Pro Pedophile group bashes Sound Of Freedom

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Of course not, and not just because of your history of truth-bending.

I have at least one very good reason to believe that you support human trafficking: your eagerness to attempt to validate and then disseminate half-assed criticisms of one of the few movies that draws attention this vile crime while it's going largely unreported. 

Why would you even do that? Shouldn't we be celebrating every attempt to bring this crime to the forefront?

How is it even possible that human trafficking is so common in the modern world and we are doing almost nothing to combat it? 

If you had a missing child would you be so quick to condemn a feature film that drew attention to this problem? I doubt it, f'ing hypocrite. 

And what reason do I have to believe that you don't support human trafficking? I'd honestly just be making an assumption. 

The desperation of right wingnuts, who fall for bullshit conspiracy after bullshit conspiracy because they don't have the wits to think for themselves, has never been better illustrated than in this post.

You silly little wanker.

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, West said:

When Dems talk about sanctuary cities they actually want a sanctuary for PEDOPHILES to do their thing. Sick puppies

I gotta admit, it is a little bit disturbing that leftists are all in lock step in opposing what's basically the only lightning rod out there against pedophilia/human trafficking. 

You'd think that opposition to pedophilia and human trafficking would more or less unite us. I guess we're opposites in that regard as well.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

The desperation of right wingnuts, who fall for bullshit conspiracy after bullshit conspiracy because they don't have the wits to think for themselves, has never been better illustrated than in this post.

You silly little wanker.

Wow. Pedophilia and human trafficking are conspiracy theories now? 

Thanks you silly little wanker. 

[Guest]

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Wow. Pedophilia and human trafficking are conspiracy theories now? 

Thanks you silly little wanker. 

The conspiracy is that because someone disparaged your movie they support human trafficking.  It's almost like an addiction.

Let's make a deal, in front of everyone.  I think your movie is sh!t, and I've never seen it. (I'd never even heard about until today)

You prove that makes me a supporter of human trafficking, and I'll leave this site.

If you can't, you fück off and never come back.

How about it?

Edited July 22, 2023 by bcsapper

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, bcsapper said:

The conspiracy is that because someone disparaged your movie they support human trafficking.

OMG little boy, that's not a conspiracy, it's an observation.

MH is grasping at straws to throw shade on this movie and that's really weird. Who cares if one guy who made a random accusation supports this film? Why is that even worth mentioning? There are weird people who are against almost everything. 

A Bernie Sanders supporter went and shot up the GOP at the congressional baseball game. Is that somehow proof that Bernie Sanders is a murderer? Is everyone who feels the Bern somehow represented by that guy's actions? 

Quote

Let's make a deal, in front of everyone.  You prove MH supports human trafficking, and I'll leave this site. 

I already proved that MH is weirdly in opposition to a movie that targets human trafficking/pedophilia. Take that to mean what you want.

Quote

If you can't, you fück off and never come back.

How about it?

Are you joking right now? I can't even prove to you that the covid "vaccine" doesn't stop people from ending up in ICU, and tens of thousands of Canadians have already died of covid after being fully "vaccinated and boosted". You'll never admit to anything because you've got no integrity at all inside of that empty little head of yours.   

Accepting a deal with you on gentleman's terms is like giving your car keys to a crackhead so they can take care of it while you're in a movie. If you had any decency you'd fück off right now. 

[Guest]

33 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG little boy, that's not a conspiracy, it's an observation.

MH is grasping at straws to throw shade on this movie and that's really weird. Who cares if one guy who made a random accusation supports this film? Why is that even worth mentioning? There are weird people who are against almost everything. 

A Bernie Sanders supporter went and shot up the GOP at the congressional baseball game. Is that somehow proof that Bernie Sanders is a murderer? Is everyone who feels the Bern somehow represented by that guy's actions? 

No, like I said, it's an addiction.  There has to be some kind of nefarious reason.  I read about the movie and it sounds like button pushing puerile shite to me. 

 

33 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I already proved that MH is weirdly in opposition to a movie that targets human trafficking/pedophilia. Take that to mean what you want.

The problem is what you take it to mean. 

 

33 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Are you joking right now? I can't even prove to you that the covid "vaccine" doesn't stop people from ending up in ICU, and tens of thousands of Canadians have already died of covid after being fully "vaccinated and boosted". You'll never admit to anything because you've got no integrity at all inside of that empty little head of yours.   

