremacist. Only the truly ignorant and bigoted would draw such a comparison. But if he did have a Swastika tattoo, you'd be telling us he's just celebrating Hindu religious symbols. You know why he has it. Edited January 15 by Hodad 1 Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 3 minutes ago, Hodad said: But if he did have a Swastika tattoo, you'd be telling us he's just celebrating Hindu religious symbols. You know why he has it. There is no real shared meaning to a swastika tattoo like Dues Vault though. YOU want to presume why he has it, with no other evidence to back it up. The folks who have swastika tattoos you find attending nazi rallies or other such nazi or white supremacist groups... they are members of such far right extreme racists violent organizations and actively promote that kind of language in support of those causes. The tattoo just goes with that. So... where is Hegseth doing anything like that? Has Hegseth been a member of some kind of Crusades group where he is calling for the return to conquer Jerusalem to kill Muslims or something I missed? So, keep running from me you coward. you hide because you know you can't keep up with me. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 (edited) 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: In your imagination. Again: are you dumb, really naive or just play acting? Hegseth has also spoken out against rooting out right wing extremists in the military which is the kind of thing you'd expect from someone sympathetic to that cause. Edited January 15 by Black Dog Quote
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 7 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Again: are you dumb, really naive or just play acting? Hegseth has also spoken out against rooting out right wing extremists in the military which is the kind of thing you'd expect from someone sympathetic to that cause. Give us the exact words... Hegseth was the victim of clowns like you trying to root out so-called extremists in the military, and he is certainly opposed to that. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Hey what's up loser haven't seen you reply since you embarrassed yourself about Canada not restricting foreign immigration for a good chunk of its history and the whole deal with the cybertruck guy's mainfestos, and now you are gonna talk about respectable arguments? lol gtfo. You've been the one hiding out since then And it was you who wound up looking like an !diot when it turned out your 'restriction was a tax which is no restriction at all and the only actual restrictions only lasted about 20 years out of a 150 year history Which isn't exactly "most' To be honest i'd forgotten about it. You lose so many discussions with me that i can't even keep track any more. I see it's still bothering you tho obvious;ly LOLOLOL sorry to hear about your butthurt ! And you got absolutely creamed in the cybertruck one - that's where you refused to provide a cite till after someone else did and then it turned out the guy didn't say anything like what you said at all. That one wasn't even a fight, you were just wrong and wanted your error to be my fault somehow as usual. Anyway, the fact you were wrong in those cases has nothing to do with 'respect' and everything to do with you being dumb. This however was beyond that Do better for heaven's sake. Nobody respects you as it is but this is just a new low. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 32 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You've been the one hiding out since then Yeah I don't know how many times I have to remind you I'm not a no-life loser like you who would shrivel up and die if he didn't post 200 times a week on this dumb website. Quote And it was you who wound up looking like an !diot when it turned out your 'restriction was a tax which is no restriction at all and the only actual restrictions only lasted about 20 years out of a 150 year history Which isn't exactly "most' Oh you mean the restrictions you explicitly said did not exist? lol, you f*ckin' loser. Quote To be honest i'd forgotten about it. You lose so many discussions with me that i can't even keep track any more. You do post a lot of dumb shit and you are old and decrepit so I understand why you might not remember but you and I both know you remember every single time I beat your ass. Quote And you got absolutely creamed in the cybertruck one - that's where you refused to provide a cite till after someone else did and then it turned out the guy didn't say anything like what you said at all. That one wasn't even a fight, you were just wrong and wanted your error to be my fault somehow as usual. lol you lying little b!tch, i almost feel sorry for you. Quote Anyway, the fact you were wrong in those cases has nothing to do with 'respect' and everything to do with you being dumb. This however was beyond that Do better for heaven's sake. Nobody respects you as it is but this is just a new low. Aw the pathetic little shut-in who has made more than 125 posts in the last four days is going to try and lecture other people that's so cute. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Yeah I don't know how many times I have to remind you I'm not a no-life loser You can lie to yourself as many times as you like Enjoy your mommy's basement Quote Oh you mean the restrictions you explicitly said did not exist? lol, you f*ckin' loser. Nope, the ones i said didn't exist for most of our history. And as it turns out they didn't exist for most of our history LOLOL Your comment was that only white people were allowed into Canada for most of our history. I said that was wrong. Turned out I was correct and you were mistaken. Now your butters. Quote You do post a lot of dumb shit and you are old and decrepit so I understand why you might not remember but you and I both know you remember every single time I beat your ass. I'm sure we will if it happens I mean you're about zero for 100 now, statistically you're about due to win one by accident. Your problem is you can't make an argument. And when you begin to lose an argument you simply try and pick one point of it that you think you can argue and change the goal posts. That works for some people who aren't very intelligent but unfortunately for you it doesn't work for me Quote lol you lying little b!tch, i almost feel sorry for you. Glad to see you're still getting use out of that mirror Took forever to try and get you not to fight with it Quote Aw the pathetic little shut-in who has made more than 125 posts in the last four days is going to try and lecture other people that's so cute. DUUHHH - IF I WAS WRONG IT"S BECAUSE OF YOUR POST COUNT!!! DERP!!!!! LOLOL well i guess that's one way of admitting you're a failure Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Just now, CdnFox said: You can lie to yourself as many times as you like Enjoy your mommy's basement I'm enjoying your mommy's basement actually. Quote Nope, the ones i said didn't exist for most of our history. And as it turns out they didn't exist for most of our history LOLOL I don't know why you do this to yourself, you know I always bring receipts. On 1/6/2025 at 11:51 AM, CdnFox said: Non whites were absolutely allowed, there were no restrictions they could come in in whatever numbers they wanted and frequently did. And the populations prove it. Your claim that non whites were 'not allowed' in canada is just silly and a perfect example of the woke left trying to rewrite history as fast as they can to fit an agenda and claim racism where it simply didn't exist. People from all kinds of countries including the orient came to canada without restriction. I mean goddamn son, you are just flat out retarded. Quote Your comment was that only white people were allowed into Canada for most of our history. I said that was wrong. Turned out I was correct and you were mistaken. Now your butters. That's not what I said, you're very bad at this. I said: Quote 43 years was the amount of time the Chinese exclusion act was in effect, the head Tax was in effect for 30 years before that so that's 83 out of the first 100 years of Canada's existence as a sovereign state. And then you, absolute braindead turd you are, didn't realize that 83 is more than half of 150 years. That was funny. Quote I'm sure we will if it happens I mean you're about zero for 100 now, statistically you're about due to win one by accident. The problem here is when you do lose an argument you aren't man enough to admit it, you act like a child and pretend you won anyway, which is b!tch behaviour. Quote Your problem is you can't make an argument. And when you begin to lose an argument you simply try and pick one point of it that you think you can argue and change the goal posts. That works for some people who aren't very intelligent but unfortunately for you it doesn't work for me Glad to see you're still getting use out of that mirror Took forever to try and get you not to fight with it Again, this is just boring filler. Quote DUUHHH - IF I WAS WRONG IT"S BECAUSE OF YOUR POST COUNT!!! DERP!!!!! LOLOL well i guess that's one way of admitting you're a failure No, you must understand the post count thing doesn't have anything to do with you being wrong, it's just an indicator of you being a f*cking loser. Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 12 minutes ago, Black Dog said: I'm enjoying your mommy's basement actually. I don't know why you do this to yourself, you know I always bring receipts. I mean goddamn son, you are just flat out retarded. That's not what I said, you're very bad at this. I said: And then you, absolute braindead turd you are, didn't realize that 83 is more than half of 150 years. That was funny. The problem here is when you do lose an argument you aren't man enough to admit it, you act like a child and pretend you won anyway, which is b!tch behaviour. Again, this is just boring filler. No, you must understand the post count thing doesn't have anything to do with you being wrong, it's just an indicator of you being a f*cking loser. There is no point in arguing with @CdnFox. For starters, he is not even Canadian. His loyalty is with Russia. Furthermore, when he loses arguments, which is the norm, he will resort to childish antics, like calling his adversaries "liars." He is predictable as a clock. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 15 Author Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: Again: are you dumb, really naive or just play acting? Hegseth has also spoken out against rooting out right wing extremists in the military which is the kind of thing you'd expect from someone sympathetic to that cause. Because you and your ilk think anyone that knows how to shoot a gun is a right wing extremist. The problem is not Pete and his views, it's you. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 10 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said: There is no point in arguing with @CdnFox. For starters, he is not even Canadian. His loyalty is with Russia. Furthermore, when he loses arguments, which is the norm, he will resort to childish antics, like calling his adversaries "liars." He is predictable as a clock. As opposed to your storming off like a child saying you are going to ignore people? 25 minutes ago, Black Dog said: I mean goddamn son, you are just flat out retarded. Again, you are the guy who tried to claim someone having a fake vagina made them a real woman. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Just now, gatomontes99 said: Because you and your ilk think anyone that knows how to shoot a gun is a right wing extremist. The problem is not Pete and his views, it's you. So to be clear you also don't think the military should be looking for any people with extremist beliefs in their ranks? Now is that because you don't thinks such people exist or is it because you are sympathetic to the cause of right wing extremism? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.