robosmith Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 Trump’s Next Legal Move: Personal Bankruptcy Quote Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones did it two years ago. Rudolph Giuliani did it just before Christmas. Now there’s a very good chance that before March 12, Donald Trump will join them in filing personal bankruptcy. Filing for personal bankruptcy stops the clock on both awards, meaning that he won’t need to deposit cash or get bonds to appeal the Carroll and New York State civil fraud awards. The automatic stay to these and other civil proceedings would benefit Trump by getting past what he sees as the finish line: the Nov. 5 presidential election. That strategy worked for conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. Two years after his bankruptcy filing Jones has yet to pay any of the $1.5 billion jury award for defaming the parents and relatives of the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre. That more than two years have passed suggests Trump should have no trouble getting past the election through this delaying tactic. Of course, any INNOCENT man would want his trial BEFORE the election. Delay tactics are virtual proof that Trump is guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 (edited) 14 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump’s Next Legal Move: Personal Bankruptcy Of course, any INNOCENT man would want his trial BEFORE the election. Delay tactics are virtual proof that Trump is guilty. He wont get a trial unless he coughs up the money. Why should any person innocent or guilty be required to pay for their day in court. BTW who did trump defraud? And how does someone defame a gold digging ho? Edited February 26 by Yakuda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 50 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump’s Next Legal Move: Personal Bankruptcy Of course, any INNOCENT man would want his trial BEFORE the election. Delay tactics are virtual proof that Trump is guilty. Of course, any SMART AND INNOCENT man knows he doesn't have a snowball's chance in the hostile banana courts of New York, so delay is the best strategy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Yakuda said: He wont get a trial unless he coughs up the money. Why should any person innocent or guilty be required to pay for their day in court. BTW who did trump defraud? And how does someone defame a gold digging ho? Excellent points. I've been hearing that there are no claims of fraud from banks or other institutions. This is just about left-wing shit piles trying to derail his presidential campaign, nothing more. Edited February 26 by Deluge 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godzilla Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Yakuda said: He wont get a trial unless he coughs up the money. Why should any person innocent or guilty be required to pay for their day in court. BTW who did trump defraud? And how does someone defame a gold digging ho? Trump Org’s false financial statements cost banks $168M in interest: NY AG financial expert the fact that the victims did not want to claim to be victims (like domestic violence) does not matter in law. one defames a "gold digging ho" by calling them a "gold digging ho". Edited February 26 by godzilla 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 4 minutes ago, godzilla said: Trump Org’s false financial statements cost banks $168M in interest: NY AG financial expert the fact that the victims did not want to claim to be victims (like domestic violence) does not matter in law. one defames a "gold digging ho" by calling them a "gold digging ho". Optimal word "victims". Cite the people victimized by trump repaying his loans. She is a gold digging ho. What we should we call a good digging ho? Oh wait ...you think someone with a penis is a girl right? Is misgendering the new defaming? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 15 minutes ago, godzilla said: Trump Org’s false financial statements cost banks $168M in interest: NY AG financial expert the fact that the victims did not want to claim to be victims (like domestic violence) does not matter in law. one defames a "gold digging ho" by calling them a "gold digging ho". Smells like an Engoron/James/DNC/TDS Sufferers Anonymous conspiracy. This has, and always will be, a political witch hunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 58 minutes ago, Yakuda said: He wont get a trial unless he coughs up the money. Why should any person innocent or guilty be required to pay for their day in court. Did you miss the FACT that Trump was already found liable in TWO cases? He has to deposit the money owed in order to file an APPEAL. 58 minutes ago, Yakuda said: BTW who did trump defraud? Bank fraud is ILLEGAL. Lying on applications is bank fraud. 58 minutes ago, Yakuda said: And how does someone defame a gold digging ho? By LYING about her in public. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffypants Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 13 minutes ago, godzilla said: Trump Org’s false financial statements cost banks $168M in interest: NY AG financial expert the fact that the victims did not want to claim to be victims (like domestic violence) does not matter in law. one defames a "gold digging ho" by calling them a "gold digging ho". They didn't feel they were victims because they did their own due diligence before giving him the loan. They based his interest rates on their own valuations and other factors such as credit worthiness and his reputation simple. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 28 minutes ago, Deluge said: Of course, any SMART AND INNOCENT man knows he doesn't have a snowball's chance in the hostile banana courts of New York, so delay is the best strategy. Link? Trump wasn't very smart to commit FRAUD in NY then. 1 minute ago, Fluffypants said: They didn't feel they were victims because they did their own due diligence before giving him the loan. They based his interest rates on their own valuations and other factors such as credit worthiness and his reputation simple. It's still bank fraud to lie on applications. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 Just now, robosmith said: Did you miss the FACT that Trump was already found liable in TWO cases? He has to deposit the money owed in order to file an APPEAL. Bank fraud is ILLEGAL. Lying on applications is bank fraud. By LYING about her in public. Duh Right people have a right to appeal but in this case trump will have to pay for that right. This is why leftists are a greater risk to America than any terrorist organization. Cite the law he broke. It's not a lie shes a good digging whore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 28 minutes ago, Deluge said: Excellent points. I've been hearing that there are no claims of fraud from banks or other institutions. This is just about left-wing shit piles trying to derail his presidential campaign, nothing more. Because "you heard"? LMAO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 (edited) 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Link? Trump wasn't very smart to commit FRAUD in NY then. It's still bank fraud to lie on applications. Duh Cite the code of the law. Edited February 26 by Yakuda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 Just now, robosmith said: Link? Trump wasn't very smart to commit FRAUD in NY then. This was before wokeness took a stranglehold of New York. There's a reason businesses are fleeing that state. And the link is every f*cking story that comes out of New York. EVERYBODY who isn't at least partly MAGA wants the man's head. THAT is not normal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 15 minutes ago, Yakuda said: Optimal word "victims". Cite the people victimized by trump repaying his loans. She is a gold digging ho. What we should we call a good digging ho? Oh wait ...you think someone with a penis is a girl right? Is misgendering the new defaming? Sorry ONLY the jury decides, and that deal is done. Now Trump has to cough up the money to appeal or declare bankruptcy. 1 minute ago, Yakuda said: Cite the code of the law. The code has already been posted here. Sorry you missed it newbie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Because "you heard"? LMAO Correct. No one claimed fraud except a dimwitted da that made a campaign promise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Because "you heard"? LMAO Did I hear wrong? If I did, then take your finger pointer out of your ass and show me otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 8 minutes ago, Deluge said: Smells like an Engoron/James/DNC/TDS Sufferers Anonymous conspiracy. This has, and always will be, a political witch hunt. You mean YOU MAGA CULT will always parrot Trump calling it that. Means NOTHING. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Sorry ONLY the jury decides, and that deal is done. Now Trump has to cough up the money to appeal or declare bankruptcy. The code has already been posted here. Sorry you missed it newbie. Juries are perfect. Sm guy dont know the code or the law. I guess trained monkeys can only do what they've been trained to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, Deluge said: Did I hear wrong? If I did, then take your finger pointer out of your ass and show me otherwise. Probably. Prove it's true and I'll show you it's NOT. 2 minutes ago, Yakuda said: Correct. No one claimed fraud except a dimwitted da that made a campaign promise Judge RULE talks, ^BULLSHIT walks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 (edited) 1 minute ago, robosmith said: Probably. Prove it's true and I'll show you it's NOT. If he proves it's true you wouldn't be able to show it's not. Is this the kind of "logic" you use? Edited February 26 by Yakuda 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted February 26 Author Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, Yakuda said: Juries are perfect. No they're not. That's why Trump will appeal or file bankrupt. 1 minute ago, Yakuda said: Sm guy dont know the code or the law. I guess trained monkeys can only do what they've been trained to do. The JUDGE knows the code and the law. Duh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 Just now, robosmith said: Probably. Prove it's true and I'll show you it's NOT. No, dumbass. Nobody has stepped up to the plate. Where are the accusers other than the zombies waving pitchforks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yakuda Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: Probably. Prove it's true and I'll show you it's NOT. Judge RULE talks, ^BULLSHIT walks. I agree a crooked judge that not only wasnt seeking truth but didn't want to seek truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deluge Posted February 26 Report Share Posted February 26 1 minute ago, Yakuda said: If he proves it's true you wouldn't be able to show it's not. Is this the kind of "logic" you use? Please excuse robobot - its programming only gets it so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.