Accepting a deal with you on gentleman's terms is like giving your car keys to a crackhead so they can take care of it while you're in a movie. If you had any decency you'd fück off right now. 

Yes, it was an act of the purest optimism to assume that you would try.

 

To reiterate my point so even you can understand it.  Your life is so consumed by irrational beliefs, whether virus conspiracies, climate hoaxes, election fraud lies or any of the other kind of Qanon nonsense that people espouse that it just made sense to you that anyone who didn't like the film must do so because they support human trafficking.  You still don't see how asinine that is?

Edited July 22, 2023 by bcsapper

[WestCanMan]

25 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

No, like I said, it's an addiction.  There has to be come kind of nefarious reason.  I read about the movie and it sounds like button pushing puerile shite to me. 

It's fine for you to give your own opinion on the movie, as if anyone cares, but your point that "MH's comment along the lines of "some conspiracy nut supports the movie, so that's about all you need to know about it" is a pertinent and quite meaningful" is way wide of the mark. 

He's trying to write off the entire movie based on a weird story by someone who supports the movie. 

Do you know how many weirdos support the Star Wars franchise? 

When people talk about Star Wars is it germane to the discussion to say: "Look at this guy with the unibrow watching gay schissporn. HE SUPPORTS STAR WARS!!!!!! ?"? It's kinda weird, right?

 

Quote

The problem is what you take it to mean. 

The problem is that it is exactly what it is and you'd rather not notice.

Quote

Yes, it was an act of the purest optimism to assume that you would try.

It was absurd for you to think that I'd be dumb enough to take you at your word on anything.

Quote

To reiterate my point so even you can understand it.  Your life is so consumed by irrational beliefs, whether virus conspiracies, climate hoaxes, election fraud lies or any of the other kind of Qanon nonsense that people espouse that

Reiterating your 'point' is just saying the same stupid thing twice.

If you think I have a virus conspiracy going on then lay it out detective sappy....

Is it bad to accuse someone of election fraud all of a sudden numbnuts? CNN, the Dems, and all the leftards here just finished doing that for 4 years. I'm pretty sure it was the coolest thing to do for a while. What changed? 

Quote

it just made sense to you that anyone who didn't like the film must do so because they support human trafficking.  You still don't see how asinine that is?

MH never said that he didn't like the film, dummy: he never even saw it.

He didn't even comment on the trailer or anything in the movie.

He just found the most ridiculous reason that I've ever seen for someone to try to make the case that the movie isn't worth watching: "some conspiracy nut supports it!" 

Do you understand how asinine it is for you to try to pretend that MH just offered a reasonable critique of the movie? 

He just attacked the movie from the weirdest quarter ever. It was completely irrational. And that's weird. 

Edited July 22, 2023 by WestCanMan

[West]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I gotta admit, it is a little bit disturbing that leftists are all in lock step in opposing what's basically the only lightning rod out there against pedophilia/human trafficking. 

You'd think that opposition to pedophilia and human trafficking would more or less unite us. I guess we're opposites in that regard as well.

That party is the POP (Party of Pedo). I'm not surprised

[West]

2 hours ago, bcsapper said:

The desperation of right wingnuts, who fall for bullshit conspiracy after bullshit conspiracy because they don't have the wits to think for themselves, has never been better illustrated than in this post.

You silly little wanker.

Lol.. 

If leftists claim it to be a "conspiracy theory" chances are its not. Just pedos trynna cover their tracks. 

When I was in southeast Asia they'd set up brothels with children. Affluent pedos from Australia and Europe would flock to these places to abuse kids. Parents lived in poverty and therefore was a means of survival. No fake news; real disgusting sh*t that happens and a bit disgusting that these nutcase in the media try and discredit it; they are part of the issue

Edited July 22, 2023 by West

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, West said:

Lol.. 

If leftists claim it to be a "conspiracy theory" chances are its not. Just pedos trynna cover their tracks

[Guest]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

It's fine for you to give your own opinion on the movie, as if anyone cares, but your point that "MH's comment along the lines of "some conspiracy nut supports the movie, so that's about all you need to know about it" is a pertinent and quite meaningful" is way wide of the mark. 

He's trying to write off the entire movie based on a weird story by someone who supports the movie. 

Do you know how many weirdos support the Star Wars franchise? 

