Jump to content

Trump promises to subvert the law — first by freeing the Jan. 6 criminals


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, User said:

He is no more subverting than what you support with sanctuary cities. 

Why they have the policy is irrelevant to the fact that the law is being subverted. They are aiding people in breaking the law. Yes, much of it is political spite. 

No, why they have the policy is exactly why we have a federal system. It is their job and their responsibility to act to the benefit of their constituency. Local policies for local governance. For local police, that means NOT alienating a population that exists in their community. They didn't cause the population to exist, but it is their responsibility to deal with it in the manner that works best for the community. That's not a subversion of the law. Again, it's literally why our constitution was conceived as it is. 

And, as expected, you're projecting. The politics of spite may be the primary driver of MAGA politics, but the rest of us are just interested in meeting challenges and build a better future.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, why they have the policy is exactly why we have a federal system. It is their job and their responsibility to act to the benefit of their constituency. Local policies for local governance. For local police, that means NOT alienating a population that exists in their community. They didn't cause the population to exist, but it is their responsibility to deal with it in the manner that works best for the community. That's not a subversion of the law. Again, it's literally why our constitution was conceived as it is. 

And, as expected, you're projecting. The politics of spite may be the primary driver of MAGA politics, but the rest of us are just interested in meeting challenges and build a better future.

No, you are merely arguing that their why is a "just" why, it is still subverting the law. 

Yes, just as our Constitution gives the President pardon authority.... 

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, User said:

No, you are merely arguing that their why is a "just" why, it is still subverting the law. 

Yes, just as our Constitution gives the President pardon authority.... 

 

Bullshit. They can't be "subverting" a law that isn't even relevant to their jurisdiction. Name the law. Name the jurisdiction.

And the SCOTUS has spilled ink explaining the purpose of the pardon power. Trump (though not alone) clearly has and would again use that power for other purposes.

You can't even be serious. The framers sat down and drafted a constitution specifically to separate powers and responsibilities to allow local governance to foster local interests. They did not sit down and draft pardon powers with the expectation that the POTUS would be unethical enough to use it to do himself legal and political favors. You know full well that that is not what Madison and Hamilton had in mind. That kind of behavior was almost unthinkable to those idealists. 

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Remember he is a super tall super genius that all the girls love.

^He is a LIAR.

3 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

He has all this time yet he can't be bothered to look things up that are common knowledge of anyone with a modicum political and economic knowledge and demands proof and when he gets it he either cherry picks or complains about the source.

^Completely ignorant about the rules of DEBATE.

It is YOUR JOB to sell YOUR IDEAS. If you FAIL, you LOSE.

It's easy to post YOUR OPINION and just as easy to say YOU'RE WRONG.

It's also easy to post a naked link that doesn't point to ANYTHING that backs YOUR OPINION.

With experience you'll learn that chasing naked links is as WASTE OF TIME.

 

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Meh...don't forget that the air is much more thin at the elevation of his head so...ya...there's that... ;)

But you're in Toronto, right? The air is MUCH THINNER there than at the COAST where I live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, User said:

And to the point here... you cheer on the subversion of law this way... so don't complain when Trump uses his legal authority to pardon people. 

And you should NOT CELEBRATE CRIMINALS getting a PASS on accountability for their CRIMES.

YOU will just encourage CRIMINALS and CRIME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Anyone else notice that all the allegations of subverting the law were all how Trump would use the legal avenues to achieve desired goals?

 

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

John Eastman admitted that the schemes he was advocating to force a contingent election would NOT PASS MUSTER with the SCOTUS.

 

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's not what we were talking about and you should know because you started this topic.

It's about what you called "legal avenues" in YOUR POST ABOVE.

They were ONLY superficially "legal," and admitted as such by the dishonest guy proposing them. Duh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

But you're in Toronto, right? The air is MUCH THINNER there than at the COAST where I live.

LOL...My Gawd but you're a silly human.

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And you should NOT CELEBRATE CRIMINALS getting a PASS on accountability for their CRIMES.

YOU will just encourage CRIMINALS and CRIME.

You mean like letting illegals who assault cops out on bail or cutting deals with them?

Or like letting gangs shoplift so much that businesses have to close?

How about "mostly peaceful protests"? Like that perhaps?

Not only are you a silly human...but your a fcking silly hypocrite.

But...If Trump wins, he will probably let all those political prisoners out with pardons...as the law allows.

Many will be pleased by this act of fairness...and silly fcks like you will go...

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, User said:

I hope his rhetoric is mostly hyperbole, and he will focus his pardons on only the misdemeanor cases and the ones where the DOJ has vindictively gone after people for what is trespassing. 

And he leaves the violent people in prison. 

 

The "misdemeanor cases" were likely NEVER IN PRISON.

And "vindictively" is ONLY your SPECULATION.

When you break into a building that is CLOSED, to threaten people working there, that is NOT just "trespassing."

1 hour ago, User said:

Glad you agree then. Trump isn't subverting anything either. 

Federal LEO do not have the OPTION of enforcing Federal law. That is their JOB.

Edited by robosmith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

What they forget is that it wasn't until Trump became elected that sanctuary cities and states became widespread because they didn't want him to enforce the law.

 

Cities being "sanctuary" does not stop Trump's Federal LEO from enforcing Federal law. Duh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, User said:

No, you are merely arguing that their why is a "just" why, it is still subverting the law. 

Yes, just as our Constitution gives the President pardon authority.... 

