Kamala Harris believed at one time police should not answer 911 calls.

[WestCanMan]

43 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL look at you fly off the handle here, you absolutely smack your wife around if she burns the toast don't you?

You wanted an answer about Trump's one sentence in his entire life and I gave it to you, dummy. 

If I made you poop your pants a little bit just by explaining how stupid your question was, that's not my fault. I was doing you a favour.

I never talk to my wife like that because I never would have married anyone as stupid as you. 

Quote

Yeah normal people tend to frown on vigilante justice, but I know that you right wingers love a lynching.

Leftists are the ones who cheered when cops were ambushed and killed. Obama even stood in front of 5 dead cops and blamed their murders on "centuries of racism, slavery and Jim Crowe laws". 

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

By his own admission he went to protect businesses from rioters and provide first aid, which are typically jobs that fall to police and other first responders, not fat teenagers.

So, it's not vigilantism. Or, I guess to you, everytime someone gets a bandaid out for their kids boo boo, OMG, they are a vigilante!!! 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Wanna read that over and try again, dummy?

Let me help you: determining whether or not Rittenhouse is a vigilante does in fact hinge upon the definition of vigilante. 

Let me help you out again, the issue is no longer the definition of Vigilante, it is your applying it to Rittenhouse. 

Do I need to draw that in crayon with pictures for you?

 

[Black Dog]

Just now, User said:

So, it's not vigilantism. Or, I guess to you, everytime someone gets a bandaid out for their kids boo boo, OMG, they are a vigilante!!! 

lol this is a pathetic argument. Someone giving their kid a bandaid is not analogous to someone taking up arms and travelling to a site of civil unrest for the express purpose of carrying out duties that are typically the purview of authorized agents of the state.

Quote

Let me help you out again, the issue is no longer the definition of Vigilante, it is your applying it to Rittenhouse. 

By both the dictionary and commonly held definitions of the term, he was acting as a vigilante. Simply asserting otherwise is not an argument.

Quote

Do I need to draw that in crayon with pictures for you?

No, I'd hate for you to have to go and dig them out of your nose.

[User]

Just now, Black Dog said:

lol this is a pathetic argument. Someone giving their kid a bandaid is not analogous to someone taking up arms and travelling to a site of civil unrest for the express purpose of carrying out duties that are typically the purview of authorized agents of the state.

Cleaning up vandalism in the community, helping people in need, putting out fires, helping protect a business... 

So, when will you get to the vigilantism you keep talking about?

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

By both the dictionary and commonly held definitions of the term, he was acting as a vigilante. Simply asserting otherwise is not an argument.

Yes, you asserted this again. You have yet to explain how. Well, beyond saying that apparently everyone in the world is a vigilante because they would help another person out with first aid, or help put out a fire... 

 

 

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, User said:

Cleaning up vandalism in the community, helping people in need, putting out fires, helping protect a business... 

So, when will you get to the vigilantism you keep talking about?

How was he planning to protect a business, exactly?

Quote

Yes, you asserted this again. You have yet to explain how.

I've explained it multiple times, get your head out of your ass and learn to read.

Quote

Well, beyond saying that apparently everyone in the world is a vigilante because they would help another person out with first aid, or help put out a fire... 

Yeah if you omit the part where he brought a gun to a riot to protect businesses then it seems much more anodyne, unfortunately for your retarded argument, the gun thing is kind of central to the story.

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

How was he planning to protect a business, exactly?

The same way an entire industry of private security or people do on their own... everyone is a vigilante!
 

 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I've explained it multiple times, get your head out of your ass and learn to read.

No, you just keep asserting it as if it were true. It is not. 

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah if you omit the part where he brought a gun to a riot to protect businesses then it seems much more anodyne, unfortunately for your retarded argument, the gun thing is kind of central to the story.

It is lawful to carry firearms. It is lawful to help protect a business. Are you ever going to get to a point here?

[Black Dog]

Just now, User said:

The same way an entire industry of private security or people do on their own... everyone is a vigilante!

Private security  guards are authorized by the state to perform their duties and "people who do on their own" would also be considered vigilantes, dummy.

Quote

No, you just keep asserting it as if it were true. It is not. 

Nope, I've given the definition if vigilante and explained how he meets it. You haven't provided any argument at all, because you're a loser.

Quote

It is lawful to carry firearms. It is lawful to help protect a business. Are you ever going to get to a point here?