When people talk about Star Wars is it germane to the discussion to say: "Look at this guy with the unibrow watching gay schissporn. HE SUPPORTS STAR WARS!!!!!! ?"? It's kinda weird, right?

 

The problem is that it is exactly what it is and you'd rather not notice.

It was absurd for you to think that I'd be dumb enough to take you at your word on anything.

Reiterating your 'point' is just saying the same stupid thing twice.

If you think I have a virus conspiracy going on then lay it out detective sappy....

Is it bad to accuse someone of election fraud all of a sudden numbnuts? CNN, the Dems, and all the leftards here just finished doing that for 4 years. I'm pretty sure it was the coolest thing to do for a while. What changed? 

MH never said that he didn't like the film dummy: he never even saw it.

He didn't even commented on the trailer.

He just found the most ridiculous reason that I've ever seen for someone to try to make the case that the movie isn't worth watching: "some conspiracy nut supports it!" 

Do you understand how asinine it is for you to try to pretend that MH just offered a reasonable critique of the movie? 

He just attacked the movie from the weirdest quarter ever. It was completely irrational. And that's weird. 

No it's not.  This site is full of the most wide eyed, insane conspiracy wingnuts, and has been for a few years now.

MH called the film ridiculous.  That would indicate to me he didn't like it.

Question:  If that had been the last comment would you still have felt the need to make the accusation, or was it the conspiracy comment that pushed you over the edge? 

Another one:  Where are you with the theories espoused by a couple of the people involved in making the movie.  To wit:

Ballard once entertained a viral theory that claimed the online furniture retailer Wayfair was selling children, sometimes packing them into overpriced storage cabinets. “Law enforcement’s going to flush that out and we’ll get our answers sooner than later,” he said in a July 2020 Twitter video. “But I want to tell you this: children are sold that way.” There is no evidence to support the theory, which has inspired threats against employees and impeded actual child trafficking investigations.

 

Caviezel — ... — has espoused even more extreme theories.

He has focused on one QAnon belief in particular while promoting “Sound of Freedom”: the idea that child traffickers drain children’s blood to harvest a life-giving substance called adrenochrome.

Speaking at a QAnon-affiliated conference in Oklahoma in 2021, the actor said Ballard wanted to join him but “he’s down there saving children as we speak, because they’re pulling kids out of the darkest recesses of hell right now, in … all kinds of places, uh, the adrenochroming of children.”

The moderator asked him to elaborate. “If a child knows he’s going to die, his body will secrete this adrenaline,” Caviezel said, his voice catching. “These people that do it, there’ll be no mercy for them. This is one of the best films I’ve ever done in my life. The film is on Academy Award level.”

In reality, adrenochrome is a relatively mundane chemical compound created by oxidizing adrenaline, though the author Hunter S. Thompson portrayed it as a kind of super-drug popular with pedophiles in “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2023/07/07/sound-of-freedom-qanon-theories-jim-caviezel/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2023/07/15/the-adrenochrome-conspiracy-theory-pushed-by-sound-of-freedom-star-explained/?sh=57399cb45179

 

 

[Guest]

27 minutes ago, West said:

Lol.. 

If leftists claim it to be a "conspiracy theory" chances are its not. Just pedos trynna cover their tracks. 

When I was in southeast Asia they'd set up brothels with children. Affluent pedos from Australia and Europe would flock to these places to abuse kids. Parents lived in poverty and therefore was a means of survival. No fake news; real disgusting sh*t that happens and a bit disgusting that these nutcase in the media try and discredit it; they are part of the issue

What conspiracy claims have been made about that?  It's pretty much common knowledge.  Do you have any reliable information as to the political affiliation of those "affluent pedos"?

Who has tried to discredit that?  Do you have any details of people trying to discredit it?

Just for my own information, if you don't mind, where are you on the two conspiracy theories I mentioned in my last post?

[WestCanMan]

27 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

No it's not.  This site is full of the most wide eyed, insane conspiracy wingnuts, and has been for a few years now.

MH called the film ridiculous.  That would indicate to me he didn't like it.

Yeah, and I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but you're one of the most credulous people here. If you let go of foolish pride you'd see it.

Quote

Question:  If that had been the last comment would you still have felt the need to make the accusation, or was it the conspiracy comment that pushed you over the edge? 

