J6 Pipe Bomber Revelation

[gatomontes99]

Backstory for those that haven't followed the story of the assasination attempt on Kamala Harris (what? You didn't know about that?).

On J6, 2 pipe bombs were left in DC, one outside the RNC (but far enough away to not be much of a threat) and one right under a window at the DNC. Oddly, instead of confirming herself, Kamala was at a meeting at the DNC building. She really never talks about it.

The pipe bomber was caught on numerous videos, yet somehow managed to conceal his/her face. Also, our government that spends trillions more than it takes in, could afford video cameras with any kind of real quality, so all the videos show little to no detail.

After the bomber planted the supposedly viable bombs, a sweep performed by a bomb dog (within feet) turned up nothing.

All this to say that during the investigation the USSS claims all of the data from all of their agents was lost in an equipment swap/upgrade. The FBI also claimed that all the phone data for that area was gone. That means that, even though the bomber was seen on cam talking on the phone, there was no record of the call or location services that would have lead to the bomber.

Quote

Cellular carriers have told Congress they possess intact phone usage data from the vicinity where two pipe bombs were planted during the Jan. 6 incident, directly disputing FBI testimony that agents couldn't identify a suspect because the phone data was corrupted, a key House chairman tells Just the News.

The revelations from Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., the chairman of the House Administration oversight subcommittee, adds new intrigue to a debate that has gripped Washington for nearly four years: Why can't the FBI with so much evidence and manpower identify the suspect who planted the explosive devices at the Democrat and Republican Party headquarters hours before the Capitol was breached.

“In the days and weeks following January 6, 2021, the FBI opened an investigation into the pipe bomber and attempted to identify the suspect by analyzing cell phone data linked to the area surrounding the RNC and DNC,” Loudermilk told Just the News

https://justthenews.com/government/security/hldcell-companies-refute-fbi-testimony-j6-pipe-bomber-investigation-loudermilk

The question becomes, why would the FBI lie about the data being corrupted? The telecoms say the data exists.

[Legato]

Federal Bureau Of Instigation.

[WestCanMan]

30 minutes ago, Legato said:

Federal Bureau Of Instigation.

Bureau of Farcical Incarceration

[WestCanMan]

39 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Backstory for those that haven't followed the story of the assasination attempt on Kamala Harris (what? You didn't know about that?).

On J6, 2 pipe bombs were left in DC, one outside the RNC (but far enough away to not be much of a threat) and one right under a window at the DNC. Oddly, instead of confirming herself, Kamala was at a meeting at the DNC building. She really never talks about it.

The pipe bomber was caught on numerous videos, yet somehow managed to conceal his/her face. Also, our government that spends trillions more than it takes in, could afford video cameras with any kind of real quality, so all the videos show little to no detail.

After the bomber planted the supposedly viable bombs, a sweep performed by a bomb dog (within feet) turned up nothing.

All this to say that during the investigation the USSS claims all of the data from all of their agents was lost in an equipment swap/upgrade. The FBI also claimed that all the phone data for that area was gone. That means that, even though the bomber was seen on cam talking on the phone, there was no record of the call or location services that would have lead to the bomber.

The question becomes, why would the FBI lie about the data being corrupted? The telecoms say the data exists.

We have the same thing in Canada. 

Whenever Trudeau commits a scandal we always hear "These guys can't be compelled to talk because of Parliamentary privilege", or "The AG can't talk because of lawyer-client confidentiality" or "The RCMP aren't allowed to question these people because of blah blah blah" and "These records are ordered sealed for 100 years". And that's when things have happened that we know about. When things happen, like for example, SNC Lavalin having a court-documented history of bribing liberal bureaucratic appointees, the MSM simply refuses to acknowledge it out loud.

The FBI "losing evidence 😉 😉" related to something that looks fishy for the Dems is par for the course.

Some of Hillary's aides were given immunity by the FBI in exchange for nothing at all regarding her destruction of subpoenaed evidence case. The FBI's Russian collusion investigation presented their 'evidence' to the FISA court containing 17 significant errors and omissions (lies) regarding Carter Page alone, there were dozens more significant errors and omissions which aren't talked about, and the FBI was even convicted of fabricating evidence. The FBI created the Whimer kidnapping plot themselves and then solved it as an October surprise, and then were found guilty of entrapment in the first trial after the 2020 election, but the records of that case were not allowed to be presented in the subsequent (and entirely farcical) kidnapping trials - "Please keep the details of our FBI crime spree out of the other trials, judge".

The FBI isn't even 1% better than the KGB (GRU). They are an abomination of a "police force". 

[CdnFox]

35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

We have the same thing in Canada. 

Whenever Trudeau commits a scandal we always hear "These guys can't be compelled to talk because of Parliamentary privilege", 

Well that's at least more honest

The FBI are like "Ummmm... bomber? Data? Whaaaat? Oh you mean the data... yeah, well the dog ate it you see so.... yeah that sounds pretty good we're going with that. (*whispers to agent beside him* get the dog  shove this in his mouth right now)

at least in Canada they don't pretend, it's more like  "Of course we've got the data, but we've also got a big ole can of F U" 

[WestCanMan]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's at least more honest

The FBI are like "Ummmm... bomber? Data? Whaaaat? Oh you mean the data... yeah, well the dog ate it you see so.... yeah that sounds pretty good we're going with that. (*whispers to agent beside him* get the dog  shove this in his mouth right now)

at least in Canada they don't pretend, it's more like  "Of course we've got the data, but we've also got a big ole can of F U" 

And then the party that's using the judiciary and federal police force in each country calls the other party fascists. Because apparently that's what fascists do nowadays - they get the other members of gov't to use the judiciary and police against them. They fascist masochists. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

And then the party that's using the judiciary and federal police force in each country calls the other party fascists. Because apparently that's what fascists do nowadays - they get the other members of gov't to use the judiciary and police against them. They fascist masochists. 

IT's like a new tounge twister for politiican's kids. 

"Pierre Poilievre picked apart a fascist frenchman. If Pierre Poilievre picked apart a fascist frenchman, how many fascist frenchmen lawsuits did Pierre Poilievre provoke?

 

Seriously  bet you can't say it 10 times fast   

Edited November 18, 2024 by CdnFox

[gatomontes99]

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

IT's like a new tounge twister for politiican's kids. 

"Pierre Poilievre picked apart a fascist frenchman. If Pierre Poilievre picked apart a fascist frenchman, how many fascist frenchmen lawsuits did Pierre Poilievre provoke?

 

Seriously  bet you can't say it 10 times fast   

It 10 times fast.

What did I win?

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

It 10 times fast.

What did I win?

A round trip all expenses paid visit to your Proctologist to get my boot back.  Ya dink.