Why God permit the evil? Answer:

[User]

2 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

Denial without argument.

You are a crappy judge and apologist and must love Hitler and Stalin as they mimic your God.

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. 

 

[French Patriot]

3 minutes ago, User said:

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. 

 

Full ignore to you, a hole child.

[User]

18 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

Full ignore to you, a hole child.

LOL, you have never really honestly engaged with me to begin with. 

[Gaétan]

The populations are manipulated by leaders sent by the devil and their media corrupted by money and we must pray to God to aim juste.

[Radiorum]

Good and evil are adjectives, not nouns.

There is no such thing as sin (although there are harmful behaviors).

We are just a species of bipedal, self-aware, hairless apes who evolved the mental capacity to make inferences and assumptions about the mental states of others. (Religion is a by-product of this ability as we infer what is in God’s mind.) We react to what we experience with the primary goal of survival in a world of both randomness and cause and effect.

[User]

11 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Good and evil are adjectives, not nouns.

No, they are definitely nouns too. 

I don't need to get a dictionary for you, do I?

[Radiorum]

9 hours ago, User said:

No, they are definitely nouns too. 

I was speaking to my personal beliefs. I don't believe in in some kind of force or entity of "good" and "evil" that exist as separate and self-directing capacities that can be separated from human behavior. 

You can't get a basket of "good" or "evil." 

[French Patriot]

23 hours ago, Radiorum said:

Good and evil are adjectives, not nouns.

There is no such thing as sin (although there are harmful behaviors).

We are just a species of bipedal, self-aware, hairless apes who evolved the mental capacity to make inferences and assumptions about the mental states of others. (Religion is a by-product of this ability as we infer what is in God’s mind.) We react to what we experience with the primary goal of survival in a world of both randomness and cause and effect.

I am trying to write something different for sin. So that some might look at it differently.

Please critique this following  O P. 

=========

I create sin for God. You should all be so good.

Sin equates to missing a mark of excellence.

Christianity is clear, and even Gnostic Christians agree for different reasons, that sin is a happy fault and necessary to God’s plan.

Sin is a must do if that plan includes human evolution.

In our evolution and lives, sin, missing the mark, is a must as it means that you taking shots at some ideal, and are working towards your best possible end.

This is what we all do at all points in our lives.

I do not believe in the supernatural, but see the wisdom of the scribes who created and consolidated the Bible for throwing it in.

Cooperation is good and does not create a victim.

Competition creates losers who will see their lose as evil.

Their sin is missing the mark of excellence shown by the best.

We would not have leaders in any field without sin and that is why I try to create many sinners.

It make us all better.

[French Patriot]

11 hours ago, User said:

No, they are definitely nouns too. 

I don't need to get a dictionary for you, do I?

I am French so have an excuse for seeing good and evil as adjectives.

As a noun, if I say I have a good, I do not think people will know what I mean as a noun.

What do I mean if I say I have an evil here with me?

[User]

2 hours ago, Radiorum said:

I was speaking to my personal beliefs. I don't believe in in some kind of force or entity of "good" and "evil" that exist as separate and self-directing capacities that can be separated from human behavior. 

You can't get a basket of "good" or "evil." 

You should say that you don't believe in good or evil next time. They are still nouns. 

 

[French Patriot]

3 minutes ago, User said:

You should say that you don't believe in good or evil next time. They are still nouns. 

 

Which dictionary.

I looked and it looks like your lying.

[User]

22 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

Which dictionary.

I looked and it looks like your lying.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evil

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evil#google_vignette

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/evil

What dictionary were you looking at?

[French Patriot]

9 hours ago, User said:

What dictionary were you looking at?

It is a matter of reading them properly.

As a noun, if I say you are an evil, in our dualistic reality, am I not also saying that you are evil and good?

If I say you are a good, what am I saying if not that you also have an evil side?

Learn English please. 

[User]

14 hours ago, French Patriot said:

It is a matter of reading them properly.

As a noun, if I say you are an evil, in our dualistic reality, am I not also saying that you are evil and good?

If I say you are a good, what am I saying if not that you also have an evil side?

Learn English please. 

As a noun?

The debate here was not on how to use them as a noun, it was that the words were not a noun nor did the dictionary list them as such. 

I have easily proven you wrong. 

Now you want to have some other argument about their use and not admit you were wrong. 

My English is just fine. Your integrity here not so much. 

 

[NAME REMOVED]

On 11/19/2024 at 8:19 AM, French Patriot said:

Which dictionary.

I looked and it looks like your lying.

User always lies...It's his M.O. on this forum.

Edited November 20, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[User]

5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

User always lies...It's his M.O. on this forum.

I literally shared dictionary links. 

There is something wrong with you. 

[French Patriot]

15 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

User always lies...It's his M.O. on this forum.

My list of locations where I seek those who do not lie is getting short.

Most have died due to the lying and poor apologetics from believers.

If they ever could argue their religion, they would not need inquisitions and jihads.

Hell, a Gnostic Christian can do better apologetics for Christianity than the adherents.

[User]

2 hours ago, French Patriot said:

My list of locations where I seek those who do not lie is getting short.

Well, with as earnestly as you engage on here yourself, I think I already recommended you consider a diary where you can just talk to yourself. 

 

[French Patriot]

22 hours ago, User said:

Well, with as earnestly as you engage on here yourself, I think I already recommended you consider a diary where you can just talk to yourself. 

 

At least I would get an intelligent conversation instead of the religious garbage from those who adore a genocidal praick of a God.

[User]

4 minutes ago, French Patriot said:

At least I would get an intelligent conversation instead of the religious garbage from those who adore a genocidal praick of a God.

You came to this forum subsection specifically on religion. No one forced you down here. 

The simple fact is that you are a religious bigot who gets off on saying stuff like: "genocidal praick of a God"

You just don't like people who can tear apart your surface-level BS. 

[French Patriot]

2 hours ago, User said:

You came to this forum subsection specifically on religion. No one forced you down here. 

The simple fact is that you are a religious bigot who gets off on saying stuff like: "genocidal praick of a God"

You just don't like people who can tear apart your surface-level BS. 

You can tear Yahweh from being a genocidal and evil God?

Wow. Hitler and Stalin will be pleased.

Let us hear your argument for genocide as the best solution for a God who can cure all things without killing them.

This will be a first.

 

[User]

On 11/22/2024 at 12:51 PM, French Patriot said:

You can tear Yahweh from being a genocidal and evil God?

I have yet to see your big argument here for what makes God evil or what this genocide is you think was wrong and why.

Hell, you have yet to explain how you reconcile being a "Gnostic Christian" with this same God. 

 

[French Patriot]

17 hours ago, User said:

I have yet to see your big argument here for what makes God evil or what this genocide is you think was wrong and why.

Hell, you have yet to explain how you reconcile being a "Gnostic Christian" with this same God. 

 

If I have to argue against genocide for you to know you should condemn the practice, you will not understand as you would be quite stupid.

Let's have your argument for genocide and I will counter.

You have shown incompetence in that so I will not hold my breath. 

 

[User]

1 hour ago, French Patriot said:

If I have to argue against genocide for you to know you should condemn the practice, you will not understand as you would be quite stupid.

Let's have your argument for genocide and I will counter.

You have shown incompetence in that so I will not hold my breath. 

Yet again, you can't support your assertions with any kind of good argument. I figured as much. 

[French Patriot]

2 hours ago, User said:

Yet again, you can't support your assertions with any kind of good argument. I figured as much. 

Where is your argument for killing instead of curing, when curing is just as easy for a God.

Last change immoral a hole.