The timing of the post within the thread itself isn't all that important to me. Maybe it is to you? I don't care why, keep it to yourself.

Quote

Caviezel — ... — has espoused even more extreme theories.

He has focused on one QAnon belief in particular while promoting “Sound of Freedom”: the idea that child traffickers drain children’s blood to harvest a life-giving substance called adrenochrome.

Speaking at a QAnon-affiliated conference in Oklahoma in 2021, the actor said Ballard wanted to join him but “he’s down there saving children as we speak, because they’re pulling kids out of the darkest recesses of hell right now, in … all kinds of places, uh, the adrenochroming of children.”

The moderator asked him to elaborate. “If a child knows he’s going to die, his body will secrete this adrenaline,” Caviezel said, his voice catching. “These people that do it, there’ll be no mercy for them. This is one of the best films I’ve ever done in my life. The film is on Academy Award level.”

I personally don't want to believe in the adrenalchrome thing, but he's the second major Hollywood actor making that accusation. At some point, if enough people are saying it, I'm going to have to start considering it. 

Quote

In reality, adrenochrome is a relatively mundane chemical compound created by oxidizing adrenaline, though the author Hunter S. Thompson portrayed it as a kind of super-drug popular with pedophiles in “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.”

In reality, the covid 'vaccine' has long been proven to be nearly useless, but people like you were strong advocates for forcing young people and even children to take it, while knowing that the vax kills a very small % of people. I've known since early 2020 that healthy young people and children weren't at risk of dying of covid. 

If someone from CNN said "adrenalchrome is tha shiznit", you take it tomorrow. 

[Guest]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, and I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but you're one of the most credulous people here. If you let go of foolish pride you'd see it.

?

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The timing of the post within the thread itself isn't all that important to me. Maybe it is to you? I don't care why, keep it to yourself.

What I asked wasn't related to the timing of the post.  I was merely asking if calling the film ridiculous was enough to trigger your response, or was it the connection to a wacky conspiracy?

 

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I personally don't want to believe in the adrenalchrome thing, but he's the second major Hollywood actor making that accusation. At some point, if enough people are saying it, I'm going to have to start considering it. 

Well, I asked the question, and I got an answer.   Can't say fairer than that.

Who's the other one?  How many more people?  Would it matter who they were?

 

18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

In reality, the covid 'vaccine' has long been proven to be nearly useless, but people like you were strong advocates for forcing young people and even children to take it, while knowing that the vax kills a very small % of people. I've known since early 2020 that healthy young people and children weren't at risk of dying of covid. 

If someone from CNN said "adrenalchrome is tha shiznit", you take it tomorrow. 

So, because of what you believe with regards COVID, you think that article is somehow lying to us about adrenochrome?

[West]

5 hours ago, bcsapper said:

What conspiracy claims have been made about that?  It's pretty much common knowledge.  Do you have any reliable information as to the political affiliation of those "affluent pedos"?

Who has tried to discredit that?  Do you have any details of people trying to discredit it?

Just for my own information, if you don't mind, where are you on the two conspiracy theories I mentioned in my last post?

The Democrats actively oppose anything that'll help curb this. Proof is in the pudding. 

As for what you call "conspiracy theories", I wouldn't expect you to hear anything about it in "reputable sources". They've been telling us just this past week that a man who protested Trudeau calling him a "little puke" actually said "little Jew".. and that the convoy tried to burn down an apartment building. Not the most honest group of people

Edited July 23, 2023 by West

[Guest]

18 minutes ago, West said:

The Democrats actively oppose anything that'll help curb this. Proof is in the pudding. 

As for what you call "conspiracy theories", I wouldn't expect you to hear anything about it in "reputable sources". They've been telling us just this past week that a man who protested Trudeau calling him a "little puke" actually said "little Jew".. and that the convoy tried to burn down an apartment building. Not the most honest group of people

That's just meaningless drivel.  What evidence do you have that the Democrats have been actively opposing anything?  What pudding?

Your example talks of south east Asia.  What have the Democrats being doing there?

You didn't answer my question about the conspiracy theories I mentioned.  Was that deliberate or did you just forget?

I'm sure Trudeau was referred to as a "little puke".  He's not Jewish.

As for your last point, the very first article I found on it said that the "police again say they haven't uncovered anything linking the accused with the protest."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/apartment-building-lisgar-arson-second-man-charged-1.6410506

[Hodad]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

you're one of the most credulous people here. If you let go of foolish pride you'd see it.