The legality of those things is irrelevant to whether or not someone is a vigilante.

[User]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Private security  guards are authorized by the state to perform their duties and "people who do on their own" would also be considered vigilantes, dummy.

No, not all private security must be "authorized" by the state. Private security is primarily regulated at the city level, if at all. 

No, yet again, that is not what makes someone a vigilante. 

You keep leaving out the key part of that definition. 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Nope, I've given the definition if vigilante and explained how he meets it. You haven't provided any argument at all, because you're a loser.

You are half right, you gave a definition, then just keep mindlessly asserting he is one. 

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The legality of those things is irrelevant to whether or not someone is a vigilante.

I guess you are back to playing ignorant again and don't know the definition. 

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, User said:

Cleaning up vandalism in the community, helping people in need, putting out fires

Now I see why cultists hate him.

Quote

So, when will you get to the vigilantism you keep talking about?

Yes, you asserted this again. You have yet to explain how. Well, beyond saying that apparently everyone in the world is a vigilante because they would help another person out with first aid, or help put out a fire... 

1. He loved the fires and the destruction of all the businesses because he's a Demi cultist, and he was sad to see someone interfering, just like Walz would have been: Tim's wife said that she opens her window so that she can the smell of tire fires
2. He cares deeply about the safety and freedom of the pedophiles and wife beaters at the riots

He's a Kamala supporter. What else did you expect? 

[Black Dog]

48 minutes ago, User said:

No, not all private security must be "authorized" by the state. Private security is primarily regulated at the city level, if at all. 

Yes that would be "authorized by the state" you m0ron.

Quote

No, yet again, that is not what makes someone a vigilante. 

You keep leaving out the key part of that definition. 

And that is what? This oughta be good.

Quote

You are half right, you gave a definition, then just keep mindlessly asserting he is one. 

By showing how he meets the definition you stupid c*nt.

Quote

I guess you are back to playing ignorant again and don't know the definition. 

I know you're not playing ignorant here, yours is an extremely earnest stupidity.

40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Now I see why cultists hate him.

1. He cares deeply about the safety and freedom of the pedophiles and wife beaters at the riots

You should be glad I'm looking out for you.

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Yes that would be "authorized by the state" you m0ron.

Way to ignore the point... that you are wrong. 

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

And that is what? This oughta be good.

The part of trying to enforce law without authority to do so... 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

By showing how he meets the definition you stupid c*nt.

Speaking of c*nt, is that what you call your boyfriends fake vagina?

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I know you're not playing ignorant here, yours is an extremely earnest stupidity.

Are you playing ignorant about your boyfriends fake vagina being real or do you really think it is one?

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, User said:

Way to ignore the point... that you are wrong. 

The part of trying to enforce law without authority to do so... 

You mean the thing he did? LOL.

3 minutes ago, User said:

Speaking of c*nt, is that what you call your boyfriends fake vagina?

Are you playing ignorant about your boyfriends fake vagina being real or do you really think it is one?

Oh good, two more for my collection. Keep going buddy this doesn't make you look unhinged and obsessed at all!

On 8/23/2024 at 5:24 PM, User said:

Are you so ashamed of your boyfriend with the fake vagina now? LOL

On 8/23/2024 at 11:04 AM, User said:

Hell, you can't even tell the difference between your boyfriends fake vagina and a real one... or just don't care to admit it. 

On 8/16/2024 at 10:01 AM, User said:

I can see why this is upsetting for you. If only he had a fake vagina, then you would be into him. 

On 8/16/2024 at 12:58 PM, User said:

We had already moved on to your use of the fake vagina by then. 

1 hour ago, User said:

Maybe if you spent more time educating yourself, you would be able to tell the difference between a fake vagina on your boyfriend and a real one. 

On 8/23/2024 at 3:41 PM, User said:

Oh, maybe your poor memory is part of whatever condition you have that makes you unable to tell a fake vagina on a man apart from a real one? =

Just now, User said:

Are you playing ignorant about your boyfriends fake vagina being real or do you really think it is one?

 

[WestCanMan]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You should be glad I'm looking out for you.

Don't kid yourself. Those wife beaters and pedophiles at the riots are your bothers and sisters. 

If you weren't out burning and looting yourself, and throwing rocks at cops, then you're a hypocrite. 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Oh good, two more for my collection. Keep going buddy this doesn't make you look unhinged and obsessed at all!

99% of your posts are worse than that. Stop acting offended, Dirty B1tch. 

