User Posted September 10, 2024 Author Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, impartialobserver said: On a side note.. Hill kind of got the last laugh. He scored the TD that started the rally which won them the game. Now only 1 game of 17. Going to need him at his best next week against Buffalo. His celebration was funny, he pretended to be handcuffed. LOL Quote
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 Tyreek, being an NFL Superstar, thought that he had licence to eff with po-po I can't deny, that if I was a copper like my mates who are coppers I too would have put him in his place he doesn't play for the Chiefs anymore so he's not on my team if it was in Killer City and he was playing for the Chiefs, I'd let him off the hook but now that he plays for the Dolphins, I'd lock him in the hoosegow and throw away the key Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 Hill is arguably the top WR in the current NFL. My guess is that his legal team will have a field day. That being said, he is not a great guy off the field. On the field, he is one of a kind. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 33 minutes ago, User said: Clearly excessive. I already explained this, you can't actually respond directly to each of the points I laid out. -Pulling him out of car -> Excessive use of force -Putting him on the ground, aggressively cuffing him while pushing down on his back -> Excessive use of force -Pushing him to the ground while he was already cuffed to force him to sit down -> Excessive use of force They already did. The officer walked away to write the ticket, the other officer walked away to look at the VIN. This is not excessive force. Quote https://m.flsenate.gov/Statutes/943.1735 (b) “Excessive use of force” means use of force that exceeds the degree of force permitted by law, policy, or the observing officer’s employing agency. Quote https://floridajustice.com/excessive-force-law-enforcement/ What Excessive Use of Force or Police Brutality Looks Like Excessive force can occur when police are trying to detain or speak to someone, at a traffic stop, during crowd control at an event, or after an arrest. The situation itself does not have to be violent in nature for police to employ excessive force. Force becomes excessive and illegal when an officer continues the force after the suspect has complied, that is been subdued and arrested. Some ways we have seen it displayed are: ∅ Tackling; ∅ Kicking; ∅ Punching; ∅ Choking; ∅ Tasering; ∅ Martial Arts; ∅ Baton Strikes; ∅ Nachachku; ∅ Excessively Tight Handcuffs or Zip-Ties; ∅ Use of Firearms; ∅ And More. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Hill is arguably the top WR in the current NFL. My guess is that his legal team will have a field day. That being said, he is not a great guy off the field. On the field, he is one of a kind. f*ck the Dolphins Killa City FTW Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: f*ck the Dolphins Killa City FTW I have no one NFL team that I root for every year. As for MIA, my guess is that they make the playoffs but lose in the WC round or possibly the divisional round. If there is a team that I am rooting for.. it is DET. Never been to a super bowl and only twice in the NFC championship game. I figure the Red Sox and Cubs of MLB ended their championship droughts.. why not the Detroit Lions? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: Hill is arguably the top WR in the current NFL. My guess is that his legal team will have a field day. That being said, he is not a great guy off the field. On the field, he is one of a kind. As a Chiefs fan, I agree. I loved his abilities on the field and I just cringed at the person he is off the field. It's one of those things that is pretty much a law. You should idolize ideals and not people. Ideals won't let you down but people always will. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 Just now, impartialobserver said: I have no one NFL team that I root for every year. As for MIA, my guess is that they make the playoffs but lose in the WC round or possibly the divisional round. If there is a team that I am rooting for.. it is DET. Never been to a super bowl and only twice in the NFC championship game. I figure the Red Sox and Cubs of MLB ended their championship droughts.. why not the Detroit Lions? well technically I am \Californian my father was raised in Glendale, he went to UC Berkeley on a scholarship hence how I became a Niners fan I was at Candlestick watching Joe Montana defeat them all but when the Niners chose Steve Young over Joe I followed Joe to Missouruh and I've been in love with Missouruh ever since 1 Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: well technically I am \Californian my father was raised in Glendale, he went to UC Berkeley on a scholarship hence how I became a Niners fan I was at Candlestick watching Joe Montana defeat them all but when the Niners chose Steve Young over Joe I followed Joe to Missouruh and I've been in love with Missouruh ever since I remember watching Montana play with KC play in the 1993 afc championship game against Buffalo. I was rooting for him and KC. How cool would it have been to see Joe Montana take on DAL with Troy Aikman. Anyways, barring injury Tyreek Hill ends up in the pro football hall of fame. He is already #52 in all time receptions and plenty of games left for him to play. Quote
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, impartialobserver said: I remember watching Montana play with KC play in the 1993 afc championship game against Buffalo. I was rooting for him and KC. How cool would it have been to see Joe Montana take on DAL with Troy Aikman. Anyways, barring injury Tyreek Hill ends up in the pro football hall of fame. He is already #52 in all time receptions and plenty of games left for him to play. the Niners under Joe delivered for me over and over because my father, being from Glendale, was actually a Rams fan but for me, I loved San Francisco at the time, I felt more attachment to the Bay Area but I don't identify with California anymore I'm with working classes fighting to survive, in Missouruh my father is dead, yet I am thankful that he can't see therein what has happened to his beloved California Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: the Niners under Joe delivered for me over and over because my father, being from Glendale, was actually a Rams fan but for me, I loved San Francisco at the time, I felt more attachment to the Bay Area but I don't identify with California anymore I'm with working classes fighting to survive, in Missouruh my father is dead, yet I am thankful that he can't see therein what has happened to his beloved California A lot of California is very Conservative. Travel north of the Bay area and it gets pretty rural and Conservative. Ever been to Alturas, CA? Quote