 

Having the authority does NOT mean it cannot be abused for improper purposes.

The POTUS takes an OATH to faithfully execute the laws. For example, that does NOT permit SELLING PARDONS to enrich himself nor his campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...My Gawd but you're a silly human.

I'm not BANKRUPT like YOU.

8 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You mean like letting illegals who assault cops out on bail or cutting deals with them?

Or like letting gangs shoplift so much that businesses have to close?

How about "mostly peaceful protests"? Like that perhaps?

Not only are you a silly human...but your a fcking silly hypocrite.

But...If Trump wins, he will probably let all those political prisoners out with pardons...as the law allows.

Many will be pleased by this act of fairness...and silly fcks like you will go...

Thanks for demonstrating YOU have NO RESPECT for ENFORCING the law.

YOU, like the HOUSE REPUBLICONS at Trump's trial, MAKE A MOCKERY of LAW ENFORCEMENT and JUDICIAL PROCESS purely for your partisan political HACKERY.

As for your OTHER BULLSHIT, that has NOTHING TO DO with ME, NOR what I post HERE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'm not BANKRUPT like YOU.

Thanks for demonstrating YOU have NO RESPECT for ENFORCING the law.

YOU, like the HOUSE REPUBLICONS at Trump's trial, MAKE A MOCKERY of LAW ENFORCEMENT and JUDICIAL PROCESS purely for your partisan political HACKERY.

As for your OTHER BULLSHIT, that has NOTHING TO DO with ME, NOR what I post HERE.

LOL...look who's whining again. The teacher of lawfare.

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

LOL...look who's whining again. The teacher of lawfare.

That would be you, whining about the LAW BEING ENFORCED.

And trying to claim it should NOT be enforced and convicted criminals should be freed.

We know you would NOT DO THAT if someone broke down YOUR front door (and survived).

Cause you're just a partisan political HACK. Yes, you are "dear." NOT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

That would be you, whining about the LAW BEING ENFORCED.

And trying to claim it should NOT be enforced and convicted criminals should be freed.

We know you would NOT DO THAT if someone broke down YOUR front door (and survived).

Cause you're just a partisan political HACK. Yes, you are "dear." NOT.

Criminals? Like Michael Byrd? That brave soul who shot an unarmed woman to death?

Those who are political prisoners will be pardoned. You will scream. I will relish your anguish. 

You are a hypocrite.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

 

It's about what you called "legal avenues" in YOUR POST ABOVE.

They were ONLY superficially "legal," and admitted as such by the dishonest guy proposing them. Duh

Superficially legal? Pardon power comes straight from the COTUS. How in the hell is that superficial?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Hodad said:

Bullshit. They can't be "subverting" a law that isn't even relevant to their jurisdiction. Name the law. Name the jurisdiction.

So, now you are playing some game in which, even though they are subverting the law because it is not their law, that doesn't count.

No, that is still subverting the law. You are just excusing it. 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

And you should NOT CELEBRATE CRIMINALS getting a PASS on accountability for their CRIMES.

YOU will just encourage CRIMINALS and CRIME.

Wow, where was this version of robosmith last week when the other version of robosmith was cheering on protestors for Hamas breaking the law?

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Criminals? Like Michael Byrd? That brave soul who shot an unarmed woman to death?

Those who are political prisoners will be pardoned. You will scream. I will relish your anguish. 

You are a hypocrite.

You are DELUSIONAL AND a HYPOCRITE. You would shoot anyone who broke down YOUR DOOR, but denigrate the LEO who protected Congressional members from an armed mob just because it was LED by a woman that the armed mob CHOSE to be the tip of the spear.

You are also a FOOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Superficially legal? Pardon power comes straight from the COTUS. How in the hell is that superficial?

I was referring to what you called "legal avenues" in YOUR POST ABOVE. AKA, the methods proposed by John Eastman to overturn the election.

WTH are you talking about NOW?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, User said:

So, now you are playing some game in which, even though they are subverting the law because it is not their law, that doesn't count.

No, that is still subverting the law. You are just excusing it. 

Local LEO have NO responsibility to enforce Federal law no matter how much YOU IMAGINE THEY DO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robosmith said:

Local LEO have NO responsibility to enforce Federal law no matter how much YOU IMAGINE THEY DO.  

No... but when they actively work against it, that is the very definition of subverting it. 

You know... when you support letting all those illegal immigrants go that end up raping and murdering American citizens... that is what you are supporting. 

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, User said:

Wow, where was this version of robosmith last week when the other version of robosmith was cheering on protestors for Hamas breaking the law?

I didn't say ANYTHING about Hamas NOT BEING ACCOUNTABLE for their CRIMES. That is YOU about the Jan 6th CRIMINALS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, User said:

No... but when they actively work against it, that is the very definition of subverting it. 

No one is actively working against the enforcement of Federal law by Federal LEO.

Not aiding is not actively working against.

Just now, User said:

You know... when you support letting all those illegal immigrants go that end up raping and murdering American citizens... that is what you are supporting. 

I don't support ANYTHING at the border. I have NO SAY about what happens there.

Asylum application is required to be permitted by LAW and adjudicated by JUDGES. 

You really are completely ignorant; probably cause all you see is FOS LIES. 🤮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I didn't say ANYTHING about Hamas NOT BEING ACCOUNTABLE for their CRIMES. That is YOU about the Jan 6th CRIMINALS.

I said "protestors for Hamas"

You spent last week defending their lawlessness, did you not?

 

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,803
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Morris12
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...