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

You mean the thing he did? LOL.

You don't need authority to help people. If you see someone on the side of the road hurt, do you just ignore them because you don't have authority to help or is it just because that is the kind of jer% you are?

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh good, two more for my collection. Keep going buddy this doesn't make you look unhinged and obsessed at all!

So... which was it? Do you know it is fake or do you really think it is real?

Nothing weird about you collecting all my comments on this at all... LOL 

You brought it up, not sure why you are acting like you are bothered about it now. 

[Black Dog]

Just now, User said:

You don't need authority to help people. 

He armed himself to go join a mob of similarly inclined armed people to protect private property, which is again, the literal dictionary definition of a vigilante: a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority.

Quote

If you see someone on the side of the road hurt, do you just ignore them because you don't have authority to help or is it just because that is the kind of jer% you are?

Depends: is that person you? 

Quote

So... which was it? Do you know it is fake or do you really think it is real?

Nothing weird about you collecting all my comments on this at all... LOL 

You brought it up, not sure why you are acting like you are bothered about it now. 

I thought maybe if you saw how many times you've repeated yourself in one spot that you'd experience a moment of self-reflection, but that requires emotional intelligence you do not possess (along with regular intelligence). 

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, User said:

You don't need authority to help people. If you see someone on the side of the road hurt, do you just ignore them because you don't have authority to help

TBH, "I wanted to be there to put out fires" is fair. If he needed a gun for protection because the city/state/country weren't providing it, that's fair. 

In any event, pedos and wife beaters were killed for attacking KR 👍 and:

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

He armed himself to go join a mob of similarly inclined armed people to protect private property, which is again, the literal dictionary definition of a vigilante: a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority.

What law was he enforcing? If you are reducing the definition of vigilante to anyone ever doing anything to protect themselves or others, then the term is meaningless. 

You do not need legal authority to help people or to act as security for property for others. 

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Depends: is that person you? 

No, it is your princess boyfriend with the fake vagina. Do you stop to help and if so are you a vigilante?

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I thought maybe if you saw how many times you've repeated yourself in one spot that you'd experience a moment of self-reflection, but that requires emotional intelligence you do not possess (along with regular intelligence). 

If I thought for a moment you were a person worthy of any of that... maybe. You are not. 

[Black Dog]

11 minutes ago, User said:

What law was he enforcing?

Mob: "It's time to take the law into our own hands!"

You, a f*cking nerd: "Uh guys can we be clear which specific legal statute we're taking into our own hands here?"

Quote

If you are reducing the definition of vigilante to anyone ever doing anything to protect themselves or others, then the term is meaningless. 

I'm not reducing the definition of vigilante to anything: I'm telling you what that definition is. You're crying about the dictionary not agreeing with you.

Here's some more elaboration you can read once you've dried your tears. The last list in particular fits Rittenhouse to a tee.

Quote

 

According to political scientist Regina Bateson, vigilantism is "the extralegal prevention, investigation, or punishment of offenses."[1] The definition has three components:

1. Extralegal: Vigilantism is done outside of the law (not necessarily in violation of the law)
2. Prevention, investigation, or punishment: Vigilantism requires specific actions, not just attitudes or beliefs
3. Offense: Vigilantism is a response to a perceived crime or violation of an authoritative norm

Other scholars have defined "collective vigilantism" as "group violence to punish perceived offenses to a community."

Les Johnston argues that vigilantism has six necessary components:[3]

1. it is planned or premeditated
2. it is carried out by private volunteers
3. it is a social movement
4. it involves or threatens the use of force
5. it occurs when established societal norms are perceived to be threatened
6. its primary goal is to enforce safety and security, especially to its participants, by combating crime

 

 

Quote

No, it is your princess boyfriend with the fake vagina. Do you stop to help and if so are you a vigilante?

lol, it's amazing how I've completely driven you insane to the point you aren't even pretending to give a shit about your "honesty" and "integrity" anymore, just spewing the same trite things trying to be edgy but all you are doing is looking like an absolute weirdo with a genital obsession.

Edited August 26, 2024 by Black Dog

[User]

9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Mob: "It's time to take the law into our own hands!"

How did they take the law into their own hands?

It is already legal to help people with medical issues, to put out fires, to protect property. No laws were taken into their own hands. 