...

I personally don't want to believe in the adrenalchrome thing, but he's the second major Hollywood actor making that accusation. At some point, if enough people are saying it, I'm going to have to start considering it. 

 

?

[West]

14 hours ago, bcsapper said:

That's just meaningless drivel.  What evidence do you have that the Democrats have been actively opposing anything?  What pudding?

Your example talks of south east Asia.  What have the Democrats being doing there?

You didn't answer my question about the conspiracy theories I mentioned.  Was that deliberate or did you just forget?

I'm sure Trudeau was referred to as a "little puke".  He's not Jewish.

As for your last point, the very first article I found on it said that the "police again say they haven't uncovered anything linking the accused with the protest."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/apartment-building-lisgar-arson-second-man-charged-1.6410506

I don't know if the adrenochrome thing is true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was given the amount of things you folks have called "conspiracy theories" that have turned up true. 

As for your cbc article, they did initially state the protest was responsible for trying to burn down an apartment complex. They sat on that lie until it wasn't beneficial to them any longer then issued a "retraction". This is a factual accounting of events

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, bcsapper said:

What I asked wasn't related to the timing of the post.  I was merely asking if calling the film ridiculous was enough to trigger your response, or was it the connection to a wacky conspiracy?

You're blurring the lines now between your own comments about the film and MH's criticism of it. 

Initially we were talking about MH's critique, and he never made a comment on the merits of the film itself (e.g., called it ridiculous), he just said that some of its supporters were wackos.

Again, you must understand that was a completely worthless comment about the film. I find it weird that he'd go to such an odd angle to attack the film, when it should be lauded for at least breaching a seemingly taboo subject.

If you want to call the film ridiculous you can do so for yourself. What do you find ridiculous about it?

Just out of curiosity, have you seen any covid coverage that was ridiculous? Do some of the things that they said about covid seem ridiculous now, with the benefit of hindsight?

Did you ever see any ridiculous coverage of BLM/Antifa riots? No? 

Have you sen any Tom Cruise movies lately sap?

Quote

Who's the other one?  How many more people?  Would it matter who they were?

I try to avoid the topic of adrenalchrome in general. People who wanna talk about won't shut up, and I'm not at the point where I will have a serious discussion about it, but if Jim Caveizal said it I will listen to what he as to say and I will take it with a grain of salt.

I have absolutely no doubt that there are people who would be sucked in by that, so for sure it's out there, even if it's just fake, like for example tomato juice with oregano in it. It's entirely possible that there are people who try to harvest it from late-term abortion victims, but I can't be convinced that there's a cottage industry of people torturing babies to get it, or that it's a mainstream phenomenon in Hollywood or any other institution with thousands of members. 

Quote

So, because of what you believe with regards COVID, you think that article is somehow lying to us about adrenochrome?

That's not what I said at all.

That article could be telling the exact truth about adrenalchrome, how would I know? Maybe they're even up-selling it - maybe it's entirely worthless or even dangerous as well as useless. I don't personally care because I'd never take it either way.

What I can say for sure is that lots of people are highly susceptible to wonder-drug scams, yourself included, and for that reason I'm certain that you could be convinced that it's worth taking, even at a high cost. 

If you were at a party with celebrities and a "real sciency looking guy" (left-speak) who was working as a Dr for a lot of them told you about the secret wonders of adrenalchrome, would you take it? I think you would. In fact, I'd bet money on it. 

So yeah, I think it's an absolute certainty that some people are taking it [or think they're taking it], and they will also claim that it's working for them, just like they do with the vax. Get it? 

[Guest]

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're blurring the lines now between your own comments about the film and MH's criticism of it. 

Initially we were talking about MH's critique, and he never made a comment on the merits of the film itself (e.g., called it ridiculous), he just said that some of its supporters were wackos.

Again, you must understand that was a completely worthless comment about the film. I find it weird that he'd go to such an odd angle to attack the film, when it should be lauded for at least breaching a seemingly taboo subject.

If you want to call the film ridiculous you can do so for yourself. What do you find ridiculous about it?

Just out of curiosity, have you seen any covid coverage that was ridiculous? Do some of the things that they said about covid seem ridiculous now, with the benefit of hindsight?

