Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I will accurately state that you are a dishonest person who goes out of his way to avoid a simple question.

Where was I dishonest? What was the question I avoided?

You have repeatedly made statements about me that are not true. 

 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, User said:

Where was I dishonest? What was the question I avoided?

You have repeatedly made statements about me that are not true. 

Do you think a false flag is a possibility or not?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Do you think a false flag is a possibility or not?

Of course its a possibility, doesn't seem likely based on what we know. 

Now, can you admit you should not have said what you did about me or not?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

Of course its a possibility, doesn't seem likely based on what we know. 

Now, can you admit you should not have said what you did about me or not?

OK fine. I wouldn't have said that if you had been clearer in the beginning. I think it is quite possible that someone would use it to stir up hatred toward a particular group. It has happened many times in history. Gulf of Tonkin and Second Gulf War in your own.

Posted
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Yup. She was a weak choice.

I actually think Pete Buttigieg would have made a good leader.

Unfortunately I don't think they had any real options at that time. They could sell the idea of going to the vice president but if they had tried to hold some sort of miniature leadership race in like 2 weeks it probably would have been an unmitigated disaster that divided the party more than anything.

They needed to keep Biden out of it from the beginning and let a normal nomination take place and unfortunately for the democrat voters  that just didn't happen

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
39 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Unfortunately I don't think they had any real options at that time. They could sell the idea of going to the vice president but if they had tried to hold some sort of miniature leadership race in like 2 weeks it probably would have been an unmitigated disaster that divided the party more than anything.

They needed to keep Biden out of it from the beginning and let a normal nomination take place and unfortunately for the democrat voters  that just didn't happen

Yes, Biden should not have run. Him and Jill probably both knew well before 2024, that Biden was experiencing cognitive decline. For him to screw over his party like that, was very selfish.

Posted
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Yes, Biden should not have run. Him and Jill probably both knew well before 2024, that Biden was experiencing cognitive decline. For him to screw over his party like that, was very selfish.

True. I mean he still denying that there's any issue and still mad that he got pushed out at this late stage despite it being so obvious. And Jill was attending important meetings for quite a while, so obviously they knew there was something up. Since when does the wife of the president somehow become involved in the negotiations and talks with other groups about the business of the country?

If the rumors and accusations are to be believed, the entire family makes a lot of its money based around Biden's influence one way or another. I suspect there was a lot of pressure for him to keep going if he could

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

I noticed a complete lack of Robo's unhinged post about Maga cultists ever since the revelation that they had Free Gaza on the devices.

Strangely I didn't have them on my bingo card for this but they either have been quiet lately or the media is covering for the Dems by not publicizing their actions.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

I noticed a complete lack of Robo's unhinged post about Maga cultists ever since the revelation that they had Free Gaza on the devices.

Strangely I didn't have them on my bingo card for this but they either have been quiet lately or the media is covering for the Dems by not publicizing their actions.

What's the point of controlling the media if you can't use it to your advantage in an election? As Robo would say,  Duh!! :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...