Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Apparently you don't know that WT has NO CREDIBITIY. Find a legitimate source IF YOU CAN. Duh

well that's what a loser who knows it's credible would say. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

well that's what a loser who knows it's credible would say. 

There are no sources that are acceptable that report factual information, in his view.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The NYTs has no credibility because they reported something negative that harms his fantasy.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

There are no sources that are acceptable that report factual information, in his view.

Precisely. You could have a note from God that's notarized and he'd still claim the source was bias. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Precisely. You could have a note from God that's notarized and he'd still claim the source was bias. 

Gawd is smarter than that. He'd just let nature take care of him. Maybe even, give it a nudge in his direction.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Gawd is smarter than that. He'd just let nature take care of him. Maybe even, give it a nudge in his direction.

I dunno  - this is the guy who flooded the earth to wipe out the stupid people once already.  I think if he's not careful Robo might be in for a darn good smiting one of these days. 

 

The Lord is vengeful. Oh, spiteful one! Show me who to smite, and they shall be smoten!

-Homer Simpson

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I dunno  - this is the guy who flooded the earth to wipe out the stupid people once already.  I think if he's not careful Robo might be in for a darn good smiting one of these days. 

 

The Lord is vengeful. Oh, spiteful one! Show me who to smite, and they shall be smoten!

-Homer Simpson

Oh that's ominous. 

Hey @robosmith maybe you should consider repenting...I mean...before you meet your maker?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oh that's ominous. 

Hey @robosmith maybe you should consider repenting...I mean...before you meet your maker?

In his case i believe the term is "recalled by the manufacturer". 

You keep forgetting he's not a real little boy :)  

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...