11 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

lol, it's amazing how I've completely driven you insane to the point you aren't even pretending to give a shit about your "honesty" and "integrity" anymore, just spewing the same trite things trying to be edgy but all you are doing is looking like an absolute weirdo with a genital obsession.

My mocking you for your inability to understand the difference between a man and a woman has nothing to do with my honesty or integrity. I am not the one lying about what a woman is, you are. 

 

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Mob: "It's time to take the law into our own hands!"

Dirty B1tch! and Kamala: "OH HELL YEAH!!!! BURN AND LOOT UNTIL AFTER CHRISTMAS, BABY!!!!  "

DB!: "OMG! Someone is trying to prevent the burning and looting. Let's KILL HIM! OMG, NOOOOO, he defended himself!! He killed my pedo and wife-beating buddies! He's a CRIMINAL!"

 

DB! You didn't answer my question from above...

Did you riot, loot, burn down buildings and assault cops, or are you a cowardly hypocrite who just sat at home and cheered while other people did it? At least Kamala bailed her rioting pedophile friends out of jail so that they could reoffend. You did nothing.

[Black Dog]

21 minutes ago, User said:

How did they take the law into their own hands?

Again, stupid, do you not understand the phrase "taking the law into your own hands" doesn't mean a specific law?

Quote

It is already legal to help people with medical issues, to put out fires, to protect property. No laws were taken into their own hands. 

Vigilantism is done outside of the law not necessarily in violation of the law.

User when he sees a dictionary:

Quote

My mocking you for your inability to understand the difference between a man and a woman has nothing to do with my honesty or integrity. I am not the one lying about what a woman is, you are. 

That might be what you think you're doing but what you're actually doing is presenting yourself as a gigantic freak with a genital obsession.

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Dirty B1tch! and Kamala: "OH HELL YEAH!!!! BURN AND LOOT UNTIL AFTER CHRISTMAS, BABY!!!!  "

Boomer brainrot. KYS.

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Boomer brainrot. KYS.

Look at yourself, dipshit. You wanna act like Trump saying "fight like hell" one single time was proof that "HE WANTED HIS SUPPORTERS TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE US GOV'T IN AN ARMED INSURRECTION (with no guns)", but when Kamala bails out rioters after extremely violent riots, and openly hopes for the riots to last 6 more months, you want to pretend that she's not supporting the riots that she's talking about...

That's why people say "DB! is the dumbest cultist here".

Who did you think she was bailing out, DirBi? Do you think that they were locking up peaceful protesters in Minnesota, and she was bailing them out, or was she just randomly supporting a bail fund in a different state to let pimps and rapists out of jail? 

[User]

53 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Again, stupid, do you not understand the phrase "taking the law into your own hands" doesn't mean a specific law?

So, what was the point in your using it then?

54 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Vigilantism is done outside of the law not necessarily in violation of the law.

So, what was done outside of the law here?

54 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

That might be what you think you're doing but what you're actually doing is presenting yourself as a gigantic freak with a genital obsession.

So... you think your boyfriend with a fake vagina is totally a legit woman... but according to you I am the freak for pointing out how stupid that is... *eye roll*

I get it; you are not obsessed with your boyfriend's fake vagina being fake, you think it is real. 

[Black Dog]

9 minutes ago, User said:

So, what was the point in your using it then?

It's a common idiom describing the vigilante mindset.

Quote

So, what was done outside of the law here?

The whole taking a gun to a riot to safeguard private property thing.

 

Quote

So... you think your boyfriend with a fake vagina is totally a legit woman... but according to you I am the freak for pointing out how stupid that is... *eye roll*

I get it; you are not obsessed with your boyfriend's fake vagina being fake, you think it is real. 

No you're a genital obsessed freak for constantly going on about imaginary "fake vaginas" in every single thread.

55 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Look at yourself, dipshit. You wanna act like Trump saying "fight like hell" one single time was proof that "HE WANTED HIS SUPPORTERS TO VIOLENTLY OVERTHROW THE US GOV'T IN AN ARMED INSURRECTION (with no guns)", but when Kamala bails out rioters after extremely violent riots, and openly hopes for the riots to last 6 more months, you want to pretend that she's not supporting the riots that she's talking about...

That's why people say "DB! is the dumbest cultist here".

Who did you think she was bailing out, DirBi? Do you think that they were locking up peaceful protesters in Minnesota, and she was bailing them out, or was she just randomly supporting a bail fund in a different state to let pimps and rapists out of jail? 

lol you're so easily triggered.