Hodad Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: They were not excessive. WTF? They were wildly excessive. There was zero reason to drag him out of the car. Complete bullshit. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 3 minutes ago, Hodad said: WTF? They were wildly excessive. There was zero reason to drag him out of the car. Complete bullshit. I posted the definition and the list of things considered excessive. Nothing in that video indicates excessive force. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: A lot of California is very Conservative. Travel north of the Bay area and it gets pretty rural and Conservative. Ever been to Alturas, CA? it's a one party state now, descending into chaos it's even spreading to Nevada now thus I look to Ocean Springs Mississippi perfect white sand beaches on the Gulf Coast, across the causeway from Biloxi fleeing from the Democrat Plantation Aristocracy traitors to the republic Quote
User Posted September 10, 2024 Author Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: This is not excessive force. Funny how you left out the rest of that... (a) Instruction on the proportional use of force. (b) Alternatives to use of force, including de-escalation techniques. Also, show me the policy and training where they are shown to immediately escalate in mere seconds to ripping someone out of the car? Where was the de-escalation techniques? You are grasping at straws to justify the indefensible. 21 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I posted the definition and the list of things considered excessive. Nothing in that video indicates excessive force. No, you did not. You posted a link that is circular in nature, not the department policy in question. Your argument is that they don't define it as excessive so it is not excessive... Again: -Pulling him out of car -> Excessive use of force -Putting him on the ground, aggressively cuffing him while pushing down on his back -> Excessive use of force -Pushing him to the ground while he was already cuffed to force him to sit down -> Excessive use of force Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 10 minutes ago, User said: Funny how you left out the rest of that... (a) Instruction on the proportional use of force. (b) Alternatives to use of force, including de-escalation techniques. Also, show me the policy and training where they are shown to immediately escalate in mere seconds to ripping someone out of the car? Where was the de-escalation techniques? You are grasping at straws to justify the indefensible. No, you did not. You posted a link that is circular in nature, not the department policy in question. Your argument is that they don't define it as excessive so it is not excessive... Again: -Pulling him out of car -> Excessive use of force -Putting him on the ground, aggressively cuffing him while pushing down on his back -> Excessive use of force -Pushing him to the ground while he was already cuffed to force him to sit down -> Excessive use of force None of that is excessive. It just isn't. Your insistence that it is is baffling. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted September 10, 2024 Author Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: None of that is excessive. It just isn't. Your insistence that it is is baffling. Of course, it is. All you can do is keep saying it isn't while I have explained in detail exactly why it is. Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 30 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: it's a one party state now, descending into chaos it's even spreading to Nevada now thus I look to Ocean Springs Mississippi perfect white sand beaches on the Gulf Coast, across the causeway from Biloxi fleeing from the Democrat Plantation Aristocracy traitors to the republic Most states are one party honestly. Very few have any balance. Nevada is one of the few where the outcome of an election is not a simple formality. Quote
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, impartialobserver said: Most states are one party honestly. Very few have any balance. Nevada is one of the few where the outcome of an election is not a simple formality. be thankful for America because the UK, Canada, Australia & New Zealand are much worse fall back to the temple; rally round the Ark of the Covenant; Declaration of Independence preamble Grotius Union to free all the slaves everywhere, or die trying Quote
gatomontes99 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 9 minutes ago, User said: Of course, it is. All you can do is keep saying it isn't while I have explained in detail exactly why it is. But nothing you described, in detail, rises to excessive. If anything, you've described unnecessary actions. But you haven't described excessive actions. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: be thankful for America because the UK, Canada, Australia & New Zealand are much worse fall back to the temple; rally round the Ark of the Covenant; Declaration of Independence preamble Grotius Union to free all the slaves everywhere, or die trying not sure about what you wrote but still you should try out NE California one day. The state might be very blue.. this corner is not. My kids and I venture out this way 4 or 5 times per year for fishing, hunting, and assorted mayhem. Quote
User Posted September 10, 2024 Author Report Posted September 10, 2024 Just now, gatomontes99 said: But nothing you described, in detail, rises to excessive. If anything, you've described unnecessary actions. But you haven't described excessive actions. OMG, are you going to quibble over unnecessary and excessive? If the force was unnecessary, then it was excessive. Again, you just keep asserting it is not excessive because you can't actually respond to the absurdity of their ripping him out of his car within seconds of asking him to exit. They didn't even give him a chance. That they shoved him to the ground instead of giving him a chance to sit on his own. None of that was reasonable use of force. None of it. All they had to do was write the ticket and give it to him. Thats it. Quote
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 Just now, impartialobserver said: not sure about what you wrote but still you should try out NE California one day. The state might be very blue.. this corner is not. My kids and I venture out this way 4 or 5 times per year for fishing, hunting, and assorted mayhem. as my wife is Canadian and I could never leave her I am doomed to live behind the iron curtain against American freedom until my dying day De Oppresso Liber Quote
impartialobserver Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: as my wife is Canadian and I could never leave her I am doomed to live behind the iron curtain against American freedom until my dying day De Oppresso Liber not saying that you have to move there. Visit one day. Fishing may not be what you are used to but the wide open spaces, gun culture, and folks letting their hair down is nice Quote
Dougie93 Posted September 10, 2024 Report Posted September 10, 2024 5 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: not saying that you have to move there. Visit one day. Fishing may not be what you are used to but the wide open spaces, gun culture, and folks letting their hair down is nice I hear you, pilgrim none the less, I thirst for American freedom from here behind the lines there is no free speech here, no first amendment, quite the opposite can you imagine ? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.