Did you ever see any ridiculous coverage of BLM/Antifa riots? No? 

Have you sen any Tom Cruise movies lately sap?

That's wrong.  His first comment on the film was that it was ridiculous. My own comments were that it was sh!t, and button pushing puerile shite, but that was just from reading about it, and I'd be just as happy to say ridiculous.  I might change my mind if I was ever to watch it, but that's unlikely.

Do you understand that the merits of a film are not based on the subject matter?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_the_Clown_Cried

I don't pay a lot of attention to COVID coverage.  It was a virus.  I never got it (I think) and I got the vaccinations without any qualms whatsoever.  I realise that doesn't fit in with your world view, but that's too bad.

I was vehemently opposed to any BLM/Antifa riots.  In both cases, I agree with the sentiment, but don't support many of the actions of the groups.

I think the last one I saw was the one where he kept dying, and Emily Blunt kept killing him.  It was really good.  Why?

 

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I try to avoid the topic of adrenalchrome in general. People who wanna talk about won't shut up, and I'm not at the point where I will have a serious discussion about it, but if Jim Caveizal said it I will listen to what he as to say and I will take it with a grain of salt.

I have absolutely no doubt that there are people who would be sucked in by that, so for sure it's out there, even if it's just fake, like for example tomato juice with oregano in it. It's entirely possible that there are people who try to harvest it from late-term abortion victims, but I can't be convinced that there's a cottage industry of people torturing babies to get it, or that it's a mainstream phenomenon in Hollywood or any other institution with thousands of members. 

I had never heard of it.  I'm not surprised you have heard of it enough to want to try and avoid it.  We travel in different circles, obviously.  I agree there will be people who will be sucked in by it.  There are still those who think climate change is a hoax, and Trump won in 2020.  Jim Caviezel is a crackpot.   I'm not surprised you would put stock in what he has to say.  The circles thing again.

 

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's not what I said at all.

That article could be telling the exact truth about adrenalchrome, how would I know? Maybe they're even up-selling it - maybe it's entirely worthless or even dangerous as well as useless. I don't personally care because I'd never take it either way.

What I can say for sure is that lots of people are highly susceptible to wonder-drug scams, yourself included, and for that reason I'm certain that you could be convinced that it's worth taking, even at a high cost. 

If you were at a party with celebrities and a "real sciency looking guy" (left-speak) who was working as a Dr for a lot of them told you about the secret wonders of adrenalchrome, would you take it? I think you would. In fact, I'd bet money on it. 

So yeah, I think it's an absolute certainty that some people are taking it [or think they're taking it], and they will also claim that it's working for them, just like they do with the vax. Get it? 

That's just all bollocks, of course.  Not worth a response.

Edited July 23, 2023 by bcsapper

[Guest]

2 hours ago, West said:

I don't know if the adrenochrome thing is true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was given the amount of things you folks have called "conspiracy theories" that have turned up true. 

As for your cbc article, they did initially state the protest was responsible for trying to burn down an apartment complex. They sat on that lie until it wasn't beneficial to them any longer then issued a "retraction". This is a factual accounting of events

Which ones?  The things we folks have called "conspiracy theories" that have turned out to be true, I mean.

A good news organization will correct itself if it feels it needs to.  I saw the corrected vesrsion, obviously, so I'm up to date.  That's what matters.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, bcsapper said:

That's wrong.  His first comment on the film was that it was ridiculous.

1) You're a God-damned liar. 

2) Did you forget that I have the internet? Did you forget that I could just go back to P1 to look for myself?

This is his first post sapper, it's the second post in the whole thread:

FYI it's one thing for someone to passionately believe something and be wrong, I can handle that, but just bold-faced lying is something that I won't tolerate. Slither the f away now. You make my skin crawl. 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

1) You're a God-damned liar. 

2) Did you forget that I have the internet? Did you forget that I could just go back to P1 to look for myself?

This is his first post sapper, it's the second post in the whole thread:

FYI it's one thing for someone to passionately believe something and be wrong, I can handle that, but just bold-faced lying is something that I won't tolerate. Slither the f away now. You make my skin crawl. 

Can you actually read?

[Guest]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Slither the f away now. You make my skin crawl. 

It's probably the vaccine.

?

[WestCanMan]

Just now, bcsapper said:

Can you actually read?

Stop pretending that this is about your reading comprehension. Hit the skids, weasel.